Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review
Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current urology reports 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Current urology reports |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Elbers, Javier Reinoso Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises Rivas, Juan Gómez Autran, Ana Maria Esperto, Francesco Tortolero, Leonardo Carrion, Diego M Sancha, Fernando Gómez |
description | Purpose of Review
To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures.
Recent Findings
The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly
TM
to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series.
Summary
Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2539523646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539523646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6yyZGPwI4kniA2qKCBVQirt2nLcCbhK42InIP4el7Bm5ZF17ujMJeSSs2vOmLqJnFcyp0xwyjgrSgpHZMKL9FUKKI4Ps1BUKKlOyVmMW8YEY5BPyN3S1753Nlvi3riQ-SZbB-wxmDZ77YOz_RAw3mYrtO-d-xgwZqbbJPrT4dc5OWlMG_Hi752S9fxhNXuii5fH59n9glop8p5ysEmOAeeNxApKkLyxoMwGihKS2AaVrZIOKmUMWkAGVV01ABKxtkl6Sq7GvfvgDwq93rlosW1Nh36IWhSyKoQs8zKhYkRt8DEGbPQ-uJ0J35ozfahKj1XpVJX-rUpDCskxFBPcvWHQWz-ELp30X-oHmyJrBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539523646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creator><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose of Review
To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures.
Recent Findings
The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly
TM
to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series.
Summary
Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nephrology ; Section Editor ; Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autran, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esperto, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortolero, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrion, Diego M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>Purpose of Review
To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures.
Recent Findings
The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly
TM
to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series.
Summary
Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</description><subject>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6yyZGPwI4kniA2qKCBVQirt2nLcCbhK42InIP4el7Bm5ZF17ujMJeSSs2vOmLqJnFcyp0xwyjgrSgpHZMKL9FUKKI4Ps1BUKKlOyVmMW8YEY5BPyN3S1753Nlvi3riQ-SZbB-wxmDZ77YOz_RAw3mYrtO-d-xgwZqbbJPrT4dc5OWlMG_Hi752S9fxhNXuii5fH59n9glop8p5ysEmOAeeNxApKkLyxoMwGihKS2AaVrZIOKmUMWkAGVV01ABKxtkl6Sq7GvfvgDwq93rlosW1Nh36IWhSyKoQs8zKhYkRt8DEGbPQ-uJ0J35ozfahKj1XpVJX-rUpDCskxFBPcvWHQWz-ELp30X-oHmyJrBA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creator><creator>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creator><creator>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creator><creator>Autran, Ana Maria</creator><creator>Esperto, Francesco</creator><creator>Tortolero, Leonardo</creator><creator>Carrion, Diego M</creator><creator>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><author>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autran, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esperto, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortolero, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrion, Diego M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</au><au>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</au><au>Rivas, Juan Gómez</au><au>Autran, Ana Maria</au><au>Esperto, Francesco</au><au>Tortolero, Leonardo</au><au>Carrion, Diego M</au><au>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Urol Rep</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>39-39</pages><artnum>39</artnum><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>Purpose of Review
To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures.
Recent Findings
The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly
TM
to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series.
Summary
Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-2737 |
ispartof | Current urology reports, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39 |
issn | 1527-2737 1534-6285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2539523646 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nephrology Section Editor Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases Urology |
title | Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20Repair%20of%20Ureteral%20Strictures:%20Techniques%20and%20Review&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Elbers,%20Javier%20Reinoso&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=39-39&rft.artnum=39&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539523646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539523646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |