Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database

To examine voluntary reports in the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, categorize complications and assign device-related causality with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and transurethr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.211-215
Hauptverfasser: Weiss, Jason K., Santucci, Nicole M., Sajadi, Kamran P., Chouhan, Jyoti D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue
container_start_page 211
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 156
creator Weiss, Jason K.
Santucci, Nicole M.
Sajadi, Kamran P.
Chouhan, Jyoti D.
description To examine voluntary reports in the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, categorize complications and assign device-related causality with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and transurethral water vapor therapy (TWVT). A review was performed using the terms “Urolift,” “Rezum,” and “transurethral resection of the prostate” between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2019. Duplicate and incomplete reports were excluded. The Gupta system was used to report complications and device related causality.1 Pearson's Chi-square analysis was performed to compare minor (Level 1) versus major (Levels 2-4) complications. A total of 548 events were examined. After removal of duplicates (n = 60), irrelevant reports (n=65), and incomplete information (n = 14), we included 409 events (74.6%). Of the 409 events, 214 were for TURP, 112 for TWVT, and 83 for PUL. In aggregate, 39.4% of events were minor/Level 1 (n=161/409). The proportion of subjects with Level 2-4 complications versus Level 1 complications was significantly higher for PUL than TURP or TWVT [X2 (2, N = 408) = 41.4023, P < .00001]. Device causality was attributable to device malfunction in 60.4% of cases (n=247/409). Device malfunction was noted in all groups and 39.4% of these were minor (Level 1). However, the majority of PUL reports noted a Level 3 or 4 complication (50.6%, 42/83), primarily bleeding related. Previous studies have not revealed significant risk of bleeding and suggests a discrepancy between study data and real-world experience that may alter patient counseling practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2525662158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429521003745</els_id><sourcerecordid>2525662158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-144c16f09b23a99057f4f863ed1b9c8feaeb971b9ba399217bfdc66818918bcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCAvy2IGe36cMRs05AeQWhVBs7Y8nuvgyBmntqdinqUvW4cEtkiW7lmc46tzP4TeUpJTQtmHXT56Z912ygtS0JxUOSnJMzSjdTHPOOf1czQjhJOsKnh9gV6FsCOEMMbmL9FFWfI5pQ2focfvLsTs5-i3RkmLF25_sElF44aAWx3B489W9n2at2O0EPEP6Edlhi0-hsBPH3E7pCftFEzATuO7X4DXyxbfyGHUUsXRp7AcerwJSaylMtbECS_hwSjAq98H8AaGJK9u2s1y9R4vZZSdDPAavdDSBnhznpdos17dLb5m17dfvi3a60yVrI4ZrSpFmSa8K0rJOannutINK6GnHVeNBgldqtvxTpacF3Te6V4x1qT-tOmULi_R1enfg3f3I4Qo9iYosFYO4MYgirqoGSto3SRrfbIq70LwoMXBm730k6BEHLmInThzEUcuglQicUm5d-cVY7eH_l_qL4hk-HQyQCr6YMCLoP5cpTceVBS9M_9Z8QQDTKKk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525662158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weiss, Jason K. ; Santucci, Nicole M. ; Sajadi, Kamran P. ; Chouhan, Jyoti D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jason K. ; Santucci, Nicole M. ; Sajadi, Kamran P. ; Chouhan, Jyoti D.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine voluntary reports in the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, categorize complications and assign device-related causality with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and transurethral water vapor therapy (TWVT). A review was performed using the terms “Urolift,” “Rezum,” and “transurethral resection of the prostate” between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2019. Duplicate and incomplete reports were excluded. The Gupta system was used to report complications and device related causality.1 Pearson's Chi-square analysis was performed to compare minor (Level 1) versus major (Levels 2-4) complications. A total of 548 events were examined. After removal of duplicates (n = 60), irrelevant reports (n=65), and incomplete information (n = 14), we included 409 events (74.6%). Of the 409 events, 214 were for TURP, 112 for TWVT, and 83 for PUL. In aggregate, 39.4% of events were minor/Level 1 (n=161/409). The proportion of subjects with Level 2-4 complications versus Level 1 complications was significantly higher for PUL than TURP or TWVT [X2 (2, N = 408) = 41.4023, P &lt; .00001]. Device causality was attributable to device malfunction in 60.4% of cases (n=247/409). Device malfunction was noted in all groups and 39.4% of these were minor (Level 1). However, the majority of PUL reports noted a Level 3 or 4 complication (50.6%, 42/83), primarily bleeding related. Previous studies have not revealed significant risk of bleeding and suggests a discrepancy between study data and real-world experience that may alter patient counseling practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33971189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Databases, Factual ; Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - instrumentation ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Severity of Illness Index ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.211-215</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-144c16f09b23a99057f4f863ed1b9c8feaeb971b9ba399217bfdc66818918bcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-144c16f09b23a99057f4f863ed1b9c8feaeb971b9ba399217bfdc66818918bcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429521003745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jason K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santucci, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajadi, Kamran P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Jyoti D.</creatorcontrib><title>Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To examine voluntary reports in the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, categorize complications and assign device-related causality with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and transurethral water vapor therapy (TWVT). A review was performed using the terms “Urolift,” “Rezum,” and “transurethral resection of the prostate” between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2019. Duplicate and incomplete reports were excluded. The Gupta system was used to report complications and device related causality.1 Pearson's Chi-square analysis was performed to compare minor (Level 1) versus major (Levels 2-4) complications. A total of 548 events were examined. After removal of duplicates (n = 60), irrelevant reports (n=65), and incomplete information (n = 14), we included 409 events (74.6%). Of the 409 events, 214 were for TURP, 112 for TWVT, and 83 for PUL. In aggregate, 39.4% of events were minor/Level 1 (n=161/409). The proportion of subjects with Level 2-4 complications versus Level 1 complications was significantly higher for PUL than TURP or TWVT [X2 (2, N = 408) = 41.4023, P &lt; .00001]. Device causality was attributable to device malfunction in 60.4% of cases (n=247/409). Device malfunction was noted in all groups and 39.4% of these were minor (Level 1). However, the majority of PUL reports noted a Level 3 or 4 complication (50.6%, 42/83), primarily bleeding related. Previous studies have not revealed significant risk of bleeding and suggests a discrepancy between study data and real-world experience that may alter patient counseling practices.</description><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCAvy2IGe36cMRs05AeQWhVBs7Y8nuvgyBmntqdinqUvW4cEtkiW7lmc46tzP4TeUpJTQtmHXT56Z912ygtS0JxUOSnJMzSjdTHPOOf1czQjhJOsKnh9gV6FsCOEMMbmL9FFWfI5pQ2focfvLsTs5-i3RkmLF25_sElF44aAWx3B489W9n2at2O0EPEP6Edlhi0-hsBPH3E7pCftFEzATuO7X4DXyxbfyGHUUsXRp7AcerwJSaylMtbECS_hwSjAq98H8AaGJK9u2s1y9R4vZZSdDPAavdDSBnhznpdos17dLb5m17dfvi3a60yVrI4ZrSpFmSa8K0rJOannutINK6GnHVeNBgldqtvxTpacF3Te6V4x1qT-tOmULi_R1enfg3f3I4Qo9iYosFYO4MYgirqoGSto3SRrfbIq70LwoMXBm730k6BEHLmInThzEUcuglQicUm5d-cVY7eH_l_qL4hk-HQyQCr6YMCLoP5cpTceVBS9M_9Z8QQDTKKk</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Weiss, Jason K.</creator><creator>Santucci, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Sajadi, Kamran P.</creator><creator>Chouhan, Jyoti D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database</title><author>Weiss, Jason K. ; Santucci, Nicole M. ; Sajadi, Kamran P. ; Chouhan, Jyoti D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-144c16f09b23a99057f4f863ed1b9c8feaeb971b9ba399217bfdc66818918bcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jason K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santucci, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajadi, Kamran P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Jyoti D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiss, Jason K.</au><au>Santucci, Nicole M.</au><au>Sajadi, Kamran P.</au><au>Chouhan, Jyoti D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>156</volume><spage>211</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>211-215</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To examine voluntary reports in the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, categorize complications and assign device-related causality with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and transurethral water vapor therapy (TWVT). A review was performed using the terms “Urolift,” “Rezum,” and “transurethral resection of the prostate” between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2019. Duplicate and incomplete reports were excluded. The Gupta system was used to report complications and device related causality.1 Pearson's Chi-square analysis was performed to compare minor (Level 1) versus major (Levels 2-4) complications. A total of 548 events were examined. After removal of duplicates (n = 60), irrelevant reports (n=65), and incomplete information (n = 14), we included 409 events (74.6%). Of the 409 events, 214 were for TURP, 112 for TWVT, and 83 for PUL. In aggregate, 39.4% of events were minor/Level 1 (n=161/409). The proportion of subjects with Level 2-4 complications versus Level 1 complications was significantly higher for PUL than TURP or TWVT [X2 (2, N = 408) = 41.4023, P &lt; .00001]. Device causality was attributable to device malfunction in 60.4% of cases (n=247/409). Device malfunction was noted in all groups and 39.4% of these were minor (Level 1). However, the majority of PUL reports noted a Level 3 or 4 complication (50.6%, 42/83), primarily bleeding related. Previous studies have not revealed significant risk of bleeding and suggests a discrepancy between study data and real-world experience that may alter patient counseling practices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33971189</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.211-215
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2525662158
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Databases, Factual
Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatectomy - instrumentation
Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
Severity of Illness Index
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery
title Post-Surgical Complications After Bladder Outlet Reducing Surgery: An Analysis of The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-Surgical%20Complications%20After%20Bladder%20Outlet%20Reducing%20Surgery:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20The%20FDA%20Manufacturer%20and%20User%20Facility%20Device%20Experience%20(MAUDE)%20Database&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Weiss,%20Jason%20K.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=156&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=211-215&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2525662158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525662158&rft_id=info:pmid/33971189&rft_els_id=S0090429521003745&rfr_iscdi=true