Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans

Understanding the mechanisms of spatial variation of biological invasions, across local-to-global scales, has been a major challenge. The importance of evolutionary history for invasion dynamics was noted by Darwin, and several studies have since considered how biodiversity of source and recipient r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2021-08, Vol.102 (8), p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Torchin, Mark E., Freestone, Amy L., McCann, Linda, Larson, Kristen, Schlöder, Carmen, Steves, Brian P., Fofonoff, Paul, Repetto, Michele F., Ruiz, Gregory M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 102
creator Torchin, Mark E.
Freestone, Amy L.
McCann, Linda
Larson, Kristen
Schlöder, Carmen
Steves, Brian P.
Fofonoff, Paul
Repetto, Michele F.
Ruiz, Gregory M.
description Understanding the mechanisms of spatial variation of biological invasions, across local-to-global scales, has been a major challenge. The importance of evolutionary history for invasion dynamics was noted by Darwin, and several studies have since considered how biodiversity of source and recipient regions can influence the probability of invasions. For over a century, the Panama Canal has connected water bodies and biotas with different evolutionary histories, and created a global shipping hot spot, providing unique opportunities to test mechanisms that affect invasion patterns. Here, we test for asymmetry in both the extent of invasions and predation effects, a possible mechanism of biotic resistance, between two tropical oceans at similar latitudes. We estimated nonnative species (NNS) richness for sessile marine invertebrates, using standardized field surveys and literature synthesis, to examine whether invasions are asymmetrical, with more NNS present in the less diverse Pacific compared to the Atlantic. We also experimentally tested whether predation differentially limits the abundance and distribution of these invertebrates between oceans. In standardized surveys, observed total NNS richness was higher in the Pacific (18 NNS, 30% of all Pacific species) than the Atlantic (11 NNS, 13% of all Atlantic species). Similarly, literature-based records also display this asymmetry between coasts. When considering only the reciprocal exchange of NNS between Atlantic and Pacific biotas, NNS exchange from Atlantic to Pacific was eightfold higher than the opposite direction, exceeding the asymmetry predicted by random exchange based simply on differences of overall diversity per region. Predation substantially reduced biomass and changed NNS composition in the Pacific, but no such effects were detected on the Atlantic coast. Specifically, some dominant NNS were particularly susceptible to predation in the Pacific, supporting the hypothesis that predation may reduce the abundance of certain NNS here. These results are consistent with predictions that high diversity in source regions, and species interactions in recipient regions, shape marine invasion patterns. Our comparisons and experiments across two tropical ocean basins, suggest that global invasion dynamics are likely driven by both ecological and evolutionary factors that shape susceptibility to and directionality of invasions across biogeographic scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.3434
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2540517347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27070653</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27070653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3824-818512e9e60609f20e513c2742afe82624c9d4861a7ce745ae70b62ca61fd1e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8A8IAS9eUme_k2MJ9QMKXvTgaVm3E0hJsnU3VfLv3dqiIDiXuTy8zLyEXFKYUQB2i26cccHFEZnQkpd5STUckwkAZXmpZHFKzmJcQxoqigkR8zh2HQ5hzHyddTY0PWZN_2Fj4_uYWRd8jNkQ_KZxts28Q9vHc3JS2zbixWFPycvd4rl6yJdP94_VfJk7XjCRF7SQlGGJChSUNQOUlDumBbM1Fkwx4cqVKBS12qEW0qKGN8WcVbReUeR8Sm72uZvg37cYB9M10WHb2h79NhomBUiqudCJXv-ha78NfbouKam5ElKp38DvtwLWZhOa9PRoKJhdfSbVZ3b1JZrv6WfT4vivM4vq9eCv9n4dBx9-PNOgQUnOvwCIpXgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557364566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Torchin, Mark E. ; Freestone, Amy L. ; McCann, Linda ; Larson, Kristen ; Schlöder, Carmen ; Steves, Brian P. ; Fofonoff, Paul ; Repetto, Michele F. ; Ruiz, Gregory M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torchin, Mark E. ; Freestone, Amy L. ; McCann, Linda ; Larson, Kristen ; Schlöder, Carmen ; Steves, Brian P. ; Fofonoff, Paul ; Repetto, Michele F. ; Ruiz, Gregory M.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the mechanisms of spatial variation of biological invasions, across local-to-global scales, has been a major challenge. The importance of evolutionary history for invasion dynamics was noted by Darwin, and several studies have since considered how biodiversity of source and recipient regions can influence the probability of invasions. For over a century, the Panama Canal has connected water bodies and biotas with different evolutionary histories, and created a global shipping hot spot, providing unique opportunities to test mechanisms that affect invasion patterns. Here, we test for asymmetry in both the extent of invasions and predation effects, a possible mechanism of biotic resistance, between two tropical oceans at similar latitudes. We estimated nonnative species (NNS) richness for sessile marine invertebrates, using standardized field surveys and literature synthesis, to examine whether invasions are asymmetrical, with more NNS present in the less diverse Pacific compared to the Atlantic. We also experimentally tested whether predation differentially limits the abundance and distribution of these invertebrates between oceans. In standardized surveys, observed total NNS richness was higher in the Pacific (18 NNS, 30% of all Pacific species) than the Atlantic (11 NNS, 13% of all Atlantic species). Similarly, literature-based records also display this asymmetry between coasts. When considering only the reciprocal exchange of NNS between Atlantic and Pacific biotas, NNS exchange from Atlantic to Pacific was eightfold higher than the opposite direction, exceeding the asymmetry predicted by random exchange based simply on differences of overall diversity per region. Predation substantially reduced biomass and changed NNS composition in the Pacific, but no such effects were detected on the Atlantic coast. Specifically, some dominant NNS were particularly susceptible to predation in the Pacific, supporting the hypothesis that predation may reduce the abundance of certain NNS here. These results are consistent with predictions that high diversity in source regions, and species interactions in recipient regions, shape marine invasion patterns. Our comparisons and experiments across two tropical ocean basins, suggest that global invasion dynamics are likely driven by both ecological and evolutionary factors that shape susceptibility to and directionality of invasions across biogeographic scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Asymmetry ; Biodiversity ; Biological evolution ; biotic interactions ; Evolution ; evolutionary history ; evolutionary imbalance hypothesis ; Exchanging ; Introduced species ; Invasions ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; marine invasions ; Marine invertebrates ; nonnative species ; Ocean basins ; Oceans ; Panama ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Predation ; Spatial variations ; tropical</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2021-08, Vol.102 (8), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>2021 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2021 Ecological Society of America. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3824-818512e9e60609f20e513c2742afe82624c9d4861a7ce745ae70b62ca61fd1e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3824-818512e9e60609f20e513c2742afe82624c9d4861a7ce745ae70b62ca61fd1e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0103-577X ; 0000-0002-4899-6682</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27070653$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27070653$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torchin, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freestone, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlöder, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steves, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fofonoff, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repetto, Michele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Gregory M.</creatorcontrib><title>Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Understanding the mechanisms of spatial variation of biological invasions, across local-to-global scales, has been a major challenge. The importance of evolutionary history for invasion dynamics was noted by Darwin, and several studies have since considered how biodiversity of source and recipient regions can influence the probability of invasions. For over a century, the Panama Canal has connected water bodies and biotas with different evolutionary histories, and created a global shipping hot spot, providing unique opportunities to test mechanisms that affect invasion patterns. Here, we test for asymmetry in both the extent of invasions and predation effects, a possible mechanism of biotic resistance, between two tropical oceans at similar latitudes. We estimated nonnative species (NNS) richness for sessile marine invertebrates, using standardized field surveys and literature synthesis, to examine whether invasions are asymmetrical, with more NNS present in the less diverse Pacific compared to the Atlantic. We also experimentally tested whether predation differentially limits the abundance and distribution of these invertebrates between oceans. In standardized surveys, observed total NNS richness was higher in the Pacific (18 NNS, 30% of all Pacific species) than the Atlantic (11 NNS, 13% of all Atlantic species). Similarly, literature-based records also display this asymmetry between coasts. When considering only the reciprocal exchange of NNS between Atlantic and Pacific biotas, NNS exchange from Atlantic to Pacific was eightfold higher than the opposite direction, exceeding the asymmetry predicted by random exchange based simply on differences of overall diversity per region. Predation substantially reduced biomass and changed NNS composition in the Pacific, but no such effects were detected on the Atlantic coast. Specifically, some dominant NNS were particularly susceptible to predation in the Pacific, supporting the hypothesis that predation may reduce the abundance of certain NNS here. These results are consistent with predictions that high diversity in source regions, and species interactions in recipient regions, shape marine invasion patterns. Our comparisons and experiments across two tropical ocean basins, suggest that global invasion dynamics are likely driven by both ecological and evolutionary factors that shape susceptibility to and directionality of invasions across biogeographic scales.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>biotic interactions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>evolutionary history</subject><subject>evolutionary imbalance hypothesis</subject><subject>Exchanging</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>marine invasions</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>nonnative species</subject><subject>Ocean basins</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Panama</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>tropical</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8A8IAS9eUme_k2MJ9QMKXvTgaVm3E0hJsnU3VfLv3dqiIDiXuTy8zLyEXFKYUQB2i26cccHFEZnQkpd5STUckwkAZXmpZHFKzmJcQxoqigkR8zh2HQ5hzHyddTY0PWZN_2Fj4_uYWRd8jNkQ_KZxts28Q9vHc3JS2zbixWFPycvd4rl6yJdP94_VfJk7XjCRF7SQlGGJChSUNQOUlDumBbM1Fkwx4cqVKBS12qEW0qKGN8WcVbReUeR8Sm72uZvg37cYB9M10WHb2h79NhomBUiqudCJXv-ha78NfbouKam5ElKp38DvtwLWZhOa9PRoKJhdfSbVZ3b1JZrv6WfT4vivM4vq9eCv9n4dBx9-PNOgQUnOvwCIpXgw</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Torchin, Mark E.</creator><creator>Freestone, Amy L.</creator><creator>McCann, Linda</creator><creator>Larson, Kristen</creator><creator>Schlöder, Carmen</creator><creator>Steves, Brian P.</creator><creator>Fofonoff, Paul</creator><creator>Repetto, Michele F.</creator><creator>Ruiz, Gregory M.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-577X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-6682</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans</title><author>Torchin, Mark E. ; Freestone, Amy L. ; McCann, Linda ; Larson, Kristen ; Schlöder, Carmen ; Steves, Brian P. ; Fofonoff, Paul ; Repetto, Michele F. ; Ruiz, Gregory M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3824-818512e9e60609f20e513c2742afe82624c9d4861a7ce745ae70b62ca61fd1e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>biotic interactions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>evolutionary history</topic><topic>evolutionary imbalance hypothesis</topic><topic>Exchanging</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>marine invasions</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>nonnative species</topic><topic>Ocean basins</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Panama</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>tropical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torchin, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freestone, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlöder, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steves, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fofonoff, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repetto, Michele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Gregory M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torchin, Mark E.</au><au>Freestone, Amy L.</au><au>McCann, Linda</au><au>Larson, Kristen</au><au>Schlöder, Carmen</au><au>Steves, Brian P.</au><au>Fofonoff, Paul</au><au>Repetto, Michele F.</au><au>Ruiz, Gregory M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Understanding the mechanisms of spatial variation of biological invasions, across local-to-global scales, has been a major challenge. The importance of evolutionary history for invasion dynamics was noted by Darwin, and several studies have since considered how biodiversity of source and recipient regions can influence the probability of invasions. For over a century, the Panama Canal has connected water bodies and biotas with different evolutionary histories, and created a global shipping hot spot, providing unique opportunities to test mechanisms that affect invasion patterns. Here, we test for asymmetry in both the extent of invasions and predation effects, a possible mechanism of biotic resistance, between two tropical oceans at similar latitudes. We estimated nonnative species (NNS) richness for sessile marine invertebrates, using standardized field surveys and literature synthesis, to examine whether invasions are asymmetrical, with more NNS present in the less diverse Pacific compared to the Atlantic. We also experimentally tested whether predation differentially limits the abundance and distribution of these invertebrates between oceans. In standardized surveys, observed total NNS richness was higher in the Pacific (18 NNS, 30% of all Pacific species) than the Atlantic (11 NNS, 13% of all Atlantic species). Similarly, literature-based records also display this asymmetry between coasts. When considering only the reciprocal exchange of NNS between Atlantic and Pacific biotas, NNS exchange from Atlantic to Pacific was eightfold higher than the opposite direction, exceeding the asymmetry predicted by random exchange based simply on differences of overall diversity per region. Predation substantially reduced biomass and changed NNS composition in the Pacific, but no such effects were detected on the Atlantic coast. Specifically, some dominant NNS were particularly susceptible to predation in the Pacific, supporting the hypothesis that predation may reduce the abundance of certain NNS here. These results are consistent with predictions that high diversity in source regions, and species interactions in recipient regions, shape marine invasion patterns. Our comparisons and experiments across two tropical ocean basins, suggest that global invasion dynamics are likely driven by both ecological and evolutionary factors that shape susceptibility to and directionality of invasions across biogeographic scales.</abstract><cop>Brooklyn</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ecy.3434</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-577X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-6682</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2021-08, Vol.102 (8), p.1-12
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2540517347
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Abundance
Asymmetry
Biodiversity
Biological evolution
biotic interactions
Evolution
evolutionary history
evolutionary imbalance hypothesis
Exchanging
Introduced species
Invasions
Invasive species
Invertebrates
marine invasions
Marine invertebrates
nonnative species
Ocean basins
Oceans
Panama
Polls & surveys
Predation
Spatial variations
tropical
title Asymmetry of marine invasions across tropical oceans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A22%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymmetry%20of%20marine%20invasions%20across%20tropical%20oceans&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Torchin,%20Mark%20E.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.3434&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27070653%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557364566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27070653&rfr_iscdi=true