Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential
•Accurate assessment of burn severity is essential for clinical decision making.•Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging is a promising technique in burn assessment.•Prediction of burn wound healing potential by LSCI is valid compared to LDI.•LSCI is a tool with high feasibility.•Future research in full thic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2022-03, Vol.48 (2), p.319-327 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 327 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 319 |
| container_title | Burns |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Zheng, K.J. Middelkoop, E. Stoop, M. van Zuijlen, P.P.M. Pijpe, A. |
| description | •Accurate assessment of burn severity is essential for clinical decision making.•Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging is a promising technique in burn assessment.•Prediction of burn wound healing potential by LSCI is valid compared to LDI.•LSCI is a tool with high feasibility.•Future research in full thickness burns, colour palette, cost-effectiveness needed.
To assess validity of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) for the measurement of burn wound healing potential (HP) in a burn centre patient population, based on Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) as reference standard.
A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was performed between September–December 2019. A total of 50 burns in 14 patients were included. Imaging and data collection were standardized. Correlation between LSCI and LDI flux values was tested. ROC curves were developed to test the discriminative ability of LSCI between LDI HP categories.
Number of adults and children were equal. Mean total body surface area burnt was 5.5%. Main burn causes were scalds (64%) and flame burns (36%). LSCI set-up and imaging duration was 3 min and 10 s, respectively. LSCI was able to discriminate between wounds with early versus delayed HP (21 days, similar sensitivity (74%) and specificity (95%) were found (p < 0.001). Correlations between LSCI and LDI flux values were moderate (21 days).
LSCI shows good validity for the prediction of burn wound HP. It is a highly feasible, patient and physician friendly tool. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.028 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417921001182</els_id><sourcerecordid>2528906411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-feb301b1d55e95c4516df600050fd616ceb2b8db6dc4c9496a2b5c8054cd339d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQeK4eYICBccuUo8SqYhDhsBI0gAGujTZCkIiTzZdWVRIqoHfPlTtdCwXLt9_d_9HyGcGOQNWfdvl7eSHkBdQsBx4DkX9gSxYfS0zxkF-JAsoQWScXcsLchnCDtITNZyTi5IDVJzBgvx6bnprbDxQ19G-CehpGFH_7pFqN0TfhEjtvtnYYUM752ncIh09GqujdcMcmo-gr24aDN1iGpbA0UUcom36T-Ssa_qAV6d_SZ7u736uvmfrHw-Pq9t1pkshY9ZhWwJrmRECpdBcsMp01XwtdKZilca2aGvTVkZzLbmsmqIVugbBtSlLacol-XqcO3r3MmGIam-Dxr5vBnRTUIUoajk3Zgktj6j2LgSPnRp9KugPioGavaqd-utVzV4VcJW8ptSX04Kp3aP5l3kXmYCbI4Cp5h-LXgVtcdDJlEcdlXH2vwveADy_i5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528906411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zheng, K.J. ; Middelkoop, E. ; Stoop, M. ; van Zuijlen, P.P.M. ; Pijpe, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, K.J. ; Middelkoop, E. ; Stoop, M. ; van Zuijlen, P.P.M. ; Pijpe, A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Accurate assessment of burn severity is essential for clinical decision making.•Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging is a promising technique in burn assessment.•Prediction of burn wound healing potential by LSCI is valid compared to LDI.•LSCI is a tool with high feasibility.•Future research in full thickness burns, colour palette, cost-effectiveness needed.
To assess validity of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) for the measurement of burn wound healing potential (HP) in a burn centre patient population, based on Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) as reference standard.
A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was performed between September–December 2019. A total of 50 burns in 14 patients were included. Imaging and data collection were standardized. Correlation between LSCI and LDI flux values was tested. ROC curves were developed to test the discriminative ability of LSCI between LDI HP categories.
Number of adults and children were equal. Mean total body surface area burnt was 5.5%. Main burn causes were scalds (64%) and flame burns (36%). LSCI set-up and imaging duration was 3 min and 10 s, respectively. LSCI was able to discriminate between wounds with early versus delayed HP (<14 versus ≥14 days) with sensitivity 71% and specificity 95% (p < 0.001). For HP ≤21 versus >21 days, similar sensitivity (74%) and specificity (95%) were found (p < 0.001). Correlations between LSCI and LDI flux values were moderate (<14 days) to absent (>21 days).
LSCI shows good validity for the prediction of burn wound HP. It is a highly feasible, patient and physician friendly tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34006410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Burns ; Burns - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Diagnostic measurement tools ; Healing potential ; Humans ; Laser Doppler Imaging ; Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging ; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Skin - diagnostic imaging ; Validity ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2022-03, Vol.48 (2), p.319-327</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-feb301b1d55e95c4516df600050fd616ceb2b8db6dc4c9496a2b5c8054cd339d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-feb301b1d55e95c4516df600050fd616ceb2b8db6dc4c9496a2b5c8054cd339d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6940-7552 ; 0000-0003-3461-8848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417921001182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelkoop, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoop, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zuijlen, P.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijpe, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>•Accurate assessment of burn severity is essential for clinical decision making.•Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging is a promising technique in burn assessment.•Prediction of burn wound healing potential by LSCI is valid compared to LDI.•LSCI is a tool with high feasibility.•Future research in full thickness burns, colour palette, cost-effectiveness needed.
To assess validity of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) for the measurement of burn wound healing potential (HP) in a burn centre patient population, based on Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) as reference standard.
A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was performed between September–December 2019. A total of 50 burns in 14 patients were included. Imaging and data collection were standardized. Correlation between LSCI and LDI flux values was tested. ROC curves were developed to test the discriminative ability of LSCI between LDI HP categories.
Number of adults and children were equal. Mean total body surface area burnt was 5.5%. Main burn causes were scalds (64%) and flame burns (36%). LSCI set-up and imaging duration was 3 min and 10 s, respectively. LSCI was able to discriminate between wounds with early versus delayed HP (<14 versus ≥14 days) with sensitivity 71% and specificity 95% (p < 0.001). For HP ≤21 versus >21 days, similar sensitivity (74%) and specificity (95%) were found (p < 0.001). Correlations between LSCI and LDI flux values were moderate (<14 days) to absent (>21 days).
LSCI shows good validity for the prediction of burn wound HP. It is a highly feasible, patient and physician friendly tool.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diagnostic measurement tools</subject><subject>Healing potential</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser Doppler Imaging</subject><subject>Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging</subject><subject>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQeK4eYICBccuUo8SqYhDhsBI0gAGujTZCkIiTzZdWVRIqoHfPlTtdCwXLt9_d_9HyGcGOQNWfdvl7eSHkBdQsBx4DkX9gSxYfS0zxkF-JAsoQWScXcsLchnCDtITNZyTi5IDVJzBgvx6bnprbDxQ19G-CehpGFH_7pFqN0TfhEjtvtnYYUM752ncIh09GqujdcMcmo-gr24aDN1iGpbA0UUcom36T-Ssa_qAV6d_SZ7u736uvmfrHw-Pq9t1pkshY9ZhWwJrmRECpdBcsMp01XwtdKZilca2aGvTVkZzLbmsmqIVugbBtSlLacol-XqcO3r3MmGIam-Dxr5vBnRTUIUoajk3Zgktj6j2LgSPnRp9KugPioGavaqd-utVzV4VcJW8ptSX04Kp3aP5l3kXmYCbI4Cp5h-LXgVtcdDJlEcdlXH2vwveADy_i5I</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Zheng, K.J.</creator><creator>Middelkoop, E.</creator><creator>Stoop, M.</creator><creator>van Zuijlen, P.P.M.</creator><creator>Pijpe, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6940-7552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-8848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential</title><author>Zheng, K.J. ; Middelkoop, E. ; Stoop, M. ; van Zuijlen, P.P.M. ; Pijpe, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-feb301b1d55e95c4516df600050fd616ceb2b8db6dc4c9496a2b5c8054cd339d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diagnostic measurement tools</topic><topic>Healing potential</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser Doppler Imaging</topic><topic>Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging</topic><topic>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelkoop, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoop, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zuijlen, P.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pijpe, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, K.J.</au><au>Middelkoop, E.</au><au>Stoop, M.</au><au>van Zuijlen, P.P.M.</au><au>Pijpe, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>319-327</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>•Accurate assessment of burn severity is essential for clinical decision making.•Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging is a promising technique in burn assessment.•Prediction of burn wound healing potential by LSCI is valid compared to LDI.•LSCI is a tool with high feasibility.•Future research in full thickness burns, colour palette, cost-effectiveness needed.
To assess validity of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) for the measurement of burn wound healing potential (HP) in a burn centre patient population, based on Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) as reference standard.
A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was performed between September–December 2019. A total of 50 burns in 14 patients were included. Imaging and data collection were standardized. Correlation between LSCI and LDI flux values was tested. ROC curves were developed to test the discriminative ability of LSCI between LDI HP categories.
Number of adults and children were equal. Mean total body surface area burnt was 5.5%. Main burn causes were scalds (64%) and flame burns (36%). LSCI set-up and imaging duration was 3 min and 10 s, respectively. LSCI was able to discriminate between wounds with early versus delayed HP (<14 versus ≥14 days) with sensitivity 71% and specificity 95% (p < 0.001). For HP ≤21 versus >21 days, similar sensitivity (74%) and specificity (95%) were found (p < 0.001). Correlations between LSCI and LDI flux values were moderate (<14 days) to absent (>21 days).
LSCI shows good validity for the prediction of burn wound HP. It is a highly feasible, patient and physician friendly tool.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34006410</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.028</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6940-7552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-8848</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
| ispartof | Burns, 2022-03, Vol.48 (2), p.319-327 |
| issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906411 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Adult Burns Burns - diagnostic imaging Child Diagnostic measurement tools Healing potential Humans Laser Doppler Imaging Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods Prospective Studies Skin - diagnostic imaging Validity Wound Healing |
| title | Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A19%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20laser%20speckle%20contrast%20imaging%20for%20the%20prediction%20of%20burn%20wound%20healing%20potential&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Zheng,%20K.J.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=319-327&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528906411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528906411&rft_id=info:pmid/34006410&rft_els_id=S0305417921001182&rfr_iscdi=true |