Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons
The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play. Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilater...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2021-05, Vol.85, p.105366-105366, Article 105366 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 105366 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 105366 |
| container_title | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
| container_volume | 85 |
| creator | Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo Abián, Pablo Jimenez, Fernando Abián-Vicén, Javier |
| description | The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play.
Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilateral Achilles tendon rupture group and 177 non-injured players (age = 55.4(9.4)years), assigned to the control group. A Logiq®S8 ultrasound was used to study tendon structure and elastography index values and a Myoton®PRO hand-held myotonometer was used to record the stiffness of the Achilles tendon.
In Achilles tendon rupture group, operated tendons showed higher values than non-injured ones in thickness (Operated = 9.03(2.67)mm vs. non-injured = 5.88(0.88)mm; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520875203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268003321000966</els_id><sourcerecordid>2520875203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-56ac08816d45cb327015e68747753bd1361620fb985924278adbf5bea03896a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FyTevPSYj85He1sGv2BhD-o5pJNqJkN3Mibphfn3ZuhVPHqp4i3et4p6EHpHyZ4SKj-c9m4OcQxpAXfcM8Jomwsu5TO0o1oNHWWKPkc7wqTuCOH8Br0q5UQI6ZlQL9EN5wMV_cB36PK95tXVNdsZ2-jxdaONwTV5zukMuQYoOE24HgHfuWOY56YrRJ8iDhEXiCFlPFq_hFjb7DzbC-TyET-0sK3g8WPZ45hiF-JpzU1v4fIavZjsXODNU79FPz9_-nH42t0_fPl2uLvvXM907YS0jmhNpe-FGzlThAqQWvVKCT56yiWVjEzjoMXAeqa09eMkRrCE60FawW_R-21v--fXCqWaJRQH82wjpLUYJhjRqhXerMNmdTmVkmEy5xwWmy-GEnMlb07mH_LmSt5s5Fv27dOZdVzA_03-Qd0Mh80A7dnHANkUFyA68CGDq8an8B9nfgNYW5tz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520875203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo ; Abián, Pablo ; Jimenez, Fernando ; Abián-Vicén, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo ; Abián, Pablo ; Jimenez, Fernando ; Abián-Vicén, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play.
Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilateral Achilles tendon rupture group and 177 non-injured players (age = 55.4(9.4)years), assigned to the control group. A Logiq®S8 ultrasound was used to study tendon structure and elastography index values and a Myoton®PRO hand-held myotonometer was used to record the stiffness of the Achilles tendon.
In Achilles tendon rupture group, operated tendons showed higher values than non-injured ones in thickness (Operated = 9.03(2.67)mm vs. non-injured = 5.88(0.88)mm; P < 0.001), width (Operated = 18.44(3.20)mm vs. non-injured = 16.80(1.97)mm; P = 0.039), cross sectional area (Operated = 140.33(60.29)mm2 vs. non-injured = 74.40(17.09)mm2; P < 0.001) and elastography index (Operated = 2.05(1.35)A.U. vs. non-injured = 1.47(0.62)A.U.; P = 0.025). The bilateral differences shown by the Achilles tendon rupture group were greater than the bilateral differences shown by the control group for thickness (P < 0.001), width (P = 0.001), cross sectional area (P < 0.001), tone (P = 0.006) and dynamic stiffness (Achilles tendon rupture group = 10.85(23.90)N∙m−1. vs. control group = 0.18(18.83)N∙m−1; P = 0.031).
Surgery on the Achilles tendon and adaptation to the mobilisation and strength training during rehabilitation could provoke structural and mechanical differences compared to the non-injured tendon. Furthermore, the differences between both Achilles tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group was higher than the asymmetry observed between dominant and non-dominant Achilles tendons in the control group. In addition, the higher logarithmic decrement values showed by non-injured tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group could be a tendinous injury risk factor.
•This research provides characteristics of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players.•Operated Achilles tendons are thicker and wider than non-injured tendons.•Achilles surgery causes an asymmetry between operated and non-injuried tendons.•An increase in the logarithmic decrement value could be an indicator of the risk of injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33915493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Achilles tendon ; Badminton ; Elastography ; Myotonometer ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2021-05, Vol.85, p.105366-105366, Article 105366</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-56ac08816d45cb327015e68747753bd1361620fb985924278adbf5bea03896a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-56ac08816d45cb327015e68747753bd1361620fb985924278adbf5bea03896a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abián, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abián-Vicén, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play.
Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilateral Achilles tendon rupture group and 177 non-injured players (age = 55.4(9.4)years), assigned to the control group. A Logiq®S8 ultrasound was used to study tendon structure and elastography index values and a Myoton®PRO hand-held myotonometer was used to record the stiffness of the Achilles tendon.
In Achilles tendon rupture group, operated tendons showed higher values than non-injured ones in thickness (Operated = 9.03(2.67)mm vs. non-injured = 5.88(0.88)mm; P < 0.001), width (Operated = 18.44(3.20)mm vs. non-injured = 16.80(1.97)mm; P = 0.039), cross sectional area (Operated = 140.33(60.29)mm2 vs. non-injured = 74.40(17.09)mm2; P < 0.001) and elastography index (Operated = 2.05(1.35)A.U. vs. non-injured = 1.47(0.62)A.U.; P = 0.025). The bilateral differences shown by the Achilles tendon rupture group were greater than the bilateral differences shown by the control group for thickness (P < 0.001), width (P = 0.001), cross sectional area (P < 0.001), tone (P = 0.006) and dynamic stiffness (Achilles tendon rupture group = 10.85(23.90)N∙m−1. vs. control group = 0.18(18.83)N∙m−1; P = 0.031).
Surgery on the Achilles tendon and adaptation to the mobilisation and strength training during rehabilitation could provoke structural and mechanical differences compared to the non-injured tendon. Furthermore, the differences between both Achilles tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group was higher than the asymmetry observed between dominant and non-dominant Achilles tendons in the control group. In addition, the higher logarithmic decrement values showed by non-injured tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group could be a tendinous injury risk factor.
•This research provides characteristics of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players.•Operated Achilles tendons are thicker and wider than non-injured tendons.•Achilles surgery causes an asymmetry between operated and non-injuried tendons.•An increase in the logarithmic decrement value could be an indicator of the risk of injury.</description><subject>Achilles tendon</subject><subject>Badminton</subject><subject>Elastography</subject><subject>Myotonometer</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FyTevPSYj85He1sGv2BhD-o5pJNqJkN3Mibphfn3ZuhVPHqp4i3et4p6EHpHyZ4SKj-c9m4OcQxpAXfcM8Jomwsu5TO0o1oNHWWKPkc7wqTuCOH8Br0q5UQI6ZlQL9EN5wMV_cB36PK95tXVNdsZ2-jxdaONwTV5zukMuQYoOE24HgHfuWOY56YrRJ8iDhEXiCFlPFq_hFjb7DzbC-TyET-0sK3g8WPZ45hiF-JpzU1v4fIavZjsXODNU79FPz9_-nH42t0_fPl2uLvvXM907YS0jmhNpe-FGzlThAqQWvVKCT56yiWVjEzjoMXAeqa09eMkRrCE60FawW_R-21v--fXCqWaJRQH82wjpLUYJhjRqhXerMNmdTmVkmEy5xwWmy-GEnMlb07mH_LmSt5s5Fv27dOZdVzA_03-Qd0Mh80A7dnHANkUFyA68CGDq8an8B9nfgNYW5tz</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo</creator><creator>Abián, Pablo</creator><creator>Jimenez, Fernando</creator><creator>Abián-Vicén, Javier</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons</title><author>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo ; Abián, Pablo ; Jimenez, Fernando ; Abián-Vicén, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-56ac08816d45cb327015e68747753bd1361620fb985924278adbf5bea03896a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Achilles tendon</topic><topic>Badminton</topic><topic>Elastography</topic><topic>Myotonometer</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abián, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abián-Vicén, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo-Sánchez, Alfredo</au><au>Abián, Pablo</au><au>Jimenez, Fernando</au><au>Abián-Vicén, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>105366</spage><epage>105366</epage><pages>105366-105366</pages><artnum>105366</artnum><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play.
Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilateral Achilles tendon rupture group and 177 non-injured players (age = 55.4(9.4)years), assigned to the control group. A Logiq®S8 ultrasound was used to study tendon structure and elastography index values and a Myoton®PRO hand-held myotonometer was used to record the stiffness of the Achilles tendon.
In Achilles tendon rupture group, operated tendons showed higher values than non-injured ones in thickness (Operated = 9.03(2.67)mm vs. non-injured = 5.88(0.88)mm; P < 0.001), width (Operated = 18.44(3.20)mm vs. non-injured = 16.80(1.97)mm; P = 0.039), cross sectional area (Operated = 140.33(60.29)mm2 vs. non-injured = 74.40(17.09)mm2; P < 0.001) and elastography index (Operated = 2.05(1.35)A.U. vs. non-injured = 1.47(0.62)A.U.; P = 0.025). The bilateral differences shown by the Achilles tendon rupture group were greater than the bilateral differences shown by the control group for thickness (P < 0.001), width (P = 0.001), cross sectional area (P < 0.001), tone (P = 0.006) and dynamic stiffness (Achilles tendon rupture group = 10.85(23.90)N∙m−1. vs. control group = 0.18(18.83)N∙m−1; P = 0.031).
Surgery on the Achilles tendon and adaptation to the mobilisation and strength training during rehabilitation could provoke structural and mechanical differences compared to the non-injured tendon. Furthermore, the differences between both Achilles tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group was higher than the asymmetry observed between dominant and non-dominant Achilles tendons in the control group. In addition, the higher logarithmic decrement values showed by non-injured tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group could be a tendinous injury risk factor.
•This research provides characteristics of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players.•Operated Achilles tendons are thicker and wider than non-injured tendons.•Achilles surgery causes an asymmetry between operated and non-injuried tendons.•An increase in the logarithmic decrement value could be an indicator of the risk of injury.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33915493</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-0033 |
| ispartof | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2021-05, Vol.85, p.105366-105366, Article 105366 |
| issn | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520875203 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Achilles tendon Badminton Elastography Myotonometer Ultrasound |
| title | Structural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendons |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A00%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20and%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20the%20Achilles%20tendon%20in%20senior%20badminton%20players:%20Operated%20vs.%20non-injured%20tendons&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Bravo-S%C3%A1nchez,%20Alfredo&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=105366&rft.epage=105366&rft.pages=105366-105366&rft.artnum=105366&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520875203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520875203&rft_id=info:pmid/33915493&rft_els_id=S0268003321000966&rfr_iscdi=true |