Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task

Wang et al. ( Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2021-11, Vol.83 (8), p.3146-3161
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Mengsi, Blythe, Hazel I., Liversedge, Simon P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3161
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3146
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 83
creator Wang, Mengsi
Blythe, Hazel I.
Liversedge, Simon P.
description Wang et al. ( Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate of learning high-frequency (HF) targets were greater than that of learning low-frequency (LF) targets. In a subsequent scanning session, participants were required to scan text-like Landolt-C strings to detect whether any pre-learnt target was embedded in the strings. The Landolt-C strings were displayed under different spacing formats (i.e., spaced format, unspaced format, and unspaced shaded format). However, the simulated exposure frequency effect did not occur in the scanning session. Wang et al. argued one straightforward reason for this might be because participants failed to maintain the memory of pre-learnt target to the scanning session. In the current study, we employed the same learning and scanning paradigm to investigate whether exposure frequency would occur in a target search task by using easier learning materials – pseudoword stimuli. The learning of pseudoword stimuli was much more successful than Landolt-C stimuli. Interestingly, however, we found a very different rate of learning effect such that the rate of learning LF targets was greater than HF targets. To our surprise, we did not find any influence of exposure frequency on eye movements during scanning even when participants were able to identify pre-learnt pseudowords in strings. Learning rate effect, exposure frequency effects, and saccadic targeting during the scanning of strings under different spacing formats are discussed in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532258270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2532258270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51be55826f419534ff6b0cea6c42ddb800f0800bf3034aa376c4df31d31e27a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO3TAQjaoilV74ga4ssekmre1xXt0hdGkrIXUDEjvL1xlDaGKnngR6v6S_i0NKkbpgYXvGc86Z0Zws-yD4J6iK-jMJUELlXIp0QMqcv8kORaMghwau3_6LpXiXvSe647yEsuKH2Z_tHvMh3OOAfmI2-CmGnrVz7PwN69FEvwTGt4ys8U9JcGzrb_qObtlIOLfhIcRUnrph7rsvbPt7DDRHZC7irxm93TN0Du1Eq8xo7KLy_Nd5Zth9R7PpGaV-9pZNhn4eZQfO9ITHf99NdnW-vTz7ll_8-Pr97PQit6CqKS_EDouilqVToilAOVfuuEVTWiXbdldz7ni6dg44KGOgSoXWgWhBoKxMA5vs46o7xpCmpUkPHVnse-MxzKRlkbaZGlQ8QU_-g96FOfo0XULVtWok1AtKrigbA1FEp8fYDSbuteB68UqvXunklX7ySi8kWEk0LovH-CL9CusRlVuZtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588492380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wang, Mengsi ; Blythe, Hazel I. ; Liversedge, Simon P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengsi ; Blythe, Hazel I. ; Liversedge, Simon P.</creatorcontrib><description>Wang et al. ( Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate of learning high-frequency (HF) targets were greater than that of learning low-frequency (LF) targets. In a subsequent scanning session, participants were required to scan text-like Landolt-C strings to detect whether any pre-learnt target was embedded in the strings. The Landolt-C strings were displayed under different spacing formats (i.e., spaced format, unspaced format, and unspaced shaded format). However, the simulated exposure frequency effect did not occur in the scanning session. Wang et al. argued one straightforward reason for this might be because participants failed to maintain the memory of pre-learnt target to the scanning session. In the current study, we employed the same learning and scanning paradigm to investigate whether exposure frequency would occur in a target search task by using easier learning materials – pseudoword stimuli. The learning of pseudoword stimuli was much more successful than Landolt-C stimuli. Interestingly, however, we found a very different rate of learning effect such that the rate of learning LF targets was greater than HF targets. To our surprise, we did not find any influence of exposure frequency on eye movements during scanning even when participants were able to identify pre-learnt pseudowords in strings. Learning rate effect, exposure frequency effects, and saccadic targeting during the scanning of strings under different spacing formats are discussed in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alphabets ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Chinese languages ; Cognitive Psychology ; Experiments ; Eye movements ; Instructional Materials ; Language Processing ; Learning ; Linguistics ; Memory ; Nonwords ; Phonemes ; Phonology ; Psychology ; Reading ; Stimuli ; Word Frequency</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2021-11, Vol.83 (8), p.3146-3161</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51be55826f419534ff6b0cea6c42ddb800f0800bf3034aa376c4df31d31e27a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2707-8652</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blythe, Hazel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liversedge, Simon P.</creatorcontrib><title>Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Wang et al. ( Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate of learning high-frequency (HF) targets were greater than that of learning low-frequency (LF) targets. In a subsequent scanning session, participants were required to scan text-like Landolt-C strings to detect whether any pre-learnt target was embedded in the strings. The Landolt-C strings were displayed under different spacing formats (i.e., spaced format, unspaced format, and unspaced shaded format). However, the simulated exposure frequency effect did not occur in the scanning session. Wang et al. argued one straightforward reason for this might be because participants failed to maintain the memory of pre-learnt target to the scanning session. In the current study, we employed the same learning and scanning paradigm to investigate whether exposure frequency would occur in a target search task by using easier learning materials – pseudoword stimuli. The learning of pseudoword stimuli was much more successful than Landolt-C stimuli. Interestingly, however, we found a very different rate of learning effect such that the rate of learning LF targets was greater than HF targets. To our surprise, we did not find any influence of exposure frequency on eye movements during scanning even when participants were able to identify pre-learnt pseudowords in strings. Learning rate effect, exposure frequency effects, and saccadic targeting during the scanning of strings under different spacing formats are discussed in this paper.</description><subject>Alphabets</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Nonwords</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctO3TAQjaoilV74ga4ssekmre1xXt0hdGkrIXUDEjvL1xlDaGKnngR6v6S_i0NKkbpgYXvGc86Z0Zws-yD4J6iK-jMJUELlXIp0QMqcv8kORaMghwau3_6LpXiXvSe647yEsuKH2Z_tHvMh3OOAfmI2-CmGnrVz7PwN69FEvwTGt4ys8U9JcGzrb_qObtlIOLfhIcRUnrph7rsvbPt7DDRHZC7irxm93TN0Du1Eq8xo7KLy_Nd5Zth9R7PpGaV-9pZNhn4eZQfO9ITHf99NdnW-vTz7ll_8-Pr97PQit6CqKS_EDouilqVToilAOVfuuEVTWiXbdldz7ni6dg44KGOgSoXWgWhBoKxMA5vs46o7xpCmpUkPHVnse-MxzKRlkbaZGlQ8QU_-g96FOfo0XULVtWok1AtKrigbA1FEp8fYDSbuteB68UqvXunklX7ySi8kWEk0LovH-CL9CusRlVuZtw</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Wang, Mengsi</creator><creator>Blythe, Hazel I.</creator><creator>Liversedge, Simon P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-8652</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task</title><author>Wang, Mengsi ; Blythe, Hazel I. ; Liversedge, Simon P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51be55826f419534ff6b0cea6c42ddb800f0800bf3034aa376c4df31d31e27a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alphabets</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Nonwords</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blythe, Hazel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liversedge, Simon P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Mengsi</au><au>Blythe, Hazel I.</au><au>Liversedge, Simon P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3146</spage><epage>3161</epage><pages>3146-3161</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Wang et al. ( Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, in press, 2021) reported a Landolt-C learning and scanning experiment. In a learning session, they simulated exposure frequency effects successfully by training participants to learn target Landolt-C clusters with different exposures. The rate of learning high-frequency (HF) targets were greater than that of learning low-frequency (LF) targets. In a subsequent scanning session, participants were required to scan text-like Landolt-C strings to detect whether any pre-learnt target was embedded in the strings. The Landolt-C strings were displayed under different spacing formats (i.e., spaced format, unspaced format, and unspaced shaded format). However, the simulated exposure frequency effect did not occur in the scanning session. Wang et al. argued one straightforward reason for this might be because participants failed to maintain the memory of pre-learnt target to the scanning session. In the current study, we employed the same learning and scanning paradigm to investigate whether exposure frequency would occur in a target search task by using easier learning materials – pseudoword stimuli. The learning of pseudoword stimuli was much more successful than Landolt-C stimuli. Interestingly, however, we found a very different rate of learning effect such that the rate of learning LF targets was greater than HF targets. To our surprise, we did not find any influence of exposure frequency on eye movements during scanning even when participants were able to identify pre-learnt pseudowords in strings. Learning rate effect, exposure frequency effects, and saccadic targeting during the scanning of strings under different spacing formats are discussed in this paper.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-8652</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021-11, Vol.83 (8), p.3146-3161
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532258270
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alphabets
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Chinese languages
Cognitive Psychology
Experiments
Eye movements
Instructional Materials
Language Processing
Learning
Linguistics
Memory
Nonwords
Phonemes
Phonology
Psychology
Reading
Stimuli
Word Frequency
title Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of English pseudoword stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye-movement%20control%20during%20learning%20and%20scanning%20of%20English%20pseudoword%20stimuli:%20Exposure%20frequency%20effects%20and%20spacing%20effects%20in%20a%20visual%20search%20task&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Wang,%20Mengsi&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3146&rft.epage=3161&rft.pages=3146-3161&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-021-02322-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2532258270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588492380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true