Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey
Dermatophytes are among the most common fungal agents causing superficial skin infections worldwide. Epidemiology of these infections is evolving and variable in every country. This report presents the Belgian epidemiological data regarding the distribution of dermatophytes species isolated by the t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Mycopathologia (1975) 2021-06, Vol.186 (3), p.399-409 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 409 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 399 |
| container_title | Mycopathologia (1975) |
| container_volume | 186 |
| creator | Sacheli, Rosalie Cuypers, Lize Seidel, Laurence Darfouf, Rajae Adjetey, Caroline Lagrou, Katrien Hayette, Marie-Pierre |
| description | Dermatophytes are among the most common fungal agents causing superficial skin infections worldwide. Epidemiology of these infections is evolving and variable in every country. This report presents the Belgian epidemiological data regarding the distribution of dermatophytes species isolated by the two national reference centers for mycosis during a period of 5 years (2012–2016).
Trichophyton rubrum
was the most frequently isolated species, considering all sampling sites (60.3% on average between 2012 and 2016). More precisely, this dermatophyte was the major agent of
Tinea unguium
and
Tinea corporis
during this period, followed by species of the
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
complex
.
Moreover,
Microsporum audouinii
was the main etiological agent of
Tinea capitis
(TC) with a frequency of 52.5% on average between 2012 and 2016. Other African dermatophytes species such as
Trichophyton soudanense
and
Trichophyton violaceum
were also agents of TC with a respective prevalence of 11.6% and 11.5% on average. This study highlights a different dermatophyte distribution in Belgium in comparison with other European countries. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518739102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A667178679</galeid><sourcerecordid>A667178679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-662d451c4db0e9980d7222247712775d932890ec15d8b1b786011714ec71e3733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTigSFzgkDJjO56EA9JSClSqhERBgpOVTSYhVRIvdoLYG6_BjWfhUXgSvGyhWoSwD5bs7xvN-BfiLsIRAtCjgAjapCAxBci0TPU1scCMVAq5ktfFAhRgqnPz7kDcCuECIGpIN8WBUkU0VLEQT07WXc1D53rXbhLXJM_YD-Xk1h82E4ekG5On3LfdPDxOlkn2_dt7Ln348eVrcj77T7y5LW40ZR_4zuV5KN4-P3lz_DI9e_Xi9Hh5llaazJQaI2udYaXrFXBR5FCTjEsToSTK6kLJvACuMKvzFa4oN4BIqLkiZEVKHYoHu7pr7z7OHCY7dKHivi9HdnOwMsOcVIEgI3r_L_TCzX6M3UVKExIVJrui2rJn242Nm3xZbYvapTGRyg0VkTr6BxX39ssqN3LTxfs94eGeEJmJP09tOYdgT89f77Nyx1beheC5sWvfDaXfWAS7DdjuArYxYPsrYKujdO9yunk1cP1H-Z1oBNQOCPFpbNlfjf-fsj8BFwyryA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547177965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sacheli, Rosalie ; Cuypers, Lize ; Seidel, Laurence ; Darfouf, Rajae ; Adjetey, Caroline ; Lagrou, Katrien ; Hayette, Marie-Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Sacheli, Rosalie ; Cuypers, Lize ; Seidel, Laurence ; Darfouf, Rajae ; Adjetey, Caroline ; Lagrou, Katrien ; Hayette, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>Dermatophytes are among the most common fungal agents causing superficial skin infections worldwide. Epidemiology of these infections is evolving and variable in every country. This report presents the Belgian epidemiological data regarding the distribution of dermatophytes species isolated by the two national reference centers for mycosis during a period of 5 years (2012–2016).
Trichophyton rubrum
was the most frequently isolated species, considering all sampling sites (60.3% on average between 2012 and 2016). More precisely, this dermatophyte was the major agent of
Tinea unguium
and
Tinea corporis
during this period, followed by species of the
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
complex
.
Moreover,
Microsporum audouinii
was the main etiological agent of
Tinea capitis
(TC) with a frequency of 52.5% on average between 2012 and 2016. Other African dermatophytes species such as
Trichophyton soudanense
and
Trichophyton violaceum
were also agents of TC with a respective prevalence of 11.6% and 11.5% on average. This study highlights a different dermatophyte distribution in Belgium in comparison with other European countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-486X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33900539</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Epidemiology ; Eukaryotic Microbiology ; Geographical distribution ; Health aspects ; Infection ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbial Ecology ; Microbiology ; Mycoses ; Mycosis ; Original Article ; Plant Sciences ; Skin ; Species ; Surveys ; Tinea capitis ; Tinea corporis</subject><ispartof>Mycopathologia (1975), 2021-06, Vol.186 (3), p.399-409</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021. corrected publication 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-662d451c4db0e9980d7222247712775d932890ec15d8b1b786011714ec71e3733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-662d451c4db0e9980d7222247712775d932890ec15d8b1b786011714ec71e3733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3922-324X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33900539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sacheli, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuypers, Lize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darfouf, Rajae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjetey, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagrou, Katrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayette, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey</title><title>Mycopathologia (1975)</title><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><description>Dermatophytes are among the most common fungal agents causing superficial skin infections worldwide. Epidemiology of these infections is evolving and variable in every country. This report presents the Belgian epidemiological data regarding the distribution of dermatophytes species isolated by the two national reference centers for mycosis during a period of 5 years (2012–2016).
Trichophyton rubrum
was the most frequently isolated species, considering all sampling sites (60.3% on average between 2012 and 2016). More precisely, this dermatophyte was the major agent of
Tinea unguium
and
Tinea corporis
during this period, followed by species of the
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
complex
.
Moreover,
Microsporum audouinii
was the main etiological agent of
Tinea capitis
(TC) with a frequency of 52.5% on average between 2012 and 2016. Other African dermatophytes species such as
Trichophyton soudanense
and
Trichophyton violaceum
were also agents of TC with a respective prevalence of 11.6% and 11.5% on average. This study highlights a different dermatophyte distribution in Belgium in comparison with other European countries.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Microbiology</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbial Ecology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mycoses</subject><subject>Mycosis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tinea capitis</subject><subject>Tinea corporis</subject><issn>0301-486X</issn><issn>1573-0832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTigSFzgkDJjO56EA9JSClSqhERBgpOVTSYhVRIvdoLYG6_BjWfhUXgSvGyhWoSwD5bs7xvN-BfiLsIRAtCjgAjapCAxBci0TPU1scCMVAq5ktfFAhRgqnPz7kDcCuECIGpIN8WBUkU0VLEQT07WXc1D53rXbhLXJM_YD-Xk1h82E4ekG5On3LfdPDxOlkn2_dt7Ln348eVrcj77T7y5LW40ZR_4zuV5KN4-P3lz_DI9e_Xi9Hh5llaazJQaI2udYaXrFXBR5FCTjEsToSTK6kLJvACuMKvzFa4oN4BIqLkiZEVKHYoHu7pr7z7OHCY7dKHivi9HdnOwMsOcVIEgI3r_L_TCzX6M3UVKExIVJrui2rJn242Nm3xZbYvapTGRyg0VkTr6BxX39ssqN3LTxfs94eGeEJmJP09tOYdgT89f77Nyx1beheC5sWvfDaXfWAS7DdjuArYxYPsrYKujdO9yunk1cP1H-Z1oBNQOCPFpbNlfjf-fsj8BFwyryA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Sacheli, Rosalie</creator><creator>Cuypers, Lize</creator><creator>Seidel, Laurence</creator><creator>Darfouf, Rajae</creator><creator>Adjetey, Caroline</creator><creator>Lagrou, Katrien</creator><creator>Hayette, Marie-Pierre</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-324X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey</title><author>Sacheli, Rosalie ; Cuypers, Lize ; Seidel, Laurence ; Darfouf, Rajae ; Adjetey, Caroline ; Lagrou, Katrien ; Hayette, Marie-Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-662d451c4db0e9980d7222247712775d932890ec15d8b1b786011714ec71e3733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Microbiology</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbial Ecology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mycoses</topic><topic>Mycosis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tinea capitis</topic><topic>Tinea corporis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sacheli, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuypers, Lize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darfouf, Rajae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjetey, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagrou, Katrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayette, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sacheli, Rosalie</au><au>Cuypers, Lize</au><au>Seidel, Laurence</au><au>Darfouf, Rajae</au><au>Adjetey, Caroline</au><au>Lagrou, Katrien</au><au>Hayette, Marie-Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey</atitle><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle><stitle>Mycopathologia</stitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>399-409</pages><issn>0301-486X</issn><eissn>1573-0832</eissn><abstract>Dermatophytes are among the most common fungal agents causing superficial skin infections worldwide. Epidemiology of these infections is evolving and variable in every country. This report presents the Belgian epidemiological data regarding the distribution of dermatophytes species isolated by the two national reference centers for mycosis during a period of 5 years (2012–2016).
Trichophyton rubrum
was the most frequently isolated species, considering all sampling sites (60.3% on average between 2012 and 2016). More precisely, this dermatophyte was the major agent of
Tinea unguium
and
Tinea corporis
during this period, followed by species of the
Trichophyton mentagrophytes
complex
.
Moreover,
Microsporum audouinii
was the main etiological agent of
Tinea capitis
(TC) with a frequency of 52.5% on average between 2012 and 2016. Other African dermatophytes species such as
Trichophyton soudanense
and
Trichophyton violaceum
were also agents of TC with a respective prevalence of 11.6% and 11.5% on average. This study highlights a different dermatophyte distribution in Belgium in comparison with other European countries.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33900539</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-324X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-486X |
| ispartof | Mycopathologia (1975), 2021-06, Vol.186 (3), p.399-409 |
| issn | 0301-486X 1573-0832 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518739102 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Epidemiology Eukaryotic Microbiology Geographical distribution Health aspects Infection Life Sciences Medical Microbiology Microbial Ecology Microbiology Mycoses Mycosis Original Article Plant Sciences Skin Species Surveys Tinea capitis Tinea corporis |
| title | Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years’ Survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A12%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20Dermatophytes%20in%20Belgium:%20A%205%C2%A0Years%E2%80%99%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Mycopathologia%20(1975)&rft.au=Sacheli,%20Rosalie&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=399-409&rft.issn=0301-486X&rft.eissn=1573-0832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11046-021-00542-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA667178679%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547177965&rft_id=info:pmid/33900539&rft_galeid=A667178679&rfr_iscdi=true |