Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake
•We assessed the psychosocial factors associated with older adults’ vaccination uptake.•Influenza vaccine awareness and uptake was greater than for the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Participants were unsure about their future uptake of the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Vaccine uptake was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2021-06, Vol.39 (26), p.3520-3527 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3527 |
---|---|
container_issue | 26 |
container_start_page | 3520 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Nicholls, Louise A. Brown Gallant, Allyson J. Cogan, Nicola Rasmussen, Susan Young, David Williams, Lynn |
description | •We assessed the psychosocial factors associated with older adults’ vaccination uptake.•Influenza vaccine awareness and uptake was greater than for the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Participants were unsure about their future uptake of the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Vaccine uptake was associated with psychosocial factors, including collective responsibility.•Future interventions could highlight disease risks and the community benefits of vaccination.
Influenza, pneumococcal disease, and shingles (herpes zoster) are more prevalent in older people. These illnesses are preventable via vaccination, but uptake is low and decreasing. Little research has focused on understanding the psychosocial reasons behind older adults’ hesitancy towards different vaccines. A cross-sectional survey with 372 UK-based adults aged 65–92 years (M = 70.5) assessed awareness and uptake of the influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines. Participants provided health and socio-demographic data and completed two scales measuring the psychosocial factors associated with vaccination behaviour. Self-reported daily functioning, cognitive difficulties, and social support were also assessed. Participants were additionally given the opportunity to provide free text responses outlining up to three main reasons for their vaccination decisions. We found that considerably more participants had received the influenza vaccine in the last 12 months (83.6%), relative to having ever received the pneumococcal (60.2%) and shingles vaccines (58.9%). Participants were more aware of their eligibility for the influenza vaccine, and were more likely to have been offered it. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a lower sense of collective responsibility independently predicted lack of uptake of all three vaccines. Greater calculation of disease and vaccination risk, and preference for natural immunity, also predicted not getting the influenza vaccine. For both the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines, concerns about profiteering further predicted lack of uptake. Analysis of the qualitative responses highlighted that participants vaccinated to protect their own health and that of others. Our findings suggest that interventions targeted towards older adults would benefit from being vaccine-specific and that they should emphasise disease risks and vaccine benefits for the individual, as well as the benefits of vaccination for the wider community. These findings can help inform i |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531538996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X21005442</els_id><sourcerecordid>2531538996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e95da06bb814bfac62daa8d681b8434034ebcd8dc2ec884d999953ab5d0fa3073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwE0CWOMChu_hrN14uCFV8VKrUHkDiZnntWeLg2MH2FqW_vg4JPXDpXEYaPfPOx4vQS0paSmj_bt3eaGNcgJYRRlsiWtKzR2hB5ZI3rKPyMVoQ1otGUPLjBD3LeU0I6TgdnqITLgjjlPcLdHvlLSSs7exLfoOPmngF2RUdzO49vs47s4o5Gqc9nrQpMWWs899CAYv_uLLCLkx-hnCrz_A2wLyJJhqj_RnWweK8cuGnh3yvPm-L_gXP0ZNJ-wwvjvkUff_86dv51-by6svF-cfLxghBSgNDZzXpx1FSMdb5PbNaS9tLOkpRD-ECRmOlNQyMlMIONTqux86SSXOy5Kfo7UF3m-LvGXJRG5cNeK8DxDkrVp_ScTkMfUVf_4eu45xC3W5PLSljQgyV6g6USTHnBJPaJrfRaacoUXtz1FodT1V7cxQRqppT-14d1edxA_a-658bFfhwAKC-48ZBUtk4CAasS2CKstE9MOION6uk2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2537122449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown ; Gallant, Allyson J. ; Cogan, Nicola ; Rasmussen, Susan ; Young, David ; Williams, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown ; Gallant, Allyson J. ; Cogan, Nicola ; Rasmussen, Susan ; Young, David ; Williams, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>•We assessed the psychosocial factors associated with older adults’ vaccination uptake.•Influenza vaccine awareness and uptake was greater than for the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Participants were unsure about their future uptake of the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Vaccine uptake was associated with psychosocial factors, including collective responsibility.•Future interventions could highlight disease risks and the community benefits of vaccination.
Influenza, pneumococcal disease, and shingles (herpes zoster) are more prevalent in older people. These illnesses are preventable via vaccination, but uptake is low and decreasing. Little research has focused on understanding the psychosocial reasons behind older adults’ hesitancy towards different vaccines. A cross-sectional survey with 372 UK-based adults aged 65–92 years (M = 70.5) assessed awareness and uptake of the influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines. Participants provided health and socio-demographic data and completed two scales measuring the psychosocial factors associated with vaccination behaviour. Self-reported daily functioning, cognitive difficulties, and social support were also assessed. Participants were additionally given the opportunity to provide free text responses outlining up to three main reasons for their vaccination decisions. We found that considerably more participants had received the influenza vaccine in the last 12 months (83.6%), relative to having ever received the pneumococcal (60.2%) and shingles vaccines (58.9%). Participants were more aware of their eligibility for the influenza vaccine, and were more likely to have been offered it. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a lower sense of collective responsibility independently predicted lack of uptake of all three vaccines. Greater calculation of disease and vaccination risk, and preference for natural immunity, also predicted not getting the influenza vaccine. For both the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines, concerns about profiteering further predicted lack of uptake. Analysis of the qualitative responses highlighted that participants vaccinated to protect their own health and that of others. Our findings suggest that interventions targeted towards older adults would benefit from being vaccine-specific and that they should emphasise disease risks and vaccine benefits for the individual, as well as the benefits of vaccination for the wider community. These findings can help inform intervention development aimed at increasing vaccination uptake in future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34023136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adults ; Age ; Aged ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Cognitive ability ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data collection ; Health risks ; Healthy ageing/aging ; Herpes Zoster ; Herpes Zoster Vaccine ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Older people ; Pneumococcal ; Pneumococcal Vaccines ; Psychological aspects ; Qualitative analysis ; Shingles ; Social interactions ; Social networks ; Social support ; Sociodemographics ; Streptococcus infections ; Vaccination ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2021-06, Vol.39 (26), p.3520-3527</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e95da06bb814bfac62daa8d681b8434034ebcd8dc2ec884d999953ab5d0fa3073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e95da06bb814bfac62daa8d681b8434034ebcd8dc2ec884d999953ab5d0fa3073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2537122449?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallant, Allyson J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogan, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>•We assessed the psychosocial factors associated with older adults’ vaccination uptake.•Influenza vaccine awareness and uptake was greater than for the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Participants were unsure about their future uptake of the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Vaccine uptake was associated with psychosocial factors, including collective responsibility.•Future interventions could highlight disease risks and the community benefits of vaccination.
Influenza, pneumococcal disease, and shingles (herpes zoster) are more prevalent in older people. These illnesses are preventable via vaccination, but uptake is low and decreasing. Little research has focused on understanding the psychosocial reasons behind older adults’ hesitancy towards different vaccines. A cross-sectional survey with 372 UK-based adults aged 65–92 years (M = 70.5) assessed awareness and uptake of the influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines. Participants provided health and socio-demographic data and completed two scales measuring the psychosocial factors associated with vaccination behaviour. Self-reported daily functioning, cognitive difficulties, and social support were also assessed. Participants were additionally given the opportunity to provide free text responses outlining up to three main reasons for their vaccination decisions. We found that considerably more participants had received the influenza vaccine in the last 12 months (83.6%), relative to having ever received the pneumococcal (60.2%) and shingles vaccines (58.9%). Participants were more aware of their eligibility for the influenza vaccine, and were more likely to have been offered it. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a lower sense of collective responsibility independently predicted lack of uptake of all three vaccines. Greater calculation of disease and vaccination risk, and preference for natural immunity, also predicted not getting the influenza vaccine. For both the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines, concerns about profiteering further predicted lack of uptake. Analysis of the qualitative responses highlighted that participants vaccinated to protect their own health and that of others. Our findings suggest that interventions targeted towards older adults would benefit from being vaccine-specific and that they should emphasise disease risks and vaccine benefits for the individual, as well as the benefits of vaccination for the wider community. These findings can help inform intervention development aimed at increasing vaccination uptake in future.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Healthy ageing/aging</subject><subject>Herpes Zoster</subject><subject>Herpes Zoster Vaccine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pneumococcal</subject><subject>Pneumococcal Vaccines</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Shingles</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwE0CWOMChu_hrN14uCFV8VKrUHkDiZnntWeLg2MH2FqW_vg4JPXDpXEYaPfPOx4vQS0paSmj_bt3eaGNcgJYRRlsiWtKzR2hB5ZI3rKPyMVoQ1otGUPLjBD3LeU0I6TgdnqITLgjjlPcLdHvlLSSs7exLfoOPmngF2RUdzO49vs47s4o5Gqc9nrQpMWWs899CAYv_uLLCLkx-hnCrz_A2wLyJJhqj_RnWweK8cuGnh3yvPm-L_gXP0ZNJ-wwvjvkUff_86dv51-by6svF-cfLxghBSgNDZzXpx1FSMdb5PbNaS9tLOkpRD-ECRmOlNQyMlMIONTqux86SSXOy5Kfo7UF3m-LvGXJRG5cNeK8DxDkrVp_ScTkMfUVf_4eu45xC3W5PLSljQgyV6g6USTHnBJPaJrfRaacoUXtz1FodT1V7cxQRqppT-14d1edxA_a-658bFfhwAKC-48ZBUtk4CAasS2CKstE9MOION6uk2g</recordid><startdate>20210611</startdate><enddate>20210611</enddate><creator>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown</creator><creator>Gallant, Allyson J.</creator><creator>Cogan, Nicola</creator><creator>Rasmussen, Susan</creator><creator>Young, David</creator><creator>Williams, Lynn</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210611</creationdate><title>Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake</title><author>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown ; Gallant, Allyson J. ; Cogan, Nicola ; Rasmussen, Susan ; Young, David ; Williams, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e95da06bb814bfac62daa8d681b8434034ebcd8dc2ec884d999953ab5d0fa3073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Healthy ageing/aging</topic><topic>Herpes Zoster</topic><topic>Herpes Zoster Vaccine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pneumococcal</topic><topic>Pneumococcal Vaccines</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Shingles</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallant, Allyson J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogan, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicholls, Louise A. Brown</au><au>Gallant, Allyson J.</au><au>Cogan, Nicola</au><au>Rasmussen, Susan</au><au>Young, David</au><au>Williams, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2021-06-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>3520</spage><epage>3527</epage><pages>3520-3527</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>•We assessed the psychosocial factors associated with older adults’ vaccination uptake.•Influenza vaccine awareness and uptake was greater than for the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Participants were unsure about their future uptake of the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines.•Vaccine uptake was associated with psychosocial factors, including collective responsibility.•Future interventions could highlight disease risks and the community benefits of vaccination.
Influenza, pneumococcal disease, and shingles (herpes zoster) are more prevalent in older people. These illnesses are preventable via vaccination, but uptake is low and decreasing. Little research has focused on understanding the psychosocial reasons behind older adults’ hesitancy towards different vaccines. A cross-sectional survey with 372 UK-based adults aged 65–92 years (M = 70.5) assessed awareness and uptake of the influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines. Participants provided health and socio-demographic data and completed two scales measuring the psychosocial factors associated with vaccination behaviour. Self-reported daily functioning, cognitive difficulties, and social support were also assessed. Participants were additionally given the opportunity to provide free text responses outlining up to three main reasons for their vaccination decisions. We found that considerably more participants had received the influenza vaccine in the last 12 months (83.6%), relative to having ever received the pneumococcal (60.2%) and shingles vaccines (58.9%). Participants were more aware of their eligibility for the influenza vaccine, and were more likely to have been offered it. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a lower sense of collective responsibility independently predicted lack of uptake of all three vaccines. Greater calculation of disease and vaccination risk, and preference for natural immunity, also predicted not getting the influenza vaccine. For both the pneumococcal and shingles vaccines, concerns about profiteering further predicted lack of uptake. Analysis of the qualitative responses highlighted that participants vaccinated to protect their own health and that of others. Our findings suggest that interventions targeted towards older adults would benefit from being vaccine-specific and that they should emphasise disease risks and vaccine benefits for the individual, as well as the benefits of vaccination for the wider community. These findings can help inform intervention development aimed at increasing vaccination uptake in future.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34023136</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2021-06, Vol.39 (26), p.3520-3527 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2531538996 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Activities of daily living Adults Age Aged Attitudes Behavior Cognitive ability Cross-Sectional Studies Data collection Health risks Healthy ageing/aging Herpes Zoster Herpes Zoster Vaccine Humans Illnesses Influenza Influenza Vaccines Influenza, Human - prevention & control Older people Pneumococcal Pneumococcal Vaccines Psychological aspects Qualitative analysis Shingles Social interactions Social networks Social support Sociodemographics Streptococcus infections Vaccination Vaccine hesitancy Vaccines |
title | Older adults' vaccine hesitancy: Psychosocial factors associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine uptake |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Older%20adults'%20vaccine%20hesitancy:%20Psychosocial%20factors%20associated%20with%20influenza,%20pneumococcal,%20and%20shingles%20vaccine%20uptake&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Nicholls,%20Louise%20A.%20Brown&rft.date=2021-06-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=3520&rft.epage=3527&rft.pages=3520-3527&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531538996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2537122449&rft_id=info:pmid/34023136&rft_els_id=S0264410X21005442&rfr_iscdi=true |