Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges
Current Trends In May 2019 AveXis, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Novartis, announced that it had received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to market its gene therapy Zolgensma for the treatment of pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The Institute for Clinic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Licensing journal 2020-08, Vol.40 (7), p.4-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 4 |
container_title | The Licensing journal |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Lambrix, Ellen Müürsepp, Erik Lawrence, Janna |
description | Current Trends In May 2019 AveXis, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Novartis, announced that it had received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to market its gene therapy Zolgensma for the treatment of pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review in the US has estimated that if gene therapies are developed to treat only one in ten American patients with a genetic condition-approximately 1% of the total population-the cumulative budget impact could rise to $3 trillion2. Alternative Pricing Models The pharmaceutical industry has sought to counter criticism over the high price tags for gene and cell therapies by coupling these revolutionary therapies with new and unconventional pricing and reimbursement mechanisms. If royalties are payable on net sales of the therapy on a regular basis (e.g., quarterly or annually) then unless the license includes a mechanism to take account of outcomes-based refunds made by the licensee to payers, the licensee could find itself out of pocket, unable to recover royalties paid to the licensor despite having had to refund the therapy price to the payer. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528509914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528509914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_25285099143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjbsOgjAUQDtoIj7-oaMLSWmLiqP4GhwY2EnFK1TrBXvh_yXGH3A6ZzjJGbEgElqEWkg1YVOihxDRWqpVwPYpOMcN3vgJEHhegzetBdrynWvK57WnDjzPvC2BvtllMCSLFU9r4xxgBTRn47txBIsfZ2x5POTpOWx98-6BuuJlqRxGBqHpqZCx3MQiSSKt_kg_1Oc9Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>2528509914</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lambrix, Ellen ; Müürsepp, Erik ; Lawrence, Janna</creator><creatorcontrib>Lambrix, Ellen ; Müürsepp, Erik ; Lawrence, Janna</creatorcontrib><description>Current Trends In May 2019 AveXis, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Novartis, announced that it had received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to market its gene therapy Zolgensma for the treatment of pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review in the US has estimated that if gene therapies are developed to treat only one in ten American patients with a genetic condition-approximately 1% of the total population-the cumulative budget impact could rise to $3 trillion2. Alternative Pricing Models The pharmaceutical industry has sought to counter criticism over the high price tags for gene and cell therapies by coupling these revolutionary therapies with new and unconventional pricing and reimbursement mechanisms. If royalties are payable on net sales of the therapy on a regular basis (e.g., quarterly or annually) then unless the license includes a mechanism to take account of outcomes-based refunds made by the licensee to payers, the licensee could find itself out of pocket, unable to recover royalties paid to the licensor despite having had to refund the therapy price to the payer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-4023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Atrophy ; Biotechnology industry ; Clinical outcomes ; Gene therapy ; Intellectual property ; Licenses ; Licensing ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pricing ; Royalties ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The Licensing journal, 2020-08, Vol.40 (7), p.4-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Aug 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lambrix, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müürsepp, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Janna</creatorcontrib><title>Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges</title><title>The Licensing journal</title><description>Current Trends In May 2019 AveXis, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Novartis, announced that it had received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to market its gene therapy Zolgensma for the treatment of pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review in the US has estimated that if gene therapies are developed to treat only one in ten American patients with a genetic condition-approximately 1% of the total population-the cumulative budget impact could rise to $3 trillion2. Alternative Pricing Models The pharmaceutical industry has sought to counter criticism over the high price tags for gene and cell therapies by coupling these revolutionary therapies with new and unconventional pricing and reimbursement mechanisms. If royalties are payable on net sales of the therapy on a regular basis (e.g., quarterly or annually) then unless the license includes a mechanism to take account of outcomes-based refunds made by the licensee to payers, the licensee could find itself out of pocket, unable to recover royalties paid to the licensor despite having had to refund the therapy price to the payer.</description><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Royalties</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1040-4023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjbsOgjAUQDtoIj7-oaMLSWmLiqP4GhwY2EnFK1TrBXvh_yXGH3A6ZzjJGbEgElqEWkg1YVOihxDRWqpVwPYpOMcN3vgJEHhegzetBdrynWvK57WnDjzPvC2BvtllMCSLFU9r4xxgBTRn47txBIsfZ2x5POTpOWx98-6BuuJlqRxGBqHpqZCx3MQiSSKt_kg_1Oc9Tg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Lambrix, Ellen</creator><creator>Müürsepp, Erik</creator><creator>Lawrence, Janna</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges</title><author>Lambrix, Ellen ; Müürsepp, Erik ; Lawrence, Janna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_25285099143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Royalties</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lambrix, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müürsepp, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Janna</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Licensing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lambrix, Ellen</au><au>Müürsepp, Erik</au><au>Lawrence, Janna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges</atitle><jtitle>The Licensing journal</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>4-7</pages><issn>1040-4023</issn><abstract>Current Trends In May 2019 AveXis, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Novartis, announced that it had received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to market its gene therapy Zolgensma for the treatment of pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review in the US has estimated that if gene therapies are developed to treat only one in ten American patients with a genetic condition-approximately 1% of the total population-the cumulative budget impact could rise to $3 trillion2. Alternative Pricing Models The pharmaceutical industry has sought to counter criticism over the high price tags for gene and cell therapies by coupling these revolutionary therapies with new and unconventional pricing and reimbursement mechanisms. If royalties are payable on net sales of the therapy on a regular basis (e.g., quarterly or annually) then unless the license includes a mechanism to take account of outcomes-based refunds made by the licensee to payers, the licensee could find itself out of pocket, unable to recover royalties paid to the licensor despite having had to refund the therapy price to the payer.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-4023 |
ispartof | The Licensing journal, 2020-08, Vol.40 (7), p.4-7 |
issn | 1040-4023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528509914 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Atrophy Biotechnology industry Clinical outcomes Gene therapy Intellectual property Licenses Licensing Patients Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceuticals Pricing Royalties Trends |
title | Cell and Gene Therapies: Blockbuster Prices and Licensing Challenges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cell%20and%20Gene%20Therapies:%20Blockbuster%20Prices%20and%20Licensing%20Challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20Licensing%20journal&rft.au=Lambrix,%20Ellen&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=4-7&rft.issn=1040-4023&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2528509914%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528509914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |