Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review

Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current urology reports 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39
Hauptverfasser: Elbers, Javier Reinoso, Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises, Rivas, Juan Gómez, Autran, Ana Maria, Esperto, Francesco, Tortolero, Leonardo, Carrion, Diego M, Sancha, Fernando Gómez
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue 8
container_start_page 39
container_title Current urology reports
container_volume 22
creator Elbers, Javier Reinoso
Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises
Rivas, Juan Gómez
Autran, Ana Maria
Esperto, Francesco
Tortolero, Leonardo
Carrion, Diego M
Sancha, Fernando Gómez
description Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly TM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Summary Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2539523646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539523646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6yyZGPwI4kniA2qKCBVQirt2nLcCbhK42InIP4el7Bm5ZF17ujMJeSSs2vOmLqJnFcyp0xwyjgrSgpHZMKL9FUKKI4Ps1BUKKlOyVmMW8YEY5BPyN3S1753Nlvi3riQ-SZbB-wxmDZ77YOz_RAw3mYrtO-d-xgwZqbbJPrT4dc5OWlMG_Hi752S9fxhNXuii5fH59n9glop8p5ysEmOAeeNxApKkLyxoMwGihKS2AaVrZIOKmUMWkAGVV01ABKxtkl6Sq7GvfvgDwq93rlosW1Nh36IWhSyKoQs8zKhYkRt8DEGbPQ-uJ0J35ozfahKj1XpVJX-rUpDCskxFBPcvWHQWz-ELp30X-oHmyJrBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539523646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creator><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly TM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Summary Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Section Editor ; Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autran, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esperto, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortolero, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrion, Diego M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly TM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Summary Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</description><subject>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6yyZGPwI4kniA2qKCBVQirt2nLcCbhK42InIP4el7Bm5ZF17ujMJeSSs2vOmLqJnFcyp0xwyjgrSgpHZMKL9FUKKI4Ps1BUKKlOyVmMW8YEY5BPyN3S1753Nlvi3riQ-SZbB-wxmDZ77YOz_RAw3mYrtO-d-xgwZqbbJPrT4dc5OWlMG_Hi752S9fxhNXuii5fH59n9glop8p5ysEmOAeeNxApKkLyxoMwGihKS2AaVrZIOKmUMWkAGVV01ABKxtkl6Sq7GvfvgDwq93rlosW1Nh36IWhSyKoQs8zKhYkRt8DEGbPQ-uJ0J35ozfahKj1XpVJX-rUpDCskxFBPcvWHQWz-ELp30X-oHmyJrBA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creator><creator>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creator><creator>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creator><creator>Autran, Ana Maria</creator><creator>Esperto, Francesco</creator><creator>Tortolero, Leonardo</creator><creator>Carrion, Diego M</creator><creator>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</title><author>Elbers, Javier Reinoso ; Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises ; Rivas, Juan Gómez ; Autran, Ana Maria ; Esperto, Francesco ; Tortolero, Leonardo ; Carrion, Diego M ; Sancha, Fernando Gómez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-18c9340811f3e986831fc87ad8568152de7c9008e77aaec8e089b9f883eebc273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Juan Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autran, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esperto, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortolero, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrion, Diego M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elbers, Javier Reinoso</au><au>Rodríguez Socarrás, Moises</au><au>Rivas, Juan Gómez</au><au>Autran, Ana Maria</au><au>Esperto, Francesco</au><au>Tortolero, Leonardo</au><au>Carrion, Diego M</au><au>Sancha, Fernando Gómez</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Urol Rep</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>39-39</pages><artnum>39</artnum><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>Purpose of Review To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. Recent Findings The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture’s length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and Firefly TM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Summary Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-683X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-2737
ispartof Current urology reports, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.39-39, Article 39
issn 1527-2737
1534-6285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2539523646
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Section Editor
Topical Collection on Kidney Diseases
Urology
title Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20Repair%20of%20Ureteral%20Strictures:%20Techniques%20and%20Review&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Elbers,%20Javier%20Reinoso&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=39-39&rft.artnum=39&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539523646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539523646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true