Fracking, farming, and water
Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111799 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Hitaj, Claudia Boslett, Andrew J. Weber, Jeremy G. |
description | Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted.
•Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524334785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030142152030519X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2524334785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC2CoxMJAwvkjsT0woIoCUiUWmC3XviCHNCl2CuLfkzZMDEx3Oj3v6e4h5JxCToGWN3WO7aZrcgZsmFAqtT4gE6okz0op5SGZAAeaCUaLY3KSUg0AQmkxIReLaN17aN-uZ5WN631jWz_7sj3GU3JU2Sbh2W-dktfF_cv8MVs-PzzN75aZ41r2WYFWgtQlXVWFL8FSp3jlvC0EKCxACe9sxXTp0CEqUE6XKNF5SVdspSXnU3I17t3E7mOLqTfrkBw2jW2x2ybDCiY4F1IVA3r5B627bWyH6wwTqqQaGFUDxUfKxS6liJXZxLC28dtQMDtjpjZ7Y2ZnzIzGhtTtmMLh18-A0SQXsHXoQ0TXG9-Ff_M_HKpyxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486190218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted.
•Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agriculture ; Counties ; Crops ; energy ; Energy policy ; Farmers ; Farming ; Feet ; Gas wells ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Irrigation ; Irrigation water ; North Dakota ; Oil and gas ; Oil shale ; oils ; Oklahoma ; Petroleum ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Shales ; Texas ; Water ; Water policy ; Water use ; Water wells</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152030519X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boslett, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted.
•Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>North Dakota</subject><subject>Oil and gas</subject><subject>Oil shale</subject><subject>oils</subject><subject>Oklahoma</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water policy</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC2CoxMJAwvkjsT0woIoCUiUWmC3XviCHNCl2CuLfkzZMDEx3Oj3v6e4h5JxCToGWN3WO7aZrcgZsmFAqtT4gE6okz0op5SGZAAeaCUaLY3KSUg0AQmkxIReLaN17aN-uZ5WN631jWz_7sj3GU3JU2Sbh2W-dktfF_cv8MVs-PzzN75aZ41r2WYFWgtQlXVWFL8FSp3jlvC0EKCxACe9sxXTp0CEqUE6XKNF5SVdspSXnU3I17t3E7mOLqTfrkBw2jW2x2ybDCiY4F1IVA3r5B627bWyH6wwTqqQaGFUDxUfKxS6liJXZxLC28dtQMDtjpjZ7Y2ZnzIzGhtTtmMLh18-A0SQXsHXoQ0TXG9-Ff_M_HKpyxg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Hitaj, Claudia</creator><creator>Boslett, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Weber, Jeremy G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><author>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>North Dakota</topic><topic>Oil and gas</topic><topic>Oil shale</topic><topic>oils</topic><topic>Oklahoma</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water policy</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boslett, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitaj, Claudia</au><au>Boslett, Andrew J.</au><au>Weber, Jeremy G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracking, farming, and water</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>111799</spage><pages>111799-</pages><artnum>111799</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted.
•Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524334785 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | agriculture Counties Crops energy Energy policy Farmers Farming Feet Gas wells Hydraulic fracturing Irrigation Irrigation water North Dakota Oil and gas Oil shale oils Oklahoma Petroleum Shale Shale gas Shales Texas Water Water policy Water use Water wells |
title | Fracking, farming, and water |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracking,%20farming,%20and%20water&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Hitaj,%20Claudia&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=111799&rft.pages=111799-&rft.artnum=111799&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524334785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486190218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S030142152030519X&rfr_iscdi=true |