Fracking, farming, and water

Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799
Hauptverfasser: Hitaj, Claudia, Boslett, Andrew J., Weber, Jeremy G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111799
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 146
creator Hitaj, Claudia
Boslett, Andrew J.
Weber, Jeremy G.
description Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted. •Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524334785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030142152030519X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2524334785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC2CoxMJAwvkjsT0woIoCUiUWmC3XviCHNCl2CuLfkzZMDEx3Oj3v6e4h5JxCToGWN3WO7aZrcgZsmFAqtT4gE6okz0op5SGZAAeaCUaLY3KSUg0AQmkxIReLaN17aN-uZ5WN631jWz_7sj3GU3JU2Sbh2W-dktfF_cv8MVs-PzzN75aZ41r2WYFWgtQlXVWFL8FSp3jlvC0EKCxACe9sxXTp0CEqUE6XKNF5SVdspSXnU3I17t3E7mOLqTfrkBw2jW2x2ybDCiY4F1IVA3r5B627bWyH6wwTqqQaGFUDxUfKxS6liJXZxLC28dtQMDtjpjZ7Y2ZnzIzGhtTtmMLh18-A0SQXsHXoQ0TXG9-Ff_M_HKpyxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486190218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted. •Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agriculture ; Counties ; Crops ; energy ; Energy policy ; Farmers ; Farming ; Feet ; Gas wells ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Irrigation ; Irrigation water ; North Dakota ; Oil and gas ; Oil shale ; oils ; Oklahoma ; Petroleum ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Shales ; Texas ; Water ; Water policy ; Water use ; Water wells</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152030519X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boslett, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted. •Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>North Dakota</subject><subject>Oil and gas</subject><subject>Oil shale</subject><subject>oils</subject><subject>Oklahoma</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water policy</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC2CoxMJAwvkjsT0woIoCUiUWmC3XviCHNCl2CuLfkzZMDEx3Oj3v6e4h5JxCToGWN3WO7aZrcgZsmFAqtT4gE6okz0op5SGZAAeaCUaLY3KSUg0AQmkxIReLaN17aN-uZ5WN631jWz_7sj3GU3JU2Sbh2W-dktfF_cv8MVs-PzzN75aZ41r2WYFWgtQlXVWFL8FSp3jlvC0EKCxACe9sxXTp0CEqUE6XKNF5SVdspSXnU3I17t3E7mOLqTfrkBw2jW2x2ybDCiY4F1IVA3r5B627bWyH6wwTqqQaGFUDxUfKxS6liJXZxLC28dtQMDtjpjZ7Y2ZnzIzGhtTtmMLh18-A0SQXsHXoQ0TXG9-Ff_M_HKpyxg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Hitaj, Claudia</creator><creator>Boslett, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Weber, Jeremy G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Fracking, farming, and water</title><author>Hitaj, Claudia ; Boslett, Andrew J. ; Weber, Jeremy G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-5ea707961bf5d60a1c83fcda5408e5084dcaf296cecee808c96e7ecd71b2b9733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>North Dakota</topic><topic>Oil and gas</topic><topic>Oil shale</topic><topic>oils</topic><topic>Oklahoma</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water policy</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitaj, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boslett, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitaj, Claudia</au><au>Boslett, Andrew J.</au><au>Weber, Jeremy G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracking, farming, and water</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>111799</spage><pages>111799-</pages><artnum>111799</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Several studies note the large quantity of water used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells. We quantify this water use and its effects on water use for irrigating crops. For nine western states in 2017, water use in fracking represented 1.7 percent of water use in irrigation overall, but up to 55 percent in the Bakken shale of North Dakota, 28 percent in Oklahoma shale regions, and 12 percent in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. However, in counties where the percentage of water use for fracking relative to irrigation is large, it is primarily because such counties have had minimal historical irrigation. We analyze the effect of state water policies governing the transfer of water from farming to fracking on water withdrawals for the two sectors. In North Dakota, which allowed farmers to forego irrigating and sell water to energy firms, each acre-foot of water used in fracking displaced about 1.1 acre feet from irrigation, thereby avoiding an increase in total withdrawals. Weaker evidence suggests an increase in irrigation in Oklahoma and Texas. Because of the lack of displacement in Texas and Oklahoma, concerns that fracking contributes to excess withdrawals in the present time may be warranted. •Quantify water use in fracking and in irrigation for 9 western states in 2017.•Fracking water use represents 2% of irrigation water use, but 12–55% in shale areas.•Estimate the displacement of water use in fracking on irrigation in 2002–17 period.•In North Dakota, each ac-ft of water in fracking displaced 1.1 ac-ft in irrigation.•Weaker evidence for water use in fracking increasing irrigation water use in OK, TX.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2020-11, Vol.146, p.111799, Article 111799
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524334785
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agriculture
Counties
Crops
energy
Energy policy
Farmers
Farming
Feet
Gas wells
Hydraulic fracturing
Irrigation
Irrigation water
North Dakota
Oil and gas
Oil shale
oils
Oklahoma
Petroleum
Shale
Shale gas
Shales
Texas
Water
Water policy
Water use
Water wells
title Fracking, farming, and water
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracking,%20farming,%20and%20water&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Hitaj,%20Claudia&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=111799&rft.pages=111799-&rft.artnum=111799&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524334785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486190218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S030142152030519X&rfr_iscdi=true