Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes

Vertebrate embryos require access to water; however, many species nest in terrestrial habitats that vary considerably in moisture content. Oviparous, non‐avian reptiles have served as models to understand how environmental factors, like moisture availability, influence development because eggs are o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrative zoology 2022-07, Vol.17 (4), p.550-566
Hauptverfasser: HALL, Joshua M., MIRACLE, Jocelyn, SCRUGGS, Cindy D., WARNER, Daniel A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 4
container_start_page 550
container_title Integrative zoology
container_volume 17
creator HALL, Joshua M.
MIRACLE, Jocelyn
SCRUGGS, Cindy D.
WARNER, Daniel A.
description Vertebrate embryos require access to water; however, many species nest in terrestrial habitats that vary considerably in moisture content. Oviparous, non‐avian reptiles have served as models to understand how environmental factors, like moisture availability, influence development because eggs are often exposed to prevailing environments in the absence of parental care. Though much research demonstrates the importance of water absorption by eggs, many ecological factors that influence moisture availability in natural nests have received little attention. For example, the type of substrate in which nests are constructed is understudied. We experimentally incubated eggs of the brown anole lizard (Anolis sagrei) in 2 naturally occurring nest substrates that were treated with varying amounts of water to determine how natural substrates influence development at different moisture concentrations. One substrate consisted of sand and crushed seashells and the other was mostly organic material (i.e. decayed plant material). Both are common nesting substrates at our field site. When controlling for water uptake by eggs, we found that egg survival and hatchling phenotypes were similar between substrates; however, embryos developed more quickly in the sand/shell substrate than the organic substrate, indicating substrate‐specific effects on embryo physiology. These results demonstrate that different natural substrates can result in similar developmental outcomes if the water available to eggs is comparable; however, some aspects of development, like developmental rate, are affected by the type of substrate, independent of water availability. Further study is required to determine how natural substrates influence embryo physiology independent of water content. We incubated squamate eggs in substrates from natural nests. We observed substrate‐specific effects on egg physiology but not on hatchling morphology or performance. Our results indicate that substrate characteristics other than moisture retention can influence embryo development.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1749-4877.12553
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528823177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3723-710b090bc0ea660bf5a8956f4b307e9aeb68cfc7233f908aebb83809379f4eee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PHDEQxa0oCMiFOl1kKU2aA6-9a3vLCAFBQqSBhsaynTG34F0f_gDtfx8fd0EoTdyM_fSbp_EbhL405Lip56QRbb9spRDHDe069gEdvikf390P0KeUHgjhpOPdPjpgLSG0Z_QQPV7rXKL2eIKUcSom5agzJDxMzheYLOD0VPRYNQyjiXPA69WchuDD_YxNyXilnwH7IWdfCefAZhymqma78sN0X3GYQp7XkD6jPad9gqNdXaDb87Ob05_Lq18Xl6c_rpaWCcqWoiGG9MRYAppzYlynZd9x1xpGBPQaDJfW2Yoy1xNZ30YySXometcCAFug71vfdQxPpf5LjUOy4L2eIJSkaEelpKwRoqLf_kEfQolTnU5RLrmkvGm7Sp1sKRtDShGcWsdh1HFWDVGbPahN0mqTtHrdQ-34uvMtZoTfb_zf4CvAt8DL4GH-n5-6vL6jW-c_mSKT_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686826145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>HALL, Joshua M. ; MIRACLE, Jocelyn ; SCRUGGS, Cindy D. ; WARNER, Daniel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>HALL, Joshua M. ; MIRACLE, Jocelyn ; SCRUGGS, Cindy D. ; WARNER, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><description>Vertebrate embryos require access to water; however, many species nest in terrestrial habitats that vary considerably in moisture content. Oviparous, non‐avian reptiles have served as models to understand how environmental factors, like moisture availability, influence development because eggs are often exposed to prevailing environments in the absence of parental care. Though much research demonstrates the importance of water absorption by eggs, many ecological factors that influence moisture availability in natural nests have received little attention. For example, the type of substrate in which nests are constructed is understudied. We experimentally incubated eggs of the brown anole lizard (Anolis sagrei) in 2 naturally occurring nest substrates that were treated with varying amounts of water to determine how natural substrates influence development at different moisture concentrations. One substrate consisted of sand and crushed seashells and the other was mostly organic material (i.e. decayed plant material). Both are common nesting substrates at our field site. When controlling for water uptake by eggs, we found that egg survival and hatchling phenotypes were similar between substrates; however, embryos developed more quickly in the sand/shell substrate than the organic substrate, indicating substrate‐specific effects on embryo physiology. These results demonstrate that different natural substrates can result in similar developmental outcomes if the water available to eggs is comparable; however, some aspects of development, like developmental rate, are affected by the type of substrate, independent of water availability. Further study is required to determine how natural substrates influence embryo physiology independent of water content. We incubated squamate eggs in substrates from natural nests. We observed substrate‐specific effects on egg physiology but not on hatchling morphology or performance. Our results indicate that substrate characteristics other than moisture retention can influence embryo development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4877</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12553</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34002932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Availability ; developmental plasticity ; egg incubation ; Eggs ; Embryos ; Environmental factors ; hydric conditions ; Moisture availability ; Moisture content ; Nesting ; nesting behavior ; Nests ; nest‐site selection ; Oviparity ; Parental behaviour ; Phenotypes ; Physiology ; Reptiles ; Sand ; Shells ; Substrates ; Survival ; Terrestrial environments ; Uptake ; Water ; Water availability ; Water content ; Water uptake</subject><ispartof>Integrative zoology, 2022-07, Vol.17 (4), p.550-566</ispartof><rights>2021 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3723-710b090bc0ea660bf5a8956f4b307e9aeb68cfc7233f908aebb83809379f4eee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3723-710b090bc0ea660bf5a8956f4b307e9aeb68cfc7233f908aebb83809379f4eee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0389-2772 ; 0000-0001-7231-7785 ; 0000-0002-5587-3402 ; 0000-0002-3693-1857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1749-4877.12553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1749-4877.12553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HALL, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRACLE, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCRUGGS, Cindy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARNER, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes</title><title>Integrative zoology</title><addtitle>Integr Zool</addtitle><description>Vertebrate embryos require access to water; however, many species nest in terrestrial habitats that vary considerably in moisture content. Oviparous, non‐avian reptiles have served as models to understand how environmental factors, like moisture availability, influence development because eggs are often exposed to prevailing environments in the absence of parental care. Though much research demonstrates the importance of water absorption by eggs, many ecological factors that influence moisture availability in natural nests have received little attention. For example, the type of substrate in which nests are constructed is understudied. We experimentally incubated eggs of the brown anole lizard (Anolis sagrei) in 2 naturally occurring nest substrates that were treated with varying amounts of water to determine how natural substrates influence development at different moisture concentrations. One substrate consisted of sand and crushed seashells and the other was mostly organic material (i.e. decayed plant material). Both are common nesting substrates at our field site. When controlling for water uptake by eggs, we found that egg survival and hatchling phenotypes were similar between substrates; however, embryos developed more quickly in the sand/shell substrate than the organic substrate, indicating substrate‐specific effects on embryo physiology. These results demonstrate that different natural substrates can result in similar developmental outcomes if the water available to eggs is comparable; however, some aspects of development, like developmental rate, are affected by the type of substrate, independent of water availability. Further study is required to determine how natural substrates influence embryo physiology independent of water content. We incubated squamate eggs in substrates from natural nests. We observed substrate‐specific effects on egg physiology but not on hatchling morphology or performance. Our results indicate that substrate characteristics other than moisture retention can influence embryo development.</description><subject>Availability</subject><subject>developmental plasticity</subject><subject>egg incubation</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>hydric conditions</subject><subject>Moisture availability</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>nesting behavior</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>nest‐site selection</subject><subject>Oviparity</subject><subject>Parental behaviour</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Shells</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water uptake</subject><issn>1749-4877</issn><issn>1749-4869</issn><issn>1749-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb1PHDEQxa0oCMiFOl1kKU2aA6-9a3vLCAFBQqSBhsaynTG34F0f_gDtfx8fd0EoTdyM_fSbp_EbhL405Lip56QRbb9spRDHDe069gEdvikf390P0KeUHgjhpOPdPjpgLSG0Z_QQPV7rXKL2eIKUcSom5agzJDxMzheYLOD0VPRYNQyjiXPA69WchuDD_YxNyXilnwH7IWdfCefAZhymqma78sN0X3GYQp7XkD6jPad9gqNdXaDb87Ob05_Lq18Xl6c_rpaWCcqWoiGG9MRYAppzYlynZd9x1xpGBPQaDJfW2Yoy1xNZ30YySXometcCAFug71vfdQxPpf5LjUOy4L2eIJSkaEelpKwRoqLf_kEfQolTnU5RLrmkvGm7Sp1sKRtDShGcWsdh1HFWDVGbPahN0mqTtHrdQ-34uvMtZoTfb_zf4CvAt8DL4GH-n5-6vL6jW-c_mSKT_w</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>HALL, Joshua M.</creator><creator>MIRACLE, Jocelyn</creator><creator>SCRUGGS, Cindy D.</creator><creator>WARNER, Daniel A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-2772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7231-7785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes</title><author>HALL, Joshua M. ; MIRACLE, Jocelyn ; SCRUGGS, Cindy D. ; WARNER, Daniel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3723-710b090bc0ea660bf5a8956f4b307e9aeb68cfc7233f908aebb83809379f4eee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Availability</topic><topic>developmental plasticity</topic><topic>egg incubation</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>hydric conditions</topic><topic>Moisture availability</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>nesting behavior</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>nest‐site selection</topic><topic>Oviparity</topic><topic>Parental behaviour</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Shells</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HALL, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIRACLE, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCRUGGS, Cindy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARNER, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrative zoology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HALL, Joshua M.</au><au>MIRACLE, Jocelyn</au><au>SCRUGGS, Cindy D.</au><au>WARNER, Daniel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes</atitle><jtitle>Integrative zoology</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Zool</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>550-566</pages><issn>1749-4877</issn><issn>1749-4869</issn><eissn>1749-4877</eissn><abstract>Vertebrate embryos require access to water; however, many species nest in terrestrial habitats that vary considerably in moisture content. Oviparous, non‐avian reptiles have served as models to understand how environmental factors, like moisture availability, influence development because eggs are often exposed to prevailing environments in the absence of parental care. Though much research demonstrates the importance of water absorption by eggs, many ecological factors that influence moisture availability in natural nests have received little attention. For example, the type of substrate in which nests are constructed is understudied. We experimentally incubated eggs of the brown anole lizard (Anolis sagrei) in 2 naturally occurring nest substrates that were treated with varying amounts of water to determine how natural substrates influence development at different moisture concentrations. One substrate consisted of sand and crushed seashells and the other was mostly organic material (i.e. decayed plant material). Both are common nesting substrates at our field site. When controlling for water uptake by eggs, we found that egg survival and hatchling phenotypes were similar between substrates; however, embryos developed more quickly in the sand/shell substrate than the organic substrate, indicating substrate‐specific effects on embryo physiology. These results demonstrate that different natural substrates can result in similar developmental outcomes if the water available to eggs is comparable; however, some aspects of development, like developmental rate, are affected by the type of substrate, independent of water availability. Further study is required to determine how natural substrates influence embryo physiology independent of water content. We incubated squamate eggs in substrates from natural nests. We observed substrate‐specific effects on egg physiology but not on hatchling morphology or performance. Our results indicate that substrate characteristics other than moisture retention can influence embryo development.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34002932</pmid><doi>10.1111/1749-4877.12553</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-2772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7231-7785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1857</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4877
ispartof Integrative zoology, 2022-07, Vol.17 (4), p.550-566
issn 1749-4877
1749-4869
1749-4877
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528823177
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Availability
developmental plasticity
egg incubation
Eggs
Embryos
Environmental factors
hydric conditions
Moisture availability
Moisture content
Nesting
nesting behavior
Nests
nest‐site selection
Oviparity
Parental behaviour
Phenotypes
Physiology
Reptiles
Sand
Shells
Substrates
Survival
Terrestrial environments
Uptake
Water
Water availability
Water content
Water uptake
title Natural nest substrates influence squamate embryo physiology but have little effect on hatchling phenotypes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20nest%20substrates%20influence%20squamate%20embryo%20physiology%20but%20have%20little%20effect%20on%20hatchling%20phenotypes&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20zoology&rft.au=HALL,%20Joshua%20M.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=550-566&rft.issn=1749-4877&rft.eissn=1749-4877&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1749-4877.12553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528823177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686826145&rft_id=info:pmid/34002932&rfr_iscdi=true