Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria
The presence of elemental sulphur in several coals from the midwestern US (Illinois No. 6, Indiana No. 5, and an Indiana refuse coal) as well as in an Australian brown coal was probed using specific microbial activity to this sulphur speciation. The objective of this work was to differentiate elemen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 1989-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1368-1375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1368 |
container_title | Fuel (Guildford) |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Schicho, R.N. Brown, S.H. Olson, G.J. Parks, E.J. Kelly, R.M. |
description | The presence of elemental sulphur in several coals from the midwestern US (Illinois No. 6, Indiana No. 5, and an Indiana refuse coal) as well as in an Australian brown coal was probed using specific microbial activity to this sulphur speciation. The objective of this work was to differentiate elemental sulphur from the apparent organic sulphur fraction in these coals. Two hyperthermophilic archaebacteria,
Pyrodictium brockii and
Pyrococcus furiosus, are known to specifically reduce elemental sulphur to sulphide seawater-based media. The eubacterium,
Thiobacillus thiooxidans, is known to specifically oxidize elemental sulphur to sulphate. These biological activities were examined in aqueous solutions containing the above coal samples by comparing the biotic production of sulphide or sulphate with both the reduction of total coal sulphur content and the reduction in the sulphur extractable by carbon disulphide. Only the heavily weathered, refuse coal contained significant elemental sulphur (≈ 1%), by both biological assay and sulphur assay of carbon disulphide-extractable material. The elemental sulphur content of the refuse coal appeared as organic sulphur by conventional analytical methods (i.e., ASTM method for coal sulphur speciation). The results here point to the prospect of using biological probes for elemental sulphur determination in coals, thereby making organic sulphur content determination more specific. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0016-2361(89)90032-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25382665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>001623618990032X</els_id><sourcerecordid>15016683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a456t-3c9d62f22c0e749945a7521e3bd4036445139a795e5b5d291108911bdcae75003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAQx4MouD6-gYceRPRQzaNJm4sg4gsEPSjsLaTp1M3SNjVphfXTm7qrR73MMMNvXv9B6Ijgc4KJuMDRpJQJclrIM4kxo-l8C81IkbM0J5xto9kvsov2QlhijPOCZzO0fPautN1bYpxuQlI7n3SuS_uVt4M1SRibfjH6ZAwTs4nSFgZdusZ-TskWgusXtom07qpkserBDwvw7U-21GYAb_UB2qnjDDjc-H30envzcn2fPj7dPVxfPaY642JImZGVoDWlBkOeSZlxnXNKgJVVhpnIMk6Y1LnkwEteUUkILqIpK6Mh5_H4fXSy7tt79z5CGFRrg4Gm0R24MSjKWUGF4P-ChEfRRMEimK1B410IHmrVe9tqv1IEq-kDapJXTfKqQqrvD6h5LDve9NfB6Kb2ujM2_NYKkWMspzUu1xhEUT4seBWMhc5AZT2YQVXO_j3nC0Tamzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15016683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schicho, R.N. ; Brown, S.H. ; Olson, G.J. ; Parks, E.J. ; Kelly, R.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schicho, R.N. ; Brown, S.H. ; Olson, G.J. ; Parks, E.J. ; Kelly, R.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of elemental sulphur in several coals from the midwestern US (Illinois No. 6, Indiana No. 5, and an Indiana refuse coal) as well as in an Australian brown coal was probed using specific microbial activity to this sulphur speciation. The objective of this work was to differentiate elemental sulphur from the apparent organic sulphur fraction in these coals. Two hyperthermophilic archaebacteria,
Pyrodictium brockii and
Pyrococcus furiosus, are known to specifically reduce elemental sulphur to sulphide seawater-based media. The eubacterium,
Thiobacillus thiooxidans, is known to specifically oxidize elemental sulphur to sulphate. These biological activities were examined in aqueous solutions containing the above coal samples by comparing the biotic production of sulphide or sulphate with both the reduction of total coal sulphur content and the reduction in the sulphur extractable by carbon disulphide. Only the heavily weathered, refuse coal contained significant elemental sulphur (≈ 1%), by both biological assay and sulphur assay of carbon disulphide-extractable material. The elemental sulphur content of the refuse coal appeared as organic sulphur by conventional analytical methods (i.e., ASTM method for coal sulphur speciation). The results here point to the prospect of using biological probes for elemental sulphur determination in coals, thereby making organic sulphur content determination more specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(89)90032-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; coal ; Coal and derived products ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fuels ; microbial activity ; Structure, chemical and physical properties ; sulphur</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 1989-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1368-1375</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a456t-3c9d62f22c0e749945a7521e3bd4036445139a795e5b5d291108911bdcae75003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a456t-3c9d62f22c0e749945a7521e3bd4036445139a795e5b5d291108911bdcae75003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90032-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6670095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schicho, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, R.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>The presence of elemental sulphur in several coals from the midwestern US (Illinois No. 6, Indiana No. 5, and an Indiana refuse coal) as well as in an Australian brown coal was probed using specific microbial activity to this sulphur speciation. The objective of this work was to differentiate elemental sulphur from the apparent organic sulphur fraction in these coals. Two hyperthermophilic archaebacteria,
Pyrodictium brockii and
Pyrococcus furiosus, are known to specifically reduce elemental sulphur to sulphide seawater-based media. The eubacterium,
Thiobacillus thiooxidans, is known to specifically oxidize elemental sulphur to sulphate. These biological activities were examined in aqueous solutions containing the above coal samples by comparing the biotic production of sulphide or sulphate with both the reduction of total coal sulphur content and the reduction in the sulphur extractable by carbon disulphide. Only the heavily weathered, refuse coal contained significant elemental sulphur (≈ 1%), by both biological assay and sulphur assay of carbon disulphide-extractable material. The elemental sulphur content of the refuse coal appeared as organic sulphur by conventional analytical methods (i.e., ASTM method for coal sulphur speciation). The results here point to the prospect of using biological probes for elemental sulphur determination in coals, thereby making organic sulphur content determination more specific.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>coal</subject><subject>Coal and derived products</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>microbial activity</subject><subject>Structure, chemical and physical properties</subject><subject>sulphur</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAQx4MouD6-gYceRPRQzaNJm4sg4gsEPSjsLaTp1M3SNjVphfXTm7qrR73MMMNvXv9B6Ijgc4KJuMDRpJQJclrIM4kxo-l8C81IkbM0J5xto9kvsov2QlhijPOCZzO0fPautN1bYpxuQlI7n3SuS_uVt4M1SRibfjH6ZAwTs4nSFgZdusZ-TskWgusXtom07qpkserBDwvw7U-21GYAb_UB2qnjDDjc-H30envzcn2fPj7dPVxfPaY642JImZGVoDWlBkOeSZlxnXNKgJVVhpnIMk6Y1LnkwEteUUkILqIpK6Mh5_H4fXSy7tt79z5CGFRrg4Gm0R24MSjKWUGF4P-ChEfRRMEimK1B410IHmrVe9tqv1IEq-kDapJXTfKqQqrvD6h5LDve9NfB6Kb2ujM2_NYKkWMspzUu1xhEUT4seBWMhc5AZT2YQVXO_j3nC0Tamzs</recordid><startdate>19891101</startdate><enddate>19891101</enddate><creator>Schicho, R.N.</creator><creator>Brown, S.H.</creator><creator>Olson, G.J.</creator><creator>Parks, E.J.</creator><creator>Kelly, R.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891101</creationdate><title>Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria</title><author>Schicho, R.N. ; Brown, S.H. ; Olson, G.J. ; Parks, E.J. ; Kelly, R.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a456t-3c9d62f22c0e749945a7521e3bd4036445139a795e5b5d291108911bdcae75003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>coal</topic><topic>Coal and derived products</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>microbial activity</topic><topic>Structure, chemical and physical properties</topic><topic>sulphur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schicho, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, R.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schicho, R.N.</au><au>Brown, S.H.</au><au>Olson, G.J.</au><au>Parks, E.J.</au><au>Kelly, R.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>1989-11-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1368</spage><epage>1375</epage><pages>1368-1375</pages><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>The presence of elemental sulphur in several coals from the midwestern US (Illinois No. 6, Indiana No. 5, and an Indiana refuse coal) as well as in an Australian brown coal was probed using specific microbial activity to this sulphur speciation. The objective of this work was to differentiate elemental sulphur from the apparent organic sulphur fraction in these coals. Two hyperthermophilic archaebacteria,
Pyrodictium brockii and
Pyrococcus furiosus, are known to specifically reduce elemental sulphur to sulphide seawater-based media. The eubacterium,
Thiobacillus thiooxidans, is known to specifically oxidize elemental sulphur to sulphate. These biological activities were examined in aqueous solutions containing the above coal samples by comparing the biotic production of sulphide or sulphate with both the reduction of total coal sulphur content and the reduction in the sulphur extractable by carbon disulphide. Only the heavily weathered, refuse coal contained significant elemental sulphur (≈ 1%), by both biological assay and sulphur assay of carbon disulphide-extractable material. The elemental sulphur content of the refuse coal appeared as organic sulphur by conventional analytical methods (i.e., ASTM method for coal sulphur speciation). The results here point to the prospect of using biological probes for elemental sulphur determination in coals, thereby making organic sulphur content determination more specific.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0016-2361(89)90032-X</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-2361 |
ispartof | Fuel (Guildford), 1989-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1368-1375 |
issn | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25382665 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences coal Coal and derived products Energy Exact sciences and technology Fuels microbial activity Structure, chemical and physical properties sulphur |
title | Probing coals for non-pyritic sulphur using sulphur-metabolizing mesophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probing%20coals%20for%20non-pyritic%20sulphur%20using%20sulphur-metabolizing%20mesophilic%20and%20hyperthermophilic%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Schicho,%20R.N.&rft.date=1989-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1368&rft.epage=1375&rft.pages=1368-1375&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90032-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15016683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15016683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=001623618990032X&rfr_iscdi=true |