Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective but underutilized method of HIV prevention. Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations meeting CDC eligibility criteria for PrEP. Characterizing this population could help motivate, develop, and implement ED interventions to p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2021-10, Vol.48, p.198-202
Hauptverfasser: Faryar, Kiran A., Ancona, Rachel M., Braun, Robert S., Brown, Jennifer L., Sickles, Ryane K., Lyons, Michael S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue
container_start_page 198
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 48
creator Faryar, Kiran A.
Ancona, Rachel M.
Braun, Robert S.
Brown, Jennifer L.
Sickles, Ryane K.
Lyons, Michael S.
description Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective but underutilized method of HIV prevention. Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations meeting CDC eligibility criteria for PrEP. Characterizing this population could help motivate, develop, and implement ED interventions to promote PrEP uptake. This cross-sectional study explored the proportion of patients from an urban, academic ED who met CDC 2017 PrEP eligibility criteria using three existing datasets that mimic patient selection strategies for HIV screening: 1) study of consecutively approached ED patients from 2008 to 2009 (analogous to non-targeted screening), 2) patients of the ED's HIV screening program in 2017 (analogous to risk-targeted screening), and 3) electronic health record (EHR) diagnostic codes in 2017 (analogous to EHR selected screening). The primary outcome was the proportion eligible for PrEP referral. Secondary outcomes included proportion by risk group: men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men and women (HMW), and persons who inject drugs (PWID). The proportion eligible for PrEP was: 568/1970 (28.8%, 95% CI: 26.9–30.9) for consecutively approached patients, 552/3884 (14%, 95% CI: 13–15) for risk-targeted patients, and 605/66287 (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0) for EHR diagnoses of all patients. For the two datasets with behavioral risk information, the proportion eligible was: MSM 1–2%, HMW 12–28%, and PWID 1–4%. A large subgroup of this ED population was eligible for PrEP referral. EDs are a compelling setting for development and implementation of HIV prevention interventions to assist in national efforts to expand PrEP. •Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but underutilized for HIV prevention.•PrEP use is one of the key strategies of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.•Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations eligible for HIV PrEP.•A large subgroup of patients visiting this urban academic ED was eligible for PrEP.•EDs can assist in PrEP uptake by developing and implementing prevention interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2526147195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675721003740</els_id><sourcerecordid>2526147195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5124100b4a691ac5fc5663473c8fd47958eb4d84a0117c021123358d08c305443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwSfBv7JHYoKrQSpXYtGwtx7kpjpI42E7V4enxzLRdsOjGd_Odc33PQegDJTUltPky1HaAqWaE0ZqImmj1Cm2o5KzSVNHXaEMUl1WjpDpBpykNhFAqpHiLTjjfKkk53aC_Fyn7yWbo8BLDEmL2Ycahx3bGa2zLa53tYPIOwwTxDma3wx0sNuYJ5owXm_1hhmUd7UEMo7_z7Qi4DxFfXv0qxgAPS0hrhMOS37vRPvj0Dr3p7Zjg_eM8Q7ffL27OL6vrnz-uzr9dV45rkStJmaCEtMI2W2qd7J1sGi4Ud7rvhNpKDa3otLDlOuVKFpRxLnVHtONECsHP0Oejb9n9Z4WUzeSTg3G0M4Q1GSZZQ4WiW1nQT_-hQ1jjXH5XKE04K8zekB0pF0NKEXqzxJJh3BlKzL4ZM5h9M2bfjCHClGaK6OOj9dpO0D1LnqoowNcjACWLew_RJFeiddD5CC6bLviX_P8BV3afnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580329534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Faryar, Kiran A. ; Ancona, Rachel M. ; Braun, Robert S. ; Brown, Jennifer L. ; Sickles, Ryane K. ; Lyons, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Faryar, Kiran A. ; Ancona, Rachel M. ; Braun, Robert S. ; Brown, Jennifer L. ; Sickles, Ryane K. ; Lyons, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective but underutilized method of HIV prevention. Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations meeting CDC eligibility criteria for PrEP. Characterizing this population could help motivate, develop, and implement ED interventions to promote PrEP uptake. This cross-sectional study explored the proportion of patients from an urban, academic ED who met CDC 2017 PrEP eligibility criteria using three existing datasets that mimic patient selection strategies for HIV screening: 1) study of consecutively approached ED patients from 2008 to 2009 (analogous to non-targeted screening), 2) patients of the ED's HIV screening program in 2017 (analogous to risk-targeted screening), and 3) electronic health record (EHR) diagnostic codes in 2017 (analogous to EHR selected screening). The primary outcome was the proportion eligible for PrEP referral. Secondary outcomes included proportion by risk group: men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men and women (HMW), and persons who inject drugs (PWID). The proportion eligible for PrEP was: 568/1970 (28.8%, 95% CI: 26.9–30.9) for consecutively approached patients, 552/3884 (14%, 95% CI: 13–15) for risk-targeted patients, and 605/66287 (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0) for EHR diagnoses of all patients. For the two datasets with behavioral risk information, the proportion eligible was: MSM 1–2%, HMW 12–28%, and PWID 1–4%. A large subgroup of this ED population was eligible for PrEP referral. EDs are a compelling setting for development and implementation of HIV prevention interventions to assist in national efforts to expand PrEP. •Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but underutilized for HIV prevention.•PrEP use is one of the key strategies of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.•Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations eligible for HIV PrEP.•A large subgroup of patients visiting this urban academic ED was eligible for PrEP.•EDs can assist in PrEP uptake by developing and implementing prevention interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33975131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automation ; Datasets ; Demographics ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Gays &amp; lesbians ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Medical tests ; Mens health ; Patients ; Preexposure prophylaxis ; Prevention ; Prophylaxis ; Questionnaires ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Risk taking ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021-10, Vol.48, p.198-202</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5124100b4a691ac5fc5663473c8fd47958eb4d84a0117c021123358d08c305443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5124100b4a691ac5fc5663473c8fd47958eb4d84a0117c021123358d08c305443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2580329534?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faryar, Kiran A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ancona, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sickles, Ryane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective but underutilized method of HIV prevention. Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations meeting CDC eligibility criteria for PrEP. Characterizing this population could help motivate, develop, and implement ED interventions to promote PrEP uptake. This cross-sectional study explored the proportion of patients from an urban, academic ED who met CDC 2017 PrEP eligibility criteria using three existing datasets that mimic patient selection strategies for HIV screening: 1) study of consecutively approached ED patients from 2008 to 2009 (analogous to non-targeted screening), 2) patients of the ED's HIV screening program in 2017 (analogous to risk-targeted screening), and 3) electronic health record (EHR) diagnostic codes in 2017 (analogous to EHR selected screening). The primary outcome was the proportion eligible for PrEP referral. Secondary outcomes included proportion by risk group: men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men and women (HMW), and persons who inject drugs (PWID). The proportion eligible for PrEP was: 568/1970 (28.8%, 95% CI: 26.9–30.9) for consecutively approached patients, 552/3884 (14%, 95% CI: 13–15) for risk-targeted patients, and 605/66287 (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0) for EHR diagnoses of all patients. For the two datasets with behavioral risk information, the proportion eligible was: MSM 1–2%, HMW 12–28%, and PWID 1–4%. A large subgroup of this ED population was eligible for PrEP referral. EDs are a compelling setting for development and implementation of HIV prevention interventions to assist in national efforts to expand PrEP. •Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but underutilized for HIV prevention.•PrEP use is one of the key strategies of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.•Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations eligible for HIV PrEP.•A large subgroup of patients visiting this urban academic ED was eligible for PrEP.•EDs can assist in PrEP uptake by developing and implementing prevention interventions.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Gays &amp; lesbians</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preexposure prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwSfBv7JHYoKrQSpXYtGwtx7kpjpI42E7V4enxzLRdsOjGd_Odc33PQegDJTUltPky1HaAqWaE0ZqImmj1Cm2o5KzSVNHXaEMUl1WjpDpBpykNhFAqpHiLTjjfKkk53aC_Fyn7yWbo8BLDEmL2Ycahx3bGa2zLa53tYPIOwwTxDma3wx0sNuYJ5owXm_1hhmUd7UEMo7_z7Qi4DxFfXv0qxgAPS0hrhMOS37vRPvj0Dr3p7Zjg_eM8Q7ffL27OL6vrnz-uzr9dV45rkStJmaCEtMI2W2qd7J1sGi4Ud7rvhNpKDa3otLDlOuVKFpRxLnVHtONECsHP0Oejb9n9Z4WUzeSTg3G0M4Q1GSZZQ4WiW1nQT_-hQ1jjXH5XKE04K8zekB0pF0NKEXqzxJJh3BlKzL4ZM5h9M2bfjCHClGaK6OOj9dpO0D1LnqoowNcjACWLew_RJFeiddD5CC6bLviX_P8BV3afnw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Faryar, Kiran A.</creator><creator>Ancona, Rachel M.</creator><creator>Braun, Robert S.</creator><creator>Brown, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Sickles, Ryane K.</creator><creator>Lyons, Michael S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis</title><author>Faryar, Kiran A. ; Ancona, Rachel M. ; Braun, Robert S. ; Brown, Jennifer L. ; Sickles, Ryane K. ; Lyons, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-5124100b4a691ac5fc5663473c8fd47958eb4d84a0117c021123358d08c305443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Gays &amp; lesbians</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preexposure prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faryar, Kiran A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ancona, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sickles, Ryane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faryar, Kiran A.</au><au>Ancona, Rachel M.</au><au>Braun, Robert S.</au><au>Brown, Jennifer L.</au><au>Sickles, Ryane K.</au><au>Lyons, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>198</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>198-202</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective but underutilized method of HIV prevention. Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations meeting CDC eligibility criteria for PrEP. Characterizing this population could help motivate, develop, and implement ED interventions to promote PrEP uptake. This cross-sectional study explored the proportion of patients from an urban, academic ED who met CDC 2017 PrEP eligibility criteria using three existing datasets that mimic patient selection strategies for HIV screening: 1) study of consecutively approached ED patients from 2008 to 2009 (analogous to non-targeted screening), 2) patients of the ED's HIV screening program in 2017 (analogous to risk-targeted screening), and 3) electronic health record (EHR) diagnostic codes in 2017 (analogous to EHR selected screening). The primary outcome was the proportion eligible for PrEP referral. Secondary outcomes included proportion by risk group: men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men and women (HMW), and persons who inject drugs (PWID). The proportion eligible for PrEP was: 568/1970 (28.8%, 95% CI: 26.9–30.9) for consecutively approached patients, 552/3884 (14%, 95% CI: 13–15) for risk-targeted patients, and 605/66287 (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0) for EHR diagnoses of all patients. For the two datasets with behavioral risk information, the proportion eligible was: MSM 1–2%, HMW 12–28%, and PWID 1–4%. A large subgroup of this ED population was eligible for PrEP referral. EDs are a compelling setting for development and implementation of HIV prevention interventions to assist in national efforts to expand PrEP. •Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but underutilized for HIV prevention.•PrEP use is one of the key strategies of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.•Emergency departments (EDs) have access to at-risk populations eligible for HIV PrEP.•A large subgroup of patients visiting this urban academic ED was eligible for PrEP.•EDs can assist in PrEP uptake by developing and implementing prevention interventions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33975131</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.087</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021-10, Vol.48, p.198-202
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2526147195
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Automation
Datasets
Demographics
Disease control
Disease prevention
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Emergency department
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Gays & lesbians
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
Medical tests
Mens health
Patients
Preexposure prophylaxis
Prevention
Prophylaxis
Questionnaires
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Risk taking
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
title Estimated proportion of an urban academic emergency department patient population eligible for HIV preexposure prophylaxis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimated%20proportion%20of%20an%20urban%20academic%20emergency%20department%20patient%20population%20eligible%20for%20HIV%20preexposure%20prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Faryar,%20Kiran%20A.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=198-202&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2526147195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580329534&rft_id=info:pmid/33975131&rft_els_id=S0735675721003740&rfr_iscdi=true