Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet

To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2021-11, Vol.37 (11), p.3248-3252
Hauptverfasser: Rodkey, Daniel L., Colantonio, Donald F., LeClere, Lance E., Kilcoyne, Kelly G., Dickens, Jonathan F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3252
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3248
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 37
creator Rodkey, Daniel L.
Colantonio, Donald F.
LeClere, Lance E.
Kilcoyne, Kelly G.
Dickens, Jonathan F.
description To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL; no prior shoulder stabilization procedure) or salvage Latarjet (SL; ≥1 previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedures). A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 PL procedures and 135 SL procedures. The SL group had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (SL 28/135, 20.7%; PL 9/99, 9.1%; P = .0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (SL 26/135, 19.3%; PL 13/99, 13.1%; P = .2140) or complication rates (SL 20/135, 14.8%; PL 13/99, 13.3%; P = .9101). The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population is 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence compared with salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% versus 20.7%). III.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_elsev</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524880781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806321004515</els_id><sourcerecordid>2524880781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b58b2ffdecde330c6a55308fa874fe27d068e9edd976848d2ac94f412653df4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE-L1TAUxYMozpvRb-AiS0Fa869tuhGexRkHHijDiMuQl9zw8uxrapI6zNovbsaOLsVFuIF7zrmHH0KvKKkpoe3bY61jPsRQM8JoTURNmv4J2tCGtRVnnD5FG9KJvpKk5WfoPKUjIYRzyZ-jM877VnDZbdDPnc46HiHjrcsQ8aX2I1i8_R2dTJi9we_19K3cwjcwax_LSMuYE_YTvr3zBnA-AL7RGXBwZWmWGGHK-HpKWe_96PM9HsJp1rHkfvX5gD9Hf9LxHv85_QI9c3pM8PJxXqAvlx9uh4_V7tPV9bDdVab0zdW-kXvmnAVjgXNiWt00nEinZSccsM6SVkIP1vZdK4W0TJteOEFZ23DrhOYX6PWaO8fwfYGU1cknA-OoJwhLUqxhQkrSSVqkYpWaQiFFcGpeSytK1AN-dVQrfvWAXxGhCv5ie7Pa7mAfXDIeJgN_rYV_R1tRXvkRWdTy_9WDzzr7MA1hmXKxvlutUHj98BDVo936CCYrG_y_m_4CB-WxXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524880781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Rodkey, Daniel L. ; Colantonio, Donald F. ; LeClere, Lance E. ; Kilcoyne, Kelly G. ; Dickens, Jonathan F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodkey, Daniel L. ; Colantonio, Donald F. ; LeClere, Lance E. ; Kilcoyne, Kelly G. ; Dickens, Jonathan F.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL; no prior shoulder stabilization procedure) or salvage Latarjet (SL; ≥1 previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedures). A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 PL procedures and 135 SL procedures. The SL group had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (SL 28/135, 20.7%; PL 9/99, 9.1%; P = .0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (SL 26/135, 19.3%; PL 13/99, 13.1%; P = .2140) or complication rates (SL 20/135, 14.8%; PL 13/99, 13.3%; P = .9101). The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population is 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence compared with salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% versus 20.7%). III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33964387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>PHILADELPHIA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Orthopedics ; Science &amp; Technology ; Sport Sciences ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2021-11, Vol.37 (11), p.3248-3252</ispartof><rights>2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>18</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000716471600008</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b58b2ffdecde330c6a55308fa874fe27d068e9edd976848d2ac94f412653df4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b58b2ffdecde330c6a55308fa874fe27d068e9edd976848d2ac94f412653df4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodkey, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colantonio, Donald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeClere, Lance E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilcoyne, Kelly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Jonathan F.</creatorcontrib><title>Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>ARTHROSCOPY</addtitle><description>To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL; no prior shoulder stabilization procedure) or salvage Latarjet (SL; ≥1 previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedures). A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 PL procedures and 135 SL procedures. The SL group had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (SL 28/135, 20.7%; PL 9/99, 9.1%; P = .0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (SL 26/135, 19.3%; PL 13/99, 13.1%; P = .2140) or complication rates (SL 20/135, 14.8%; PL 13/99, 13.3%; P = .9101). The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population is 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence compared with salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% versus 20.7%). III.</description><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Sport Sciences</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE-L1TAUxYMozpvRb-AiS0Fa869tuhGexRkHHijDiMuQl9zw8uxrapI6zNovbsaOLsVFuIF7zrmHH0KvKKkpoe3bY61jPsRQM8JoTURNmv4J2tCGtRVnnD5FG9KJvpKk5WfoPKUjIYRzyZ-jM877VnDZbdDPnc46HiHjrcsQ8aX2I1i8_R2dTJi9we_19K3cwjcwax_LSMuYE_YTvr3zBnA-AL7RGXBwZWmWGGHK-HpKWe_96PM9HsJp1rHkfvX5gD9Hf9LxHv85_QI9c3pM8PJxXqAvlx9uh4_V7tPV9bDdVab0zdW-kXvmnAVjgXNiWt00nEinZSccsM6SVkIP1vZdK4W0TJteOEFZ23DrhOYX6PWaO8fwfYGU1cknA-OoJwhLUqxhQkrSSVqkYpWaQiFFcGpeSytK1AN-dVQrfvWAXxGhCv5ie7Pa7mAfXDIeJgN_rYV_R1tRXvkRWdTy_9WDzzr7MA1hmXKxvlutUHj98BDVo936CCYrG_y_m_4CB-WxXA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Rodkey, Daniel L.</creator><creator>Colantonio, Donald F.</creator><creator>LeClere, Lance E.</creator><creator>Kilcoyne, Kelly G.</creator><creator>Dickens, Jonathan F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet</title><author>Rodkey, Daniel L. ; Colantonio, Donald F. ; LeClere, Lance E. ; Kilcoyne, Kelly G. ; Dickens, Jonathan F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b58b2ffdecde330c6a55308fa874fe27d068e9edd976848d2ac94f412653df4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Sport Sciences</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodkey, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colantonio, Donald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeClere, Lance E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilcoyne, Kelly G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Jonathan F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodkey, Daniel L.</au><au>Colantonio, Donald F.</au><au>LeClere, Lance E.</au><au>Kilcoyne, Kelly G.</au><au>Dickens, Jonathan F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><stitle>ARTHROSCOPY</stitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3248</spage><epage>3252</epage><pages>3248-3252</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>To assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL; no prior shoulder stabilization procedure) or salvage Latarjet (SL; ≥1 previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedures). A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 PL procedures and 135 SL procedures. The SL group had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (SL 28/135, 20.7%; PL 9/99, 9.1%; P = .0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (SL 26/135, 19.3%; PL 13/99, 13.1%; P = .2140) or complication rates (SL 20/135, 14.8%; PL 13/99, 13.3%; P = .9101). The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population is 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence compared with salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% versus 20.7%). III.</abstract><cop>PHILADELPHIA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33964387</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2021-11, Vol.37 (11), p.3248-3252
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524880781
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Orthopedics
Science & Technology
Sport Sciences
Surgery
title Latarjet After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Twice the Rate of Recurrent Instability Compared With Primary Latarjet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T18%3A17%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_elsev&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Latarjet%20After%20Failed%20Arthroscopic%20Bankart%20Repair%20Results%20in%20Twice%20the%20Rate%20of%20Recurrent%20Instability%20Compared%20With%20Primary%20Latarjet&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Rodkey,%20Daniel%20L.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3248&rft.epage=3252&rft.pages=3248-3252&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_elsev%3E2524880781%3C/proquest_elsev%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524880781&rft_id=info:pmid/33964387&rft_els_id=S0749806321004515&rfr_iscdi=true