Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

To compare the biomechanical characteristics of a single radially expanding all-suture anchor with an interference screw for open subpectoral long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. Eighteen fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric humeri were used for this biomechanical study. The matched pai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2021-10, Vol.37 (10), p.3016-3021
Hauptverfasser: Smuin, Dallas M., Vannatta, Emily, Ammerman, Brittany, Stauch, Christopher M., Lewis, Gregory S., Dhawan, Aman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3021
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3016
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 37
creator Smuin, Dallas M.
Vannatta, Emily
Ammerman, Brittany
Stauch, Christopher M.
Lewis, Gregory S.
Dhawan, Aman
description To compare the biomechanical characteristics of a single radially expanding all-suture anchor with an interference screw for open subpectoral long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. Eighteen fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric humeri were used for this biomechanical study. The matched pair humeri were randomly assigned into 2 experimental biceps tenodesis groups: conventional interference screw (CIS) or all-suture suture anchor (ASSA). Open subpectoral LHBT tenodesis was then performed and biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic test frame. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes before cyclic loading. Displacement was recorded at cycle 300 (D300) and cycle 500 (D500) and at ultimate failure. Data recorded included displacement, load to failure, displacement at failure. Paired t test was used for analysis. Decreased displacement was observed for the CIS group at D300 (1.67 ± 0.57 mm vs 3.35 ± 2.24 mm; P = .04), D500 (2.00 ± 0.76 mm vs 3.87 ± 2.20 mm; P = .04), and at failure (5.17 ± 3.05 mm vs 10.76 ± 2.66 mm; P < .001). Load to failure was lower in CIS specimens (170 ± 24.5 N vs 217.8 ± 51.54 N; P = .02). Failure in each case was tendon pullout for all CIS specimens; in ASSA 6 specimens failed as the suture pulled through the tendon, 2 specimens failed by suture breakage. No difference in stiffness was observed between the 2 groups (CIS = 98.33 ± 22.98 N/m vs ASSA = 75.94 ± 44.83 N/m; P = .20). Our study found that open subpectoral biceps tenodesis performed with an ASSA construct results in increased load to failure as compared with CIS. However, the CIS did demonstrate decreased displacement as compared to ASSA in this cadaveric biomechanical study. ASSA and CIS at time zero provide fixation as indicated by the provider intraoperatively for LHBT tenodesis. ASSA, however, does remove less cortical bone than does CIS and therefore produces a smaller stress riser in the proximal humerus. Further testing as to the integrity of ASSA is warranted to determine the integrity of the tenodesis with cyclical loading.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518726378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806321003637</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518726378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4343ec20753bda76e32b57cb503a0e4f5f7075a8d8484c5eccb71fff7c38f8ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2OEzEQhC0EYsPCGyDkI5cZ_DMeezkghYiFSJE47CKOlsduK45mxsH2LNqH4J1xSODIqQ79dZW6C6HXlLSU0P7doTWp7FNsGWG0JbwlSjxBKypY33DG6VO0IrK7aRTp-RV6kfOBEMK54s_RVZUbwUm_Qr-2s01gMji8i8bhEvGtCeOSAIcZfwwWjhnfwxwd5JDx91D2eD2Ozd1STsxF1rPdx4Q3cTqaVK3-YNu5QPKQYLYVrCk_3-M13hhnHiAFW83jBHZv5mDNiO_K4h5fomfejBleXfQafbv9dL_50uy-ft5u1rvG8p6VpuMdB8uIFHxwRvbA2SCkHQThhkDnhZd1ZpRTneqsAGsHSb330nLl1WD4NXp79j2m-GOBXPQUsoVxNDPEJWsmqJKs51JVtDujNsWcE3h9TGEy6VFTok9F6IM-F6FPRWjCdS2irr25JCzDBO7f0t_PV-DDGYB650OApLMNp1e5kMAW7WL4f8Jv4DadQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518726378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Smuin, Dallas M. ; Vannatta, Emily ; Ammerman, Brittany ; Stauch, Christopher M. ; Lewis, Gregory S. ; Dhawan, Aman</creator><creatorcontrib>Smuin, Dallas M. ; Vannatta, Emily ; Ammerman, Brittany ; Stauch, Christopher M. ; Lewis, Gregory S. ; Dhawan, Aman</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the biomechanical characteristics of a single radially expanding all-suture anchor with an interference screw for open subpectoral long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. Eighteen fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric humeri were used for this biomechanical study. The matched pair humeri were randomly assigned into 2 experimental biceps tenodesis groups: conventional interference screw (CIS) or all-suture suture anchor (ASSA). Open subpectoral LHBT tenodesis was then performed and biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic test frame. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes before cyclic loading. Displacement was recorded at cycle 300 (D300) and cycle 500 (D500) and at ultimate failure. Data recorded included displacement, load to failure, displacement at failure. Paired t test was used for analysis. Decreased displacement was observed for the CIS group at D300 (1.67 ± 0.57 mm vs 3.35 ± 2.24 mm; P = .04), D500 (2.00 ± 0.76 mm vs 3.87 ± 2.20 mm; P = .04), and at failure (5.17 ± 3.05 mm vs 10.76 ± 2.66 mm; P &lt; .001). Load to failure was lower in CIS specimens (170 ± 24.5 N vs 217.8 ± 51.54 N; P = .02). Failure in each case was tendon pullout for all CIS specimens; in ASSA 6 specimens failed as the suture pulled through the tendon, 2 specimens failed by suture breakage. No difference in stiffness was observed between the 2 groups (CIS = 98.33 ± 22.98 N/m vs ASSA = 75.94 ± 44.83 N/m; P = .20). Our study found that open subpectoral biceps tenodesis performed with an ASSA construct results in increased load to failure as compared with CIS. However, the CIS did demonstrate decreased displacement as compared to ASSA in this cadaveric biomechanical study. ASSA and CIS at time zero provide fixation as indicated by the provider intraoperatively for LHBT tenodesis. ASSA, however, does remove less cortical bone than does CIS and therefore produces a smaller stress riser in the proximal humerus. Further testing as to the integrity of ASSA is warranted to determine the integrity of the tenodesis with cyclical loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33895306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Screws ; Cadaver ; Humans ; Suture Anchors ; Sutures ; Tenodesis</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2021-10, Vol.37 (10), p.3016-3021</ispartof><rights>2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4343ec20753bda76e32b57cb503a0e4f5f7075a8d8484c5eccb71fff7c38f8ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4343ec20753bda76e32b57cb503a0e4f5f7075a8d8484c5eccb71fff7c38f8ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806321003637$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smuin, Dallas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannatta, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauch, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, Aman</creatorcontrib><title>Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>To compare the biomechanical characteristics of a single radially expanding all-suture anchor with an interference screw for open subpectoral long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. Eighteen fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric humeri were used for this biomechanical study. The matched pair humeri were randomly assigned into 2 experimental biceps tenodesis groups: conventional interference screw (CIS) or all-suture suture anchor (ASSA). Open subpectoral LHBT tenodesis was then performed and biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic test frame. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes before cyclic loading. Displacement was recorded at cycle 300 (D300) and cycle 500 (D500) and at ultimate failure. Data recorded included displacement, load to failure, displacement at failure. Paired t test was used for analysis. Decreased displacement was observed for the CIS group at D300 (1.67 ± 0.57 mm vs 3.35 ± 2.24 mm; P = .04), D500 (2.00 ± 0.76 mm vs 3.87 ± 2.20 mm; P = .04), and at failure (5.17 ± 3.05 mm vs 10.76 ± 2.66 mm; P &lt; .001). Load to failure was lower in CIS specimens (170 ± 24.5 N vs 217.8 ± 51.54 N; P = .02). Failure in each case was tendon pullout for all CIS specimens; in ASSA 6 specimens failed as the suture pulled through the tendon, 2 specimens failed by suture breakage. No difference in stiffness was observed between the 2 groups (CIS = 98.33 ± 22.98 N/m vs ASSA = 75.94 ± 44.83 N/m; P = .20). Our study found that open subpectoral biceps tenodesis performed with an ASSA construct results in increased load to failure as compared with CIS. However, the CIS did demonstrate decreased displacement as compared to ASSA in this cadaveric biomechanical study. ASSA and CIS at time zero provide fixation as indicated by the provider intraoperatively for LHBT tenodesis. ASSA, however, does remove less cortical bone than does CIS and therefore produces a smaller stress riser in the proximal humerus. Further testing as to the integrity of ASSA is warranted to determine the integrity of the tenodesis with cyclical loading.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Tenodesis</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2OEzEQhC0EYsPCGyDkI5cZ_DMeezkghYiFSJE47CKOlsduK45mxsH2LNqH4J1xSODIqQ79dZW6C6HXlLSU0P7doTWp7FNsGWG0JbwlSjxBKypY33DG6VO0IrK7aRTp-RV6kfOBEMK54s_RVZUbwUm_Qr-2s01gMji8i8bhEvGtCeOSAIcZfwwWjhnfwxwd5JDx91D2eD2Ozd1STsxF1rPdx4Q3cTqaVK3-YNu5QPKQYLYVrCk_3-M13hhnHiAFW83jBHZv5mDNiO_K4h5fomfejBleXfQafbv9dL_50uy-ft5u1rvG8p6VpuMdB8uIFHxwRvbA2SCkHQThhkDnhZd1ZpRTneqsAGsHSb330nLl1WD4NXp79j2m-GOBXPQUsoVxNDPEJWsmqJKs51JVtDujNsWcE3h9TGEy6VFTok9F6IM-F6FPRWjCdS2irr25JCzDBO7f0t_PV-DDGYB650OApLMNp1e5kMAW7WL4f8Jv4DadQg</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Smuin, Dallas M.</creator><creator>Vannatta, Emily</creator><creator>Ammerman, Brittany</creator><creator>Stauch, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Lewis, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Dhawan, Aman</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study</title><author>Smuin, Dallas M. ; Vannatta, Emily ; Ammerman, Brittany ; Stauch, Christopher M. ; Lewis, Gregory S. ; Dhawan, Aman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4343ec20753bda76e32b57cb503a0e4f5f7075a8d8484c5eccb71fff7c38f8ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Tenodesis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smuin, Dallas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannatta, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauch, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, Aman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smuin, Dallas M.</au><au>Vannatta, Emily</au><au>Ammerman, Brittany</au><au>Stauch, Christopher M.</au><au>Lewis, Gregory S.</au><au>Dhawan, Aman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3016</spage><epage>3021</epage><pages>3016-3021</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>To compare the biomechanical characteristics of a single radially expanding all-suture anchor with an interference screw for open subpectoral long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. Eighteen fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric humeri were used for this biomechanical study. The matched pair humeri were randomly assigned into 2 experimental biceps tenodesis groups: conventional interference screw (CIS) or all-suture suture anchor (ASSA). Open subpectoral LHBT tenodesis was then performed and biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic test frame. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes before cyclic loading. Displacement was recorded at cycle 300 (D300) and cycle 500 (D500) and at ultimate failure. Data recorded included displacement, load to failure, displacement at failure. Paired t test was used for analysis. Decreased displacement was observed for the CIS group at D300 (1.67 ± 0.57 mm vs 3.35 ± 2.24 mm; P = .04), D500 (2.00 ± 0.76 mm vs 3.87 ± 2.20 mm; P = .04), and at failure (5.17 ± 3.05 mm vs 10.76 ± 2.66 mm; P &lt; .001). Load to failure was lower in CIS specimens (170 ± 24.5 N vs 217.8 ± 51.54 N; P = .02). Failure in each case was tendon pullout for all CIS specimens; in ASSA 6 specimens failed as the suture pulled through the tendon, 2 specimens failed by suture breakage. No difference in stiffness was observed between the 2 groups (CIS = 98.33 ± 22.98 N/m vs ASSA = 75.94 ± 44.83 N/m; P = .20). Our study found that open subpectoral biceps tenodesis performed with an ASSA construct results in increased load to failure as compared with CIS. However, the CIS did demonstrate decreased displacement as compared to ASSA in this cadaveric biomechanical study. ASSA and CIS at time zero provide fixation as indicated by the provider intraoperatively for LHBT tenodesis. ASSA, however, does remove less cortical bone than does CIS and therefore produces a smaller stress riser in the proximal humerus. Further testing as to the integrity of ASSA is warranted to determine the integrity of the tenodesis with cyclical loading.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33895306</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.085</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2021-10, Vol.37 (10), p.3016-3021
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518726378
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Screws
Cadaver
Humans
Suture Anchors
Sutures
Tenodesis
title Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20Load%20to%20Failure%20in%20Biceps%20Tenodesis%20With%20All-Suture%20Suture%20Anchor%20Compared%20With%20Interference%20Screw:%20A%20Cadaveric%20Biomechanical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Smuin,%20Dallas%20M.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3016&rft.epage=3021&rft.pages=3016-3021&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518726378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518726378&rft_id=info:pmid/33895306&rft_els_id=S0749806321003637&rfr_iscdi=true