Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania

The effort to increase the sustainable supply of food and fibre is challenged by the potential for increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming systems with intensified production systems. This study aimed at quantifying soil N2O emissions from smallholder organic and conventional cotton pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-09, Vol.785, p.147301-147301, Article 147301
Hauptverfasser: Bwana, Thomas N., Amuri, Nyambilila A., Semu, Ernest, Elsgaard, Lars, Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus, Pelster, David E., Olesen, Jørgen Eivind
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147301
container_issue
container_start_page 147301
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 785
creator Bwana, Thomas N.
Amuri, Nyambilila A.
Semu, Ernest
Elsgaard, Lars
Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
Pelster, David E.
Olesen, Jørgen Eivind
description The effort to increase the sustainable supply of food and fibre is challenged by the potential for increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming systems with intensified production systems. This study aimed at quantifying soil N2O emissions from smallholder organic and conventional cotton production practices in a semi-arid area, Meatu, Northern Tanzania. Field experiments were conducted to quantify N2O emissions under (i) current practices with organic (3 Mg ha−1 farmyard manure (FYM)) and conventional (30 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; (ii) a high input practice with organic (5 Mg ha−1 FYM) and conventional (60 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; and (iii) an integrated practice with organic (3 Mg FYM + legume intercropping) and conventional (30 kg N + 3 Mg ha−1 FYM) cultivation. In both organic and conventional farming, control treatments with no fertilizer application were included. The study was performed over two growing seasons, where season 1 was rather wet and season 2 was rather dry. Static chambers were used for in-situ measurement of N2O emission from soil. The current organic and conventional cotton farming practices did not differ (P > 0.05) in cumulative area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions. High input conventional cotton showed higher area scaled N2O emissions than organic cotton during the wetter season, but not during the drier season. The inorganic fertilizer + FYM combination did not differ (P > 0.05) in area- and yield-scaled N2O emissions from conventional practice. Intercropping cotton and legumes did not affect (P > 0.05) N2O emission compared to 3 Mg FYM ha−1. The emission factors for both conventional and organic systems were generally above 1% in the dry season 2, but below 1% in the wetter season 1. The use of organic and inorganic fertilizers at rates up to 60 kg N ha−1, FYM-inorganic fertilizer combination, and cotton-legume intercropping increased yields, while N2O emissions stayed low, in particular with use of mineral fertilizers. [Display omitted] •Fertilization in organic and conventional systems increased N2O emissions.•Organic and conventional practice with 30 kg N ha−1 gave similar N2O emissions.•Cotton-legume intercropping did not affect N2O emissions.•N2O emission factors were higher than 1% for all treatments in dry season.•High yield scaled N2O emissions indicate that productivity is too low.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521497195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004896972102372X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2521497195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-183c5c2431f32aac8dfb338f6cf6834f7030d0fb12140e5cd1f246fd617d68853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_wSzdTM1N5pFZluILSrtoXYc0k9SUmaQmaUF_vTOMuPVuLpd7zoHzIXQPZAYEysfDLCqbfNLuPKOEwgzyihG4QBPgVZ0BoeUlmhCS86wu6-oa3cR4IP1UHCZos_G2xSu6xrqzMVrvsAm-wz7spbMKS9dg5d1Zu9T_ZNsfKQ0iGTrr9tg6vPIhfejg8Fa6794kb9GVkW3Ud797it6fn7aL12y5fnlbzJeZYjlPGXCmCkVzBoZRKRVvzI4xbkplSs5yUxFGGmJ2QCEnulANGJqXpimhakrOCzZFD2PuMfjPk45J9BWUblvptD9FQYveWVdQD9JqlKrgYwzaiGOwnQxfAogYMIqD-MMoBoxixNg756NT903OVodBp53SjQ1aJdF4-2_GD2MlgD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521497195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bwana, Thomas N. ; Amuri, Nyambilila A. ; Semu, Ernest ; Elsgaard, Lars ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; Pelster, David E. ; Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</creator><creatorcontrib>Bwana, Thomas N. ; Amuri, Nyambilila A. ; Semu, Ernest ; Elsgaard, Lars ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; Pelster, David E. ; Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</creatorcontrib><description>The effort to increase the sustainable supply of food and fibre is challenged by the potential for increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming systems with intensified production systems. This study aimed at quantifying soil N2O emissions from smallholder organic and conventional cotton production practices in a semi-arid area, Meatu, Northern Tanzania. Field experiments were conducted to quantify N2O emissions under (i) current practices with organic (3 Mg ha−1 farmyard manure (FYM)) and conventional (30 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; (ii) a high input practice with organic (5 Mg ha−1 FYM) and conventional (60 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; and (iii) an integrated practice with organic (3 Mg FYM + legume intercropping) and conventional (30 kg N + 3 Mg ha−1 FYM) cultivation. In both organic and conventional farming, control treatments with no fertilizer application were included. The study was performed over two growing seasons, where season 1 was rather wet and season 2 was rather dry. Static chambers were used for in-situ measurement of N2O emission from soil. The current organic and conventional cotton farming practices did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in cumulative area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions. High input conventional cotton showed higher area scaled N2O emissions than organic cotton during the wetter season, but not during the drier season. The inorganic fertilizer + FYM combination did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in area- and yield-scaled N2O emissions from conventional practice. Intercropping cotton and legumes did not affect (P &gt; 0.05) N2O emission compared to 3 Mg FYM ha−1. The emission factors for both conventional and organic systems were generally above 1% in the dry season 2, but below 1% in the wetter season 1. The use of organic and inorganic fertilizers at rates up to 60 kg N ha−1, FYM-inorganic fertilizer combination, and cotton-legume intercropping increased yields, while N2O emissions stayed low, in particular with use of mineral fertilizers. [Display omitted] •Fertilization in organic and conventional systems increased N2O emissions.•Organic and conventional practice with 30 kg N ha−1 gave similar N2O emissions.•Cotton-legume intercropping did not affect N2O emissions.•N2O emission factors were higher than 1% for all treatments in dry season.•High yield scaled N2O emissions indicate that productivity is too low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cotton ; Fertilizer ; Greenhouse gas ; Intercropping ; Manure ; Nitrous oxide</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-09, Vol.785, p.147301-147301, Article 147301</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-183c5c2431f32aac8dfb338f6cf6834f7030d0fb12140e5cd1f246fd617d68853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-183c5c2431f32aac8dfb338f6cf6834f7030d0fb12140e5cd1f246fd617d68853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972102372X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bwana, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amuri, Nyambilila A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semu, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsgaard, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelster, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</creatorcontrib><title>Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>The effort to increase the sustainable supply of food and fibre is challenged by the potential for increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming systems with intensified production systems. This study aimed at quantifying soil N2O emissions from smallholder organic and conventional cotton production practices in a semi-arid area, Meatu, Northern Tanzania. Field experiments were conducted to quantify N2O emissions under (i) current practices with organic (3 Mg ha−1 farmyard manure (FYM)) and conventional (30 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; (ii) a high input practice with organic (5 Mg ha−1 FYM) and conventional (60 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; and (iii) an integrated practice with organic (3 Mg FYM + legume intercropping) and conventional (30 kg N + 3 Mg ha−1 FYM) cultivation. In both organic and conventional farming, control treatments with no fertilizer application were included. The study was performed over two growing seasons, where season 1 was rather wet and season 2 was rather dry. Static chambers were used for in-situ measurement of N2O emission from soil. The current organic and conventional cotton farming practices did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in cumulative area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions. High input conventional cotton showed higher area scaled N2O emissions than organic cotton during the wetter season, but not during the drier season. The inorganic fertilizer + FYM combination did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in area- and yield-scaled N2O emissions from conventional practice. Intercropping cotton and legumes did not affect (P &gt; 0.05) N2O emission compared to 3 Mg FYM ha−1. The emission factors for both conventional and organic systems were generally above 1% in the dry season 2, but below 1% in the wetter season 1. The use of organic and inorganic fertilizers at rates up to 60 kg N ha−1, FYM-inorganic fertilizer combination, and cotton-legume intercropping increased yields, while N2O emissions stayed low, in particular with use of mineral fertilizers. [Display omitted] •Fertilization in organic and conventional systems increased N2O emissions.•Organic and conventional practice with 30 kg N ha−1 gave similar N2O emissions.•Cotton-legume intercropping did not affect N2O emissions.•N2O emission factors were higher than 1% for all treatments in dry season.•High yield scaled N2O emissions indicate that productivity is too low.</description><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Fertilizer</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_wSzdTM1N5pFZluILSrtoXYc0k9SUmaQmaUF_vTOMuPVuLpd7zoHzIXQPZAYEysfDLCqbfNLuPKOEwgzyihG4QBPgVZ0BoeUlmhCS86wu6-oa3cR4IP1UHCZos_G2xSu6xrqzMVrvsAm-wz7spbMKS9dg5d1Zu9T_ZNsfKQ0iGTrr9tg6vPIhfejg8Fa6794kb9GVkW3Ud797it6fn7aL12y5fnlbzJeZYjlPGXCmCkVzBoZRKRVvzI4xbkplSs5yUxFGGmJ2QCEnulANGJqXpimhakrOCzZFD2PuMfjPk45J9BWUblvptD9FQYveWVdQD9JqlKrgYwzaiGOwnQxfAogYMIqD-MMoBoxixNg756NT903OVodBp53SjQ1aJdF4-2_GD2MlgD8</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Bwana, Thomas N.</creator><creator>Amuri, Nyambilila A.</creator><creator>Semu, Ernest</creator><creator>Elsgaard, Lars</creator><creator>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creator><creator>Pelster, David E.</creator><creator>Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania</title><author>Bwana, Thomas N. ; Amuri, Nyambilila A. ; Semu, Ernest ; Elsgaard, Lars ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; Pelster, David E. ; Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-183c5c2431f32aac8dfb338f6cf6834f7030d0fb12140e5cd1f246fd617d68853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Fertilizer</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bwana, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amuri, Nyambilila A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semu, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsgaard, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelster, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bwana, Thomas N.</au><au>Amuri, Nyambilila A.</au><au>Semu, Ernest</au><au>Elsgaard, Lars</au><au>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</au><au>Pelster, David E.</au><au>Olesen, Jørgen Eivind</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>785</volume><spage>147301</spage><epage>147301</epage><pages>147301-147301</pages><artnum>147301</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The effort to increase the sustainable supply of food and fibre is challenged by the potential for increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming systems with intensified production systems. This study aimed at quantifying soil N2O emissions from smallholder organic and conventional cotton production practices in a semi-arid area, Meatu, Northern Tanzania. Field experiments were conducted to quantify N2O emissions under (i) current practices with organic (3 Mg ha−1 farmyard manure (FYM)) and conventional (30 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; (ii) a high input practice with organic (5 Mg ha−1 FYM) and conventional (60 kg mineral N ha−1) cultivation; and (iii) an integrated practice with organic (3 Mg FYM + legume intercropping) and conventional (30 kg N + 3 Mg ha−1 FYM) cultivation. In both organic and conventional farming, control treatments with no fertilizer application were included. The study was performed over two growing seasons, where season 1 was rather wet and season 2 was rather dry. Static chambers were used for in-situ measurement of N2O emission from soil. The current organic and conventional cotton farming practices did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in cumulative area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions. High input conventional cotton showed higher area scaled N2O emissions than organic cotton during the wetter season, but not during the drier season. The inorganic fertilizer + FYM combination did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) in area- and yield-scaled N2O emissions from conventional practice. Intercropping cotton and legumes did not affect (P &gt; 0.05) N2O emission compared to 3 Mg FYM ha−1. The emission factors for both conventional and organic systems were generally above 1% in the dry season 2, but below 1% in the wetter season 1. The use of organic and inorganic fertilizers at rates up to 60 kg N ha−1, FYM-inorganic fertilizer combination, and cotton-legume intercropping increased yields, while N2O emissions stayed low, in particular with use of mineral fertilizers. [Display omitted] •Fertilization in organic and conventional systems increased N2O emissions.•Organic and conventional practice with 30 kg N ha−1 gave similar N2O emissions.•Cotton-legume intercropping did not affect N2O emissions.•N2O emission factors were higher than 1% for all treatments in dry season.•High yield scaled N2O emissions indicate that productivity is too low.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147301</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-09, Vol.785, p.147301-147301, Article 147301
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521497195
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cotton
Fertilizer
Greenhouse gas
Intercropping
Manure
Nitrous oxide
title Soil N2O emission from organic and conventional cotton farming in Northern Tanzania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A58%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20N2O%20emission%20from%20organic%20and%20conventional%20cotton%20farming%20in%20Northern%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Bwana,%20Thomas%20N.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=785&rft.spage=147301&rft.epage=147301&rft.pages=147301-147301&rft.artnum=147301&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2521497195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521497195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004896972102372X&rfr_iscdi=true