Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules
The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerabilit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology letters 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1327 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1318 |
container_title | Ecology letters |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Santini, Luca Isaac, Nick J. B. Rodrigues, Ana |
description | The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences.
Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.13743 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520852619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520852619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl70UJeXpk29jTFfYCCIgreQpk9nR9rMpEX27Y127iCYSwL58ed5_gidE3xDwpmCgRvCsoQdoDFJUhJjmojD_Zu9jdCJ92uMCc0zcoxGjOWM0jQbo9tntanLaNZ2785urIYWIgfK1Ku2gbaLbBUpY2wDnat15HX4aVeR6w34U3RUKePhbHdP0Ovd4mX-EC-f7h_ns2WsmRAsJjzlaYZ1VlCVlLygWhMhFKcV5ZArnqs8obiERFdcp1qJihOSKaZZkYoyL9kEXQ25G2c_evCdbGqvwRjVgu29pJxiwWlK8kAv_9C17V0bpgsqCesTnImgrgelnfXeQSU3rm6U20qC5XehMhQqfwoN9mKX2BcNlHv522AA0wF81ga2_yfJxXIxRH4BzQV90A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2540121078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana</creator><contributor>Rodrigues, Ana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana ; Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences.
Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13743</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33932267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropocene ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Body size ; Carnivores ; energy‐equivalence rule ; global change ; Herbivores ; Mammals ; Population decline ; Population density ; Realignment ; size‐density relationship ; Species extinction</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4869-8052 ; 0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.13743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.13743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rodrigues, Ana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences.
Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</description><subject>Anthropocene</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>energy‐equivalence rule</subject><subject>global change</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Realignment</subject><subject>size‐density relationship</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl70UJeXpk29jTFfYCCIgreQpk9nR9rMpEX27Y127iCYSwL58ed5_gidE3xDwpmCgRvCsoQdoDFJUhJjmojD_Zu9jdCJ92uMCc0zcoxGjOWM0jQbo9tntanLaNZ2785urIYWIgfK1Ku2gbaLbBUpY2wDnat15HX4aVeR6w34U3RUKePhbHdP0Ovd4mX-EC-f7h_ns2WsmRAsJjzlaYZ1VlCVlLygWhMhFKcV5ZArnqs8obiERFdcp1qJihOSKaZZkYoyL9kEXQ25G2c_evCdbGqvwRjVgu29pJxiwWlK8kAv_9C17V0bpgsqCesTnImgrgelnfXeQSU3rm6U20qC5XehMhQqfwoN9mKX2BcNlHv522AA0wF81ga2_yfJxXIxRH4BzQV90A</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Santini, Luca</creator><creator>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Ana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-8052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</title><author>Santini, Luca ; Isaac, Nick J. B. ; Rodrigues, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-1565670c7b2a4d5b2cc188a52f25e9a59a9420de4cf5c6ca8f5117a3c3b68d9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anthropocene</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>energy‐equivalence rule</topic><topic>global change</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Realignment</topic><topic>size‐density relationship</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Nick J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santini, Luca</au><au>Isaac, Nick J. B.</au><au>Rodrigues, Ana</au><au>Rodrigues, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1318</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1318-1327</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>The negative relationship between body size and population density in mammals is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints. In a global change scenario, however, this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. Here we test whether the size‐density relationship (SDR) in mammals has changed over the last 50 years. We show that the relationship has shifted down and became shallower, corresponding to a decline in population density of 31–73%, for the largest and smallest mammals, respectively. However, the SDRs became steeper in some groups (e.g. carnivores) and shallower in others (e.g. herbivores). The Anthropocene reorganisation of biotic systems is apparent in macroecological relationships, reinforcing the notion that biodiversity pattens are contingent upon conditions at the time of investigation. We call for an increased attention to the role of global change on macroecological inferences.
Although the size‐density relationship is often interpreted as resulting from energetic constraints, in a global change scenario this relationship might be expected to change, given the size‐dependent nature of anthropogenic pressures and vulnerability to extinction. We show that, over the last 50 years, the relationship has shifted down and became shallower.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33932267</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13743</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-8052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-3688</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
ispartof | Ecology letters, 2021-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1318-1327 |
issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520852619 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Anthropocene Anthropogenic factors Biodiversity Body size Carnivores energy‐equivalence rule global change Herbivores Mammals Population decline Population density Realignment size‐density relationship Species extinction |
title | Rapid Anthropocene realignment of allometric scaling rules |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Anthropocene%20realignment%20of%20allometric%20scaling%20rules&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Santini,%20Luca&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1318&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1318-1327&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520852619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2540121078&rft_id=info:pmid/33932267&rfr_iscdi=true |