Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifyi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2021-09, Vol.338, p.58-62
Hauptverfasser: Moscarelli, Marco, Gallo, Francesco, Gallone, Guglielmo, Kim, Won-Keun, Reifart, Jörg, Veulemans, Verena, Zeus, Tobias, Toggweiler, Stefan, De Backer, Ole, Søndergaard, Lars, Mangieri, Antonio, De Marco, Federico, Regazzoli, Damiano, Reimers, Bernhard, Muntané-Carol, Guillem, Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez, Armario, Xavier, Mylotte, Darren, Bhadra, Oliver Daniel, Conradi, Lenard, Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin, Nombela-Franco, Luis, Barbanti, Marco, Reddavid, Claudia, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Nicolini, Elisa, Tzanis, Giorgos, Rodes-Cabau, Josep, Colombo, Antonio, Giannini, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue
container_start_page 58
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 338
creator Moscarelli, Marco
Gallo, Francesco
Gallone, Guglielmo
Kim, Won-Keun
Reifart, Jörg
Veulemans, Verena
Zeus, Tobias
Toggweiler, Stefan
De Backer, Ole
Søndergaard, Lars
Mangieri, Antonio
De Marco, Federico
Regazzoli, Damiano
Reimers, Bernhard
Muntané-Carol, Guillem
Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez
Armario, Xavier
Mylotte, Darren
Bhadra, Oliver Daniel
Conradi, Lenard
Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin
Nombela-Franco, Luis
Barbanti, Marco
Reddavid, Claudia
Brugaletta, Salvatore
Nicolini, Elisa
Tzanis, Giorgos
Rodes-Cabau, Josep
Colombo, Antonio
Giannini, Francesco
description Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR. •What is the physiological aortic angle distribution in TAVR patients?•Mean aortic angle in a large series of TAVR patients with aortic stenosis was 49.4°.•Higher aortic angle values were observed in the elderly and in the obese.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538048598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527321009116</els_id><sourcerecordid>2538048598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8be1844018a280cb56aa8ddeac2de11688d85bfe208f67977da60ccbfe542f073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpoNuk_6AHHXPxVrIlW74EQkjTQCCX5CxmpfFGi1dyRtqF5NdXyfZcGBh4vPeG-Rj7KcVaCtn_2q3DzgH5dStauRa6jvrCVtIMqpGDVl_ZqtqGRrdD9419z3knhFDjaFbs_TpRCY5D3M7IfciFwuZQQopV8nwh9MGVRJmnib8kCu8pFpg51BjwEPkCJWAsmR-iR9qmELe8EMTsoLxgQfq01gtHmI_ICZcZHO5r5IKdTTBn_PFvn7Pn37dPN3-ah8e7-5vrh8Z13Vgas0FplBLSQGuE2-gewHiP4FqPUvbGeKM3E7bCTP0wDoOHXjhXFa3aSQzdObs89S6UXg-Yi92H7HCeIWI6ZNvqzghl9GiqVZ2sjlLOhJNdKOyB3qwU9gO13dkTavuB2gpdR9XY1SmG9Y1jQLLZVSiusiN0xfoU_l_wF-7ojWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2538048598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Moscarelli, Marco ; Gallo, Francesco ; Gallone, Guglielmo ; Kim, Won-Keun ; Reifart, Jörg ; Veulemans, Verena ; Zeus, Tobias ; Toggweiler, Stefan ; De Backer, Ole ; Søndergaard, Lars ; Mangieri, Antonio ; De Marco, Federico ; Regazzoli, Damiano ; Reimers, Bernhard ; Muntané-Carol, Guillem ; Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez ; Armario, Xavier ; Mylotte, Darren ; Bhadra, Oliver Daniel ; Conradi, Lenard ; Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin ; Nombela-Franco, Luis ; Barbanti, Marco ; Reddavid, Claudia ; Brugaletta, Salvatore ; Nicolini, Elisa ; Tzanis, Giorgos ; Rodes-Cabau, Josep ; Colombo, Antonio ; Giannini, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Moscarelli, Marco ; Gallo, Francesco ; Gallone, Guglielmo ; Kim, Won-Keun ; Reifart, Jörg ; Veulemans, Verena ; Zeus, Tobias ; Toggweiler, Stefan ; De Backer, Ole ; Søndergaard, Lars ; Mangieri, Antonio ; De Marco, Federico ; Regazzoli, Damiano ; Reimers, Bernhard ; Muntané-Carol, Guillem ; Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez ; Armario, Xavier ; Mylotte, Darren ; Bhadra, Oliver Daniel ; Conradi, Lenard ; Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin ; Nombela-Franco, Luis ; Barbanti, Marco ; Reddavid, Claudia ; Brugaletta, Salvatore ; Nicolini, Elisa ; Tzanis, Giorgos ; Rodes-Cabau, Josep ; Colombo, Antonio ; Giannini, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p &lt; 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p &lt; 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p &lt; 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR. •What is the physiological aortic angle distribution in TAVR patients?•Mean aortic angle in a large series of TAVR patients with aortic stenosis was 49.4°.•Higher aortic angle values were observed in the elderly and in the obese.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aortic angle ; Horizontal aorta ; Obesity paradox ; TAVR ; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2021-09, Vol.338, p.58-62</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8be1844018a280cb56aa8ddeac2de11688d85bfe208f67977da60ccbfe542f073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8be1844018a280cb56aa8ddeac2de11688d85bfe208f67977da60ccbfe542f073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moscarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallone, Guglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifart, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veulemans, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeus, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toggweiler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangieri, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regazzoli, Damiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimers, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntané-Carol, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armario, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylotte, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadra, Oliver Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conradi, Lenard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nombela-Franco, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbanti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddavid, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugaletta, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzanis, Giorgos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodes-Cabau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><description>Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p &lt; 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p &lt; 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p &lt; 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR. •What is the physiological aortic angle distribution in TAVR patients?•Mean aortic angle in a large series of TAVR patients with aortic stenosis was 49.4°.•Higher aortic angle values were observed in the elderly and in the obese.</description><subject>Aortic angle</subject><subject>Horizontal aorta</subject><subject>Obesity paradox</subject><subject>TAVR</subject><subject>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpoNuk_6AHHXPxVrIlW74EQkjTQCCX5CxmpfFGi1dyRtqF5NdXyfZcGBh4vPeG-Rj7KcVaCtn_2q3DzgH5dStauRa6jvrCVtIMqpGDVl_ZqtqGRrdD9419z3knhFDjaFbs_TpRCY5D3M7IfciFwuZQQopV8nwh9MGVRJmnib8kCu8pFpg51BjwEPkCJWAsmR-iR9qmELe8EMTsoLxgQfq01gtHmI_ICZcZHO5r5IKdTTBn_PFvn7Pn37dPN3-ah8e7-5vrh8Z13Vgas0FplBLSQGuE2-gewHiP4FqPUvbGeKM3E7bCTP0wDoOHXjhXFa3aSQzdObs89S6UXg-Yi92H7HCeIWI6ZNvqzghl9GiqVZ2sjlLOhJNdKOyB3qwU9gO13dkTavuB2gpdR9XY1SmG9Y1jQLLZVSiusiN0xfoU_l_wF-7ojWI</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Moscarelli, Marco</creator><creator>Gallo, Francesco</creator><creator>Gallone, Guglielmo</creator><creator>Kim, Won-Keun</creator><creator>Reifart, Jörg</creator><creator>Veulemans, Verena</creator><creator>Zeus, Tobias</creator><creator>Toggweiler, Stefan</creator><creator>De Backer, Ole</creator><creator>Søndergaard, Lars</creator><creator>Mangieri, Antonio</creator><creator>De Marco, Federico</creator><creator>Regazzoli, Damiano</creator><creator>Reimers, Bernhard</creator><creator>Muntané-Carol, Guillem</creator><creator>Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez</creator><creator>Armario, Xavier</creator><creator>Mylotte, Darren</creator><creator>Bhadra, Oliver Daniel</creator><creator>Conradi, Lenard</creator><creator>Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin</creator><creator>Nombela-Franco, Luis</creator><creator>Barbanti, Marco</creator><creator>Reddavid, Claudia</creator><creator>Brugaletta, Salvatore</creator><creator>Nicolini, Elisa</creator><creator>Tzanis, Giorgos</creator><creator>Rodes-Cabau, Josep</creator><creator>Colombo, Antonio</creator><creator>Giannini, Francesco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement</title><author>Moscarelli, Marco ; Gallo, Francesco ; Gallone, Guglielmo ; Kim, Won-Keun ; Reifart, Jörg ; Veulemans, Verena ; Zeus, Tobias ; Toggweiler, Stefan ; De Backer, Ole ; Søndergaard, Lars ; Mangieri, Antonio ; De Marco, Federico ; Regazzoli, Damiano ; Reimers, Bernhard ; Muntané-Carol, Guillem ; Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez ; Armario, Xavier ; Mylotte, Darren ; Bhadra, Oliver Daniel ; Conradi, Lenard ; Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin ; Nombela-Franco, Luis ; Barbanti, Marco ; Reddavid, Claudia ; Brugaletta, Salvatore ; Nicolini, Elisa ; Tzanis, Giorgos ; Rodes-Cabau, Josep ; Colombo, Antonio ; Giannini, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8be1844018a280cb56aa8ddeac2de11688d85bfe208f67977da60ccbfe542f073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aortic angle</topic><topic>Horizontal aorta</topic><topic>Obesity paradox</topic><topic>TAVR</topic><topic>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moscarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallone, Guglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifart, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veulemans, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeus, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toggweiler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangieri, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regazzoli, Damiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimers, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntané-Carol, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armario, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylotte, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadra, Oliver Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conradi, Lenard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nombela-Franco, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbanti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddavid, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugaletta, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzanis, Giorgos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodes-Cabau, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moscarelli, Marco</au><au>Gallo, Francesco</au><au>Gallone, Guglielmo</au><au>Kim, Won-Keun</au><au>Reifart, Jörg</au><au>Veulemans, Verena</au><au>Zeus, Tobias</au><au>Toggweiler, Stefan</au><au>De Backer, Ole</au><au>Søndergaard, Lars</au><au>Mangieri, Antonio</au><au>De Marco, Federico</au><au>Regazzoli, Damiano</au><au>Reimers, Bernhard</au><au>Muntané-Carol, Guillem</au><au>Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez</au><au>Armario, Xavier</au><au>Mylotte, Darren</au><au>Bhadra, Oliver Daniel</au><au>Conradi, Lenard</au><au>Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin</au><au>Nombela-Franco, Luis</au><au>Barbanti, Marco</au><au>Reddavid, Claudia</au><au>Brugaletta, Salvatore</au><au>Nicolini, Elisa</au><au>Tzanis, Giorgos</au><au>Rodes-Cabau, Josep</au><au>Colombo, Antonio</au><au>Giannini, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>338</volume><spage>58</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>58-62</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p &lt; 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p &lt; 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p &lt; 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR. •What is the physiological aortic angle distribution in TAVR patients?•Mean aortic angle in a large series of TAVR patients with aortic stenosis was 49.4°.•Higher aortic angle values were observed in the elderly and in the obese.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2021-09, Vol.338, p.58-62
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2538048598
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aortic angle
Horizontal aorta
Obesity paradox
TAVR
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A11%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aortic%20angle%20distribution%20and%20predictors%20of%20horizontal%20aorta%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20transcatheter%20aortic%20valve%20replacement&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Moscarelli,%20Marco&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=338&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=58-62&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2538048598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2538048598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167527321009116&rfr_iscdi=true