Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas
Energy is a universal resource essential for all life functions. The rate of transformation of energy into an organism, and the energetic investment into reproduction, determines population and ecological‐level processes. Several hypotheses predicted that the ecological expansion and size of the geo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of animal ecology 2021-08, Vol.90 (8), p.1854-1863 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1863 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1854 |
| container_title | The Journal of animal ecology |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Boratyński, Zbyszek |
| description | Energy is a universal resource essential for all life functions. The rate of transformation of energy into an organism, and the energetic investment into reproduction, determines population and ecological‐level processes.
Several hypotheses predicted that the ecological expansion and size of the geographic distribution of a species are shaped by, among other factors, metabolic performance. However, how organismal energetic characteristics contribute to species geographic range size is poorly understood.
With phylogenetic comparative methods whether energetic maintenance costs (basal metabolic rate, BMR), aerobic capacity (maximum exercise metabolic rate, VO2max), summit thermoregulation (summit metabolic rate, VO2sum) and the ability to sustain energy provisioning (daily energy expenditure, DEE) determine the distribution of mammalian species range sizes was tested.
Both basal and maximum exercise metabolic rates (accounting for body mass), but not summit thermogenic metabolic rate, were positively associated with species range sizes. Furthermore, daily energy expenditure (accounting for body mass) was positively associated with species ranges. Body mass (accounting for energetic maintenance) was negatively related to range sizes.
High aerobic exercise capacity, aiding mobility such as running and dispersal, and high sustained energy provisioning, aiding reproductive effort such as pregnancy, lactation and natal dispersal, can facilitate the establishment of large mammalian geographic ranges. Consequently, the pace of organismal physiological processes can shape important ecological and biodiversity patterns by setting limits to species’ range sizes.
The presented results move foreward our understanding of how the rate of energy processing can limit animals distribution area, a long standing question in ecology (e.g. Brown & Maurer, 1989; Pettersen et al. 2020). The work presented it the first empirical test of several energetic hypotheses predicting species range sizes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2656.13501 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516839182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516839182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3721-ec1d7f8ef5bae5f7e2c4b36e01d2150eccb34d08a9bc266342c6f330a5cf236b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCxp_YjtZKyq8FIFC8yW49wgV3kUOxHqv8clpQMLd7H06fi7Vweha4LnJMyCMMFjKriYE8YxOUHTY3KKphhTEqcywxN04f0GYywpZudowliaJoKSKeJ5C-4Demsi07W-d9q2vY-6Nmp00-ja6jYqbchtMfQ2xNqB9pforNK1h6vDO0Pv9_nb6jFevz48rZbr2DAZVoMhpaxSqHihgVcSqEkKJgCTkhKOwZiCJSVOdVYYKgRLqBEVY1hzU1EmCjZDd2Pv1nWfA_heNdYbqGvdQjd4RTkRKctISgN6-wfddINrw3WB4lKSTDIeqMVIGdd576BSW2cb7XaKYLU3qvb-1N6f-jEaftwceoeigfLI_yoMgBiBL1vD7r8-9bx8ycfmb-gMfzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557719735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Boratyński, Zbyszek</creator><creatorcontrib>Boratyński, Zbyszek</creatorcontrib><description>Energy is a universal resource essential for all life functions. The rate of transformation of energy into an organism, and the energetic investment into reproduction, determines population and ecological‐level processes.
Several hypotheses predicted that the ecological expansion and size of the geographic distribution of a species are shaped by, among other factors, metabolic performance. However, how organismal energetic characteristics contribute to species geographic range size is poorly understood.
With phylogenetic comparative methods whether energetic maintenance costs (basal metabolic rate, BMR), aerobic capacity (maximum exercise metabolic rate, VO2max), summit thermoregulation (summit metabolic rate, VO2sum) and the ability to sustain energy provisioning (daily energy expenditure, DEE) determine the distribution of mammalian species range sizes was tested.
Both basal and maximum exercise metabolic rates (accounting for body mass), but not summit thermogenic metabolic rate, were positively associated with species range sizes. Furthermore, daily energy expenditure (accounting for body mass) was positively associated with species ranges. Body mass (accounting for energetic maintenance) was negatively related to range sizes.
High aerobic exercise capacity, aiding mobility such as running and dispersal, and high sustained energy provisioning, aiding reproductive effort such as pregnancy, lactation and natal dispersal, can facilitate the establishment of large mammalian geographic ranges. Consequently, the pace of organismal physiological processes can shape important ecological and biodiversity patterns by setting limits to species’ range sizes.
The presented results move foreward our understanding of how the rate of energy processing can limit animals distribution area, a long standing question in ecology (e.g. Brown & Maurer, 1989; Pettersen et al. 2020). The work presented it the first empirical test of several energetic hypotheses predicting species range sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33884621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerobic capacity ; Biodiversity ; BMR ; Body mass ; daily expenditures ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; endothermy ; Energy ; Energy distribution ; Energy expenditure ; Exercise ; geographic range ; Geographical distribution ; Lactation ; Maintenance costs ; Mammals ; maximum metabolic rate ; Metabolic rate ; Metabolism ; Oxygen consumption ; Phylogeny ; Physical fitness ; Physical training ; Provisioning ; Reproductive effort ; Species ; Thermoregulation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2021-08, Vol.90 (8), p.1854-1863</ispartof><rights>2021 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2021 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Animal Ecology © 2021 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3721-ec1d7f8ef5bae5f7e2c4b36e01d2150eccb34d08a9bc266342c6f330a5cf236b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3721-ec1d7f8ef5bae5f7e2c4b36e01d2150eccb34d08a9bc266342c6f330a5cf236b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4668-4922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boratyński, Zbyszek</creatorcontrib><title>Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Energy is a universal resource essential for all life functions. The rate of transformation of energy into an organism, and the energetic investment into reproduction, determines population and ecological‐level processes.
Several hypotheses predicted that the ecological expansion and size of the geographic distribution of a species are shaped by, among other factors, metabolic performance. However, how organismal energetic characteristics contribute to species geographic range size is poorly understood.
With phylogenetic comparative methods whether energetic maintenance costs (basal metabolic rate, BMR), aerobic capacity (maximum exercise metabolic rate, VO2max), summit thermoregulation (summit metabolic rate, VO2sum) and the ability to sustain energy provisioning (daily energy expenditure, DEE) determine the distribution of mammalian species range sizes was tested.
Both basal and maximum exercise metabolic rates (accounting for body mass), but not summit thermogenic metabolic rate, were positively associated with species range sizes. Furthermore, daily energy expenditure (accounting for body mass) was positively associated with species ranges. Body mass (accounting for energetic maintenance) was negatively related to range sizes.
High aerobic exercise capacity, aiding mobility such as running and dispersal, and high sustained energy provisioning, aiding reproductive effort such as pregnancy, lactation and natal dispersal, can facilitate the establishment of large mammalian geographic ranges. Consequently, the pace of organismal physiological processes can shape important ecological and biodiversity patterns by setting limits to species’ range sizes.
The presented results move foreward our understanding of how the rate of energy processing can limit animals distribution area, a long standing question in ecology (e.g. Brown & Maurer, 1989; Pettersen et al. 2020). The work presented it the first empirical test of several energetic hypotheses predicting species range sizes.</description><subject>Aerobic capacity</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BMR</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>daily expenditures</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>endothermy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>geographic range</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Maintenance costs</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>maximum metabolic rate</subject><subject>Metabolic rate</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Oxygen consumption</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>Reproductive effort</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Thermoregulation</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCxp_YjtZKyq8FIFC8yW49wgV3kUOxHqv8clpQMLd7H06fi7Vweha4LnJMyCMMFjKriYE8YxOUHTY3KKphhTEqcywxN04f0GYywpZudowliaJoKSKeJ5C-4Demsi07W-d9q2vY-6Nmp00-ja6jYqbchtMfQ2xNqB9pforNK1h6vDO0Pv9_nb6jFevz48rZbr2DAZVoMhpaxSqHihgVcSqEkKJgCTkhKOwZiCJSVOdVYYKgRLqBEVY1hzU1EmCjZDd2Pv1nWfA_heNdYbqGvdQjd4RTkRKctISgN6-wfddINrw3WB4lKSTDIeqMVIGdd576BSW2cb7XaKYLU3qvb-1N6f-jEaftwceoeigfLI_yoMgBiBL1vD7r8-9bx8ycfmb-gMfzs</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Boratyński, Zbyszek</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-4922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas</title><author>Boratyński, Zbyszek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3721-ec1d7f8ef5bae5f7e2c4b36e01d2150eccb34d08a9bc266342c6f330a5cf236b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aerobic capacity</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BMR</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>daily expenditures</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>endothermy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>geographic range</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Maintenance costs</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>maximum metabolic rate</topic><topic>Metabolic rate</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Oxygen consumption</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>Reproductive effort</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Thermoregulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boratyński, Zbyszek</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boratyński, Zbyszek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1854</spage><epage>1863</epage><pages>1854-1863</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><abstract>Energy is a universal resource essential for all life functions. The rate of transformation of energy into an organism, and the energetic investment into reproduction, determines population and ecological‐level processes.
Several hypotheses predicted that the ecological expansion and size of the geographic distribution of a species are shaped by, among other factors, metabolic performance. However, how organismal energetic characteristics contribute to species geographic range size is poorly understood.
With phylogenetic comparative methods whether energetic maintenance costs (basal metabolic rate, BMR), aerobic capacity (maximum exercise metabolic rate, VO2max), summit thermoregulation (summit metabolic rate, VO2sum) and the ability to sustain energy provisioning (daily energy expenditure, DEE) determine the distribution of mammalian species range sizes was tested.
Both basal and maximum exercise metabolic rates (accounting for body mass), but not summit thermogenic metabolic rate, were positively associated with species range sizes. Furthermore, daily energy expenditure (accounting for body mass) was positively associated with species ranges. Body mass (accounting for energetic maintenance) was negatively related to range sizes.
High aerobic exercise capacity, aiding mobility such as running and dispersal, and high sustained energy provisioning, aiding reproductive effort such as pregnancy, lactation and natal dispersal, can facilitate the establishment of large mammalian geographic ranges. Consequently, the pace of organismal physiological processes can shape important ecological and biodiversity patterns by setting limits to species’ range sizes.
The presented results move foreward our understanding of how the rate of energy processing can limit animals distribution area, a long standing question in ecology (e.g. Brown & Maurer, 1989; Pettersen et al. 2020). The work presented it the first empirical test of several energetic hypotheses predicting species range sizes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33884621</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.13501</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-4922</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8790 |
| ispartof | The Journal of animal ecology, 2021-08, Vol.90 (8), p.1854-1863 |
| issn | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516839182 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content |
| subjects | Aerobic capacity Biodiversity BMR Body mass daily expenditures Dispersal Dispersion Ecology endothermy Energy Energy distribution Energy expenditure Exercise geographic range Geographical distribution Lactation Maintenance costs Mammals maximum metabolic rate Metabolic rate Metabolism Oxygen consumption Phylogeny Physical fitness Physical training Provisioning Reproductive effort Species Thermoregulation |
| title | Energetic constraints on mammalian distribution areas |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetic%20constraints%20on%20mammalian%20distribution%20areas&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Boraty%C5%84ski,%20Zbyszek&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1854&rft.epage=1863&rft.pages=1854-1863&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516839182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557719735&rft_id=info:pmid/33884621&rfr_iscdi=true |