Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York

The Northeastern United States contributes a small share to national meat production. However, increasing interest in local food production and on-going challenges posed by drought and fire on Western rangelands give reason to believe that the importance of Northeastern grass-based ruminant meat cou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural systems 2021-04, Vol.189, p.102958, Article 102958
Hauptverfasser: Thorn, Alexandra M., Baker, Michael J., Peters, Christian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102958
container_title Agricultural systems
container_volume 189
creator Thorn, Alexandra M.
Baker, Michael J.
Peters, Christian J.
description The Northeastern United States contributes a small share to national meat production. However, increasing interest in local food production and on-going challenges posed by drought and fire on Western rangelands give reason to believe that the importance of Northeastern grass-based ruminant meat could grow in the near future. Using an integrated modeling approach, the present study quantifies current and potential biological capacity for grass-based ruminant meat production in New York and New England. We used the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) to establish the area and spatial distribution of hay and pasture, with area estimates validated against the USDA Census of Agriculture. Potential forage productivity was modeled using ordinary least squares linear regression of SSURGO non-irrigated crop yield values for pasture against NICC classes and subclasses, drainage classes, slope, air temperature, and quintiles of depth to restrictive soil layers, using ordinary least squares linear regression. Forage yield gaps were calculated by comparing potential productivity to annual crop survey data from the USDA. The potential production of grass-finished cattle based on either current or potential forage yields based on models of feed needs for spring- and fall-calving herds produced using the Large Ruminant Nutritional System. We show that more than half of agricultural land cover currently appears to be pasture, but that only some of this land is actively used for grazing, with actual yields just 54% or 47% of economic yields for hay and pasture respectively. Overall, we estimate the potential to increase the regional beef herd size by 90% to 270% by increasing yields, expanding production into unutilized grassland area, or both. We conclude that up to 3% of U.S. beef could be produced in the region, on less than 0.5% of U.S. agricultural land area, pointing to high potential for sustainable intensification of beef production in the Northeastern United States. Realizing this potential, however, requires closing of yield gaps and intensification of the use of land in agricultural cover. The amount of biophysical productivity that is economically attainable remains highly uncertain.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102958
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524342902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X20308192</els_id><sourcerecordid>2524342902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-244e7365f1d9f610960bc323e7630b9dec44dd1b798b2cc8edb5273399ef3e9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFOOXrbmY78CXqTUDyh6UdBTyCaza-o2qUmq9N-7y3r2MAwzvO_wzoPQJSULSmh5vVmoLh4WjLBxwURRH6EZrSueMVZWx2hGOKmzgtG3U3QW44YQIiipZ6hdxWS3KlnX4cb63ndWqx5rtVPapgNufcBdUDFmrXU2foDBYb-1TrmEt6AS3gVv9jpZ77B1-Al-8Mp1vXIGjzXO7z58nqOTVvURLv76HL3erV6WD9n6-f5xebvONK-qlLE8h4qXRUuNaEtKREkazRmHquSkEQZ0nhtDm0rUDdO6BtMUrOJcCGg5COBzdDXdHWJ97SEmubVRQz8EAr-PkhUs5zkThA1SNkl18DEGaOUuDCTCQVIiR6hyI0eocoQqJ6iD6WYywfDEt4Ugo7bgNBgbQCdpvP3P_gtFeIFj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524342902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thorn, Alexandra M. ; Baker, Michael J. ; Peters, Christian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorn, Alexandra M. ; Baker, Michael J. ; Peters, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Northeastern United States contributes a small share to national meat production. However, increasing interest in local food production and on-going challenges posed by drought and fire on Western rangelands give reason to believe that the importance of Northeastern grass-based ruminant meat could grow in the near future. Using an integrated modeling approach, the present study quantifies current and potential biological capacity for grass-based ruminant meat production in New York and New England. We used the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) to establish the area and spatial distribution of hay and pasture, with area estimates validated against the USDA Census of Agriculture. Potential forage productivity was modeled using ordinary least squares linear regression of SSURGO non-irrigated crop yield values for pasture against NICC classes and subclasses, drainage classes, slope, air temperature, and quintiles of depth to restrictive soil layers, using ordinary least squares linear regression. Forage yield gaps were calculated by comparing potential productivity to annual crop survey data from the USDA. The potential production of grass-finished cattle based on either current or potential forage yields based on models of feed needs for spring- and fall-calving herds produced using the Large Ruminant Nutritional System. We show that more than half of agricultural land cover currently appears to be pasture, but that only some of this land is actively used for grazing, with actual yields just 54% or 47% of economic yields for hay and pasture respectively. Overall, we estimate the potential to increase the regional beef herd size by 90% to 270% by increasing yields, expanding production into unutilized grassland area, or both. We conclude that up to 3% of U.S. beef could be produced in the region, on less than 0.5% of U.S. agricultural land area, pointing to high potential for sustainable intensification of beef production in the Northeastern United States. Realizing this potential, however, requires closing of yield gaps and intensification of the use of land in agricultural cover. The amount of biophysical productivity that is economically attainable remains highly uncertain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>air temperature ; annuals ; beef ; beef cattle ; beef production ; Census of Agriculture ; cropland ; drainage ; drought ; food production ; forage ; forage yield ; grasslands ; hay ; herd size ; land cover ; New England region ; New York ; pastures ; rangelands ; soil ; surveys ; USDA</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2021-04, Vol.189, p.102958, Article 102958</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-244e7365f1d9f610960bc323e7630b9dec44dd1b798b2cc8edb5273399ef3e9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-244e7365f1d9f610960bc323e7630b9dec44dd1b798b2cc8edb5273399ef3e9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X20308192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorn, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>The Northeastern United States contributes a small share to national meat production. However, increasing interest in local food production and on-going challenges posed by drought and fire on Western rangelands give reason to believe that the importance of Northeastern grass-based ruminant meat could grow in the near future. Using an integrated modeling approach, the present study quantifies current and potential biological capacity for grass-based ruminant meat production in New York and New England. We used the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) to establish the area and spatial distribution of hay and pasture, with area estimates validated against the USDA Census of Agriculture. Potential forage productivity was modeled using ordinary least squares linear regression of SSURGO non-irrigated crop yield values for pasture against NICC classes and subclasses, drainage classes, slope, air temperature, and quintiles of depth to restrictive soil layers, using ordinary least squares linear regression. Forage yield gaps were calculated by comparing potential productivity to annual crop survey data from the USDA. The potential production of grass-finished cattle based on either current or potential forage yields based on models of feed needs for spring- and fall-calving herds produced using the Large Ruminant Nutritional System. We show that more than half of agricultural land cover currently appears to be pasture, but that only some of this land is actively used for grazing, with actual yields just 54% or 47% of economic yields for hay and pasture respectively. Overall, we estimate the potential to increase the regional beef herd size by 90% to 270% by increasing yields, expanding production into unutilized grassland area, or both. We conclude that up to 3% of U.S. beef could be produced in the region, on less than 0.5% of U.S. agricultural land area, pointing to high potential for sustainable intensification of beef production in the Northeastern United States. Realizing this potential, however, requires closing of yield gaps and intensification of the use of land in agricultural cover. The amount of biophysical productivity that is economically attainable remains highly uncertain.</description><subject>air temperature</subject><subject>annuals</subject><subject>beef</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>beef production</subject><subject>Census of Agriculture</subject><subject>cropland</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>food production</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>forage yield</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>hay</subject><subject>herd size</subject><subject>land cover</subject><subject>New England region</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>USDA</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFOOXrbmY78CXqTUDyh6UdBTyCaza-o2qUmq9N-7y3r2MAwzvO_wzoPQJSULSmh5vVmoLh4WjLBxwURRH6EZrSueMVZWx2hGOKmzgtG3U3QW44YQIiipZ6hdxWS3KlnX4cb63ndWqx5rtVPapgNufcBdUDFmrXU2foDBYb-1TrmEt6AS3gVv9jpZ77B1-Al-8Mp1vXIGjzXO7z58nqOTVvURLv76HL3erV6WD9n6-f5xebvONK-qlLE8h4qXRUuNaEtKREkazRmHquSkEQZ0nhtDm0rUDdO6BtMUrOJcCGg5COBzdDXdHWJ97SEmubVRQz8EAr-PkhUs5zkThA1SNkl18DEGaOUuDCTCQVIiR6hyI0eocoQqJ6iD6WYywfDEt4Ugo7bgNBgbQCdpvP3P_gtFeIFj</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Thorn, Alexandra M.</creator><creator>Baker, Michael J.</creator><creator>Peters, Christian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York</title><author>Thorn, Alexandra M. ; Baker, Michael J. ; Peters, Christian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-244e7365f1d9f610960bc323e7630b9dec44dd1b798b2cc8edb5273399ef3e9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>air temperature</topic><topic>annuals</topic><topic>beef</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>beef production</topic><topic>Census of Agriculture</topic><topic>cropland</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>food production</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>forage yield</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>hay</topic><topic>herd size</topic><topic>land cover</topic><topic>New England region</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>USDA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorn, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorn, Alexandra M.</au><au>Baker, Michael J.</au><au>Peters, Christian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>189</volume><spage>102958</spage><pages>102958-</pages><artnum>102958</artnum><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>The Northeastern United States contributes a small share to national meat production. However, increasing interest in local food production and on-going challenges posed by drought and fire on Western rangelands give reason to believe that the importance of Northeastern grass-based ruminant meat could grow in the near future. Using an integrated modeling approach, the present study quantifies current and potential biological capacity for grass-based ruminant meat production in New York and New England. We used the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) to establish the area and spatial distribution of hay and pasture, with area estimates validated against the USDA Census of Agriculture. Potential forage productivity was modeled using ordinary least squares linear regression of SSURGO non-irrigated crop yield values for pasture against NICC classes and subclasses, drainage classes, slope, air temperature, and quintiles of depth to restrictive soil layers, using ordinary least squares linear regression. Forage yield gaps were calculated by comparing potential productivity to annual crop survey data from the USDA. The potential production of grass-finished cattle based on either current or potential forage yields based on models of feed needs for spring- and fall-calving herds produced using the Large Ruminant Nutritional System. We show that more than half of agricultural land cover currently appears to be pasture, but that only some of this land is actively used for grazing, with actual yields just 54% or 47% of economic yields for hay and pasture respectively. Overall, we estimate the potential to increase the regional beef herd size by 90% to 270% by increasing yields, expanding production into unutilized grassland area, or both. We conclude that up to 3% of U.S. beef could be produced in the region, on less than 0.5% of U.S. agricultural land area, pointing to high potential for sustainable intensification of beef production in the Northeastern United States. Realizing this potential, however, requires closing of yield gaps and intensification of the use of land in agricultural cover. The amount of biophysical productivity that is economically attainable remains highly uncertain.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102958</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-521X
ispartof Agricultural systems, 2021-04, Vol.189, p.102958, Article 102958
issn 0308-521X
1873-2267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524342902
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects air temperature
annuals
beef
beef cattle
beef production
Census of Agriculture
cropland
drainage
drought
food production
forage
forage yield
grasslands
hay
herd size
land cover
New England region
New York
pastures
rangelands
soil
surveys
USDA
title Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A32%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20biological%20capacity%20for%20grass-finished%20ruminant%20meat%20production%20in%20New%20England%20and%20New%20York&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Thorn,%20Alexandra%20M.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=189&rft.spage=102958&rft.pages=102958-&rft.artnum=102958&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102958&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524342902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524342902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308521X20308192&rfr_iscdi=true