Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases

Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicon (Oxford) 2021-07, Vol.198, p.24-31
Hauptverfasser: Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz, Nogueira de Souza, Solange, Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto, Miyaji, Karina Takesaki, Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 24
container_title Toxicon (Oxford)
container_volume 198
creator Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz
Nogueira de Souza, Solange
Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto
Miyaji, Karina Takesaki
Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos
description Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and Xenodon neuwiedii bites in which the offending snake was clearly identified. Analyses included variables related to the snake and the patient, including demographic data, clinical findings, and treatments. Of the 163 cases, 123 were bites by X. merremii and 40 by X. neuwiedii. Most bites occurred in spring and summer, predominantly during the daytime. Most offending snakes were female. Bites by X. merremii juveniles were more frequent in autumn than in other seasons, whereas those by X. neuwiedii adults were in the summer. Hands and feet were the most frequently affected regions, with no significant difference between upper and lower limbs bitten by either X. merremii or X. neuwiedii. The main clinical findings were pain, transitory bleeding, erythema, and local edema. Local edema was proportionally more frequent with X. neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites. No patient had extensive edema or systemic envenomation. A significant association between the snout-vent-length and transitory bleeding in bites by X. merremii, but not in those by X. neuwiedii, was identified. Whole blood clotting tests were normal in all tested patients (62 cases). Sixteen patients were incorrectly treated with anti-Bothrops antivenom. In conclusion, most accidents caused by X. merremii and X. neuwiedii present mild local symptomatology. These snakes can be mistaken for lance-headed vipers, and some bites present symptoms that resemble mild bites by Bothrops sp. Physicians should be aware of X. merremii and X. neuwiedii bites to avoid unnecessary patient distress and overprescription of antivenom. •Clinical, epidemiological, biological aspects of two non-front-fanged colubroids species bites studied.•Most bites occurred in spring and summer, mainly during the daytime.•Most offending snakes were female.•Key clinical findings were pain, transitory local bleeding, erythema, and local edema.•Local edema more frequent with Xenodon neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520872052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041010121001318</els_id><sourcerecordid>2520872052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e5c8027e5cc9b71162a434779e2f1ddcece4c75630f2d1e9d513f4359dd7f9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBezkhN8E8SJ91UtIWCVAkkQLCzPPYNeJTYg-0MHV6HJ2DPri-GRzPtltXZfPcenXMQek5JSQltXq7K5G-s9q5khNGSVGWWB2hGW9EVnNbkIZoRUtGCZPwIPYlxRQjhbdc8Rkecd5xVgs_Qn3ObIOLlFn8F5413eIQQYLQWz7-obwOEE0xbVi2wcuaecTD9tGB20NXtX5e-77GGL_D80q6jMtYoOL3jk3V2ga3DH29_e_xBTYM_wedB_bLDKVY4QAo-rkEnuwHslxHCRiXrnRpwTJPZYt9j2nCsVYT4FD3q1RDh2UGP0ec3rz9dvC2u31-9u3h1XWhOeSoo1LolTGTR3VJQ2jBV8UqIDlhPjdGgodKibjjpmaHQmZryvuJ1Z4zou54fo_n-7zr4HxPEJEcbNQyDcuCnKFnNSCsYqVlG6z2qc44YoJfrYEcVtpISuVtLruRhLblbS5JKZsl3Lw4W03IEc391N08GzvYA5KAbC0FGbcHpXH3IdUnj7X8s_gE7kKnC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520872052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz ; Nogueira de Souza, Solange ; Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto ; Miyaji, Karina Takesaki ; Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz ; Nogueira de Souza, Solange ; Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto ; Miyaji, Karina Takesaki ; Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and Xenodon neuwiedii bites in which the offending snake was clearly identified. Analyses included variables related to the snake and the patient, including demographic data, clinical findings, and treatments. Of the 163 cases, 123 were bites by X. merremii and 40 by X. neuwiedii. Most bites occurred in spring and summer, predominantly during the daytime. Most offending snakes were female. Bites by X. merremii juveniles were more frequent in autumn than in other seasons, whereas those by X. neuwiedii adults were in the summer. Hands and feet were the most frequently affected regions, with no significant difference between upper and lower limbs bitten by either X. merremii or X. neuwiedii. The main clinical findings were pain, transitory bleeding, erythema, and local edema. Local edema was proportionally more frequent with X. neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites. No patient had extensive edema or systemic envenomation. A significant association between the snout-vent-length and transitory bleeding in bites by X. merremii, but not in those by X. neuwiedii, was identified. Whole blood clotting tests were normal in all tested patients (62 cases). Sixteen patients were incorrectly treated with anti-Bothrops antivenom. In conclusion, most accidents caused by X. merremii and X. neuwiedii present mild local symptomatology. These snakes can be mistaken for lance-headed vipers, and some bites present symptoms that resemble mild bites by Bothrops sp. Physicians should be aware of X. merremii and X. neuwiedii bites to avoid unnecessary patient distress and overprescription of antivenom. •Clinical, epidemiological, biological aspects of two non-front-fanged colubroids species bites studied.•Most bites occurred in spring and summer, mainly during the daytime.•Most offending snakes were female.•Key clinical findings were pain, transitory local bleeding, erythema, and local edema.•Local edema more frequent with Xenodon neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-0101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33932473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Dipsadidae ; Non-front-fanged colubroids ; Non-venomous snakes ; Snakebite ; Xenodon merremii ; Xenodon neuwiedii</subject><ispartof>Toxicon (Oxford), 2021-07, Vol.198, p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e5c8027e5cc9b71162a434779e2f1ddcece4c75630f2d1e9d513f4359dd7f9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2830-9558 ; 0000-0001-9533-0819 ; 0000-0003-2653-3975</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira de Souza, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyaji, Karina Takesaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases</title><title>Toxicon (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Toxicon</addtitle><description>Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and Xenodon neuwiedii bites in which the offending snake was clearly identified. Analyses included variables related to the snake and the patient, including demographic data, clinical findings, and treatments. Of the 163 cases, 123 were bites by X. merremii and 40 by X. neuwiedii. Most bites occurred in spring and summer, predominantly during the daytime. Most offending snakes were female. Bites by X. merremii juveniles were more frequent in autumn than in other seasons, whereas those by X. neuwiedii adults were in the summer. Hands and feet were the most frequently affected regions, with no significant difference between upper and lower limbs bitten by either X. merremii or X. neuwiedii. The main clinical findings were pain, transitory bleeding, erythema, and local edema. Local edema was proportionally more frequent with X. neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites. No patient had extensive edema or systemic envenomation. A significant association between the snout-vent-length and transitory bleeding in bites by X. merremii, but not in those by X. neuwiedii, was identified. Whole blood clotting tests were normal in all tested patients (62 cases). Sixteen patients were incorrectly treated with anti-Bothrops antivenom. In conclusion, most accidents caused by X. merremii and X. neuwiedii present mild local symptomatology. These snakes can be mistaken for lance-headed vipers, and some bites present symptoms that resemble mild bites by Bothrops sp. Physicians should be aware of X. merremii and X. neuwiedii bites to avoid unnecessary patient distress and overprescription of antivenom. •Clinical, epidemiological, biological aspects of two non-front-fanged colubroids species bites studied.•Most bites occurred in spring and summer, mainly during the daytime.•Most offending snakes were female.•Key clinical findings were pain, transitory local bleeding, erythema, and local edema.•Local edema more frequent with Xenodon neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites.</description><subject>Dipsadidae</subject><subject>Non-front-fanged colubroids</subject><subject>Non-venomous snakes</subject><subject>Snakebite</subject><subject>Xenodon merremii</subject><subject>Xenodon neuwiedii</subject><issn>0041-0101</issn><issn>1879-3150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBezkhN8E8SJ91UtIWCVAkkQLCzPPYNeJTYg-0MHV6HJ2DPri-GRzPtltXZfPcenXMQek5JSQltXq7K5G-s9q5khNGSVGWWB2hGW9EVnNbkIZoRUtGCZPwIPYlxRQjhbdc8Rkecd5xVgs_Qn3ObIOLlFn8F5413eIQQYLQWz7-obwOEE0xbVi2wcuaecTD9tGB20NXtX5e-77GGL_D80q6jMtYoOL3jk3V2ga3DH29_e_xBTYM_wedB_bLDKVY4QAo-rkEnuwHslxHCRiXrnRpwTJPZYt9j2nCsVYT4FD3q1RDh2UGP0ec3rz9dvC2u31-9u3h1XWhOeSoo1LolTGTR3VJQ2jBV8UqIDlhPjdGgodKibjjpmaHQmZryvuJ1Z4zou54fo_n-7zr4HxPEJEcbNQyDcuCnKFnNSCsYqVlG6z2qc44YoJfrYEcVtpISuVtLruRhLblbS5JKZsl3Lw4W03IEc391N08GzvYA5KAbC0FGbcHpXH3IdUnj7X8s_gE7kKnC</recordid><startdate>20210730</startdate><enddate>20210730</enddate><creator>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz</creator><creator>Nogueira de Souza, Solange</creator><creator>Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto</creator><creator>Miyaji, Karina Takesaki</creator><creator>Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2830-9558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-0819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3975</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210730</creationdate><title>Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases</title><author>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz ; Nogueira de Souza, Solange ; Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto ; Miyaji, Karina Takesaki ; Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e5c8027e5cc9b71162a434779e2f1ddcece4c75630f2d1e9d513f4359dd7f9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dipsadidae</topic><topic>Non-front-fanged colubroids</topic><topic>Non-venomous snakes</topic><topic>Snakebite</topic><topic>Xenodon merremii</topic><topic>Xenodon neuwiedii</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira de Souza, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyaji, Karina Takesaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicon (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto Lima Gendler, José Luiz</au><au>Nogueira de Souza, Solange</au><au>Vuolo Marques, Otavio Augusto</au><au>Miyaji, Karina Takesaki</au><au>Roberto de Medeiros, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases</atitle><jtitle>Toxicon (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicon</addtitle><date>2021-07-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>198</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0041-0101</issn><eissn>1879-3150</eissn><abstract>Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and Xenodon neuwiedii bites in which the offending snake was clearly identified. Analyses included variables related to the snake and the patient, including demographic data, clinical findings, and treatments. Of the 163 cases, 123 were bites by X. merremii and 40 by X. neuwiedii. Most bites occurred in spring and summer, predominantly during the daytime. Most offending snakes were female. Bites by X. merremii juveniles were more frequent in autumn than in other seasons, whereas those by X. neuwiedii adults were in the summer. Hands and feet were the most frequently affected regions, with no significant difference between upper and lower limbs bitten by either X. merremii or X. neuwiedii. The main clinical findings were pain, transitory bleeding, erythema, and local edema. Local edema was proportionally more frequent with X. neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites. No patient had extensive edema or systemic envenomation. A significant association between the snout-vent-length and transitory bleeding in bites by X. merremii, but not in those by X. neuwiedii, was identified. Whole blood clotting tests were normal in all tested patients (62 cases). Sixteen patients were incorrectly treated with anti-Bothrops antivenom. In conclusion, most accidents caused by X. merremii and X. neuwiedii present mild local symptomatology. These snakes can be mistaken for lance-headed vipers, and some bites present symptoms that resemble mild bites by Bothrops sp. Physicians should be aware of X. merremii and X. neuwiedii bites to avoid unnecessary patient distress and overprescription of antivenom. •Clinical, epidemiological, biological aspects of two non-front-fanged colubroids species bites studied.•Most bites occurred in spring and summer, mainly during the daytime.•Most offending snakes were female.•Key clinical findings were pain, transitory local bleeding, erythema, and local edema.•Local edema more frequent with Xenodon neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33932473</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2830-9558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-0819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3975</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-0101
ispartof Toxicon (Oxford), 2021-07, Vol.198, p.24-31
issn 0041-0101
1879-3150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520872052
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Dipsadidae
Non-front-fanged colubroids
Non-venomous snakes
Snakebite
Xenodon merremii
Xenodon neuwiedii
title Bites by Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824) and Xenodon neuwiedii (Günther, 1863) (Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) in São Paulo, Brazil: a retrospective observational study of 163 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bites%20by%20Xenodon%20merremii%20(Wagler,%201824)%20and%20Xenodon%20neuwiedii%20(G%C3%BCnther,%201863)%20(Dipsadidae:%20Xenodontini)%20in%20S%C3%A3o%20Paulo,%20Brazil:%20a%20retrospective%20observational%20study%20of%20163%20cases&rft.jtitle=Toxicon%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Pinto%20Lima%20Gendler,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luiz&rft.date=2021-07-30&rft.volume=198&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0041-0101&rft.eissn=1879-3150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520872052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520872052&rft_id=info:pmid/33932473&rft_els_id=S0041010121001318&rfr_iscdi=true