Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites

The interplay between hydrogen bonds (HBs) and halogen bonds (XBs), has been addressed by co‐crystallizing two halogen bond donors, 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorbenzene(DITFB) and 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene(TITFB) with four series of targets; N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)benzamide (Bz‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)picoli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany) Germany), 2021-08, Vol.86 (8), p.1049-1057
Hauptverfasser: Abeysekera, Amila M., Averkiev, Boris B., Sinha, Abhijeet S., Le Magueres, Pierre, Aakeröy, Christer B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1057
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1049
container_title ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany)
container_volume 86
creator Abeysekera, Amila M.
Averkiev, Boris B.
Sinha, Abhijeet S.
Le Magueres, Pierre
Aakeröy, Christer B.
description The interplay between hydrogen bonds (HBs) and halogen bonds (XBs), has been addressed by co‐crystallizing two halogen bond donors, 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorbenzene(DITFB) and 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene(TITFB) with four series of targets; N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)benzamide (Bz‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)picolinamides (2Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)nicotinamides (3Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)isonicotinamides (4Pyr‐X); X=H/Cl/Br/I. The structural outcomes were compared with interactions in the targets themselves. 13 co‐crystals were analysed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD). In all three co‐crystals from the 2Pyr series, the intramolecular HB remained intact while the XB donors engaged with the N(pyr) or O=C sites. In the ten co‐crystals from the other three series, the intermolecular HBs present in the individual targets were disrupted in 9/10 cases. Overall, the acceptor sites selected by the halogen‐bond donors in these targets were distributed as follows; N(pyr)=81 %, O=C (15 %) or π (4 %). A series of co‐crystallization experiments with halogen bond donors and sixteen target molecules was carried out to map preferred binding sites of halogen‐bond donors, and it was found to be in the order of π (4 %)
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cplu.202100102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528927062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2565970043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3732-43ac0f2759f71c716ceae69c97cac7aac863b05d129153272f711e2c7c5a20713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgQAVVkYUiYWl5fg4iZsRKm5SK0DAHLmnp62Rm4Q4EWLjEXhGngRXLRex4MU-0udf9i_EgYSeBMATqlzbQ8AwSMANsYsyw26aQLr567wj9r1_grBSSFCrbbGjYoC-itWuuDv3jRk76-e2mEVXxpUzLj7e3s_KYhLd1jzlmgtiH9kiGpWOqXVheLHNPBq1rrGV4-iUiKumrKN727DfE1tT4zzvr_eOeLw4fxhcdYc3l9eD02GXlFbYjZUhmKJOsqmWpGVKbDjNKNNkSBtD_VSNIZlIzGSiUGNgkpE0JQZBS9URx6vcqi6fW_ZNvrCe2DlTcNn6HBPsZ6ghxUCP_tCnsq2L8Lqg0iTTALEKqrdSVJfeh6_nVW0Xpn7NJeTLvvNl3_l33-HC4Tq2HS948s2_2g0gW4EX6_j1n7h8cDt8_An_BHhNi7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565970043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Abeysekera, Amila M. ; Averkiev, Boris B. ; Sinha, Abhijeet S. ; Le Magueres, Pierre ; Aakeröy, Christer B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abeysekera, Amila M. ; Averkiev, Boris B. ; Sinha, Abhijeet S. ; Le Magueres, Pierre ; Aakeröy, Christer B.</creatorcontrib><description>The interplay between hydrogen bonds (HBs) and halogen bonds (XBs), has been addressed by co‐crystallizing two halogen bond donors, 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorbenzene(DITFB) and 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene(TITFB) with four series of targets; N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)benzamide (Bz‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)picolinamides (2Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)nicotinamides (3Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)isonicotinamides (4Pyr‐X); X=H/Cl/Br/I. The structural outcomes were compared with interactions in the targets themselves. 13 co‐crystals were analysed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD). In all three co‐crystals from the 2Pyr series, the intramolecular HB remained intact while the XB donors engaged with the N(pyr) or O=C sites. In the ten co‐crystals from the other three series, the intermolecular HBs present in the individual targets were disrupted in 9/10 cases. Overall, the acceptor sites selected by the halogen‐bond donors in these targets were distributed as follows; N(pyr)=81 %, O=C (15 %) or π (4 %). A series of co‐crystallization experiments with halogen bond donors and sixteen target molecules was carried out to map preferred binding sites of halogen‐bond donors, and it was found to be in the order of π (4 %)&lt;O=C(15 %)&lt;N(pyr)=81 %.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-6506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-6506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cplu.202100102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34008343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Benzamide ; Chemical bonds ; Chemistry ; co-crystals ; crystal engineering ; Crystals ; halogen bonding ; hydrogen bonding ; Hydrogen bonds ; supramolecular chemistry</subject><ispartof>ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany), 2021-08, Vol.86 (8), p.1049-1057</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><rights>2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3732-43ac0f2759f71c716ceae69c97cac7aac863b05d129153272f711e2c7c5a20713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3732-43ac0f2759f71c716ceae69c97cac7aac863b05d129153272f711e2c7c5a20713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8947-2068</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcplu.202100102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcplu.202100102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abeysekera, Amila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averkiev, Boris B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Abhijeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Magueres, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aakeröy, Christer B.</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites</title><title>ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany)</title><addtitle>Chempluschem</addtitle><description>The interplay between hydrogen bonds (HBs) and halogen bonds (XBs), has been addressed by co‐crystallizing two halogen bond donors, 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorbenzene(DITFB) and 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene(TITFB) with four series of targets; N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)benzamide (Bz‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)picolinamides (2Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)nicotinamides (3Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)isonicotinamides (4Pyr‐X); X=H/Cl/Br/I. The structural outcomes were compared with interactions in the targets themselves. 13 co‐crystals were analysed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD). In all three co‐crystals from the 2Pyr series, the intramolecular HB remained intact while the XB donors engaged with the N(pyr) or O=C sites. In the ten co‐crystals from the other three series, the intermolecular HBs present in the individual targets were disrupted in 9/10 cases. Overall, the acceptor sites selected by the halogen‐bond donors in these targets were distributed as follows; N(pyr)=81 %, O=C (15 %) or π (4 %). A series of co‐crystallization experiments with halogen bond donors and sixteen target molecules was carried out to map preferred binding sites of halogen‐bond donors, and it was found to be in the order of π (4 %)&lt;O=C(15 %)&lt;N(pyr)=81 %.</description><subject>Benzamide</subject><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>co-crystals</subject><subject>crystal engineering</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>halogen bonding</subject><subject>hydrogen bonding</subject><subject>Hydrogen bonds</subject><subject>supramolecular chemistry</subject><issn>2192-6506</issn><issn>2192-6506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgQAVVkYUiYWl5fg4iZsRKm5SK0DAHLmnp62Rm4Q4EWLjEXhGngRXLRex4MU-0udf9i_EgYSeBMATqlzbQ8AwSMANsYsyw26aQLr567wj9r1_grBSSFCrbbGjYoC-itWuuDv3jRk76-e2mEVXxpUzLj7e3s_KYhLd1jzlmgtiH9kiGpWOqXVheLHNPBq1rrGV4-iUiKumrKN727DfE1tT4zzvr_eOeLw4fxhcdYc3l9eD02GXlFbYjZUhmKJOsqmWpGVKbDjNKNNkSBtD_VSNIZlIzGSiUGNgkpE0JQZBS9URx6vcqi6fW_ZNvrCe2DlTcNn6HBPsZ6ghxUCP_tCnsq2L8Lqg0iTTALEKqrdSVJfeh6_nVW0Xpn7NJeTLvvNl3_l33-HC4Tq2HS948s2_2g0gW4EX6_j1n7h8cDt8_An_BHhNi7k</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Abeysekera, Amila M.</creator><creator>Averkiev, Boris B.</creator><creator>Sinha, Abhijeet S.</creator><creator>Le Magueres, Pierre</creator><creator>Aakeröy, Christer B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-2068</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites</title><author>Abeysekera, Amila M. ; Averkiev, Boris B. ; Sinha, Abhijeet S. ; Le Magueres, Pierre ; Aakeröy, Christer B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3732-43ac0f2759f71c716ceae69c97cac7aac863b05d129153272f711e2c7c5a20713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benzamide</topic><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>co-crystals</topic><topic>crystal engineering</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>halogen bonding</topic><topic>hydrogen bonding</topic><topic>Hydrogen bonds</topic><topic>supramolecular chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abeysekera, Amila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Averkiev, Boris B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Abhijeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Magueres, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aakeröy, Christer B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abeysekera, Amila M.</au><au>Averkiev, Boris B.</au><au>Sinha, Abhijeet S.</au><au>Le Magueres, Pierre</au><au>Aakeröy, Christer B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites</atitle><jtitle>ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle><addtitle>Chempluschem</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1049</spage><epage>1057</epage><pages>1049-1057</pages><issn>2192-6506</issn><eissn>2192-6506</eissn><abstract>The interplay between hydrogen bonds (HBs) and halogen bonds (XBs), has been addressed by co‐crystallizing two halogen bond donors, 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorbenzene(DITFB) and 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene(TITFB) with four series of targets; N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)benzamide (Bz‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)picolinamides (2Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)nicotinamides (3Pyr‐X), N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)isonicotinamides (4Pyr‐X); X=H/Cl/Br/I. The structural outcomes were compared with interactions in the targets themselves. 13 co‐crystals were analysed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD). In all three co‐crystals from the 2Pyr series, the intramolecular HB remained intact while the XB donors engaged with the N(pyr) or O=C sites. In the ten co‐crystals from the other three series, the intermolecular HBs present in the individual targets were disrupted in 9/10 cases. Overall, the acceptor sites selected by the halogen‐bond donors in these targets were distributed as follows; N(pyr)=81 %, O=C (15 %) or π (4 %). A series of co‐crystallization experiments with halogen bond donors and sixteen target molecules was carried out to map preferred binding sites of halogen‐bond donors, and it was found to be in the order of π (4 %)&lt;O=C(15 %)&lt;N(pyr)=81 %.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34008343</pmid><doi>10.1002/cplu.202100102</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-2068</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-6506
ispartof ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany), 2021-08, Vol.86 (8), p.1049-1057
issn 2192-6506
2192-6506
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528927062
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Benzamide
Chemical bonds
Chemistry
co-crystals
crystal engineering
Crystals
halogen bonding
hydrogen bonding
Hydrogen bonds
supramolecular chemistry
title Establishing Halogen‐Bond Preferences in Molecules with Multiple Acceptor Sites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20Halogen%E2%80%90Bond%20Preferences%20in%20Molecules%20with%20Multiple%20Acceptor%20Sites&rft.jtitle=ChemPlusChem%20(Weinheim,%20Germany)&rft.au=Abeysekera,%20Amila%20M.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1049&rft.epage=1057&rft.pages=1049-1057&rft.issn=2192-6506&rft.eissn=2192-6506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cplu.202100102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2565970043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565970043&rft_id=info:pmid/34008343&rfr_iscdi=true