Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course

The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's obje...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.819-825
Hauptverfasser: Franic, Duska M., Palmer, Russ, Fulford, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 825
container_issue 7
container_start_page 819
container_title Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning
container_volume 13
creator Franic, Duska M.
Palmer, Russ
Fulford, Michael
description The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's objective is to compare first-professional year student preferences for computer-based vs. traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a required social and administrative pharmacy class. All students enrolled in the class were invited to complete one brief survey at the end of the semester to determine their testing preference. Of the 138 first-professional year students completing the survey, 79% (109 of 138) preferred computer-based testing, 9% had no preference, 6% (8 of 138) preferred paper-and-pencil testing, and the remainder (8 of 138) stated it depended on what was being tested. Ninety-one percent of students did not perceive the testing method to impact their grades. Students preferred computer-based testing over traditional paper-and-pencil as a convenient testing method (mean 4.73 vs. 3.4, P < .001), providing immediate feedback (mean 4.87 vs. 1.91, P < .001), and as a more effective testing method (mean 4.57 vs. 3.96, P < .001). First-professional year students preferred computer-based over traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a social and administrative science class, with the method of testing not perceived to impact grade. This finding is timely, given the recent required transitioning of all pharmacy classes and subsequent testing to an online format due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536496059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877129721000952</els_id><sourcerecordid>2536496059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-74c4295bb599aa74eed5020e8fd262d83198511b2600a9ecfa304df7a8e363d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtq3TAQhk1poWmaF8hKyy5qZyT5CtmUNDcIZNOuxRxp3OpgW6okH8gL5Lkjc1Kyy2pmmP-fy1cU5xwqDry92Ffap6kSIHgFsgLefyhOeN91JZcAH__nYug-F19i3AN0AK08KZ5_Op1cYG5k_i-GGfUTi2k1tCTmA40UaNEU2Zg12s1-TRTKHUYy7BAr5tHnGhdT-qyzE0sUk13-MLsw_M6i0xYnlvsMzWwXG1PAZA_0tky7NUT6WnwacYp09hpPi98317-u7sqHx9v7qx8PpZZSprKrdS2GZrdrhgGxq4lMAwKoH41oheklH_qG851oAXAgPaKE2owd9iRbaQZ5Wnw7zvXB_VvzrWq2UdM04UJujUo0sq2HFppNKo5SHVyMGYXywc4YnhQHtUFXe7VBVxt0BVJl6Nl0eTRRfuJgKaio7UbQ2EA6KePse_YXjcGNdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536496059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Franic, Duska M. ; Palmer, Russ ; Fulford, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Franic, Duska M. ; Palmer, Russ ; Fulford, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's objective is to compare first-professional year student preferences for computer-based vs. traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a required social and administrative pharmacy class. All students enrolled in the class were invited to complete one brief survey at the end of the semester to determine their testing preference. Of the 138 first-professional year students completing the survey, 79% (109 of 138) preferred computer-based testing, 9% had no preference, 6% (8 of 138) preferred paper-and-pencil testing, and the remainder (8 of 138) stated it depended on what was being tested. Ninety-one percent of students did not perceive the testing method to impact their grades. Students preferred computer-based testing over traditional paper-and-pencil as a convenient testing method (mean 4.73 vs. 3.4, P &lt; .001), providing immediate feedback (mean 4.87 vs. 1.91, P &lt; .001), and as a more effective testing method (mean 4.57 vs. 3.96, P &lt; .001). First-professional year students preferred computer-based over traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a social and administrative science class, with the method of testing not perceived to impact grade. This finding is timely, given the recent required transitioning of all pharmacy classes and subsequent testing to an online format due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-1297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-1300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Computer-based ; COVID-19 ; Online ; Paper-and-pencil ; Social and administrative pharmacy ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.819-825</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-74c4295bb599aa74eed5020e8fd262d83198511b2600a9ecfa304df7a8e363d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-74c4295bb599aa74eed5020e8fd262d83198511b2600a9ecfa304df7a8e363d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franic, Duska M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Russ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulford, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course</title><title>Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning</title><description>The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's objective is to compare first-professional year student preferences for computer-based vs. traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a required social and administrative pharmacy class. All students enrolled in the class were invited to complete one brief survey at the end of the semester to determine their testing preference. Of the 138 first-professional year students completing the survey, 79% (109 of 138) preferred computer-based testing, 9% had no preference, 6% (8 of 138) preferred paper-and-pencil testing, and the remainder (8 of 138) stated it depended on what was being tested. Ninety-one percent of students did not perceive the testing method to impact their grades. Students preferred computer-based testing over traditional paper-and-pencil as a convenient testing method (mean 4.73 vs. 3.4, P &lt; .001), providing immediate feedback (mean 4.87 vs. 1.91, P &lt; .001), and as a more effective testing method (mean 4.57 vs. 3.96, P &lt; .001). First-professional year students preferred computer-based over traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a social and administrative science class, with the method of testing not perceived to impact grade. This finding is timely, given the recent required transitioning of all pharmacy classes and subsequent testing to an online format due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic.</description><subject>Computer-based</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Paper-and-pencil</subject><subject>Social and administrative pharmacy</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1877-1297</issn><issn>1877-1300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtq3TAQhk1poWmaF8hKyy5qZyT5CtmUNDcIZNOuxRxp3OpgW6okH8gL5Lkjc1Kyy2pmmP-fy1cU5xwqDry92Ffap6kSIHgFsgLefyhOeN91JZcAH__nYug-F19i3AN0AK08KZ5_Op1cYG5k_i-GGfUTi2k1tCTmA40UaNEU2Zg12s1-TRTKHUYy7BAr5tHnGhdT-qyzE0sUk13-MLsw_M6i0xYnlvsMzWwXG1PAZA_0tky7NUT6WnwacYp09hpPi98317-u7sqHx9v7qx8PpZZSprKrdS2GZrdrhgGxq4lMAwKoH41oheklH_qG851oAXAgPaKE2owd9iRbaQZ5Wnw7zvXB_VvzrWq2UdM04UJujUo0sq2HFppNKo5SHVyMGYXywc4YnhQHtUFXe7VBVxt0BVJl6Nl0eTRRfuJgKaio7UbQ2EA6KePse_YXjcGNdQ</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Franic, Duska M.</creator><creator>Palmer, Russ</creator><creator>Fulford, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course</title><author>Franic, Duska M. ; Palmer, Russ ; Fulford, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-74c4295bb599aa74eed5020e8fd262d83198511b2600a9ecfa304df7a8e363d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer-based</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Paper-and-pencil</topic><topic>Social and administrative pharmacy</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franic, Duska M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Russ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulford, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franic, Duska M.</au><au>Palmer, Russ</au><au>Fulford, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course</atitle><jtitle>Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>819</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>819-825</pages><issn>1877-1297</issn><eissn>1877-1300</eissn><abstract>The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's objective is to compare first-professional year student preferences for computer-based vs. traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a required social and administrative pharmacy class. All students enrolled in the class were invited to complete one brief survey at the end of the semester to determine their testing preference. Of the 138 first-professional year students completing the survey, 79% (109 of 138) preferred computer-based testing, 9% had no preference, 6% (8 of 138) preferred paper-and-pencil testing, and the remainder (8 of 138) stated it depended on what was being tested. Ninety-one percent of students did not perceive the testing method to impact their grades. Students preferred computer-based testing over traditional paper-and-pencil as a convenient testing method (mean 4.73 vs. 3.4, P &lt; .001), providing immediate feedback (mean 4.87 vs. 1.91, P &lt; .001), and as a more effective testing method (mean 4.57 vs. 3.96, P &lt; .001). First-professional year students preferred computer-based over traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a social and administrative science class, with the method of testing not perceived to impact grade. This finding is timely, given the recent required transitioning of all pharmacy classes and subsequent testing to an online format due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-1297
ispartof Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.819-825
issn 1877-1297
1877-1300
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536496059
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Computer-based
COVID-19
Online
Paper-and-pencil
Social and administrative pharmacy
Testing
title Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doctor%20of%20pharmacy%20student%20preferences%20for%20computer-based%20vs.%20paper-and-pencil%20testing%20in%20a,%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy%20course&rft.jtitle=Currents%20in%20pharmacy%20teaching%20and%20learning&rft.au=Franic,%20Duska%20M.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=819&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=819-825&rft.issn=1877-1297&rft.eissn=1877-1300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2536496059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536496059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1877129721000952&rfr_iscdi=true