Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects
Savannas are the most fire-prone of Earth's biomes and currently account for most global burned area and associated carbon emissions. In Australia, over recent decades substantial development of savanna burning emissions accounting methods has been undertaken to incentivise more conservative sa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2021-07, Vol.290, p.112568-112568, Article 112568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112568 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112568 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 290 |
creator | Edwards, Andrew Archer, Ricky De Bruyn, Phillip Evans, Jay Lewis, Ben Vigilante, Tom Whyte, Sandy Russell-Smith, Jeremy |
description | Savannas are the most fire-prone of Earth's biomes and currently account for most global burned area and associated carbon emissions. In Australia, over recent decades substantial development of savanna burning emissions accounting methods has been undertaken to incentivise more conservative savanna fire management and reduce the extent and severity of late dry season wildfires. Since inception of Australia's formal regulated savanna burning market in 2012, today 25% of the 1.2M km2 fire-prone northern savanna region is managed under such arrangements. Although savanna burning projects generate significant emissions reductions and associated financial benefits especially for Indigenous landowners, various biodiversity conservation considerations, including fine-scale management requirements for conservation of fire-vulnerable taxa, remain contentious. For the entire savanna burning region, here we compare outcomes achieved at ‘with-project’ vs ‘non-project’ sites over the period 2000–19, with respect to explicit ecologically defined fire regime metrics, and assembled fire history and spatial mapping coverages. We find that there has been little significant fire regime change at non-project sites, whereas, at with-project sites under all land uses, from 2013 there has been significant reduction in late season wildfire, increase in prescribed early season mitigation burning and patchiness metrics, and seasonally variable changes in extent of unburnt (>2, >5 years) habitat. Despite these achievements, it is acknowledged that savanna burning projects do not provide a fire management panacea for a variety of key regional conservation, production, and cultural management issues. Rather, savanna burning projects can provide an effective operational funded framework to assist with delivering various landscape-scale management objectives. With these caveats in mind, significant potential exists for implementing incentivised fire management approaches in other fire-prone international savanna settings.
•Savanna wildfires in northern Australia contribute globally significant greenhouse gas emissions.•Since 2012 a regulated emissions reduction market has developed to incentivise regional savanna fire management.•25% of the eligible 1.2 m km2 savanna region is now under a registered savanna burning project.•We demonstrate that savanna burning projects have substantially transformed the previous wildfire regime providing significant co-benefits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112568 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721006307</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518546339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-413072b17323dfdf88f519479907b11d31290b8ac401a416f23498d099f89703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc2O0zAQthCI7S48AshHLikeOz_2Ca1WC6y0EpfeLccZt44Sp9hOJR6A98bdFq6cZqT5fmbmI-QDsC0waD-P2xHDaTZhyxmHLQBvWvmKbICpppKtYK_JhgkGVd2p7obcpjQyxgSH7i25EULKrq35hvzeRROSW-Lsw546H5EWTbPHGUOmPtCwxHzAGOj9mnI0kzc0H-Ky7g80rdZiSm6dqJ-P0wvFZL8EujiazMmEYGi_xnCWxtmnVGaJRhxWm1_aY1xGtDm9I2-cmRK-v9Y7svv6uHv4Xj3_-Pb0cP9cWdE2uapBsI730AkuBjc4KV0DqhyoWNcDDAK4Yr00tmZgamgdF7WSA1PKSdUxcUc-XWSL788VU9ZlKYvTZAIua9K8AdnUrRCqQJsL1MYlpYhOH6OfTfylgelzAHrU1wD0OQB9CaDwPl4t1n7G4R_r78cL4MsFgOXOk8eok_UYLA7l9zbrYfH_sfgDSDWcdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518546339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Edwards, Andrew ; Archer, Ricky ; De Bruyn, Phillip ; Evans, Jay ; Lewis, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Whyte, Sandy ; Russell-Smith, Jeremy</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Andrew ; Archer, Ricky ; De Bruyn, Phillip ; Evans, Jay ; Lewis, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Whyte, Sandy ; Russell-Smith, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>Savannas are the most fire-prone of Earth's biomes and currently account for most global burned area and associated carbon emissions. In Australia, over recent decades substantial development of savanna burning emissions accounting methods has been undertaken to incentivise more conservative savanna fire management and reduce the extent and severity of late dry season wildfires. Since inception of Australia's formal regulated savanna burning market in 2012, today 25% of the 1.2M km2 fire-prone northern savanna region is managed under such arrangements. Although savanna burning projects generate significant emissions reductions and associated financial benefits especially for Indigenous landowners, various biodiversity conservation considerations, including fine-scale management requirements for conservation of fire-vulnerable taxa, remain contentious. For the entire savanna burning region, here we compare outcomes achieved at ‘with-project’ vs ‘non-project’ sites over the period 2000–19, with respect to explicit ecologically defined fire regime metrics, and assembled fire history and spatial mapping coverages. We find that there has been little significant fire regime change at non-project sites, whereas, at with-project sites under all land uses, from 2013 there has been significant reduction in late season wildfire, increase in prescribed early season mitigation burning and patchiness metrics, and seasonally variable changes in extent of unburnt (>2, >5 years) habitat. Despite these achievements, it is acknowledged that savanna burning projects do not provide a fire management panacea for a variety of key regional conservation, production, and cultural management issues. Rather, savanna burning projects can provide an effective operational funded framework to assist with delivering various landscape-scale management objectives. With these caveats in mind, significant potential exists for implementing incentivised fire management approaches in other fire-prone international savanna settings.
•Savanna wildfires in northern Australia contribute globally significant greenhouse gas emissions.•Since 2012 a regulated emissions reduction market has developed to incentivise regional savanna fire management.•25% of the eligible 1.2 m km2 savanna region is now under a registered savanna burning project.•We demonstrate that savanna burning projects have substantially transformed the previous wildfire regime providing significant co-benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112568</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33887642</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity conservation ; Carbon market ; Fire regimes ; Woody thickening</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2021-07, Vol.290, p.112568-112568, Article 112568</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-413072b17323dfdf88f519479907b11d31290b8ac401a416f23498d099f89703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-413072b17323dfdf88f519479907b11d31290b8ac401a416f23498d099f89703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112568$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Ricky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bruyn, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigilante, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell-Smith, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><title>Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Savannas are the most fire-prone of Earth's biomes and currently account for most global burned area and associated carbon emissions. In Australia, over recent decades substantial development of savanna burning emissions accounting methods has been undertaken to incentivise more conservative savanna fire management and reduce the extent and severity of late dry season wildfires. Since inception of Australia's formal regulated savanna burning market in 2012, today 25% of the 1.2M km2 fire-prone northern savanna region is managed under such arrangements. Although savanna burning projects generate significant emissions reductions and associated financial benefits especially for Indigenous landowners, various biodiversity conservation considerations, including fine-scale management requirements for conservation of fire-vulnerable taxa, remain contentious. For the entire savanna burning region, here we compare outcomes achieved at ‘with-project’ vs ‘non-project’ sites over the period 2000–19, with respect to explicit ecologically defined fire regime metrics, and assembled fire history and spatial mapping coverages. We find that there has been little significant fire regime change at non-project sites, whereas, at with-project sites under all land uses, from 2013 there has been significant reduction in late season wildfire, increase in prescribed early season mitigation burning and patchiness metrics, and seasonally variable changes in extent of unburnt (>2, >5 years) habitat. Despite these achievements, it is acknowledged that savanna burning projects do not provide a fire management panacea for a variety of key regional conservation, production, and cultural management issues. Rather, savanna burning projects can provide an effective operational funded framework to assist with delivering various landscape-scale management objectives. With these caveats in mind, significant potential exists for implementing incentivised fire management approaches in other fire-prone international savanna settings.
•Savanna wildfires in northern Australia contribute globally significant greenhouse gas emissions.•Since 2012 a regulated emissions reduction market has developed to incentivise regional savanna fire management.•25% of the eligible 1.2 m km2 savanna region is now under a registered savanna burning project.•We demonstrate that savanna burning projects have substantially transformed the previous wildfire regime providing significant co-benefits.</description><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Carbon market</subject><subject>Fire regimes</subject><subject>Woody thickening</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUc2O0zAQthCI7S48AshHLikeOz_2Ca1WC6y0EpfeLccZt44Sp9hOJR6A98bdFq6cZqT5fmbmI-QDsC0waD-P2xHDaTZhyxmHLQBvWvmKbICpppKtYK_JhgkGVd2p7obcpjQyxgSH7i25EULKrq35hvzeRROSW-Lsw546H5EWTbPHGUOmPtCwxHzAGOj9mnI0kzc0H-Ky7g80rdZiSm6dqJ-P0wvFZL8EujiazMmEYGi_xnCWxtmnVGaJRhxWm1_aY1xGtDm9I2-cmRK-v9Y7svv6uHv4Xj3_-Pb0cP9cWdE2uapBsI730AkuBjc4KV0DqhyoWNcDDAK4Yr00tmZgamgdF7WSA1PKSdUxcUc-XWSL788VU9ZlKYvTZAIua9K8AdnUrRCqQJsL1MYlpYhOH6OfTfylgelzAHrU1wD0OQB9CaDwPl4t1n7G4R_r78cL4MsFgOXOk8eok_UYLA7l9zbrYfH_sfgDSDWcdw</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Edwards, Andrew</creator><creator>Archer, Ricky</creator><creator>De Bruyn, Phillip</creator><creator>Evans, Jay</creator><creator>Lewis, Ben</creator><creator>Vigilante, Tom</creator><creator>Whyte, Sandy</creator><creator>Russell-Smith, Jeremy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects</title><author>Edwards, Andrew ; Archer, Ricky ; De Bruyn, Phillip ; Evans, Jay ; Lewis, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Whyte, Sandy ; Russell-Smith, Jeremy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-413072b17323dfdf88f519479907b11d31290b8ac401a416f23498d099f89703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Carbon market</topic><topic>Fire regimes</topic><topic>Woody thickening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Ricky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bruyn, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigilante, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell-Smith, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Andrew</au><au>Archer, Ricky</au><au>De Bruyn, Phillip</au><au>Evans, Jay</au><au>Lewis, Ben</au><au>Vigilante, Tom</au><au>Whyte, Sandy</au><au>Russell-Smith, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>290</volume><spage>112568</spage><epage>112568</epage><pages>112568-112568</pages><artnum>112568</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Savannas are the most fire-prone of Earth's biomes and currently account for most global burned area and associated carbon emissions. In Australia, over recent decades substantial development of savanna burning emissions accounting methods has been undertaken to incentivise more conservative savanna fire management and reduce the extent and severity of late dry season wildfires. Since inception of Australia's formal regulated savanna burning market in 2012, today 25% of the 1.2M km2 fire-prone northern savanna region is managed under such arrangements. Although savanna burning projects generate significant emissions reductions and associated financial benefits especially for Indigenous landowners, various biodiversity conservation considerations, including fine-scale management requirements for conservation of fire-vulnerable taxa, remain contentious. For the entire savanna burning region, here we compare outcomes achieved at ‘with-project’ vs ‘non-project’ sites over the period 2000–19, with respect to explicit ecologically defined fire regime metrics, and assembled fire history and spatial mapping coverages. We find that there has been little significant fire regime change at non-project sites, whereas, at with-project sites under all land uses, from 2013 there has been significant reduction in late season wildfire, increase in prescribed early season mitigation burning and patchiness metrics, and seasonally variable changes in extent of unburnt (>2, >5 years) habitat. Despite these achievements, it is acknowledged that savanna burning projects do not provide a fire management panacea for a variety of key regional conservation, production, and cultural management issues. Rather, savanna burning projects can provide an effective operational funded framework to assist with delivering various landscape-scale management objectives. With these caveats in mind, significant potential exists for implementing incentivised fire management approaches in other fire-prone international savanna settings.
•Savanna wildfires in northern Australia contribute globally significant greenhouse gas emissions.•Since 2012 a regulated emissions reduction market has developed to incentivise regional savanna fire management.•25% of the eligible 1.2 m km2 savanna region is now under a registered savanna burning project.•We demonstrate that savanna burning projects have substantially transformed the previous wildfire regime providing significant co-benefits.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33887642</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112568</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2021-07, Vol.290, p.112568-112568, Article 112568 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546339 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biodiversity conservation Carbon market Fire regimes Woody thickening |
title | Transforming fire management in northern Australia through successful implementation of savanna burning emissions reductions projects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A48%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transforming%20fire%20management%20in%20northern%20Australia%20through%20successful%20implementation%20of%20savanna%20burning%20emissions%20reductions%20projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Edwards,%20Andrew&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=290&rft.spage=112568&rft.epage=112568&rft.pages=112568-112568&rft.artnum=112568&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518546339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518546339&rft_id=info:pmid/33887642&rft_els_id=S0301479721006307&rfr_iscdi=true |