Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey

Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2565-2570.e4
Hauptverfasser: Burke, Robert E., Phelan, Jessica, Cross, Dori, Werner, Rachel M., Adler-Milstein, Julia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2570.e4
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2565
container_title Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
container_volume 22
creator Burke, Robert E.
Phelan, Jessica
Cross, Dori
Werner, Rachel M.
Adler-Milstein, Julia
description Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-sectional survey. A total of 500 randomly selected Medicare-certified SNFs in the United States in 2019. The survey inquired about 12 care integration activities with the 2 highest volume referring hospitals for each SNF. We collapsed survey responses into 5 categories of integration based on high correlations between the individual measures. These were: (1) formal integration (co-location or co-ownership); (2) informal integration (eg, formal affiliation, participation in SNF collaborative, shared pay for performance, or clinical leadership meetings between hospital and SNF); (3) shared quality/safety activities (eg, initiatives to improve medication safety or reduce hospital admission); (4) shared care coordinators; and/or (5) shared supervising clinicians. We then conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between different care integration activities and hospital/SNF characteristics. Our overall response rate was 53.0%, including 265 SNFs that represented 487 SNF-hospital pairs. Informal integration was most common (in 53.3% of pairs), whereas shared clinicians (43.0%), care coordinators (36.5%), shared quality/safety activities (35.1%), and formal integration (7.4%) were present in a minority. Hospital-SNF pairs had lower odds of being formally integrated if the SNF was for-profit compared with not-for-profit [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03–0.42, adjusted P = .04)] and higher odds of sharing quality improvement activities in metropolitan rather than rural areas (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.80–9.17, adjusted P = .02) and in the Midwest compared with West (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.44–6.06, adjusted P = .049). These findings raise important questions about what is driving variability in hospital-SNF integration activities, and which activities may be most effective for improving transitional care outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536469596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525861021004692</els_id><sourcerecordid>2536469596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8b7deb9c8f707fe3036e8d2176103abfeffa6c7d892812dde6b1080f407bc96f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqFDaX1Cp8rGXpGN77TiVelhQKUgIDtBLL5Zjj5G32WRrO1vx75vdBY6cZg7vx8xDyCcGNQOmvq7qlV17W3PgrAZZA8g35IRJoatWNPLtbuey0orBMXmf8wqAA2vVO3IsFqA4W-gT8vtqKPiQbInjQJeuxG0sETM9w_IPcaCXY97EYvtM7eDp3Z_Y9-jpzZRyHB7ohXWx3xu-0SW92afYnt5NaYuPH8hRmI348Wmekl8XP-7PL6vr259X58vrygnZlkp3jceudTo00AQUIBRqz1kz3y1sFzAEq1zjdcs1496j6hhoCAtoOteqIE7Jl0PuJo1_J8zFrGN22Pd2wHHKhkuhFqqVrZql4iB1acw5YTCbFNc2PRoGZgfVrMweqtlBNSDNDHV2fX4qmLo1-hfPM8VZ8P0gwPnNbcRksos4OPQxoSvGj_HVgv-7UonP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536469596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burke, Robert E. ; Phelan, Jessica ; Cross, Dori ; Werner, Rachel M. ; Adler-Milstein, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Burke, Robert E. ; Phelan, Jessica ; Cross, Dori ; Werner, Rachel M. ; Adler-Milstein, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-sectional survey. A total of 500 randomly selected Medicare-certified SNFs in the United States in 2019. The survey inquired about 12 care integration activities with the 2 highest volume referring hospitals for each SNF. We collapsed survey responses into 5 categories of integration based on high correlations between the individual measures. These were: (1) formal integration (co-location or co-ownership); (2) informal integration (eg, formal affiliation, participation in SNF collaborative, shared pay for performance, or clinical leadership meetings between hospital and SNF); (3) shared quality/safety activities (eg, initiatives to improve medication safety or reduce hospital admission); (4) shared care coordinators; and/or (5) shared supervising clinicians. We then conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between different care integration activities and hospital/SNF characteristics. Our overall response rate was 53.0%, including 265 SNFs that represented 487 SNF-hospital pairs. Informal integration was most common (in 53.3% of pairs), whereas shared clinicians (43.0%), care coordinators (36.5%), shared quality/safety activities (35.1%), and formal integration (7.4%) were present in a minority. Hospital-SNF pairs had lower odds of being formally integrated if the SNF was for-profit compared with not-for-profit [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03–0.42, adjusted P = .04)] and higher odds of sharing quality improvement activities in metropolitan rather than rural areas (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.80–9.17, adjusted P = .02) and in the Midwest compared with West (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.44–6.06, adjusted P = .049). These findings raise important questions about what is driving variability in hospital-SNF integration activities, and which activities may be most effective for improving transitional care outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34062148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; care transitions ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Hospital ; Hospitals ; Humans ; integration ; Medicare ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Readmission ; post-acute care ; Reimbursement, Incentive ; Skilled Nursing Facilities ; skilled nursing facility ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2565-2570.e4</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8b7deb9c8f707fe3036e8d2176103abfeffa6c7d892812dde6b1080f407bc96f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8b7deb9c8f707fe3036e8d2176103abfeffa6c7d892812dde6b1080f407bc96f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861021004692$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burke, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Dori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler-Milstein, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description>Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-sectional survey. A total of 500 randomly selected Medicare-certified SNFs in the United States in 2019. The survey inquired about 12 care integration activities with the 2 highest volume referring hospitals for each SNF. We collapsed survey responses into 5 categories of integration based on high correlations between the individual measures. These were: (1) formal integration (co-location or co-ownership); (2) informal integration (eg, formal affiliation, participation in SNF collaborative, shared pay for performance, or clinical leadership meetings between hospital and SNF); (3) shared quality/safety activities (eg, initiatives to improve medication safety or reduce hospital admission); (4) shared care coordinators; and/or (5) shared supervising clinicians. We then conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between different care integration activities and hospital/SNF characteristics. Our overall response rate was 53.0%, including 265 SNFs that represented 487 SNF-hospital pairs. Informal integration was most common (in 53.3% of pairs), whereas shared clinicians (43.0%), care coordinators (36.5%), shared quality/safety activities (35.1%), and formal integration (7.4%) were present in a minority. Hospital-SNF pairs had lower odds of being formally integrated if the SNF was for-profit compared with not-for-profit [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03–0.42, adjusted P = .04)] and higher odds of sharing quality improvement activities in metropolitan rather than rural areas (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.80–9.17, adjusted P = .02) and in the Midwest compared with West (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.44–6.06, adjusted P = .049). These findings raise important questions about what is driving variability in hospital-SNF integration activities, and which activities may be most effective for improving transitional care outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>care transitions</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>integration</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>post-acute care</subject><subject>Reimbursement, Incentive</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities</subject><subject>skilled nursing facility</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqFDaX1Cp8rGXpGN77TiVelhQKUgIDtBLL5Zjj5G32WRrO1vx75vdBY6cZg7vx8xDyCcGNQOmvq7qlV17W3PgrAZZA8g35IRJoatWNPLtbuey0orBMXmf8wqAA2vVO3IsFqA4W-gT8vtqKPiQbInjQJeuxG0sETM9w_IPcaCXY97EYvtM7eDp3Z_Y9-jpzZRyHB7ohXWx3xu-0SW92afYnt5NaYuPH8hRmI348Wmekl8XP-7PL6vr259X58vrygnZlkp3jceudTo00AQUIBRqz1kz3y1sFzAEq1zjdcs1496j6hhoCAtoOteqIE7Jl0PuJo1_J8zFrGN22Pd2wHHKhkuhFqqVrZql4iB1acw5YTCbFNc2PRoGZgfVrMweqtlBNSDNDHV2fX4qmLo1-hfPM8VZ8P0gwPnNbcRksos4OPQxoSvGj_HVgv-7UonP</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Burke, Robert E.</creator><creator>Phelan, Jessica</creator><creator>Cross, Dori</creator><creator>Werner, Rachel M.</creator><creator>Adler-Milstein, Julia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey</title><author>Burke, Robert E. ; Phelan, Jessica ; Cross, Dori ; Werner, Rachel M. ; Adler-Milstein, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8b7deb9c8f707fe3036e8d2176103abfeffa6c7d892812dde6b1080f407bc96f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>care transitions</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>integration</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>post-acute care</topic><topic>Reimbursement, Incentive</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities</topic><topic>skilled nursing facility</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burke, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Dori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler-Milstein, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burke, Robert E.</au><au>Phelan, Jessica</au><au>Cross, Dori</au><au>Werner, Rachel M.</au><au>Adler-Milstein, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2565</spage><epage>2570.e4</epage><pages>2565-2570.e4</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract>Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-sectional survey. A total of 500 randomly selected Medicare-certified SNFs in the United States in 2019. The survey inquired about 12 care integration activities with the 2 highest volume referring hospitals for each SNF. We collapsed survey responses into 5 categories of integration based on high correlations between the individual measures. These were: (1) formal integration (co-location or co-ownership); (2) informal integration (eg, formal affiliation, participation in SNF collaborative, shared pay for performance, or clinical leadership meetings between hospital and SNF); (3) shared quality/safety activities (eg, initiatives to improve medication safety or reduce hospital admission); (4) shared care coordinators; and/or (5) shared supervising clinicians. We then conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between different care integration activities and hospital/SNF characteristics. Our overall response rate was 53.0%, including 265 SNFs that represented 487 SNF-hospital pairs. Informal integration was most common (in 53.3% of pairs), whereas shared clinicians (43.0%), care coordinators (36.5%), shared quality/safety activities (35.1%), and formal integration (7.4%) were present in a minority. Hospital-SNF pairs had lower odds of being formally integrated if the SNF was for-profit compared with not-for-profit [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03–0.42, adjusted P = .04)] and higher odds of sharing quality improvement activities in metropolitan rather than rural areas (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.80–9.17, adjusted P = .02) and in the Midwest compared with West (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.44–6.06, adjusted P = .049). These findings raise important questions about what is driving variability in hospital-SNF integration activities, and which activities may be most effective for improving transitional care outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34062148</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-8610
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2565-2570.e4
issn 1525-8610
1538-9375
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536469596
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
care transitions
Cross-Sectional Studies
Hospital
Hospitals
Humans
integration
Medicare
Patient Discharge
Patient Readmission
post-acute care
Reimbursement, Incentive
Skilled Nursing Facilities
skilled nursing facility
United States
title Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20Activities%20Between%20Hospitals%20and%20Skilled%20Nursing%20Facilities:%20A%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Burke,%20Robert%20E.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2565&rft.epage=2570.e4&rft.pages=2565-2570.e4&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2536469596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536469596&rft_id=info:pmid/34062148&rft_els_id=S1525861021004692&rfr_iscdi=true