Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) are used to identify patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who are at risk of advanced fibrosis, but their reliability in predicting long-term outcomes for hepatic/extrahepatic complications or death and their concordance in cross-sectional and lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2021-10, Vol.75 (4), p.786-794
Hauptverfasser: Younes, Ramy, Caviglia, Gian Paolo, Govaere, Olivier, Rosso, Chiara, Armandi, Angelo, Sanavia, Tiziana, Pennisi, Grazia, Liguori, Antonio, Francione, Paolo, Gallego-Durán, Rocío, Ampuero, Javier, Garcia Blanco, Maria J., Aller, Rocio, Tiniakos, Dina, Burt, Alastair, David, Ezio, Vecchio, Fabio M., Maggioni, Marco, Cabibi, Daniela, Pareja, María Jesús, Zaki, Marco Y.W., Grieco, Antonio, Fracanzani, Anna L., Valenti, Luca, Miele, Luca, Fariselli, Piero, Petta, Salvatore, Romero-Gomez, Manuel, Anstee, Quentin M., Bugianesi, Elisabetta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 794
container_issue 4
container_start_page 786
container_title Journal of hepatology
container_volume 75
creator Younes, Ramy
Caviglia, Gian Paolo
Govaere, Olivier
Rosso, Chiara
Armandi, Angelo
Sanavia, Tiziana
Pennisi, Grazia
Liguori, Antonio
Francione, Paolo
Gallego-Durán, Rocío
Ampuero, Javier
Garcia Blanco, Maria J.
Aller, Rocio
Tiniakos, Dina
Burt, Alastair
David, Ezio
Vecchio, Fabio M.
Maggioni, Marco
Cabibi, Daniela
Pareja, María Jesús
Zaki, Marco Y.W.
Grieco, Antonio
Fracanzani, Anna L.
Valenti, Luca
Miele, Luca
Fariselli, Piero
Petta, Salvatore
Romero-Gomez, Manuel
Anstee, Quentin M.
Bugianesi, Elisabetta
description Non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) are used to identify patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who are at risk of advanced fibrosis, but their reliability in predicting long-term outcomes for hepatic/extrahepatic complications or death and their concordance in cross-sectional and longitudinal risk stratification remain uncertain. The most common NSS (NFS, FIB-4, BARD, APRI) and the Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) were assessed in 1,173 European patients with NAFLD from tertiary centres. Performance for fibrosis risk stratification and for the prediction of long-term hepatic/extrahepatic events, hepatocarcinoma (HCC) and overall mortality were evaluated in terms of AUC and Harrell’s c-index. For longitudinal data, NSS-based Cox proportional hazard models were trained on the whole cohort with repeated 5-fold cross-validation, sampling for testing from the 607 patients with all NSS available. Cross-sectional analysis revealed HFS as the best performer for the identification of significant (F0-1 vs. F2-4, AUC = 0.758) and advanced (F0-2 vs. F3-4, AUC = 0.805) fibrosis, while NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for detecting histological cirrhosis (range AUCs 0.85-0.88). Considering longitudinal data (follow-up between 62 and 110 months), NFS and FIB-4 were the best at predicting liver-related events (c-indices>0.7), NFS for HCC (c-index = 0.9 on average), and FIB-4 and HFS for overall mortality (c-indices >0.8). All NSS showed limited performance (c-indices
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538052208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168827821003433</els_id><sourcerecordid>2593193470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ed8df8a0edbc86d39a1a491c84fe53b740bebdd20949a2aae7178ec70558643b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-L1DAUgIMo7uzqP-BBAl68tL6kv1LwIouuwoAXPYc0ed1JaZOapCMD_vFmdlYPHjwFwvc-kvcR8opByYC176ZyOuBacuCshKYEEE_IjrUABbQ1e0p2GRKF4J24ItcxTgBQQV8_J1dVDT30XOzIr71390XCsFC_Je0XjFQ5Q9eAxupkj0jVYGebTtSP1HlXWHdU8XwftQ_W3dN4igmXSK2jq0oWXYr0p02HB1rN2h_8bDUdVcqSOU8GamxEFfEFeTaqOeLLx_OGfP_08dvt52L_9e7L7Yd9oWsuUoFGmFEoQDNo0ZqqV0zVPdOiHrGphq6GAQdjeP5br7hS2LFOoO6gaURbV0N1Q95evGvwPzaMSS42apxn5dBvUfKmEtBwDiKjb_5BJ78Fl1-Xqb5ifVV3kCl-oXTwMQYc5RrsosJJMpDnNnKS5zby3EZCI-FB_fpRvQ0Lmr8jf2Jk4P0FwLyLo8Ugo87r1LlEQJ2k8fZ__t-5oqJa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2593193470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Younes, Ramy ; Caviglia, Gian Paolo ; Govaere, Olivier ; Rosso, Chiara ; Armandi, Angelo ; Sanavia, Tiziana ; Pennisi, Grazia ; Liguori, Antonio ; Francione, Paolo ; Gallego-Durán, Rocío ; Ampuero, Javier ; Garcia Blanco, Maria J. ; Aller, Rocio ; Tiniakos, Dina ; Burt, Alastair ; David, Ezio ; Vecchio, Fabio M. ; Maggioni, Marco ; Cabibi, Daniela ; Pareja, María Jesús ; Zaki, Marco Y.W. ; Grieco, Antonio ; Fracanzani, Anna L. ; Valenti, Luca ; Miele, Luca ; Fariselli, Piero ; Petta, Salvatore ; Romero-Gomez, Manuel ; Anstee, Quentin M. ; Bugianesi, Elisabetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Younes, Ramy ; Caviglia, Gian Paolo ; Govaere, Olivier ; Rosso, Chiara ; Armandi, Angelo ; Sanavia, Tiziana ; Pennisi, Grazia ; Liguori, Antonio ; Francione, Paolo ; Gallego-Durán, Rocío ; Ampuero, Javier ; Garcia Blanco, Maria J. ; Aller, Rocio ; Tiniakos, Dina ; Burt, Alastair ; David, Ezio ; Vecchio, Fabio M. ; Maggioni, Marco ; Cabibi, Daniela ; Pareja, María Jesús ; Zaki, Marco Y.W. ; Grieco, Antonio ; Fracanzani, Anna L. ; Valenti, Luca ; Miele, Luca ; Fariselli, Piero ; Petta, Salvatore ; Romero-Gomez, Manuel ; Anstee, Quentin M. ; Bugianesi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><description>Non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) are used to identify patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who are at risk of advanced fibrosis, but their reliability in predicting long-term outcomes for hepatic/extrahepatic complications or death and their concordance in cross-sectional and longitudinal risk stratification remain uncertain. The most common NSS (NFS, FIB-4, BARD, APRI) and the Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) were assessed in 1,173 European patients with NAFLD from tertiary centres. Performance for fibrosis risk stratification and for the prediction of long-term hepatic/extrahepatic events, hepatocarcinoma (HCC) and overall mortality were evaluated in terms of AUC and Harrell’s c-index. For longitudinal data, NSS-based Cox proportional hazard models were trained on the whole cohort with repeated 5-fold cross-validation, sampling for testing from the 607 patients with all NSS available. Cross-sectional analysis revealed HFS as the best performer for the identification of significant (F0-1 vs. F2-4, AUC = 0.758) and advanced (F0-2 vs. F3-4, AUC = 0.805) fibrosis, while NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for detecting histological cirrhosis (range AUCs 0.85-0.88). Considering longitudinal data (follow-up between 62 and 110 months), NFS and FIB-4 were the best at predicting liver-related events (c-indices&gt;0.7), NFS for HCC (c-index = 0.9 on average), and FIB-4 and HFS for overall mortality (c-indices &gt;0.8). All NSS showed limited performance (c-indices &lt;0.7) for extrahepatic events. Overall, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 outperformed APRI and BARD for both cross-sectional identification of fibrosis and prediction of long-term outcomes, confirming that they are useful tools for the clinical management of patients with NAFLD at increased risk of fibrosis and liver-related complications or death. Non-invasive scoring systems are increasingly being used in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to identify those at risk of advanced fibrosis and hence clinical complications. Herein, we compared various non-invasive scoring systems and identified those that were best at identifying risk, as well as those that were best for the prediction of long-term outcomes, such as liver-related events, liver cancer and death. [Display omitted] •Different non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) have been proposed to stratify patients according to the risk of advanced fibrosis.•In the cross-sectional analysis, HFS showed the best performance for the identification of advanced fibrosis.•NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for the detection of histological cirrhosis.•After a median follow-up of ~7 years, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 performed similarly well for the prediction of HCC and overall mortality.•All NSS had limited performance for extrahepatic events, although those incorporating diabetes performed slightly better.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34090928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; APRI ; Area Under Curve ; BARD ; Cirrhosis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Death ; Fatty liver ; Female ; FIB-4 ; Fibrosis ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; HFS ; Humans ; Liver - pathology ; Liver cancer ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver diseases ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; NASH ; NFS ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - complications ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - mortality ; NSS ; Patients ; Predictions ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design - standards ; Research Design - trends ; ROC Curve ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time</subject><ispartof>Journal of hepatology, 2021-10, Vol.75 (4), p.786-794</ispartof><rights>2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ed8df8a0edbc86d39a1a491c84fe53b740bebdd20949a2aae7178ec70558643b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ed8df8a0edbc86d39a1a491c84fe53b740bebdd20949a2aae7178ec70558643b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8332-2122 ; 0000-0001-6518-7089 ; 0000-0003-1300-3027 ; 0000-0003-3464-0068 ; 0000-0003-3288-0631 ; 0000-0002-6795-4541 ; 0000-0003-3097-5776 ; 0000-0002-9224-1914 ; 0000-0001-8909-0345 ; 0000-0002-7245-4445 ; 0000-0002-4426-6930 ; 0000-0003-4657-7780 ; 0000-0002-0529-9481 ; 0000-0002-0577-0018 ; 0000-0001-6571-6577 ; 0000-0002-0801-7152</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Younes, Ramy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia, Gian Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Govaere, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosso, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armandi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanavia, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennisi, Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liguori, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francione, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego-Durán, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampuero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Blanco, Maria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aller, Rocio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiniakos, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Ezio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, Fabio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggioni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabibi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pareja, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Marco Y.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fracanzani, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miele, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariselli, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petta, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Gomez, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anstee, Quentin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugianesi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease</title><title>Journal of hepatology</title><addtitle>J Hepatol</addtitle><description>Non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) are used to identify patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who are at risk of advanced fibrosis, but their reliability in predicting long-term outcomes for hepatic/extrahepatic complications or death and their concordance in cross-sectional and longitudinal risk stratification remain uncertain. The most common NSS (NFS, FIB-4, BARD, APRI) and the Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) were assessed in 1,173 European patients with NAFLD from tertiary centres. Performance for fibrosis risk stratification and for the prediction of long-term hepatic/extrahepatic events, hepatocarcinoma (HCC) and overall mortality were evaluated in terms of AUC and Harrell’s c-index. For longitudinal data, NSS-based Cox proportional hazard models were trained on the whole cohort with repeated 5-fold cross-validation, sampling for testing from the 607 patients with all NSS available. Cross-sectional analysis revealed HFS as the best performer for the identification of significant (F0-1 vs. F2-4, AUC = 0.758) and advanced (F0-2 vs. F3-4, AUC = 0.805) fibrosis, while NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for detecting histological cirrhosis (range AUCs 0.85-0.88). Considering longitudinal data (follow-up between 62 and 110 months), NFS and FIB-4 were the best at predicting liver-related events (c-indices&gt;0.7), NFS for HCC (c-index = 0.9 on average), and FIB-4 and HFS for overall mortality (c-indices &gt;0.8). All NSS showed limited performance (c-indices &lt;0.7) for extrahepatic events. Overall, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 outperformed APRI and BARD for both cross-sectional identification of fibrosis and prediction of long-term outcomes, confirming that they are useful tools for the clinical management of patients with NAFLD at increased risk of fibrosis and liver-related complications or death. Non-invasive scoring systems are increasingly being used in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to identify those at risk of advanced fibrosis and hence clinical complications. Herein, we compared various non-invasive scoring systems and identified those that were best at identifying risk, as well as those that were best for the prediction of long-term outcomes, such as liver-related events, liver cancer and death. [Display omitted] •Different non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) have been proposed to stratify patients according to the risk of advanced fibrosis.•In the cross-sectional analysis, HFS showed the best performance for the identification of advanced fibrosis.•NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for the detection of histological cirrhosis.•After a median follow-up of ~7 years, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 performed similarly well for the prediction of HCC and overall mortality.•All NSS had limited performance for extrahepatic events, although those incorporating diabetes performed slightly better.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>APRI</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>BARD</subject><subject>Cirrhosis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Fatty liver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>FIB-4</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>HFS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>NASH</subject><subject>NFS</subject><subject>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - complications</subject><subject>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - mortality</subject><subject>NSS</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Research Design - trends</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0168-8278</issn><issn>1600-0641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-L1DAUgIMo7uzqP-BBAl68tL6kv1LwIouuwoAXPYc0ed1JaZOapCMD_vFmdlYPHjwFwvc-kvcR8opByYC176ZyOuBacuCshKYEEE_IjrUABbQ1e0p2GRKF4J24ItcxTgBQQV8_J1dVDT30XOzIr71390XCsFC_Je0XjFQ5Q9eAxupkj0jVYGebTtSP1HlXWHdU8XwftQ_W3dN4igmXSK2jq0oWXYr0p02HB1rN2h_8bDUdVcqSOU8GamxEFfEFeTaqOeLLx_OGfP_08dvt52L_9e7L7Yd9oWsuUoFGmFEoQDNo0ZqqV0zVPdOiHrGphq6GAQdjeP5br7hS2LFOoO6gaURbV0N1Q95evGvwPzaMSS42apxn5dBvUfKmEtBwDiKjb_5BJ78Fl1-Xqb5ifVV3kCl-oXTwMQYc5RrsosJJMpDnNnKS5zby3EZCI-FB_fpRvQ0Lmr8jf2Jk4P0FwLyLo8Ugo87r1LlEQJ2k8fZ__t-5oqJa</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Younes, Ramy</creator><creator>Caviglia, Gian Paolo</creator><creator>Govaere, Olivier</creator><creator>Rosso, Chiara</creator><creator>Armandi, Angelo</creator><creator>Sanavia, Tiziana</creator><creator>Pennisi, Grazia</creator><creator>Liguori, Antonio</creator><creator>Francione, Paolo</creator><creator>Gallego-Durán, Rocío</creator><creator>Ampuero, Javier</creator><creator>Garcia Blanco, Maria J.</creator><creator>Aller, Rocio</creator><creator>Tiniakos, Dina</creator><creator>Burt, Alastair</creator><creator>David, Ezio</creator><creator>Vecchio, Fabio M.</creator><creator>Maggioni, Marco</creator><creator>Cabibi, Daniela</creator><creator>Pareja, María Jesús</creator><creator>Zaki, Marco Y.W.</creator><creator>Grieco, Antonio</creator><creator>Fracanzani, Anna L.</creator><creator>Valenti, Luca</creator><creator>Miele, Luca</creator><creator>Fariselli, Piero</creator><creator>Petta, Salvatore</creator><creator>Romero-Gomez, Manuel</creator><creator>Anstee, Quentin M.</creator><creator>Bugianesi, Elisabetta</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-2122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6518-7089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-3027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-0068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-0631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6795-4541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-1914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-0345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-4445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4426-6930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-7780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0529-9481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-0018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-6577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-7152</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease</title><author>Younes, Ramy ; Caviglia, Gian Paolo ; Govaere, Olivier ; Rosso, Chiara ; Armandi, Angelo ; Sanavia, Tiziana ; Pennisi, Grazia ; Liguori, Antonio ; Francione, Paolo ; Gallego-Durán, Rocío ; Ampuero, Javier ; Garcia Blanco, Maria J. ; Aller, Rocio ; Tiniakos, Dina ; Burt, Alastair ; David, Ezio ; Vecchio, Fabio M. ; Maggioni, Marco ; Cabibi, Daniela ; Pareja, María Jesús ; Zaki, Marco Y.W. ; Grieco, Antonio ; Fracanzani, Anna L. ; Valenti, Luca ; Miele, Luca ; Fariselli, Piero ; Petta, Salvatore ; Romero-Gomez, Manuel ; Anstee, Quentin M. ; Bugianesi, Elisabetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ed8df8a0edbc86d39a1a491c84fe53b740bebdd20949a2aae7178ec70558643b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>APRI</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>BARD</topic><topic>Cirrhosis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Fatty liver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>FIB-4</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>HFS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>NASH</topic><topic>NFS</topic><topic>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - complications</topic><topic>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - mortality</topic><topic>NSS</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Research Design - trends</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Younes, Ramy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia, Gian Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Govaere, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosso, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armandi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanavia, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennisi, Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liguori, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francione, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego-Durán, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampuero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Blanco, Maria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aller, Rocio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiniakos, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Ezio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, Fabio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggioni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabibi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pareja, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaki, Marco Y.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fracanzani, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenti, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miele, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariselli, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petta, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Gomez, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anstee, Quentin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugianesi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Younes, Ramy</au><au>Caviglia, Gian Paolo</au><au>Govaere, Olivier</au><au>Rosso, Chiara</au><au>Armandi, Angelo</au><au>Sanavia, Tiziana</au><au>Pennisi, Grazia</au><au>Liguori, Antonio</au><au>Francione, Paolo</au><au>Gallego-Durán, Rocío</au><au>Ampuero, Javier</au><au>Garcia Blanco, Maria J.</au><au>Aller, Rocio</au><au>Tiniakos, Dina</au><au>Burt, Alastair</au><au>David, Ezio</au><au>Vecchio, Fabio M.</au><au>Maggioni, Marco</au><au>Cabibi, Daniela</au><au>Pareja, María Jesús</au><au>Zaki, Marco Y.W.</au><au>Grieco, Antonio</au><au>Fracanzani, Anna L.</au><au>Valenti, Luca</au><au>Miele, Luca</au><au>Fariselli, Piero</au><au>Petta, Salvatore</au><au>Romero-Gomez, Manuel</au><au>Anstee, Quentin M.</au><au>Bugianesi, Elisabetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Hepatol</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>786</spage><epage>794</epage><pages>786-794</pages><issn>0168-8278</issn><eissn>1600-0641</eissn><abstract>Non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) are used to identify patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who are at risk of advanced fibrosis, but their reliability in predicting long-term outcomes for hepatic/extrahepatic complications or death and their concordance in cross-sectional and longitudinal risk stratification remain uncertain. The most common NSS (NFS, FIB-4, BARD, APRI) and the Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) were assessed in 1,173 European patients with NAFLD from tertiary centres. Performance for fibrosis risk stratification and for the prediction of long-term hepatic/extrahepatic events, hepatocarcinoma (HCC) and overall mortality were evaluated in terms of AUC and Harrell’s c-index. For longitudinal data, NSS-based Cox proportional hazard models were trained on the whole cohort with repeated 5-fold cross-validation, sampling for testing from the 607 patients with all NSS available. Cross-sectional analysis revealed HFS as the best performer for the identification of significant (F0-1 vs. F2-4, AUC = 0.758) and advanced (F0-2 vs. F3-4, AUC = 0.805) fibrosis, while NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for detecting histological cirrhosis (range AUCs 0.85-0.88). Considering longitudinal data (follow-up between 62 and 110 months), NFS and FIB-4 were the best at predicting liver-related events (c-indices&gt;0.7), NFS for HCC (c-index = 0.9 on average), and FIB-4 and HFS for overall mortality (c-indices &gt;0.8). All NSS showed limited performance (c-indices &lt;0.7) for extrahepatic events. Overall, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 outperformed APRI and BARD for both cross-sectional identification of fibrosis and prediction of long-term outcomes, confirming that they are useful tools for the clinical management of patients with NAFLD at increased risk of fibrosis and liver-related complications or death. Non-invasive scoring systems are increasingly being used in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to identify those at risk of advanced fibrosis and hence clinical complications. Herein, we compared various non-invasive scoring systems and identified those that were best at identifying risk, as well as those that were best for the prediction of long-term outcomes, such as liver-related events, liver cancer and death. [Display omitted] •Different non-invasive scoring systems (NSS) have been proposed to stratify patients according to the risk of advanced fibrosis.•In the cross-sectional analysis, HFS showed the best performance for the identification of advanced fibrosis.•NFS and FIB-4 showed the best performance for the detection of histological cirrhosis.•After a median follow-up of ~7 years, NFS, HFS and FIB-4 performed similarly well for the prediction of HCC and overall mortality.•All NSS had limited performance for extrahepatic events, although those incorporating diabetes performed slightly better.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34090928</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-2122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6518-7089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-3027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-0068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-0631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6795-4541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-1914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-0345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-4445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4426-6930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-7780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0529-9481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-0018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-6577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-7152</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8278
ispartof Journal of hepatology, 2021-10, Vol.75 (4), p.786-794
issn 0168-8278
1600-0641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538052208
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
APRI
Area Under Curve
BARD
Cirrhosis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Death
Fatty liver
Female
FIB-4
Fibrosis
Hepatocellular carcinoma
HFS
Humans
Liver - pathology
Liver cancer
Liver cirrhosis
Liver diseases
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
NASH
NFS
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - complications
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - mortality
NSS
Patients
Predictions
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design - standards
Research Design - trends
ROC Curve
Severity of Illness Index
Time
title Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A52%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20outcomes%20and%20predictive%20ability%20of%20non-invasive%20scoring%20systems%20in%20patients%20with%20non-alcoholic%20fatty%20liver%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hepatology&rft.au=Younes,%20Ramy&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=786&rft.epage=794&rft.pages=786-794&rft.issn=0168-8278&rft.eissn=1600-0641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2593193470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2593193470&rft_id=info:pmid/34090928&rft_els_id=S0168827821003433&rfr_iscdi=true