Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Upda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2021-06, Vol.39 (29), p.3799-3802
Hauptverfasser: Crawford, Jordan A., Hurley, Laura P., O'Leary, Sean T., Crane, Lori A., Brtnikova, Michaela, Cataldi, Jessica R., Beaty, Brenda L., Gorman, Carol, Kempe, Allison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3802
container_issue 29
container_start_page 3799
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 39
creator Crawford, Jordan A.
Hurley, Laura P.
O'Leary, Sean T.
Crane, Lori A.
Brtnikova, Michaela
Cataldi, Jessica R.
Beaty, Brenda L.
Gorman, Carol
Kempe, Allison
description The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Updated schedules feature changes to vaccine recommendations as well as changes to the schedule’s usability for physicians. The objective of this study was to determine physicians’ attitudes about the Adult Immunization Schedule. Surveys were administered to a sentinel physician network from October 2019 through January 2020. Physicians that responded were comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule, but reported confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Physicians reported a lack engagement with mobile applications, CDC Vaccine Schedules and Shots by STFM (the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine). Future work should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations with medical condition-based indications and increasing knowledge of mobile applications for physicians.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538048627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X21006411</els_id><sourcerecordid>2541766187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-dafef61c5f90725ba332dc8eda1ac18986a98efed5bdcaa662634ab4a3873cd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1rGzEQFSWFOm5_QmGhl17W0cdKlk_FmOYDAg20hd7EeDQba_HuJpLW4P76yDiX9FIYGGbmvcfMPMY-C74QXJirbnEAxDDQQnIpFlyX0O_YTNilqqUW9oLNuDRN3Qj-5wO7TKnjnGslVjPWPeyOKWCAoYKcQ548pSrSI0Qfhscq76ha-0NIYzxWm7HvQ85E1ThUd30_DeEv5FCKhwiYAxbq2k_7_Hb4E3dUuvSRvW9hn-jTa56z39fff21u6_sfN3eb9X2NSthce2ipNQJ1u-JLqbeglPRoyYMAFHZlDawsteT11iOAMdKoBrYNqHIueqvm7OtZ9ymOzxOl7PqQkPZ7GGickpNaWd5YI5cF-uUfaDdOcSjbFVQjlsacfjhn-ozCOKYUqXVPMfQQj05wd3LAde7VAXdywHFdQhfetzOPyrWHQNElDDQg-RAJs_Nj-I_CC9nqlH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541766187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Crawford, Jordan A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; O'Leary, Sean T. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Cataldi, Jessica R. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Gorman, Carol ; Kempe, Allison</creator><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Jordan A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; O'Leary, Sean T. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Cataldi, Jessica R. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Gorman, Carol ; Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><description>The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Updated schedules feature changes to vaccine recommendations as well as changes to the schedule’s usability for physicians. The objective of this study was to determine physicians’ attitudes about the Adult Immunization Schedule. Surveys were administered to a sentinel physician network from October 2019 through January 2020. Physicians that responded were comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule, but reported confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Physicians reported a lack engagement with mobile applications, CDC Vaccine Schedules and Shots by STFM (the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine). Future work should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations with medical condition-based indications and increasing knowledge of mobile applications for physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult immunization schedule ; Age ; Applications programs ; Attitudes ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Electronic health records ; Immunization ; Internal medicine ; Medicine ; Mobile computing ; Patients ; Physicians ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Primary care ; Recommendation ; Schedules ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2021-06, Vol.39 (29), p.3799-3802</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 29, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-dafef61c5f90725ba332dc8eda1ac18986a98efed5bdcaa662634ab4a3873cd83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4699-8497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2541766187?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982,64370,64372,64374,72224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Jordan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brtnikova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Jessica R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><title>Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule</title><title>Vaccine</title><description>The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Updated schedules feature changes to vaccine recommendations as well as changes to the schedule’s usability for physicians. The objective of this study was to determine physicians’ attitudes about the Adult Immunization Schedule. Surveys were administered to a sentinel physician network from October 2019 through January 2020. Physicians that responded were comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule, but reported confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Physicians reported a lack engagement with mobile applications, CDC Vaccine Schedules and Shots by STFM (the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine). Future work should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations with medical condition-based indications and increasing knowledge of mobile applications for physicians.</description><subject>Adult immunization schedule</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mobile computing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Recommendation</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1rGzEQFSWFOm5_QmGhl17W0cdKlk_FmOYDAg20hd7EeDQba_HuJpLW4P76yDiX9FIYGGbmvcfMPMY-C74QXJirbnEAxDDQQnIpFlyX0O_YTNilqqUW9oLNuDRN3Qj-5wO7TKnjnGslVjPWPeyOKWCAoYKcQ548pSrSI0Qfhscq76ha-0NIYzxWm7HvQ85E1ThUd30_DeEv5FCKhwiYAxbq2k_7_Hb4E3dUuvSRvW9hn-jTa56z39fff21u6_sfN3eb9X2NSthce2ipNQJ1u-JLqbeglPRoyYMAFHZlDawsteT11iOAMdKoBrYNqHIueqvm7OtZ9ymOzxOl7PqQkPZ7GGickpNaWd5YI5cF-uUfaDdOcSjbFVQjlsacfjhn-ozCOKYUqXVPMfQQj05wd3LAde7VAXdywHFdQhfetzOPyrWHQNElDDQg-RAJs_Nj-I_CC9nqlH0</recordid><startdate>20210629</startdate><enddate>20210629</enddate><creator>Crawford, Jordan A.</creator><creator>Hurley, Laura P.</creator><creator>O'Leary, Sean T.</creator><creator>Crane, Lori A.</creator><creator>Brtnikova, Michaela</creator><creator>Cataldi, Jessica R.</creator><creator>Beaty, Brenda L.</creator><creator>Gorman, Carol</creator><creator>Kempe, Allison</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-8497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210629</creationdate><title>Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule</title><author>Crawford, Jordan A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; O'Leary, Sean T. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Cataldi, Jessica R. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Gorman, Carol ; Kempe, Allison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-dafef61c5f90725ba332dc8eda1ac18986a98efed5bdcaa662634ab4a3873cd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult immunization schedule</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mobile computing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Recommendation</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Jordan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brtnikova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Jessica R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crawford, Jordan A.</au><au>Hurley, Laura P.</au><au>O'Leary, Sean T.</au><au>Crane, Lori A.</au><au>Brtnikova, Michaela</au><au>Cataldi, Jessica R.</au><au>Beaty, Brenda L.</au><au>Gorman, Carol</au><au>Kempe, Allison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><date>2021-06-29</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>29</issue><spage>3799</spage><epage>3802</epage><pages>3799-3802</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was created out of the need to formalize vaccine recommendations for the United States. Annually, ACIP delivers recommendations to the CDC director for guidance about United States vaccine use and publishes the Adult Immunization Schedule. Updated schedules feature changes to vaccine recommendations as well as changes to the schedule’s usability for physicians. The objective of this study was to determine physicians’ attitudes about the Adult Immunization Schedule. Surveys were administered to a sentinel physician network from October 2019 through January 2020. Physicians that responded were comfortable using the Adult Immunization Schedule, but reported confusion about some medical condition-based indications. Physicians reported a lack engagement with mobile applications, CDC Vaccine Schedules and Shots by STFM (the Society for Teachers of Family Medicine). Future work should focus on increasing clarity regarding the recommendations with medical condition-based indications and increasing knowledge of mobile applications for physicians.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.055</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-8497</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2021-06, Vol.39 (29), p.3799-3802
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538048627
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adult immunization schedule
Age
Applications programs
Attitudes
Disease control
Disease prevention
Electronic health records
Immunization
Internal medicine
Medicine
Mobile computing
Patients
Physicians
Polls & surveys
Primary care
Recommendation
Schedules
Vaccination
Vaccines
title Physician attitudes regarding the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Adult Immunization Schedule
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20attitudes%20regarding%20the%20Advisory%20Committee%20on%20Immunization%20Practices%20Adult%20Immunization%20Schedule&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Crawford,%20Jordan%20A.&rft.date=2021-06-29&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=3799&rft.epage=3802&rft.pages=3799-3802&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541766187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541766187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264410X21006411&rfr_iscdi=true