Limitations of the PRODIGE 7 trial

Given that 13 (45%) of 29 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group for whom data were available and 11 (39%) of 28 patients in the cytoreductive group discontinued neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of toxic effects, perhaps this strategy is not suitable for all patients. Patients with a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The lancet oncology 2021-05, Vol.22 (5), p.e175-e175
Hauptverfasser: Bhatt, Aditi, Mehta, Sanket, Kammar, Praveen, Saklani, Avanish
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Given that 13 (45%) of 29 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group for whom data were available and 11 (39%) of 28 patients in the cytoreductive group discontinued neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of toxic effects, perhaps this strategy is not suitable for all patients. Patients with a complete or near-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could derive less benefit from HIPEC than those with a partial response or stable disease.3 In the PRODIGE 7 trial, the addition of HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery led to a significant benefit in relapse-free and overall survival in patients with a PCI of 11–15. Considering that HIPEC acts on microscopic disease, an 18-month survival benefit with a single 30-min HIPEC regimen in patients receiving intense systemic chemotherapy was unlikely. [...]the PRODIGE 7 trial did not show a survival benefit of HIPEC in one subgroup of patients, and the results should not be generalised to all patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases.
ISSN:1470-2045
1474-5488
DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00062-0