Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review

Relational continuity of care (COC) is becoming an important concept related to improving healthcare quality, reducing medical costs and increasing patient satisfaction with primary care. While community pharmacy (CP) has a considerable role in primary care, there are few reports dedicated to the ro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health & social care in the community 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.e39-e50
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Eunyoung, Lee, Iyn‐Hyang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e50
container_issue 1
container_start_page e39
container_title Health & social care in the community
container_volume 30
creator Choi, Eunyoung
Lee, Iyn‐Hyang
description Relational continuity of care (COC) is becoming an important concept related to improving healthcare quality, reducing medical costs and increasing patient satisfaction with primary care. While community pharmacy (CP) has a considerable role in primary care, there are few reports dedicated to the role of relational COC in CP. This study reviewed the existing evidence of relational COC in CP and its effect on patients. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant studies from the date of database inception through to January 2021, which were appraised according to eligibility criteria. There were no limitations on the primary outcome or language. Case reports and studies without control groups were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. Database searches identified 13 records. Relational COC measures in the included studies were grouped in three kinds; pharmacy‐visiting pattern, Continuity of Care Index and loyalty. The assessed outcomes were medication adherence behaviour (e.g., the proportion of days covered, medication possession ratio), adverse drug reactions, potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and clinical outcomes. The odds of patients adhering to their medication regimen were about 1.1~2.5 times higher among those who consistently visited a single pharmacy compared to patients visiting multiple pharmacies. Additionally, the care provision with a high level of relational continuity could lower inappropriate drug use by 21~32 per cent and the use of other costly services by 12~29 per cent. This study suggests that a high degree of relational COC in CP could improve safe use of medications among patients. Future research is needed to employ more rigorous methods to reduce heterogeneity and to measure effects on clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hsc.13428
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2535827706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618221222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-ceecc3dc4144c3a0d44dd5351d5adffc5ce5899d04973c60ba095a8ccfe5c7223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAEJuNFF7FyTibtS1AoFwct6mJ5M6JRc6kxiyds7vehC8GwO_Hzng_MjdEnwHQkzXnq4I4xTeYSGhCUipoLyYzTEWZLEmBM8QGferzAmjOL0FA0YxwkmKR6i2aspdWubWpcRNHVr6862fdQUEWhnIluHtKq6ehuul9pVGvr7aBL53remCpcQOfNlzeYcnRS69ObisEfo4_HhfTqL5y9Pz9PJPAYmpYzBGACWAyecA9M45zzPBRMkFzovChBghMyyHPMsZZDghcaZ0BKgMAJSStkI3ey9a9d8dsa3qrIeTFnq2jSdVzTIJE1TnAT0-g-6ajoXPg1UQiSlhO6Et3sKXOO9M4VaO1tp1yuC1bZeFepVu3oDe3UwdovK5L_kT58BGO-BjS1N_79Jzd6me-U36J-Dyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618221222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Choi, Eunyoung ; Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eunyoung ; Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</creatorcontrib><description>Relational continuity of care (COC) is becoming an important concept related to improving healthcare quality, reducing medical costs and increasing patient satisfaction with primary care. While community pharmacy (CP) has a considerable role in primary care, there are few reports dedicated to the role of relational COC in CP. This study reviewed the existing evidence of relational COC in CP and its effect on patients. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant studies from the date of database inception through to January 2021, which were appraised according to eligibility criteria. There were no limitations on the primary outcome or language. Case reports and studies without control groups were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. Database searches identified 13 records. Relational COC measures in the included studies were grouped in three kinds; pharmacy‐visiting pattern, Continuity of Care Index and loyalty. The assessed outcomes were medication adherence behaviour (e.g., the proportion of days covered, medication possession ratio), adverse drug reactions, potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and clinical outcomes. The odds of patients adhering to their medication regimen were about 1.1~2.5 times higher among those who consistently visited a single pharmacy compared to patients visiting multiple pharmacies. Additionally, the care provision with a high level of relational continuity could lower inappropriate drug use by 21~32 per cent and the use of other costly services by 12~29 per cent. This study suggests that a high degree of relational COC in CP could improve safe use of medications among patients. Future research is needed to employ more rigorous methods to reduce heterogeneity and to measure effects on clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13428</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34060170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Community pharmacists ; community pharmacy ; Continuity of care ; continuity of care index ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Critical incidents ; Databases, Factual ; Drug abuse ; Drug Prescriptions ; Drugs ; Health care expenditures ; Health services ; Humans ; Inappropriateness ; Loyalty ; Medication Adherence ; Medicine ; Patient compliance ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Pharmacies ; Pharmacy ; Prescribing ; Primary care ; Quality assessment ; Quality of care ; rational continuity of care ; Systematic review ; Treatment outcomes</subject><ispartof>Health &amp; social care in the community, 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.e39-e50</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-ceecc3dc4144c3a0d44dd5351d5adffc5ce5899d04973c60ba095a8ccfe5c7223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-ceecc3dc4144c3a0d44dd5351d5adffc5ce5899d04973c60ba095a8ccfe5c7223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4244-3008 ; 0000-0001-6644-0808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhsc.13428$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhsc.13428$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,30986,33761,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</creatorcontrib><title>Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review</title><title>Health &amp; social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Relational continuity of care (COC) is becoming an important concept related to improving healthcare quality, reducing medical costs and increasing patient satisfaction with primary care. While community pharmacy (CP) has a considerable role in primary care, there are few reports dedicated to the role of relational COC in CP. This study reviewed the existing evidence of relational COC in CP and its effect on patients. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant studies from the date of database inception through to January 2021, which were appraised according to eligibility criteria. There were no limitations on the primary outcome or language. Case reports and studies without control groups were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. Database searches identified 13 records. Relational COC measures in the included studies were grouped in three kinds; pharmacy‐visiting pattern, Continuity of Care Index and loyalty. The assessed outcomes were medication adherence behaviour (e.g., the proportion of days covered, medication possession ratio), adverse drug reactions, potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and clinical outcomes. The odds of patients adhering to their medication regimen were about 1.1~2.5 times higher among those who consistently visited a single pharmacy compared to patients visiting multiple pharmacies. Additionally, the care provision with a high level of relational continuity could lower inappropriate drug use by 21~32 per cent and the use of other costly services by 12~29 per cent. This study suggests that a high degree of relational COC in CP could improve safe use of medications among patients. Future research is needed to employ more rigorous methods to reduce heterogeneity and to measure effects on clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Community pharmacists</subject><subject>community pharmacy</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>continuity of care index</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Critical incidents</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inappropriateness</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Medication Adherence</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacies</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Prescribing</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>rational continuity of care</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment outcomes</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAEJuNFF7FyTibtS1AoFwct6mJ5M6JRc6kxiyds7vehC8GwO_Hzng_MjdEnwHQkzXnq4I4xTeYSGhCUipoLyYzTEWZLEmBM8QGferzAmjOL0FA0YxwkmKR6i2aspdWubWpcRNHVr6862fdQUEWhnIluHtKq6ehuul9pVGvr7aBL53remCpcQOfNlzeYcnRS69ObisEfo4_HhfTqL5y9Pz9PJPAYmpYzBGACWAyecA9M45zzPBRMkFzovChBghMyyHPMsZZDghcaZ0BKgMAJSStkI3ey9a9d8dsa3qrIeTFnq2jSdVzTIJE1TnAT0-g-6ajoXPg1UQiSlhO6Et3sKXOO9M4VaO1tp1yuC1bZeFepVu3oDe3UwdovK5L_kT58BGO-BjS1N_79Jzd6me-U36J-Dyg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Choi, Eunyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-3008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-0808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review</title><author>Choi, Eunyoung ; Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-ceecc3dc4144c3a0d44dd5351d5adffc5ce5899d04973c60ba095a8ccfe5c7223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Community pharmacists</topic><topic>community pharmacy</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>continuity of care index</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Critical incidents</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inappropriateness</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Medication Adherence</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacies</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Prescribing</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>rational continuity of care</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eunyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Eunyoung</au><au>Lee, Iyn‐Hyang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e39</spage><epage>e50</epage><pages>e39-e50</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Relational continuity of care (COC) is becoming an important concept related to improving healthcare quality, reducing medical costs and increasing patient satisfaction with primary care. While community pharmacy (CP) has a considerable role in primary care, there are few reports dedicated to the role of relational COC in CP. This study reviewed the existing evidence of relational COC in CP and its effect on patients. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant studies from the date of database inception through to January 2021, which were appraised according to eligibility criteria. There were no limitations on the primary outcome or language. Case reports and studies without control groups were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. Database searches identified 13 records. Relational COC measures in the included studies were grouped in three kinds; pharmacy‐visiting pattern, Continuity of Care Index and loyalty. The assessed outcomes were medication adherence behaviour (e.g., the proportion of days covered, medication possession ratio), adverse drug reactions, potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and clinical outcomes. The odds of patients adhering to their medication regimen were about 1.1~2.5 times higher among those who consistently visited a single pharmacy compared to patients visiting multiple pharmacies. Additionally, the care provision with a high level of relational continuity could lower inappropriate drug use by 21~32 per cent and the use of other costly services by 12~29 per cent. This study suggests that a high degree of relational COC in CP could improve safe use of medications among patients. Future research is needed to employ more rigorous methods to reduce heterogeneity and to measure effects on clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>34060170</pmid><doi>10.1111/hsc.13428</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-3008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-0808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-0410
ispartof Health & social care in the community, 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.e39-e50
issn 0966-0410
1365-2524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2535827706
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Clinical outcomes
Community pharmacists
community pharmacy
Continuity of care
continuity of care index
Continuity of Patient Care
Critical incidents
Databases, Factual
Drug abuse
Drug Prescriptions
Drugs
Health care expenditures
Health services
Humans
Inappropriateness
Loyalty
Medication Adherence
Medicine
Patient compliance
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Pharmacies
Pharmacy
Prescribing
Primary care
Quality assessment
Quality of care
rational continuity of care
Systematic review
Treatment outcomes
title Relational continuity of care in community pharmacy: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A34%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relational%20continuity%20of%20care%20in%20community%20pharmacy:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Choi,%20Eunyoung&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e39&rft.epage=e50&rft.pages=e39-e50&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hsc.13428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618221222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618221222&rft_id=info:pmid/34060170&rfr_iscdi=true