A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach
Background Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and ea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2129 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Kim, Jun Young Kim, Tae Jun Lee, Dong Kyu Min, Yang Won Lee, Hyuk Min, Byung-Hoon Lee, Jun Haeng An, Ji Yeong Choi, Min Gew Sohn, Tae Sung Bae, Jae Moon Kim, Hye Seung Ahn, Joong Hyun Kim, Jae J. |
description | Background
Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs.
Methods
The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach.
Results
A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81).
Conclusion
This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528432934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528432934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS1ERJbAH6BAlmhohvi5HpdRxEuKRBNqy-u53nWYGU9sD1L-PXezASQKKsvH330cH0LecPaBM2YuK2NqqzomeMd6zXgnnpENV1J0QvD-OdkwK1knjFXn5GWtdwx5y_ULci6ltVZosSH3V3QpkBcovqWfQEuqP47KkEJLeaZTHmCkMRd6SPsDnfyY9rOfwwNdcoO5JT_Sva-t5DQ3qC3NKByvSNK2TrlUmiNtB0AVxXB4Rc6iHyu8fjovyPdPH2-vv3Q33z5_vb666YI0unVRw2B3vVFRx10QHB1xbzQIDZJp8D2LRqH1XTRcBx4GBkIMRoEK_SDNVl6Q96e-S8n3K67mplQDjKOfIa_Vof0e_8pKhei7f9C7vBZ0gtRW9JZpYzRS4kSFkmstEN1S0uTLg-PMHQNxp0AcbuUeA3ECi94-tV53Ewx_Sn4ngIA8ARWf5j2Uv7P_0_YX44iXpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628905775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs.
Methods
The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach.
Results
A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81).
Conclusion
This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33999252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Biopsy ; Clinical decision making ; Confidence intervals ; Endoscopy ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastasis ; Mortality ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914,41477,42546,51308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Yang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jun Haeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Ji Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Min Gew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Tae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jae Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs.
Methods
The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach.
Results
A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81).
Conclusion
This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtvFDEUhS1ERJbAH6BAlmhohvi5HpdRxEuKRBNqy-u53nWYGU9sD1L-PXezASQKKsvH330cH0LecPaBM2YuK2NqqzomeMd6zXgnnpENV1J0QvD-OdkwK1knjFXn5GWtdwx5y_ULci6ltVZosSH3V3QpkBcovqWfQEuqP47KkEJLeaZTHmCkMRd6SPsDnfyY9rOfwwNdcoO5JT_Sva-t5DQ3qC3NKByvSNK2TrlUmiNtB0AVxXB4Rc6iHyu8fjovyPdPH2-vv3Q33z5_vb666YI0unVRw2B3vVFRx10QHB1xbzQIDZJp8D2LRqH1XTRcBx4GBkIMRoEK_SDNVl6Q96e-S8n3K67mplQDjKOfIa_Vof0e_8pKhei7f9C7vBZ0gtRW9JZpYzRS4kSFkmstEN1S0uTLg-PMHQNxp0AcbuUeA3ECi94-tV53Ewx_Sn4ngIA8ARWf5j2Uv7P_0_YX44iXpA</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Kim, Jun Young</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Jun</creator><creator>Lee, Dong Kyu</creator><creator>Min, Yang Won</creator><creator>Lee, Hyuk</creator><creator>Min, Byung-Hoon</creator><creator>Lee, Jun Haeng</creator><creator>An, Ji Yeong</creator><creator>Choi, Min Gew</creator><creator>Sohn, Tae Sung</creator><creator>Bae, Jae Moon</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Seung</creator><creator>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Jae J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</title><author>Kim, Jun Young ; Kim, Tae Jun ; Lee, Dong Kyu ; Min, Yang Won ; Lee, Hyuk ; Min, Byung-Hoon ; Lee, Jun Haeng ; An, Ji Yeong ; Choi, Min Gew ; Sohn, Tae Sung ; Bae, Jae Moon ; Kim, Hye Seung ; Ahn, Joong Hyun ; Kim, Jae J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ed9b874f5fbc212181a75e25e305ea80f74021bf715c1cd0e22d74e4c8d3763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Yang Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Byung-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jun Haeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Ji Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Min Gew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Tae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jae Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Joong Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jun Young</au><au>Kim, Tae Jun</au><au>Lee, Dong Kyu</au><au>Min, Yang Won</au><au>Lee, Hyuk</au><au>Min, Byung-Hoon</au><au>Lee, Jun Haeng</au><au>An, Ji Yeong</au><au>Choi, Min Gew</au><au>Sohn, Tae Sung</au><au>Bae, Jae Moon</au><au>Kim, Hye Seung</au><au>Ahn, Joong Hyun</au><au>Kim, Jae J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2129</spage><epage>2137</epage><pages>2129-2137</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs.
Methods
The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach.
Results
A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4–6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81).
Conclusion
This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33999252</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.2129-2137 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528432934 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Biopsy Clinical decision making Confidence intervals Endoscopy Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal cancer Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery Gynecology Hepatology Humans Medical prognosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastasis Mortality Proctology Retrospective Studies Risk Factors ROC Curve Stomach Stomach Neoplasms - pathology Stomach Neoplasms - surgery Surgery Tomography Tumors Ultrasonic imaging |
title | A preoperative risk prediction model for high malignancy potential gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20preoperative%20risk%20prediction%20model%20for%20high%20malignancy%20potential%20gastrointestinal%20stromal%20tumors%20of%20the%20stomach&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Kim,%20Jun%20Young&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2129&rft.epage=2137&rft.pages=2129-2137&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08501-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528432934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628905775&rft_id=info:pmid/33999252&rfr_iscdi=true |