Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India
Purpose To evaluate the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) at presentation using visual field analysis and its relationship to demographic and ocular factors in patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods Newly diagnosed POAG patients were cla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International ophthalmology 2021-09, Vol.41 (9), p.3135-3143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3135 |
container_title | International ophthalmology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Rajendrababu, Sharmila Bansal, Oshin Shroff, Sujani Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A. Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq |
description | Purpose
To evaluate the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) at presentation using visual field analysis and its relationship to demographic and ocular factors in patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
Newly diagnosed POAG patients were classified as early, moderate, or severe stage in the worse eye based on the Humphrey visual field testing using Hodapp–Parrish–Andersons criteria. The groups were compared for differences in demographics and ocular characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using STATA 14.1 (Texas, USA).
Results
The average age of 71 eligible patients was 60.04 ± 9.53 years, and the cohort had 29.5% females. Among the subjects, 19 (26.7%) had early, 24 (33.3%) had moderate and 28 (38.89%) had severe POAG at presentation. There was no statistically significant difference among different stages of glaucoma with respect to age and sex groups. No statistical association was found with education, occupation status, presenting complaints, family history of glaucoma, or systemic diseases between the different stages of severity. 5.6% with severe disease presented with a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in the severe stage was 22.54 ± 5.27 mmHg, which was not statistically higher than the other groups (
P
= 0.726).
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed POAG patients predominantly present at moderate or severe stage of disease, reflecting either the asymptomatic nature of the disease or a lack of access to vision care services. Existing screening programmes need to be improved, with special attention to women and individuals less than 50 years of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524882922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524882922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9b23c1df9c7a59fbbb1349c5879a4070257c052e5077b3714dcac965224cd9bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-K1TAUxoMoznX0BVxIwI0g1fxpmmYpl1EHBtyo25KmpyVDb3JNUoe-iY_rufY6ggtxk4Sc3_fl5HyEPOfsDWdMv82caSMqJnjFeKvban1AdlxpWYlGsodkx3ijKqUZvyBPcr5ljBltmsfkQkrTNLxWO_Ljq8-LnenoYR6q3mYY6JTs4MNE40gHnwHvaIbvkHxZqQ80wN28YsVOIZ7wY_IHm1YajxCoDdMMdJrt4uLB0qMtHkLJCEHGw8m2RGppgVT8SQUrUGcTLljGDR-4Dmj-lDwa7Zzh2Xm_JF_eX33ef6xuPn243r-7qZzUqlSmF9LxYTROW2XGvu-5rI1TrTa2ZpoJpR1TAhTTupea14OzzjRKiNoNph_lJXm1-R5T_LZALt3BZwfzbAPEJXdCibpthREC0Zd_obdxSQG7Q6rhXErEkBIb5VLMOcHYnQfUcdadcuu23DrMrfuVW7ei6MXZeukPMNxLfgeFQLsBd9DHMTucqoN7DJNt6laxBv0Z43tfcO4x7OMSCkpf_78UabnRGYkwQfrzyX_0_xM988Zc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561133292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Rajendrababu, Sharmila ; Bansal, Oshin ; Shroff, Sujani ; Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A. ; Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajendrababu, Sharmila ; Bansal, Oshin ; Shroff, Sujani ; Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A. ; Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) at presentation using visual field analysis and its relationship to demographic and ocular factors in patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
Newly diagnosed POAG patients were classified as early, moderate, or severe stage in the worse eye based on the Humphrey visual field testing using Hodapp–Parrish–Andersons criteria. The groups were compared for differences in demographics and ocular characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using STATA 14.1 (Texas, USA).
Results
The average age of 71 eligible patients was 60.04 ± 9.53 years, and the cohort had 29.5% females. Among the subjects, 19 (26.7%) had early, 24 (33.3%) had moderate and 28 (38.89%) had severe POAG at presentation. There was no statistically significant difference among different stages of glaucoma with respect to age and sex groups. No statistical association was found with education, occupation status, presenting complaints, family history of glaucoma, or systemic diseases between the different stages of severity. 5.6% with severe disease presented with a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in the severe stage was 22.54 ± 5.27 mmHg, which was not statistically higher than the other groups (
P
= 0.726).
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed POAG patients predominantly present at moderate or severe stage of disease, reflecting either the asymptomatic nature of the disease or a lack of access to vision care services. Existing screening programmes need to be improved, with special attention to women and individuals less than 50 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33966145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Age ; Demographics ; Demography ; Disease ; Eye ; Genetics ; Glaucoma ; Intraocular pressure ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Science & Technology ; Sensory neurons ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Visual field ; Visual fields</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2021-09, Vol.41 (9), p.3135-3143</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>0</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000648506100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9b23c1df9c7a59fbbb1349c5879a4070257c052e5077b3714dcac965224cd9bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9b23c1df9c7a59fbbb1349c5879a4070257c052e5077b3714dcac965224cd9bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33966145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajendrababu, Sharmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Oshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Sujani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</creatorcontrib><title>Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>INT OPHTHALMOL</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) at presentation using visual field analysis and its relationship to demographic and ocular factors in patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
Newly diagnosed POAG patients were classified as early, moderate, or severe stage in the worse eye based on the Humphrey visual field testing using Hodapp–Parrish–Andersons criteria. The groups were compared for differences in demographics and ocular characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using STATA 14.1 (Texas, USA).
Results
The average age of 71 eligible patients was 60.04 ± 9.53 years, and the cohort had 29.5% females. Among the subjects, 19 (26.7%) had early, 24 (33.3%) had moderate and 28 (38.89%) had severe POAG at presentation. There was no statistically significant difference among different stages of glaucoma with respect to age and sex groups. No statistical association was found with education, occupation status, presenting complaints, family history of glaucoma, or systemic diseases between the different stages of severity. 5.6% with severe disease presented with a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in the severe stage was 22.54 ± 5.27 mmHg, which was not statistically higher than the other groups (
P
= 0.726).
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed POAG patients predominantly present at moderate or severe stage of disease, reflecting either the asymptomatic nature of the disease or a lack of access to vision care services. Existing screening programmes need to be improved, with special attention to women and individuals less than 50 years of age.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sensory neurons</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Visual field</subject><subject>Visual fields</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-K1TAUxoMoznX0BVxIwI0g1fxpmmYpl1EHBtyo25KmpyVDb3JNUoe-iY_rufY6ggtxk4Sc3_fl5HyEPOfsDWdMv82caSMqJnjFeKvban1AdlxpWYlGsodkx3ijKqUZvyBPcr5ljBltmsfkQkrTNLxWO_Ljq8-LnenoYR6q3mYY6JTs4MNE40gHnwHvaIbvkHxZqQ80wN28YsVOIZ7wY_IHm1YajxCoDdMMdJrt4uLB0qMtHkLJCEHGw8m2RGppgVT8SQUrUGcTLljGDR-4Dmj-lDwa7Zzh2Xm_JF_eX33ef6xuPn243r-7qZzUqlSmF9LxYTROW2XGvu-5rI1TrTa2ZpoJpR1TAhTTupea14OzzjRKiNoNph_lJXm1-R5T_LZALt3BZwfzbAPEJXdCibpthREC0Zd_obdxSQG7Q6rhXErEkBIb5VLMOcHYnQfUcdadcuu23DrMrfuVW7ei6MXZeukPMNxLfgeFQLsBd9DHMTucqoN7DJNt6laxBv0Z43tfcO4x7OMSCkpf_78UabnRGYkwQfrzyX_0_xM988Zc</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Rajendrababu, Sharmila</creator><creator>Bansal, Oshin</creator><creator>Shroff, Sujani</creator><creator>Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A.</creator><creator>Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India</title><author>Rajendrababu, Sharmila ; Bansal, Oshin ; Shroff, Sujani ; Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A. ; Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9b23c1df9c7a59fbbb1349c5879a4070257c052e5077b3714dcac965224cd9bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sensory neurons</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Visual field</topic><topic>Visual fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajendrababu, Sharmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Oshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Sujani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajendrababu, Sharmila</au><au>Bansal, Oshin</au><au>Shroff, Sujani</au><au>Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A.</au><au>Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><stitle>INT OPHTHALMOL</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3135</spage><epage>3143</epage><pages>3135-3143</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) at presentation using visual field analysis and its relationship to demographic and ocular factors in patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
Newly diagnosed POAG patients were classified as early, moderate, or severe stage in the worse eye based on the Humphrey visual field testing using Hodapp–Parrish–Andersons criteria. The groups were compared for differences in demographics and ocular characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using STATA 14.1 (Texas, USA).
Results
The average age of 71 eligible patients was 60.04 ± 9.53 years, and the cohort had 29.5% females. Among the subjects, 19 (26.7%) had early, 24 (33.3%) had moderate and 28 (38.89%) had severe POAG at presentation. There was no statistically significant difference among different stages of glaucoma with respect to age and sex groups. No statistical association was found with education, occupation status, presenting complaints, family history of glaucoma, or systemic diseases between the different stages of severity. 5.6% with severe disease presented with a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in the severe stage was 22.54 ± 5.27 mmHg, which was not statistically higher than the other groups (
P
= 0.726).
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed POAG patients predominantly present at moderate or severe stage of disease, reflecting either the asymptomatic nature of the disease or a lack of access to vision care services. Existing screening programmes need to be improved, with special attention to women and individuals less than 50 years of age.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33966145</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5701 |
ispartof | International ophthalmology, 2021-09, Vol.41 (9), p.3135-3143 |
issn | 0165-5701 1573-2630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524882922 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Age Demographics Demography Disease Eye Genetics Glaucoma Intraocular pressure Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmology Original Paper Science & Technology Sensory neurons Statistical analysis Statistics Visual field Visual fields |
title | Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20field-based%20grading%20of%20disease%20severity%20in%20newly%20diagnosed%20primary%20open%20angle%20glaucoma%20patients%20presenting%20to%20a%20tertiary%20eye%20care%20centre%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Rajendrababu,%20Sharmila&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3135&rft.epage=3143&rft.pages=3135-3143&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-021-01878-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2524882922%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561133292&rft_id=info:pmid/33966145&rfr_iscdi=true |