When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?
Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of managed care 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e141 |
container_title | The American journal of managed care |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Langford, Aisha T Kang, Stella K Braithwaite, R Scott |
description | Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin |
doi_str_mv | 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528823332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQgIMotlbvnmTBi5et2bz3JFK0CgUviseQJrN0Szepya7gvzet1YMD8zh8MwwfQpcVnlIpBb81685OCSbVVClB-REaVzUVJRE1Oc4zVqrEhLAROktpjTEViolTNKIMY1ILNkbz9xX4wgVIhQ_euBVE8BaK1rvWmh4KUzj4bE3fBl80MXTFNs_g-9LmkmFXWBPh7hydNGaT4OLQJ-jt8eF19lQuXubPs_tFaSmRfek45ZhzhoWplmCkILY2tsKWGGKsc04qYqSzEstayJxNzWS1bHglGTC7pBN083N3G8PHAKnXXZssbDbGQxiSJpwoRSilJKPX_9B1GKLP32mKa5ajFipT-IeyMaQUodHb2HYmfukK671kvZOsd5L1XnJeuTocHpYduL-FX6v0G8sIdx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094444968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><source>Research Library</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin < 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34002964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Accountable care organizations ; Automation ; Blood pressure ; Chronic illnesses ; Decision making ; Diabetes ; Electronic health records ; Health administration ; Health care ; Hypertension ; Language ; Medical screening ; Patient-centered care ; Preferences ; Quality improvement ; Surveillance</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144</ispartof><rights>Copyright MultiMedia Healthcare Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094444968?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12724,12753,21367,21371,27901,27902,33429,33430,33721,33722,34311,34312,36242,36243,43592,43781,44049,44380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Stella K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin < 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</description><subject>Accountable care organizations</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQgIMotlbvnmTBi5et2bz3JFK0CgUviseQJrN0Szepya7gvzet1YMD8zh8MwwfQpcVnlIpBb81685OCSbVVClB-REaVzUVJRE1Oc4zVqrEhLAROktpjTEViolTNKIMY1ILNkbz9xX4wgVIhQ_euBVE8BaK1rvWmh4KUzj4bE3fBl80MXTFNs_g-9LmkmFXWBPh7hydNGaT4OLQJ-jt8eF19lQuXubPs_tFaSmRfek45ZhzhoWplmCkILY2tsKWGGKsc04qYqSzEstayJxNzWS1bHglGTC7pBN083N3G8PHAKnXXZssbDbGQxiSJpwoRSilJKPX_9B1GKLP32mKa5ajFipT-IeyMaQUodHb2HYmfukK671kvZOsd5L1XnJeuTocHpYduL-FX6v0G8sIdx8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Langford, Aisha T</creator><creator>Kang, Stella K</creator><creator>Braithwaite, R Scott</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88M</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</title><author>Langford, Aisha T ; Kang, Stella K ; Braithwaite, R Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d535055406a1bea762c9ac10c2a2acddd782a7dc707967796f9471bf5174e4cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accountable care organizations</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Aisha T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Stella K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braithwaite, R Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete - Professional Edition</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Aisha T</au><au>Kang, Stella K</au><au>Braithwaite, R Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e141</spage><epage>e144</epage><pages>e141-e144</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>Patient-centered care, defined as "providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions," is advocated by clinicians and professional organizations and is part of a composite criterion for augmented reimbursement for various health care settings, including patient-centered medical homes. Despite general agreement that patient-centered care is a good idea and worthy of incentivization, patient-centered care is difficult to assess accurately, scalably, and feasibly. In this commentary, we suggest that assessment of patient-centered care may be improved by identifying circumstances that indicate its probable absence-in particular, by flagging probable discordance between a patient's preferences and their treatment care plan. One potential marker of this discordance is persistent lack of control of a comorbid condition that is easily controllable by existing therapies and where existing therapies are sufficiently diverse to be compatible with a wide range of patient preferences (eg, stage 1 hypertension, type 2 diabetes with glycated hemoglobin < 8.5%). We outline how this approach may be tested, validated, and harmonized with existing quality improvement activities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub><pmid>34002964</pmid><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-0224 |
ispartof | The American journal of managed care, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.e141-e144 |
issn | 1088-0224 1936-2692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823332 |
source | Research Library; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Accountable care organizations Automation Blood pressure Chronic illnesses Decision making Diabetes Electronic health records Health administration Health care Hypertension Language Medical screening Patient-centered care Preferences Quality improvement Surveillance |
title | When does nonadherence indicate a deviation from patient-centered care? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20does%20nonadherence%20indicate%20a%20deviation%20from%20patient-centered%20care?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Langford,%20Aisha%20T&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e141&rft.epage=e144&rft.pages=e141-e144&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528823332%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094444968&rft_id=info:pmid/34002964&rfr_iscdi=true |