Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort

Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort

Twenty-six commentators from several disciplines have written on the assumption that choice is determined by comparative valuation in a common denominator of reward, the “competitive marketplace.” There was no apparent disagreement that prospective rewards are discounted hyperbolically, although som...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2021-04, Vol.44, p.e57-e57, Article e57
1. Verfasser: Ainslie, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Author's Response
Competition
Humans
Preferences
Prospective Studies
Reinforcement
Reward
Risk assessment
Valuation
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e57
container_issue
container_start_page e57
container_title The Behavioral and brain sciences
container_volume 44
creator Ainslie, George
description Twenty-six commentators from several disciplines have written on the assumption that choice is determined by comparative valuation in a common denominator of reward, the “competitive marketplace.” There was no apparent disagreement that prospective rewards are discounted hyperbolically, although some found that the resulting predictions could come just as well from other models, including the interpretation of delay as risk and analysis in terms of hot versus cold valuation systems. Several novel ideas emerged.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0140525X21000029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518739982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X21000029</cupid><sourcerecordid>2518739982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-55b095086dc844505b5060c2ac5e66e50feb944879cd18871e414acda6bce0d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXapImTeJNFr9gQfADvJU0nWqXtlmTlmX_venuqqA4l5lhnnlneBE6JvicYCIunjBhmFP-SgkOQdUOGhOWqphIynfReBjHw3yEDryfB4QzrvbRKEmkUoKqMbp8hEW9ijobGds00HbaVeCHflnV9cIuwYWqe490W6wL23cRlKV13SHaK3Xt4WibJ-jl5vp5ehfPHm7vp1ez2CQi6WLOc6w4lmlhJGMc85zjFBuqDYc0BY5LyBVjUihTECkFAUaYNoVOcwO4wMkEnW10F85-9OC7rKm8gbrWLdjeZ5QTKRKlJA3o6S90bnvXhu_WFBaJYCpQZEMZZ713UGYLVzXarTKCs8HY7I-xYedkq9znDRTfG19OBiDZiuomd1XxBj-3_5f9BLtqgQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518073749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ainslie, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, George</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-six commentators from several disciplines have written on the assumption that choice is determined by comparative valuation in a common denominator of reward, the “competitive marketplace.” There was no apparent disagreement that prospective rewards are discounted hyperbolically, although some found that the resulting predictions could come just as well from other models, including the interpretation of delay as risk and analysis in terms of hot versus cold valuation systems. Several novel ideas emerged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21000029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33899729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Author's Response ; Competition ; Humans ; Preferences ; Prospective Studies ; Reinforcement ; Reward ; Risk assessment ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2021-04, Vol.44, p.e57-e57, Article e57</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. The target article and response article are works of the U.S. Government and are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-55b095086dc844505b5060c2ac5e66e50feb944879cd18871e414acda6bce0d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-55b095086dc844505b5060c2ac5e66e50feb944879cd18871e414acda6bce0d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X21000029/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33899729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, George</creatorcontrib><title>Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Twenty-six commentators from several disciplines have written on the assumption that choice is determined by comparative valuation in a common denominator of reward, the “competitive marketplace.” There was no apparent disagreement that prospective rewards are discounted hyperbolically, although some found that the resulting predictions could come just as well from other models, including the interpretation of delay as risk and analysis in terms of hot versus cold valuation systems. Several novel ideas emerged.</description><subject>Author's Response</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXapImTeJNFr9gQfADvJU0nWqXtlmTlmX_venuqqA4l5lhnnlneBE6JvicYCIunjBhmFP-SgkOQdUOGhOWqphIynfReBjHw3yEDryfB4QzrvbRKEmkUoKqMbp8hEW9ijobGds00HbaVeCHflnV9cIuwYWqe490W6wL23cRlKV13SHaK3Xt4WibJ-jl5vp5ehfPHm7vp1ez2CQi6WLOc6w4lmlhJGMc85zjFBuqDYc0BY5LyBVjUihTECkFAUaYNoVOcwO4wMkEnW10F85-9OC7rKm8gbrWLdjeZ5QTKRKlJA3o6S90bnvXhu_WFBaJYCpQZEMZZ713UGYLVzXarTKCs8HY7I-xYedkq9znDRTfG19OBiDZiuomd1XxBj-3_5f9BLtqgQA</recordid><startdate>20210426</startdate><enddate>20210426</enddate><creator>Ainslie, George</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210426</creationdate><title>Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort</title><author>Ainslie, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-55b095086dc844505b5060c2ac5e66e50feb944879cd18871e414acda6bce0d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Author's Response</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, George</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ainslie, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>e57</spage><epage>e57</epage><pages>e57-e57</pages><artnum>e57</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>Twenty-six commentators from several disciplines have written on the assumption that choice is determined by comparative valuation in a common denominator of reward, the “competitive marketplace.” There was no apparent disagreement that prospective rewards are discounted hyperbolically, although some found that the resulting predictions could come just as well from other models, including the interpretation of delay as risk and analysis in terms of hot versus cold valuation systems. Several novel ideas emerged.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>33899729</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X21000029</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-525X
ispartof The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2021-04, Vol.44, p.e57-e57, Article e57
issn 0140-525X
1469-1825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518739982
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Author's Response
Competition
Humans
Preferences
Prospective Studies
Reinforcement
Reward
Risk assessment
Valuation
title Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reply%20to%20commentaries%20to%20willpower%20with%20and%20without%20effort&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Ainslie,%20George&rft.date=2021-04-26&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=e57&rft.epage=e57&rft.pages=e57-e57&rft.artnum=e57&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X21000029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518739982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518073749&rft_id=info:pmid/33899729&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X21000029&rfr_iscdi=true