A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jun Young, Kim, Tae Jun, Lee, Dong Kyu, Min, Yang Won, Lee, Hyuk, Min, Byung-Hoon, Lee, Jun Haeng, An, Ji Yeong, Choi, Min Gew, Sohn, Tae Sung, Bae, Jae Moon, Kim, Hye Seung, Ahn, Joong Hyun, Kim, Jae J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2137
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2129
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 36
creator Kim, Jun Young
Kim, Tae Jun
Lee, Dong Kyu
Min, Yang Won
Lee, Hyuk
Min, Byung-Hoon
Lee, Jun Haeng
An, Ji Yeong
Choi, Min Gew
Sohn, Tae Sung
Bae, Jae Moon
Kim, Hye Seung
Ahn, Joong Hyun
Kim, Jae J.
description Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs. Methods The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach. Results A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81). Conclusion This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528432934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528432934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS1ERJbAH6BAlmhohvi5HpdRxEuKRBNqy-u53nWYGU9sD1L-PXezASQKKsvH330cH0LecPaBM2YuK2NqqzomeMd6zXgnnpENV1J0QvD-OdkwK1knjFXn5GWtdwx5y_ULci6ltVZosSH3V3QpkBcovqWfQEuqP47KkEJLeaZTHmCkMRd6SPsDnfyY9rOfwwNdcoO5JT_Sva-t5DQ3qC3NKByvSNK2TrlUmiNtB0AVxXB4Rc6iHyu8fjovyPdPH2-vv3Q33z5_vb666YI0unVRw2B3vVFRx10QHB1xbzQIDZJp8D2LRqH1XTRcBx4GBkIMRoEK_SDNVl6Q96e-S8n3K67mplQDjKOfIa_Vof0e_8pKhei7f9C7vBZ0gtRW9JZpYzRS4kSFkmstEN1S0uTLg-PMHQNxp0AcbuUeA3ECi94-tV53Ewx_Sn4ngIA8ARWf5j2Uv7P_0_YX44iXpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628905775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs. Methods The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach. Results A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and &gt; 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81). Conclusion This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33999252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Biopsy ; Clinical decision making ; Confidence intervals ; Endoscopy ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Mortality ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914,41477,42546,51308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Yang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jun Haeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Ji Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Min Gew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Tae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jae Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs. Methods The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach. Results A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and &gt; 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81). Conclusion This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS1ERJbAH6BAlmhohvi5HpdRxEuKRBNqy-u53nWYGU9sD1L-PXezASQKKsvH330cH0LecPaBM2YuK2NqqzomeMd6zXgnnpENV1J0QvD-OdkwK1knjFXn5GWtdwx5y_ULci6ltVZosSH3V3QpkBcovqWfQEuqP47KkEJLeaZTHmCkMRd6SPsDnfyY9rOfwwNdcoO5JT_Sva-t5DQ3qC3NKByvSNK2TrlUmiNtB0AVxXB4Rc6iHyu8fjovyPdPH2-vv3Q33z5_vb666YI0unVRw2B3vVFRx10QHB1xbzQIDZJp8D2LRqH1XTRcBx4GBkIMRoEK_SDNVl6Q96e-S8n3K67mplQDjKOfIa_Vof0e_8pKhei7f9C7vBZ0gtRW9JZpYzRS4kSFkmstEN1S0uTLg-PMHQNxp0AcbuUeA3ECi94-tV53Ewx_Sn4ngIA8ARWf5j2Uv7P_0_YX44iXpA</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Kim, Jun Young</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Jun</creator><creator>Lee, Dong Kyu</creator><creator>Min, Yang Won</creator><creator>Lee, Hyuk</creator><creator>Min, Byung-Hoon</creator><creator>Lee, Jun Haeng</creator><creator>An, Ji Yeong</creator><creator>Choi, Min Gew</creator><creator>Sohn, Tae Sung</creator><creator>Bae, Jae Moon</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Seung</creator><creator>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Jae J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><author>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Yang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jun Haeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Ji Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Min Gew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Tae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jae Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jun Young</au><au>Kim, Tae Jun</au><au>Lee, Dong Kyu</au><au>Min, Yang Won</au><au>Lee, Hyuk</au><au>Min, Byung-Hoon</au><au>Lee, Jun Haeng</au><au>An, Ji Yeong</au><au>Choi, Min Gew</au><au>Sohn, Tae Sung</au><au>Bae, Jae Moon</au><au>Kim, Hye Seung</au><au>Ahn, Joong Hyun</au><au>Kim, Jae J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2129</spage><epage>2137</epage><pages>2129-2137</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs. Methods The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach. Results A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and &gt; 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81). Conclusion This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33999252</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528432934
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Biopsy
Clinical decision making
Confidence intervals
Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal cancer
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Medical prognosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Mortality
Proctology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Stomach
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Surgery
Tomography
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
title A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20preoperative%20risk%20prediction%20model%20for%20high%20malignancy%20potential%20gastrointestinal%20stromal%20tumors%20of%20the%20stomach&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Kim,%20Jun%20Young&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2129&rft.epage=2137&rft.pages=2129-2137&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528432934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628905775&rft_id=info:pmid/33999252&rfr_iscdi=true