Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study
Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical products has long been recognized as a critical part of the drug development process, providing foundational information related to intrinsic stability characteristics and to the development of stability-indicating analytical method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2022-02, Vol.111 (2), p.298-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 298 |
container_title | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Campbell, John M. Foti, Chris Wang, Chloe Adams, Neal Allain, Leonardo R. Araujo, Gabriela Azevedo, Renan Franca, Juçara Ribeiro Hicks, Simon R. Hostyn, Steven Jansen, Patrick J. Kotoni, Dorina Kuemmell, Andreas Marden, Stacey Rullo, Gregory Santos, Ana Cláudia O. Sluggett, Gregory W. Zelesky, Todd Baertschi, Steven W. |
description | Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical products has long been recognized as a critical part of the drug development process, providing foundational information related to intrinsic stability characteristics and to the development of stability-indicating analytical methods. A benchmarking study was undertaken by nine pharmaceutical companies and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) with a goal of understanding the utility of various stress testing conditions for producing pharmaceutically-relevant chemical degradation of drugs. Special consideration was given to determining whether solution phase stress testing of solid drug products produced degradation products that were both unique when compared to other stress conditions and relevant to the formal drug product stability data. The results from studies of 62 solid dosage form drug products were compiled. A total of 387 degradation products were reported as being observed in stress testing studies, along with 173 degradation products observed in accelerated and/or long-term stability studies for the 62 drug products. Among these, 25 of the stress testing degradation products were unique to the solution phase stress testing of the drug products; however, none of these unique degradation products were relevant to the formal stability data. The relevant degradation products were sufficiently accounted for by stress testing studies that included only drug substance stressing (in solution and in the solid state) and drug product stressing (in the solid state). Based on these results, it is the opinion of the authors that for solid dosage form drug products, well-designed stress testing studies need not include solution phase stress testing of the drug product in order to be comprehensive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.06.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2540521370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022354921003026</els_id><sourcerecordid>2540521370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5811bd3d4d883cfb551793fe4f6dfbcb426766d7ba5b96b17c74e2fa3b17b0ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi0EoqHwAhyQj1x2GXttb4K4hJTSSpVaNeVs7dqzicNmHWxvRW48Ol6l5chp5vD9v2Y-Qt4zKBkw9WlX_j5sY8mBsxJUCYy_IDMmORQKWP2SzAA4LyopFmfkTYw7AFAg5WtyVgnGmBBqRv4sY8QY3bChaYv0Hnt8bAaD1Hd07fsxOT_Qu20Tka5TyCR9wJgm_AQ4Sy98bDZIL33Y04swbuhd8HY0KX6mS7oKPsbierBjTOFIv-Jgtvsm_Jwa1mm0x7fkVdf0Ed89zXPy4_Lbw-qquLn9fr1a3hRGAKRCzhlrbWWFnc8r07VSsnpRdSg6ZbvWtIKrWilbt41sF6pltakF8q6p8tqCweqcfDz1HoL_NeYf9N5Fg33fDOjHqLkUIDmrasgoP6FmOj5gpw_B5aOPmoGezOudnszrybwGpbP5HPrw1D-2e7T_Is-qM_DlBGD-8tFh0NG4rAOtC2iStt79r_8vkXuWZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540521370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campbell, John M. ; Foti, Chris ; Wang, Chloe ; Adams, Neal ; Allain, Leonardo R. ; Araujo, Gabriela ; Azevedo, Renan ; Franca, Juçara Ribeiro ; Hicks, Simon R. ; Hostyn, Steven ; Jansen, Patrick J. ; Kotoni, Dorina ; Kuemmell, Andreas ; Marden, Stacey ; Rullo, Gregory ; Santos, Ana Cláudia O. ; Sluggett, Gregory W. ; Zelesky, Todd ; Baertschi, Steven W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, John M. ; Foti, Chris ; Wang, Chloe ; Adams, Neal ; Allain, Leonardo R. ; Araujo, Gabriela ; Azevedo, Renan ; Franca, Juçara Ribeiro ; Hicks, Simon R. ; Hostyn, Steven ; Jansen, Patrick J. ; Kotoni, Dorina ; Kuemmell, Andreas ; Marden, Stacey ; Rullo, Gregory ; Santos, Ana Cláudia O. ; Sluggett, Gregory W. ; Zelesky, Todd ; Baertschi, Steven W.</creatorcontrib><description>Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical products has long been recognized as a critical part of the drug development process, providing foundational information related to intrinsic stability characteristics and to the development of stability-indicating analytical methods. A benchmarking study was undertaken by nine pharmaceutical companies and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) with a goal of understanding the utility of various stress testing conditions for producing pharmaceutically-relevant chemical degradation of drugs. Special consideration was given to determining whether solution phase stress testing of solid drug products produced degradation products that were both unique when compared to other stress conditions and relevant to the formal drug product stability data. The results from studies of 62 solid dosage form drug products were compiled. A total of 387 degradation products were reported as being observed in stress testing studies, along with 173 degradation products observed in accelerated and/or long-term stability studies for the 62 drug products. Among these, 25 of the stress testing degradation products were unique to the solution phase stress testing of the drug products; however, none of these unique degradation products were relevant to the formal stability data. The relevant degradation products were sufficiently accounted for by stress testing studies that included only drug substance stressing (in solution and in the solid state) and drug product stressing (in the solid state). Based on these results, it is the opinion of the authors that for solid dosage form drug products, well-designed stress testing studies need not include solution phase stress testing of the drug product in order to be comprehensive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6017</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34111446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Benchmarking ; Degradation Product(s) ; Drug Stability ; Forced Conditions ; Regulatory Science ; Stability</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2022-02, Vol.111 (2), p.298-305</ispartof><rights>2021 American Pharmacists Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5811bd3d4d883cfb551793fe4f6dfbcb426766d7ba5b96b17c74e2fa3b17b0ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5811bd3d4d883cfb551793fe4f6dfbcb426766d7ba5b96b17c74e2fa3b17b0ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5847-2233 ; 0000-0002-3473-5086 ; 0000-0002-8099-2489 ; 0000-0002-0289-1762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34111446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allain, Leonardo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Renan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franca, Juçara Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Simon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostyn, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotoni, Dorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuemmell, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marden, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullo, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana Cláudia O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluggett, Gregory W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelesky, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baertschi, Steven W.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study</title><title>Journal of pharmaceutical sciences</title><addtitle>J Pharm Sci</addtitle><description>Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical products has long been recognized as a critical part of the drug development process, providing foundational information related to intrinsic stability characteristics and to the development of stability-indicating analytical methods. A benchmarking study was undertaken by nine pharmaceutical companies and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) with a goal of understanding the utility of various stress testing conditions for producing pharmaceutically-relevant chemical degradation of drugs. Special consideration was given to determining whether solution phase stress testing of solid drug products produced degradation products that were both unique when compared to other stress conditions and relevant to the formal drug product stability data. The results from studies of 62 solid dosage form drug products were compiled. A total of 387 degradation products were reported as being observed in stress testing studies, along with 173 degradation products observed in accelerated and/or long-term stability studies for the 62 drug products. Among these, 25 of the stress testing degradation products were unique to the solution phase stress testing of the drug products; however, none of these unique degradation products were relevant to the formal stability data. The relevant degradation products were sufficiently accounted for by stress testing studies that included only drug substance stressing (in solution and in the solid state) and drug product stressing (in the solid state). Based on these results, it is the opinion of the authors that for solid dosage form drug products, well-designed stress testing studies need not include solution phase stress testing of the drug product in order to be comprehensive.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Degradation Product(s)</subject><subject>Drug Stability</subject><subject>Forced Conditions</subject><subject>Regulatory Science</subject><subject>Stability</subject><issn>0022-3549</issn><issn>1520-6017</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi0EoqHwAhyQj1x2GXttb4K4hJTSSpVaNeVs7dqzicNmHWxvRW48Ol6l5chp5vD9v2Y-Qt4zKBkw9WlX_j5sY8mBsxJUCYy_IDMmORQKWP2SzAA4LyopFmfkTYw7AFAg5WtyVgnGmBBqRv4sY8QY3bChaYv0Hnt8bAaD1Hd07fsxOT_Qu20Tka5TyCR9wJgm_AQ4Sy98bDZIL33Y04swbuhd8HY0KX6mS7oKPsbierBjTOFIv-Jgtvsm_Jwa1mm0x7fkVdf0Ed89zXPy4_Lbw-qquLn9fr1a3hRGAKRCzhlrbWWFnc8r07VSsnpRdSg6ZbvWtIKrWilbt41sF6pltakF8q6p8tqCweqcfDz1HoL_NeYf9N5Fg33fDOjHqLkUIDmrasgoP6FmOj5gpw_B5aOPmoGezOudnszrybwGpbP5HPrw1D-2e7T_Is-qM_DlBGD-8tFh0NG4rAOtC2iStt79r_8vkXuWZw</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Campbell, John M.</creator><creator>Foti, Chris</creator><creator>Wang, Chloe</creator><creator>Adams, Neal</creator><creator>Allain, Leonardo R.</creator><creator>Araujo, Gabriela</creator><creator>Azevedo, Renan</creator><creator>Franca, Juçara Ribeiro</creator><creator>Hicks, Simon R.</creator><creator>Hostyn, Steven</creator><creator>Jansen, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Kotoni, Dorina</creator><creator>Kuemmell, Andreas</creator><creator>Marden, Stacey</creator><creator>Rullo, Gregory</creator><creator>Santos, Ana Cláudia O.</creator><creator>Sluggett, Gregory W.</creator><creator>Zelesky, Todd</creator><creator>Baertschi, Steven W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-2233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3473-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-2489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-1762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study</title><author>Campbell, John M. ; Foti, Chris ; Wang, Chloe ; Adams, Neal ; Allain, Leonardo R. ; Araujo, Gabriela ; Azevedo, Renan ; Franca, Juçara Ribeiro ; Hicks, Simon R. ; Hostyn, Steven ; Jansen, Patrick J. ; Kotoni, Dorina ; Kuemmell, Andreas ; Marden, Stacey ; Rullo, Gregory ; Santos, Ana Cláudia O. ; Sluggett, Gregory W. ; Zelesky, Todd ; Baertschi, Steven W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5811bd3d4d883cfb551793fe4f6dfbcb426766d7ba5b96b17c74e2fa3b17b0ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Degradation Product(s)</topic><topic>Drug Stability</topic><topic>Forced Conditions</topic><topic>Regulatory Science</topic><topic>Stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allain, Leonardo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Renan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franca, Juçara Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Simon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostyn, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotoni, Dorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuemmell, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marden, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullo, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana Cláudia O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluggett, Gregory W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelesky, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baertschi, Steven W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, John M.</au><au>Foti, Chris</au><au>Wang, Chloe</au><au>Adams, Neal</au><au>Allain, Leonardo R.</au><au>Araujo, Gabriela</au><au>Azevedo, Renan</au><au>Franca, Juçara Ribeiro</au><au>Hicks, Simon R.</au><au>Hostyn, Steven</au><au>Jansen, Patrick J.</au><au>Kotoni, Dorina</au><au>Kuemmell, Andreas</au><au>Marden, Stacey</au><au>Rullo, Gregory</au><au>Santos, Ana Cláudia O.</au><au>Sluggett, Gregory W.</au><au>Zelesky, Todd</au><au>Baertschi, Steven W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Sci</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>298-305</pages><issn>0022-3549</issn><eissn>1520-6017</eissn><abstract>Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical products has long been recognized as a critical part of the drug development process, providing foundational information related to intrinsic stability characteristics and to the development of stability-indicating analytical methods. A benchmarking study was undertaken by nine pharmaceutical companies and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) with a goal of understanding the utility of various stress testing conditions for producing pharmaceutically-relevant chemical degradation of drugs. Special consideration was given to determining whether solution phase stress testing of solid drug products produced degradation products that were both unique when compared to other stress conditions and relevant to the formal drug product stability data. The results from studies of 62 solid dosage form drug products were compiled. A total of 387 degradation products were reported as being observed in stress testing studies, along with 173 degradation products observed in accelerated and/or long-term stability studies for the 62 drug products. Among these, 25 of the stress testing degradation products were unique to the solution phase stress testing of the drug products; however, none of these unique degradation products were relevant to the formal stability data. The relevant degradation products were sufficiently accounted for by stress testing studies that included only drug substance stressing (in solution and in the solid state) and drug product stressing (in the solid state). Based on these results, it is the opinion of the authors that for solid dosage form drug products, well-designed stress testing studies need not include solution phase stress testing of the drug product in order to be comprehensive.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34111446</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.xphs.2021.06.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-2233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3473-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-2489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-1762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3549 |
ispartof | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2022-02, Vol.111 (2), p.298-305 |
issn | 0022-3549 1520-6017 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2540521370 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analytical Chemistry Benchmarking Degradation Product(s) Drug Stability Forced Conditions Regulatory Science Stability |
title | Assessing the Relevance of Solution Phase Stress Testing of Solid Dosage Form Drug Products: A Cross-Industry Benchmarking Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Relevance%20of%20Solution%20Phase%20Stress%20Testing%20of%20Solid%20Dosage%20Form%20Drug%20Products:%20A%20Cross-Industry%20Benchmarking%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20sciences&rft.au=Campbell,%20John%20M.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=298-305&rft.issn=0022-3549&rft.eissn=1520-6017&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2540521370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540521370&rft_id=info:pmid/34111446&rft_els_id=S0022354921003026&rfr_iscdi=true |