Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities. We eval...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2021-09, Vol.61 (5), p.e132-e141
Hauptverfasser: Gundrum, Danielle, Brown, Kelsey, Collingridge, Dave S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e141
container_issue 5
container_start_page e132
container_title Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
container_volume 61
creator Gundrum, Danielle
Brown, Kelsey
Collingridge, Dave S.
description The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy technicians performing chemotherapy second checks at an outpatient infusion clinic. Intermountain Medical Center is a Level 1 Trauma Center. The infusion clinic treats a variety of oncology indications, with solid organ tumors being most prevalent. At Intermountain Healthcare, a second pharmacist reverifies all chemotherapy orders for accuracy of drug, dose, preparation, and administration instructions. Pharmacy technicians are in a unique position to assist with chemotherapy second checks because they are already knowledgeable in compounding and reviewing chemotherapy. This would be particularly useful in rural settings where staffing is sparse. This was a single-center prospective analysis of chemotherapy second-check processes at an outpatient infusion clinic. Once chemotherapy orders were sent to the infusion clinic, first and second checks were completed to verify the correct patient, medication(s), dose calculations, diluents, administration rates, volumes, and other instructions. The chemotherapy first checks were completed by a pharmacist. The second checks were completed by a second pharmacist and a chemotherapy-trained certified pharmacy technician. The second checks by the pharmacist and technician were compared to determine if they were in agreement regarding error identification. Any disagreements found between the 2 second checks or between the first check and either of the second checks were discussed before compounding. We evaluated whether a chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician could identify the same errors as a pharmacist. The Cohen kappa test was used to determine rater agreement between the pharmacist and technician second checks. The kappa value measure of inter-rater reliability between pharmacist and chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician was excellent (kappa = 0.88, P < 0.001). They agreed 96.8% of the time, with technicians correctly identifying more errors. This project illustrates that chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technicians may be capable of performing chemotherapy second checks as accurately as pharmacists.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531543204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1544319121001679</els_id><sourcerecordid>2531543204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-df9971cb5dc6663d29ed5174767dca5ded6f18b6eb7e2a01a415f96ca8d5adc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwBZg8siTYjuMkEguq-CdVYgGJzXKeXxSHJg52WqnfnpTCyvRuuDu9-xFyzVnKGVe3XdqZsU0FEzxlMmVcnJAFz6VMMpmz0z_NK35OLmLsGBOFqsoF-Vi12PupxWDGPfXBYqARwQ-WQovwSc2sMAQfqHUR_A7DngYzYaT1no6tCb0BF6f4Y5wQ2sGBM0O8JGeN2US8-r1L8v748LZ6TtavTy-r-3UCQpZTYpuqKjjUuQWlVGZFhTbnhSxUYcHkFq1qeFkrrAsUhnEjed5UCkxpc2OBZUtyc-wdg__aYpx0P_-Jm40Z0G-jFnk2b88Ek7NVHK0QfIwBGz0G15uw15zpA0bd6QNGfcComdQzxjl0dwzhPGLnMOgIDgdA6wLCpK13_8W_AQgEfWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531543204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gundrum, Danielle ; Brown, Kelsey ; Collingridge, Dave S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gundrum, Danielle ; Brown, Kelsey ; Collingridge, Dave S.</creatorcontrib><description>The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy technicians performing chemotherapy second checks at an outpatient infusion clinic. Intermountain Medical Center is a Level 1 Trauma Center. The infusion clinic treats a variety of oncology indications, with solid organ tumors being most prevalent. At Intermountain Healthcare, a second pharmacist reverifies all chemotherapy orders for accuracy of drug, dose, preparation, and administration instructions. Pharmacy technicians are in a unique position to assist with chemotherapy second checks because they are already knowledgeable in compounding and reviewing chemotherapy. This would be particularly useful in rural settings where staffing is sparse. This was a single-center prospective analysis of chemotherapy second-check processes at an outpatient infusion clinic. Once chemotherapy orders were sent to the infusion clinic, first and second checks were completed to verify the correct patient, medication(s), dose calculations, diluents, administration rates, volumes, and other instructions. The chemotherapy first checks were completed by a pharmacist. The second checks were completed by a second pharmacist and a chemotherapy-trained certified pharmacy technician. The second checks by the pharmacist and technician were compared to determine if they were in agreement regarding error identification. Any disagreements found between the 2 second checks or between the first check and either of the second checks were discussed before compounding. We evaluated whether a chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician could identify the same errors as a pharmacist. The Cohen kappa test was used to determine rater agreement between the pharmacist and technician second checks. The kappa value measure of inter-rater reliability between pharmacist and chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician was excellent (kappa = 0.88, P &lt; 0.001). They agreed 96.8% of the time, with technicians correctly identifying more errors. This project illustrates that chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technicians may be capable of performing chemotherapy second checks as accurately as pharmacists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2021-09, Vol.61 (5), p.e132-e141</ispartof><rights>2021 American Pharmacists Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-df9971cb5dc6663d29ed5174767dca5ded6f18b6eb7e2a01a415f96ca8d5adc03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-df9971cb5dc6663d29ed5174767dca5ded6f18b6eb7e2a01a415f96ca8d5adc03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gundrum, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collingridge, Dave S.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians</title><title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</title><description>The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy technicians performing chemotherapy second checks at an outpatient infusion clinic. Intermountain Medical Center is a Level 1 Trauma Center. The infusion clinic treats a variety of oncology indications, with solid organ tumors being most prevalent. At Intermountain Healthcare, a second pharmacist reverifies all chemotherapy orders for accuracy of drug, dose, preparation, and administration instructions. Pharmacy technicians are in a unique position to assist with chemotherapy second checks because they are already knowledgeable in compounding and reviewing chemotherapy. This would be particularly useful in rural settings where staffing is sparse. This was a single-center prospective analysis of chemotherapy second-check processes at an outpatient infusion clinic. Once chemotherapy orders were sent to the infusion clinic, first and second checks were completed to verify the correct patient, medication(s), dose calculations, diluents, administration rates, volumes, and other instructions. The chemotherapy first checks were completed by a pharmacist. The second checks were completed by a second pharmacist and a chemotherapy-trained certified pharmacy technician. The second checks by the pharmacist and technician were compared to determine if they were in agreement regarding error identification. Any disagreements found between the 2 second checks or between the first check and either of the second checks were discussed before compounding. We evaluated whether a chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician could identify the same errors as a pharmacist. The Cohen kappa test was used to determine rater agreement between the pharmacist and technician second checks. The kappa value measure of inter-rater reliability between pharmacist and chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician was excellent (kappa = 0.88, P &lt; 0.001). They agreed 96.8% of the time, with technicians correctly identifying more errors. This project illustrates that chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technicians may be capable of performing chemotherapy second checks as accurately as pharmacists.</description><issn>1544-3191</issn><issn>1544-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwBZg8siTYjuMkEguq-CdVYgGJzXKeXxSHJg52WqnfnpTCyvRuuDu9-xFyzVnKGVe3XdqZsU0FEzxlMmVcnJAFz6VMMpmz0z_NK35OLmLsGBOFqsoF-Vi12PupxWDGPfXBYqARwQ-WQovwSc2sMAQfqHUR_A7DngYzYaT1no6tCb0BF6f4Y5wQ2sGBM0O8JGeN2US8-r1L8v748LZ6TtavTy-r-3UCQpZTYpuqKjjUuQWlVGZFhTbnhSxUYcHkFq1qeFkrrAsUhnEjed5UCkxpc2OBZUtyc-wdg__aYpx0P_-Jm40Z0G-jFnk2b88Ek7NVHK0QfIwBGz0G15uw15zpA0bd6QNGfcComdQzxjl0dwzhPGLnMOgIDgdA6wLCpK13_8W_AQgEfWo</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Gundrum, Danielle</creator><creator>Brown, Kelsey</creator><creator>Collingridge, Dave S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians</title><author>Gundrum, Danielle ; Brown, Kelsey ; Collingridge, Dave S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-df9971cb5dc6663d29ed5174767dca5ded6f18b6eb7e2a01a415f96ca8d5adc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gundrum, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collingridge, Dave S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gundrum, Danielle</au><au>Brown, Kelsey</au><au>Collingridge, Dave S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e132</spage><epage>e141</epage><pages>e132-e141</pages><issn>1544-3191</issn><eissn>1544-3450</eissn><abstract>The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy technicians performing chemotherapy second checks at an outpatient infusion clinic. Intermountain Medical Center is a Level 1 Trauma Center. The infusion clinic treats a variety of oncology indications, with solid organ tumors being most prevalent. At Intermountain Healthcare, a second pharmacist reverifies all chemotherapy orders for accuracy of drug, dose, preparation, and administration instructions. Pharmacy technicians are in a unique position to assist with chemotherapy second checks because they are already knowledgeable in compounding and reviewing chemotherapy. This would be particularly useful in rural settings where staffing is sparse. This was a single-center prospective analysis of chemotherapy second-check processes at an outpatient infusion clinic. Once chemotherapy orders were sent to the infusion clinic, first and second checks were completed to verify the correct patient, medication(s), dose calculations, diluents, administration rates, volumes, and other instructions. The chemotherapy first checks were completed by a pharmacist. The second checks were completed by a second pharmacist and a chemotherapy-trained certified pharmacy technician. The second checks by the pharmacist and technician were compared to determine if they were in agreement regarding error identification. Any disagreements found between the 2 second checks or between the first check and either of the second checks were discussed before compounding. We evaluated whether a chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician could identify the same errors as a pharmacist. The Cohen kappa test was used to determine rater agreement between the pharmacist and technician second checks. The kappa value measure of inter-rater reliability between pharmacist and chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician was excellent (kappa = 0.88, P &lt; 0.001). They agreed 96.8% of the time, with technicians correctly identifying more errors. This project illustrates that chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technicians may be capable of performing chemotherapy second checks as accurately as pharmacists.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.012</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-3191
ispartof Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2021-09, Vol.61 (5), p.e132-e141
issn 1544-3191
1544-3450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531543204
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T20%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemotherapy%20order%20second%20check%20and%20error%20discovery%20rates%20by%20pharmacists%20and%20technicians&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Pharmacists%20Association&rft.au=Gundrum,%20Danielle&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e132&rft.epage=e141&rft.pages=e132-e141&rft.issn=1544-3191&rft.eissn=1544-3450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531543204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531543204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1544319121001679&rfr_iscdi=true