Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO

Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2021-10, Vol.73, p.110330-110330, Article 110330
Hauptverfasser: Jiritano, Federica, Fina, Dario, Lorusso, Roberto, ten Cate, Hugo, Kowalewski, Mariusz, Matteucci, Matteo, Serra, Raffaele, Mastroroberto, Pasquale, Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110330
container_issue
container_start_page 110330
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 73
creator Jiritano, Federica
Fina, Dario
Lorusso, Roberto
ten Cate, Hugo
Kowalewski, Mariusz
Matteucci, Matteo
Serra, Raffaele
Mastroroberto, Pasquale
Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto
description Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. Patients on ECMO support. Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients. •This meta-analysis evaluates POC tests for anticoagulation in ECMO.•POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding, thrombosis, and ECMO circuit/change.•Use of POC-guided algorithms resulted in a reduction in surgical revision.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524356797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818021001690</els_id><sourcerecordid>2524356797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d6169e9892b6405a3d867ef2a9bbbc50a13678883b7b38e101f5f9f635dfc1143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EosvCX6gsceGSxY4Tx76BVqUgFfUAnC3HGS-OEnuxnVb7A_jfON2WAxdOc5hv3hu9h9AlJTtKKH8_7kYzOa897GpS0x2lhDHyDG2o6FjVtLV8jjZEtnUlqCAX6FVKIyGkLOhLdMGY5DVjYoN-fzulDLPOzuAIdw7usfYDniHrSns9nZJLOFicfwJeDZ3REwZrwWR3Bx7Sw_YYnM9VsJXREXCGlJ0_YBtiESvKQR-WqVgEj-cieoAZfMbDElfqav_19jV6YfWU4M3j3KIfn66-7z9XN7fXX_YfbypTHs7VwCmXIIWse96QVrNB8A5srWXf96YlmjLeCSFY3_VMQAnKtlZaztrBGkobtkXvzrrHGH4t5U01u2RgmkqOYUmqbuuGtbyTXUHf_oOOYYklkZVqSCPbriS-RfxMmRhSimDVMbpZx5OiRK1FqVE9FaXWotS5qHJ4-Si_9DMMf8-eminAhzMAJY_SS1TJOPAGBhdL-GoI7n8efwBKw6in</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540495703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiritano, Federica ; Fina, Dario ; Lorusso, Roberto ; ten Cate, Hugo ; Kowalewski, Mariusz ; Matteucci, Matteo ; Serra, Raffaele ; Mastroroberto, Pasquale ; Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiritano, Federica ; Fina, Dario ; Lorusso, Roberto ; ten Cate, Hugo ; Kowalewski, Mariusz ; Matteucci, Matteo ; Serra, Raffaele ; Mastroroberto, Pasquale ; Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</creatorcontrib><description>Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. Patients on ECMO support. Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients. •This meta-analysis evaluates POC tests for anticoagulation in ECMO.•POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding, thrombosis, and ECMO circuit/change.•Use of POC-guided algorithms resulted in a reduction in surgical revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110330</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33962338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Anticoagulation ; Bias ; Bleeding ; Blood platelets ; COVID-19 ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Handbooks ; Intervention ; Laboratories ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Patients ; Point of care ; Systematic review ; Thrombosis ; Viscoelastic test ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2021-10, Vol.73, p.110330-110330, Article 110330</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d6169e9892b6405a3d867ef2a9bbbc50a13678883b7b38e101f5f9f635dfc1143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d6169e9892b6405a3d867ef2a9bbbc50a13678883b7b38e101f5f9f635dfc1143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818021001690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33962338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiritano, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fina, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorusso, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Cate, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalewski, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteucci, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastroroberto, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. Patients on ECMO support. Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients. •This meta-analysis evaluates POC tests for anticoagulation in ECMO.•POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding, thrombosis, and ECMO circuit/change.•Use of POC-guided algorithms resulted in a reduction in surgical revision.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anticoagulation</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Blood platelets</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Handbooks</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Point of care</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Viscoelastic test</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EosvCX6gsceGSxY4Tx76BVqUgFfUAnC3HGS-OEnuxnVb7A_jfON2WAxdOc5hv3hu9h9AlJTtKKH8_7kYzOa897GpS0x2lhDHyDG2o6FjVtLV8jjZEtnUlqCAX6FVKIyGkLOhLdMGY5DVjYoN-fzulDLPOzuAIdw7usfYDniHrSns9nZJLOFicfwJeDZ3REwZrwWR3Bx7Sw_YYnM9VsJXREXCGlJ0_YBtiESvKQR-WqVgEj-cieoAZfMbDElfqav_19jV6YfWU4M3j3KIfn66-7z9XN7fXX_YfbypTHs7VwCmXIIWse96QVrNB8A5srWXf96YlmjLeCSFY3_VMQAnKtlZaztrBGkobtkXvzrrHGH4t5U01u2RgmkqOYUmqbuuGtbyTXUHf_oOOYYklkZVqSCPbriS-RfxMmRhSimDVMbpZx5OiRK1FqVE9FaXWotS5qHJ4-Si_9DMMf8-eminAhzMAJY_SS1TJOPAGBhdL-GoI7n8efwBKw6in</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Jiritano, Federica</creator><creator>Fina, Dario</creator><creator>Lorusso, Roberto</creator><creator>ten Cate, Hugo</creator><creator>Kowalewski, Mariusz</creator><creator>Matteucci, Matteo</creator><creator>Serra, Raffaele</creator><creator>Mastroroberto, Pasquale</creator><creator>Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO</title><author>Jiritano, Federica ; Fina, Dario ; Lorusso, Roberto ; ten Cate, Hugo ; Kowalewski, Mariusz ; Matteucci, Matteo ; Serra, Raffaele ; Mastroroberto, Pasquale ; Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d6169e9892b6405a3d867ef2a9bbbc50a13678883b7b38e101f5f9f635dfc1143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anticoagulation</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Blood platelets</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Handbooks</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Point of care</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Viscoelastic test</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiritano, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fina, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorusso, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Cate, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalewski, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteucci, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastroroberto, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiritano, Federica</au><au>Fina, Dario</au><au>Lorusso, Roberto</au><au>ten Cate, Hugo</au><au>Kowalewski, Mariusz</au><au>Matteucci, Matteo</au><au>Serra, Raffaele</au><au>Mastroroberto, Pasquale</au><au>Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>110330</spage><epage>110330</epage><pages>110330-110330</pages><artnum>110330</artnum><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. Patients on ECMO support. Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients. •This meta-analysis evaluates POC tests for anticoagulation in ECMO.•POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding, thrombosis, and ECMO circuit/change.•Use of POC-guided algorithms resulted in a reduction in surgical revision.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33962338</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110330</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2021-10, Vol.73, p.110330-110330, Article 110330
issn 0952-8180
1873-4529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524356797
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Anticoagulation
Bias
Bleeding
Blood platelets
COVID-19
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Handbooks
Intervention
Laboratories
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Patients
Point of care
Systematic review
Thrombosis
Viscoelastic test
Weaning
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A15%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20the%20clinical%20effectiveness%20of%20point-of-care%20testing%20for%20anticoagulation%20management%20during%20ECMO&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Jiritano,%20Federica&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=110330&rft.epage=110330&rft.pages=110330-110330&rft.artnum=110330&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524356797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540495703&rft_id=info:pmid/33962338&rft_els_id=S0952818021001690&rfr_iscdi=true