Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))

This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28
Hauptverfasser: Kwong, Elaine, Tsang, Ming-Long Celia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 632.e28
container_issue 4
container_start_page 632.e21
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 37
creator Kwong, Elaine
Tsang, Ming-Long Celia
description This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed. The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P < 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively. The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531541988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199721001156</els_id><sourcerecordid>2531541988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r20AQhpfSkrhp_kEpOjoHqbMftnYvhSDi2CTQS-vrsh-jZIUsubtSSP59ZOT22MsOyzzvDPMQ8pVCQYGuvzdF89IHhwUDRgvgBVD1gSyoLHkuVlJ-JAuQiuVUqfKSfE6pAQA2dS_IJRfAxFrJBWmq2KeUV2M7jNG02a03x8EMoe8y0_lsb9rg529fZ8MzZtu-e8oepievnkOHCbM9xnQG9r2bZmymwNOI2a7z-Jot95vdcvtwc_OFfKpNm_D6XK_I783dr2qbP_6831W3j7njazbk6xqF5w44WPDOrYChVbK0XlllXV3T0jLurBCyLpVRDKywwoCrmfLCq5pfkeU89xj7PyOmQR9Ccti2psN-TJqtOF0JqqScUDGj7mQhYq2PMRxMfNMU9MmybvRsWZ8sa-B6sjzFvp03jPaA_l_or9YJ-DEDON35EjDq5AJ2Dn2I6Abt-_D_De_D7o-Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531541988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed. The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P &lt; 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively. The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34024698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating ; Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28</ispartof><rights>2021 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199721001156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed. The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P &lt; 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively. The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</description><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r20AQhpfSkrhp_kEpOjoHqbMftnYvhSDi2CTQS-vrsh-jZIUsubtSSP59ZOT22MsOyzzvDPMQ8pVCQYGuvzdF89IHhwUDRgvgBVD1gSyoLHkuVlJ-JAuQiuVUqfKSfE6pAQA2dS_IJRfAxFrJBWmq2KeUV2M7jNG02a03x8EMoe8y0_lsb9rg529fZ8MzZtu-e8oepievnkOHCbM9xnQG9r2bZmymwNOI2a7z-Jot95vdcvtwc_OFfKpNm_D6XK_I783dr2qbP_6831W3j7njazbk6xqF5w44WPDOrYChVbK0XlllXV3T0jLurBCyLpVRDKywwoCrmfLCq5pfkeU89xj7PyOmQR9Ccti2psN-TJqtOF0JqqScUDGj7mQhYq2PMRxMfNMU9MmybvRsWZ8sa-B6sjzFvp03jPaA_l_or9YJ-DEDON35EjDq5AJ2Dn2I6Abt-_D_De_D7o-Z</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Kwong, Elaine</creator><creator>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</title><author>Kwong, Elaine ; Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6fe4d3c030b0dcc502eb987bd9b9bcff17b23cb448f79a920b4b4a0cf29d4d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwong, Elaine</au><au>Tsang, Ming-Long Celia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>632.e21</spage><epage>632.e28</epage><pages>632.e21-632.e28</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hong Kong-Chinese version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI(HK)). The original English version of the Vocal fatigue index (VFI) was translated and adapted to the VFI(HK). A total of 206 subjects (87 in the Fatigue group and 119 in the Control group) completed the VFI(HK) and validity, reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analysed. The VFI(HK) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. It showed good content validity (scale-level content validity indices ≥ 0.842) and excellent internal consistency (Part 1: α = 0.945, Part 2: α = 0.914, Part 3: α = 0.951). Parts 1 and 2 of the questionnaire showed good construct validity (Part 1: t(204) = 5.743, P &lt; 0.001; Part 2: t(204) = 5.049, P &lt; 0.001). Test-retest reliability ranged from acceptable (Part 3: Ρ = 0.702) to good (Part 1: Ρ = 0.885, Part 2: Ρ = 0.827). ROC curves showed acceptable and close-to-acceptable intrinsic accuracies for Parts 1 (Aera under curve (AUC) = 0.712) and 2 (AUC = 0.694) respectively. Cutoff scores of 25 and 10 are suggested for Parts 1 and 2 respectively. The VFI(HK) is a valid and sensitive assessment tool. It may be adopted to identify individuals with vocal fatigue in the Hong Kong-Chinese population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34024698</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.632.e21-632.e28
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531541988
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cross-Cultural Comparison
Hong Kong
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translating
Vocal fatigue — Voice disorders — Vocal fatigue index (VFI) — Self-reported questionnaire
Voice Disorders - diagnosis
title Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI(HK))
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A27%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-Cultural%20Adaptation%20and%20Validation%20of%20the%20Hong%20Kong-Chinese%20Version%20of%20Vocal%20Fatigue%20Index%20(VFI(HK))&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Kwong,%20Elaine&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=632.e21&rft.epage=632.e28&rft.pages=632.e21-632.e28&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531541988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531541988&rft_id=info:pmid/34024698&rft_els_id=S0892199721001156&rfr_iscdi=true