Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules

The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology letters 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327
Hauptverfasser: Santini, Luca, Isaac, Nick J. B., Rodrigues, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1327
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1318
container_title Ecology letters
container_volume 24
creator Santini, Luca
Isaac, Nick J. B.
Rodrigues, Ana
description The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences. Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ele.13743
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520852619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520852619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl70UJeXpk29jTFfYCCIgreQpk9nR9rMpEX27Y127iCYSwL58ed5_gidE3xDwpmCgRvCsoQdoDFJUhJjmojD_Zu9jdCJ92uMCc0zcoxGjOWM0jQbo9tntanLaNZ2785urIYWIgfK1Ku2gbaLbBUpY2wDnat15HX4aVeR6w34U3RUKePhbHdP0Ovd4mX-EC-f7h_ns2WsmRAsJjzlaYZ1VlCVlLygWhMhFKcV5ZArnqs8obiERFdcp1qJihOSKaZZkYoyL9kEXQ25G2c_evCdbGqvwRjVgu29pJxiwWlK8kAv_9C17V0bpgsqCesTnImgrgelnfXeQSU3rm6U20qC5XehMhQqfwoN9mKX2BcNlHv522AA0wF81ga2_yfJxXIxRH4BzQV90A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540121078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana</creator><contributor>Rodrigues, Ana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana ; Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences. Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13743</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33932267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropocene ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Body size ; Carnivores ; energy‐equivalence rule ; global change ; Herbivores ; Mammals ; Population decline ; Population density ; Realignment ; size‐density relationship ; Species extinction</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4869-8052 ; 0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.13743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.13743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rodrigues, Ana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences. Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</description><subject>Anthropocene</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>energy‐equivalence rule</subject><subject>global change</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Realignment</subject><subject>size‐density relationship</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl70UJeXpk29jTFfYCCIgreQpk9nR9rMpEX27Y127iCYSwL58ed5_gidE3xDwpmCgRvCsoQdoDFJUhJjmojD_Zu9jdCJ92uMCc0zcoxGjOWM0jQbo9tntanLaNZ2785urIYWIgfK1Ku2gbaLbBUpY2wDnat15HX4aVeR6w34U3RUKePhbHdP0Ovd4mX-EC-f7h_ns2WsmRAsJjzlaYZ1VlCVlLygWhMhFKcV5ZArnqs8obiERFdcp1qJihOSKaZZkYoyL9kEXQ25G2c_evCdbGqvwRjVgu29pJxiwWlK8kAv_9C17V0bpgsqCesTnImgrgelnfXeQSU3rm6U20qC5XehMhQqfwoN9mKX2BcNlHv522AA0wF81ga2_yfJxXIxRH4BzQV90A</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Santini, Luca</creator><creator>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Ana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-8052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><author>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anthropocene</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>energy‐equivalence rule</topic><topic>global change</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Realignment</topic><topic>size‐density relationship</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santini, Luca</au><au>Isaac, Nick J. B.</au><au>Rodrigues, Ana</au><au>Rodrigues, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1318</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1318-1327</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences. Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33932267</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13743</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-8052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-023X
ispartof Ecology letters, 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327
issn 1461-023X
1461-0248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520852619
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Anthropocene
Anthropogenic factors
Biodiversity
Body size
Carnivores
energy‐equivalence rule
global change
Herbivores
Mammals
Population decline
Population density
Realignment
size‐density relationship
Species extinction
title Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Anthropocene%20realignment%20of%20allometric%20scaling%20rules&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Santini,%20Luca&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1318&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1318-1327&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520852619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540121078&rft_id=info:pmid/33932267&rfr_iscdi=true