When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?

Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of managed care 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144
Hauptverfasser: Langford, Aisha T, Kang, Stella K, Braithwaite, R Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e144
container_issue 5
container_start_page e141
container_title The American journal of managed care
container_volume 27
creator Langford, Aisha T
Kang, Stella K
Braithwaite, R Scott
description Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin 
doi_str_mv 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528823332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQgIMotlbvnmTBi5et2bz3JFK0CgUviseQJrN0Szepya7gvzet1YMD8zh8MwwfQpcVnlIpBb81685OCSbVVClB-REaVzUVJRE1Oc4zVqrEhLAROktpjTEViolTNKIMY1ILNkbz9xX4wgVIhQ_euBVE8BaK1rvWmh4KUzj4bE3fBl80MXTFNs_g-9LmkmFXWBPh7hydNGaT4OLQJ-jt8eF19lQuXubPs_tFaSmRfek45ZhzhoWplmCkILY2tsKWGGKsc04qYqSzEstayJxNzWS1bHglGTC7pBN083N3G8PHAKnXXZssbDbGQxiSJpwoRSilJKPX_9B1GKLP32mKa5ajFipT-IeyMaQUodHb2HYmfukK671kvZOsd5L1XnJeuTocHpYduL-FX6v0G8sIdx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094444968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><source>Research Library</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin &lt; 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34002964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Accountable care organizations ; Automation ; Blood pressure ; Chronic illnesses ; Decision making ; Diabetes ; Electronic health records ; Health administration ; Health care ; Hypertension ; Language ; Medical screening ; Patient-centered care ; Preferences ; Quality improvement ; Surveillance</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144</ispartof><rights>Copyright MultiMedia Healthcare Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094444968?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12724,12753,21367,21371,27901,27902,33429,33430,33721,33722,34311,34312,36242,36243,43592,43781,44049,44380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Stella K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin &lt; 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</description><subject>Accountable care organizations</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQgIMotlbvnmTBi5et2bz3JFK0CgUviseQJrN0Szepya7gvzet1YMD8zh8MwwfQpcVnlIpBb81685OCSbVVClB-REaVzUVJRE1Oc4zVqrEhLAROktpjTEViolTNKIMY1ILNkbz9xX4wgVIhQ_euBVE8BaK1rvWmh4KUzj4bE3fBl80MXTFNs_g-9LmkmFXWBPh7hydNGaT4OLQJ-jt8eF19lQuXubPs_tFaSmRfek45ZhzhoWplmCkILY2tsKWGGKsc04qYqSzEstayJxNzWS1bHglGTC7pBN083N3G8PHAKnXXZssbDbGQxiSJpwoRSilJKPX_9B1GKLP32mKa5ajFipT-IeyMaQUodHb2HYmfukK671kvZOsd5L1XnJeuTocHpYduL-FX6v0G8sIdx8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Langford, Aisha T</creator><creator>Kang, Stella K</creator><creator>Braithwaite, R Scott</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88M</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><author>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accountable care organizations</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Stella K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete - Professional Edition</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Aisha T</au><au>Kang, Stella K</au><au>Braithwaite, R Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e141</spage><epage>e144</epage><pages>e141-e144</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin &lt; 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub><pmid>34002964</pmid><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-0224
ispartof The American journal of managed care, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144
issn 1088-0224
1936-2692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823332
source Research Library; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Accountable care organizations
Automation
Blood pressure
Chronic illnesses
Decision making
Diabetes
Electronic health records
Health administration
Health care
Hypertension
Language
Medical screening
Patient-centered care
Preferences
Quality improvement
Surveillance
title When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20does%20nonadherence%20indicate%20a%20deviation%20from%20patient-centered%20care?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Langford,%20Aisha%20T&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e141&rft.epage=e144&rft.pages=e141-e144&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528823332%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094444968&rft_id=info:pmid/34002964&rfr_iscdi=true