Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients
Purpose The existing concept suggests early palliative and hospice therapy for a better quality of care (QOC) and less medical expense in terminal cancer patients, but the time points of “early” initiation were defined by pre-set study protocol rather than the real-world data. The study aimed to det...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2021-11, Vol.29 (11), p.6871-6880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6880 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 6871 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Dai, Yan-Mei Huang, Ya-Ting Lai, Min-Yu Liu, Hsueh-Erh Shiao, Chih-Chung |
description | Purpose
The existing concept suggests early palliative and hospice therapy for a better quality of care (QOC) and less medical expense in terminal cancer patients, but the time points of “early” initiation were defined by pre-set study protocol rather than the real-world data. The study aimed to determine the optimal timing of initiating palliative care for patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective population-based study was conducted using a nationwide database. We extracted patients with cancer who were in their last year of lives in the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 and categorized them into two groups (“hospice-shared care” (HSC) group and “usual care” (UC) group) after a matching process. Subsequently, we used a generalized linear mixed-effects model to compare the QOC and medical expenses between groups.
Results
After the selection and matching process, we enrolled 1714 patients (67.7 ± 13.2 years, 62.7% male) categorized into the HSC and UC groups (
n
= 857 in each group). The HSC groups showed generally better QOC in the four indices (with emergency room visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and receiving chemotherapy) than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 8–60 days before death. The HSC group also had significantly lower medical expenses than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 15–90 days before death.
Conclusions
Among patients with terminal cancer, HSC initiation before the last 8 days and 15 days of lives can effectively improve QOC and save medical expenses, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2529913859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A676809463</galeid><sourcerecordid>A676809463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e88dd2cff211eb3c8efcfa2712b963f558c457ed121238cf2e464340308ab4d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVwiCdOfiCL0OBNNnL0bKmXxuRhcPAmWQuNujSW6ZHaUs_Cf58ajxMTY4KgJKRTl6u6hHzg7IwzZj43xrRglAlOWS-sosMrsuJKSmqkHI7Iig2KUyW1PiZvW7tljBujxRtyLBXjSjGzIj-u5yVt_dRhTXnTxVK7m9LmFIC2G19h7ALWLuW0JL-kkvHYLVCRxq7gc4DazfgCeWnvyOvopwbvH_cT8uvrl58X3-nV9bfLi_MrGpQSCwVrx1GEGAXnsJbBQgzRC8PFeuhl1NoGpQ2MXHAhbYgCVK_Qs2TWr9XI5Qn5dNCda7nbQVvcNrUA0-QzlF1zQoth4NLqAdHTZ-ht2VX0vqcMynIu2BO18RO4lGNZqg97UXfem97iJHuJ1NkLFK4RtimUDDHh_T8N4tAQammtQnRzxWnXe8eZ22foDhk6zNA9ZOj2jj8-Ot6ttzD-bfkTGgLyADR8yhuoT1_6j-xv7Oekqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576431120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Dai, Yan-Mei ; Huang, Ya-Ting ; Lai, Min-Yu ; Liu, Hsueh-Erh ; Shiao, Chih-Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yan-Mei ; Huang, Ya-Ting ; Lai, Min-Yu ; Liu, Hsueh-Erh ; Shiao, Chih-Chung</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The existing concept suggests early palliative and hospice therapy for a better quality of care (QOC) and less medical expense in terminal cancer patients, but the time points of “early” initiation were defined by pre-set study protocol rather than the real-world data. The study aimed to determine the optimal timing of initiating palliative care for patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective population-based study was conducted using a nationwide database. We extracted patients with cancer who were in their last year of lives in the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 and categorized them into two groups (“hospice-shared care” (HSC) group and “usual care” (UC) group) after a matching process. Subsequently, we used a generalized linear mixed-effects model to compare the QOC and medical expenses between groups.
Results
After the selection and matching process, we enrolled 1714 patients (67.7 ± 13.2 years, 62.7% male) categorized into the HSC and UC groups (
n
= 857 in each group). The HSC groups showed generally better QOC in the four indices (with emergency room visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and receiving chemotherapy) than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 8–60 days before death. The HSC group also had significantly lower medical expenses than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 15–90 days before death.
Conclusions
Among patients with terminal cancer, HSC initiation before the last 8 days and 15 days of lives can effectively improve QOC and save medical expenses, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34014407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Health care expenditures ; Hospice care ; Hospices (Terminal care) ; Hospitalization ; Medical care ; Medical referrals ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative treatment ; Patient care planning ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2021-11, Vol.29 (11), p.6871-6880</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e88dd2cff211eb3c8efcfa2712b963f558c457ed121238cf2e464340308ab4d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e88dd2cff211eb3c8efcfa2712b963f558c457ed121238cf2e464340308ab4d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2220-7574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yan-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ya-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Min-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hsueh-Erh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiao, Chih-Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
The existing concept suggests early palliative and hospice therapy for a better quality of care (QOC) and less medical expense in terminal cancer patients, but the time points of “early” initiation were defined by pre-set study protocol rather than the real-world data. The study aimed to determine the optimal timing of initiating palliative care for patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective population-based study was conducted using a nationwide database. We extracted patients with cancer who were in their last year of lives in the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 and categorized them into two groups (“hospice-shared care” (HSC) group and “usual care” (UC) group) after a matching process. Subsequently, we used a generalized linear mixed-effects model to compare the QOC and medical expenses between groups.
Results
After the selection and matching process, we enrolled 1714 patients (67.7 ± 13.2 years, 62.7% male) categorized into the HSC and UC groups (
n
= 857 in each group). The HSC groups showed generally better QOC in the four indices (with emergency room visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and receiving chemotherapy) than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 8–60 days before death. The HSC group also had significantly lower medical expenses than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 15–90 days before death.
Conclusions
Among patients with terminal cancer, HSC initiation before the last 8 days and 15 days of lives can effectively improve QOC and save medical expenses, respectively.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Hospices (Terminal care)</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Patient care planning</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVwiCdOfiCL0OBNNnL0bKmXxuRhcPAmWQuNujSW6ZHaUs_Cf58ajxMTY4KgJKRTl6u6hHzg7IwzZj43xrRglAlOWS-sosMrsuJKSmqkHI7Iig2KUyW1PiZvW7tljBujxRtyLBXjSjGzIj-u5yVt_dRhTXnTxVK7m9LmFIC2G19h7ALWLuW0JL-kkvHYLVCRxq7gc4DazfgCeWnvyOvopwbvH_cT8uvrl58X3-nV9bfLi_MrGpQSCwVrx1GEGAXnsJbBQgzRC8PFeuhl1NoGpQ2MXHAhbYgCVK_Qs2TWr9XI5Qn5dNCda7nbQVvcNrUA0-QzlF1zQoth4NLqAdHTZ-ht2VX0vqcMynIu2BO18RO4lGNZqg97UXfem97iJHuJ1NkLFK4RtimUDDHh_T8N4tAQammtQnRzxWnXe8eZ22foDhk6zNA9ZOj2jj8-Ot6ttzD-bfkTGgLyADR8yhuoT1_6j-xv7Oekqg</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Dai, Yan-Mei</creator><creator>Huang, Ya-Ting</creator><creator>Lai, Min-Yu</creator><creator>Liu, Hsueh-Erh</creator><creator>Shiao, Chih-Chung</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-7574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients</title><author>Dai, Yan-Mei ; Huang, Ya-Ting ; Lai, Min-Yu ; Liu, Hsueh-Erh ; Shiao, Chih-Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e88dd2cff211eb3c8efcfa2712b963f558c457ed121238cf2e464340308ab4d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Hospices (Terminal care)</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Patient care planning</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yan-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ya-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Min-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hsueh-Erh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiao, Chih-Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Yan-Mei</au><au>Huang, Ya-Ting</au><au>Lai, Min-Yu</au><au>Liu, Hsueh-Erh</au><au>Shiao, Chih-Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6871</spage><epage>6880</epage><pages>6871-6880</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The existing concept suggests early palliative and hospice therapy for a better quality of care (QOC) and less medical expense in terminal cancer patients, but the time points of “early” initiation were defined by pre-set study protocol rather than the real-world data. The study aimed to determine the optimal timing of initiating palliative care for patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective population-based study was conducted using a nationwide database. We extracted patients with cancer who were in their last year of lives in the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 and categorized them into two groups (“hospice-shared care” (HSC) group and “usual care” (UC) group) after a matching process. Subsequently, we used a generalized linear mixed-effects model to compare the QOC and medical expenses between groups.
Results
After the selection and matching process, we enrolled 1714 patients (67.7 ± 13.2 years, 62.7% male) categorized into the HSC and UC groups (
n
= 857 in each group). The HSC groups showed generally better QOC in the four indices (with emergency room visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and receiving chemotherapy) than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 8–60 days before death. The HSC group also had significantly lower medical expenses than the UC group in those who initiated HSC 15–90 days before death.
Conclusions
Among patients with terminal cancer, HSC initiation before the last 8 days and 15 days of lives can effectively improve QOC and save medical expenses, respectively.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34014407</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-7574</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2021-11, Vol.29 (11), p.6871-6880 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2529913859 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Cancer Cancer patients Chemotherapy Clinical outcomes Health care expenditures Hospice care Hospices (Terminal care) Hospitalization Medical care Medical referrals Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Palliative care Palliative treatment Patient care planning Quality management Quality of care Rehabilitation Medicine |
title | Optimal timing for hospice-shared care initiation in terminal cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20timing%20for%20hospice-shared%20care%20initiation%20in%20terminal%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Dai,%20Yan-Mei&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6871&rft.epage=6880&rft.pages=6871-6880&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-021-06284-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA676809463%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576431120&rft_id=info:pmid/34014407&rft_galeid=A676809463&rfr_iscdi=true |