Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))
This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of voice 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 632.e28 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 632.e21 |
container_title | Journal of voice |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Kwong, Elaine Tsang, Ming-Long Celia |
description | This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)).
The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed.
The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P < 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively.
The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531541988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199721001156</els_id><sourcerecordid>2531541988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r20AQhpfSkrhp_kEpOjoHqbMftnYvhSDi2CTQS-vrsh-jZIUsubtSSP59ZOT22MsOyzzvDPMQ8pVCQYGuvzdF89IHhwUDRgvgBVD1gSyoLHkuVlJ-JAuQiuVUqfKSfE6pAQA2dS_IJRfAxFrJBWmq2KeUV2M7jNG02a03x8EMoe8y0_lsb9rg529fZ8MzZtu-e8oepievnkOHCbM9xnQG9r2bZmymwNOI2a7z-Jot95vdcvtwc_OFfKpNm_D6XK_I783dr2qbP_6831W3j7njazbk6xqF5w44WPDOrYChVbK0XlllXV3T0jLurBCyLpVRDKywwoCrmfLCq5pfkeU89xj7PyOmQR9Ccti2psN-TJqtOF0JqqScUDGj7mQhYq2PMRxMfNMU9MmybvRsWZ8sa-B6sjzFvp03jPaA_l_or9YJ-DEDON35EjDq5AJ2Dn2I6Abt-_D_De_D7o-Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531541988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)).
The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed.
The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P < 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively.
The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34024698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating ; Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28</ispartof><rights>2021 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199721001156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)).
The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed.
The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P < 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively.
The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</description><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r20AQhpfSkrhp_kEpOjoHqbMftnYvhSDi2CTQS-vrsh-jZIUsubtSSP59ZOT22MsOyzzvDPMQ8pVCQYGuvzdF89IHhwUDRgvgBVD1gSyoLHkuVlJ-JAuQiuVUqfKSfE6pAQA2dS_IJRfAxFrJBWmq2KeUV2M7jNG02a03x8EMoe8y0_lsb9rg529fZ8MzZtu-e8oepievnkOHCbM9xnQG9r2bZmymwNOI2a7z-Jot95vdcvtwc_OFfKpNm_D6XK_I783dr2qbP_6831W3j7njazbk6xqF5w44WPDOrYChVbK0XlllXV3T0jLurBCyLpVRDKywwoCrmfLCq5pfkeU89xj7PyOmQR9Ccti2psN-TJqtOF0JqqScUDGj7mQhYq2PMRxMfNMU9MmybvRsWZ8sa-B6sjzFvp03jPaA_l_or9YJ-DEDON35EjDq5AJ2Dn2I6Abt-_D_De_D7o-Z</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Kwong, Elaine</creator><creator>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><author>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwong, Elaine</au><au>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>632.e21</spage><epage>632.e28</epage><pages>632.e21-632.e28</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)).
The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed.
The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P < 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively.
The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34024698</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-1997 |
ispartof | Journal of voice, 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28 |
issn | 0892-1997 1873-4588 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531541988 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Cross-Cultural Comparison Hong Kong Humans Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Translating Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire Voice Disorders - diagnosis |
title | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK)) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A27%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-Cultural%20Adaptation%20and%20Validation%20of%20the%20Hong%20Kong-Chinese%20Version%20of%20Vocal%20Fatigue%20Index%20(VFI(HK))&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Kwong,%20Elaine&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=632.e21&rft.epage=632.e28&rft.pages=632.e21-632.e28&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531541988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531541988&rft_id=info:pmid/34024698&rft_els_id=S0892199721001156&rfr_iscdi=true |