Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment

In this study, we compared the efficiency of culture-based methods with or without membrane filtration, real-time PCR, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the detection of Campylobacter in fresh produce. Alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, coleslaw, and lettuce salad spiked with Campylobacter jejuni we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food protection 2021-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1704-1712
Hauptverfasser: Chon, Jung-Whan, Jung, Ji Young, Ahn, Youngbeom, Bae, Dongryeoul, Khan, Saeed, Seo, Kun-Ho, Kim, Hyunsook, Sung, Kidon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1712
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1704
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 84
creator Chon, Jung-Whan
Jung, Ji Young
Ahn, Youngbeom
Bae, Dongryeoul
Khan, Saeed
Seo, Kun-Ho
Kim, Hyunsook
Sung, Kidon
description In this study, we compared the efficiency of culture-based methods with or without membrane filtration, real-time PCR, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the detection of Campylobacter in fresh produce. Alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, coleslaw, and lettuce salad spiked with Campylobacter jejuni were enriched in Bolton broth for 48 h, and enrichment cultures were either directly inoculated onto modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar or applied on membrane filters placed on the surface of plating media. In parallel, 2-mL Bolton broth cultures were taken to extract DNA for real-time PCR and ddPCR assays and bacterial community analysis. A developed primer set for ddPCR and real-time PCR was evaluated for its inclusivity and exclusivity using pure culture of C. jejuni and non-C. jejuni strains, respectively. In pure culture, the primer set reacted only with C. jejuni strains and showed negative reaction to non-C. jejuni strains. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the detection efficiency of positive Campylobacter isolates from coleslaw and lettuce salad using four detection methods. However, for sprout samples, the detection efficiency of the culture method was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those of the two PCR assays and the filtration method. The analysis also revealed the presence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter as the most prevalent competing microbiota in enriched culture and only Acinetobacter on agar plates in the selective culture step.
doi_str_mv 10.4315/JFP-20-408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516222213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516222213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-3c02bbfc83494074abece59f3990f766e8fc0702d2ec021d741c0a496c49f7843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhwg9AlrggRIq_8mFuq9CFVq1YoSJxixxnTLxK4mA7h_1r_XU47cKBucxI88yrefUi9JqSC8Fp_vF6t88YyQSpnqANlUJkksjyKdoQXrCMsOrnGXoRwoEQwiQrnqMzzquyonm-QfefIYKO1k3YGVyrcT4OrlU6gscHOCyTxca7Ee88hB7vvesWDZ9w7cZZeRtOZ8sQFw8ZVlOH9_X3rFUBOnwHup_s7wXCh4fNLUT1CyY3Wo238-yd0j02zuPtpIZjgLBqxR7wrdXetdaNgFtIADycK7M-dTl5q_sRpvgSPTNqCPDq1M_Rj93lXf01u_n25are3mSa5zRmXBPWtkZXXEhBSqFa0JBLw6UkpiwKqIwmJWEdg0TSrhRUEyVkoYU0ZSX4OXr3qJs-Xs3EZrRBwzCoCdwSGpbTgqWiPKFv_0MPbvHJXaKKXPBSEF4l6v0jlVyG4ME0s7ej8seGkmZNtEmJNizNZIXfnCSXdoTuH_o3Qv4H8XWdDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2654374038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chon, Jung-Whan ; Jung, Ji Young ; Ahn, Youngbeom ; Bae, Dongryeoul ; Khan, Saeed ; Seo, Kun-Ho ; Kim, Hyunsook ; Sung, Kidon</creator><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan ; Jung, Ji Young ; Ahn, Youngbeom ; Bae, Dongryeoul ; Khan, Saeed ; Seo, Kun-Ho ; Kim, Hyunsook ; Sung, Kidon</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we compared the efficiency of culture-based methods with or without membrane filtration, real-time PCR, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the detection of Campylobacter in fresh produce. Alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, coleslaw, and lettuce salad spiked with Campylobacter jejuni were enriched in Bolton broth for 48 h, and enrichment cultures were either directly inoculated onto modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar or applied on membrane filters placed on the surface of plating media. In parallel, 2-mL Bolton broth cultures were taken to extract DNA for real-time PCR and ddPCR assays and bacterial community analysis. A developed primer set for ddPCR and real-time PCR was evaluated for its inclusivity and exclusivity using pure culture of C. jejuni and non-C. jejuni strains, respectively. In pure culture, the primer set reacted only with C. jejuni strains and showed negative reaction to non-C. jejuni strains. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the detection efficiency of positive Campylobacter isolates from coleslaw and lettuce salad using four detection methods. However, for sprout samples, the detection efficiency of the culture method was significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower than those of the two PCR assays and the filtration method. The analysis also revealed the presence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter as the most prevalent competing microbiota in enriched culture and only Acinetobacter on agar plates in the selective culture step.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/JFP-20-408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33878155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Acinetobacter ; Alfalfa ; Animals ; Bacteria ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Campylobacter jejuni - genetics ; Cefoperazone ; Charcoal ; Chickens ; Culture Media ; Efficiency ; Enrichment ; Filtration ; Flora ; Food contamination &amp; poisoning ; Food safety ; Genetic testing ; Lettuce ; Membrane filtration ; Membranes ; Methods ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Pathogens ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Poultry ; Pseudomonas ; Pure culture ; Real time ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Strains (organisms) ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2021-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1704-1712</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©, International Association for Food Protection.</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Inc. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-3c02bbfc83494074abece59f3990f766e8fc0702d2ec021d741c0a496c49f7843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-3c02bbfc83494074abece59f3990f766e8fc0702d2ec021d741c0a496c49f7843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5720-0538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ji Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Youngbeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Dongryeoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Kidon</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>In this study, we compared the efficiency of culture-based methods with or without membrane filtration, real-time PCR, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the detection of Campylobacter in fresh produce. Alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, coleslaw, and lettuce salad spiked with Campylobacter jejuni were enriched in Bolton broth for 48 h, and enrichment cultures were either directly inoculated onto modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar or applied on membrane filters placed on the surface of plating media. In parallel, 2-mL Bolton broth cultures were taken to extract DNA for real-time PCR and ddPCR assays and bacterial community analysis. A developed primer set for ddPCR and real-time PCR was evaluated for its inclusivity and exclusivity using pure culture of C. jejuni and non-C. jejuni strains, respectively. In pure culture, the primer set reacted only with C. jejuni strains and showed negative reaction to non-C. jejuni strains. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the detection efficiency of positive Campylobacter isolates from coleslaw and lettuce salad using four detection methods. However, for sprout samples, the detection efficiency of the culture method was significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower than those of the two PCR assays and the filtration method. The analysis also revealed the presence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter as the most prevalent competing microbiota in enriched culture and only Acinetobacter on agar plates in the selective culture step.</description><subject>Acinetobacter</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni - genetics</subject><subject>Cefoperazone</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Lettuce</subject><subject>Membrane filtration</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Pure culture</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhwg9AlrggRIq_8mFuq9CFVq1YoSJxixxnTLxK4mA7h_1r_XU47cKBucxI88yrefUi9JqSC8Fp_vF6t88YyQSpnqANlUJkksjyKdoQXrCMsOrnGXoRwoEQwiQrnqMzzquyonm-QfefIYKO1k3YGVyrcT4OrlU6gscHOCyTxca7Ee88hB7vvesWDZ9w7cZZeRtOZ8sQFw8ZVlOH9_X3rFUBOnwHup_s7wXCh4fNLUT1CyY3Wo238-yd0j02zuPtpIZjgLBqxR7wrdXetdaNgFtIADycK7M-dTl5q_sRpvgSPTNqCPDq1M_Rj93lXf01u_n25are3mSa5zRmXBPWtkZXXEhBSqFa0JBLw6UkpiwKqIwmJWEdg0TSrhRUEyVkoYU0ZSX4OXr3qJs-Xs3EZrRBwzCoCdwSGpbTgqWiPKFv_0MPbvHJXaKKXPBSEF4l6v0jlVyG4ME0s7ej8seGkmZNtEmJNizNZIXfnCSXdoTuH_o3Qv4H8XWdDw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Chon, Jung-Whan</creator><creator>Jung, Ji Young</creator><creator>Ahn, Youngbeom</creator><creator>Bae, Dongryeoul</creator><creator>Khan, Saeed</creator><creator>Seo, Kun-Ho</creator><creator>Kim, Hyunsook</creator><creator>Sung, Kidon</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-0538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment</title><author>Chon, Jung-Whan ; Jung, Ji Young ; Ahn, Youngbeom ; Bae, Dongryeoul ; Khan, Saeed ; Seo, Kun-Ho ; Kim, Hyunsook ; Sung, Kidon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-3c02bbfc83494074abece59f3990f766e8fc0702d2ec021d741c0a496c49f7843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acinetobacter</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni - genetics</topic><topic>Cefoperazone</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Lettuce</topic><topic>Membrane filtration</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Pure culture</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ji Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Youngbeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Dongryeoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Kidon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chon, Jung-Whan</au><au>Jung, Ji Young</au><au>Ahn, Youngbeom</au><au>Bae, Dongryeoul</au><au>Khan, Saeed</au><au>Seo, Kun-Ho</au><au>Kim, Hyunsook</au><au>Sung, Kidon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1704</spage><epage>1712</epage><pages>1704-1712</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>In this study, we compared the efficiency of culture-based methods with or without membrane filtration, real-time PCR, and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the detection of Campylobacter in fresh produce. Alfalfa sprouts, clover sprouts, coleslaw, and lettuce salad spiked with Campylobacter jejuni were enriched in Bolton broth for 48 h, and enrichment cultures were either directly inoculated onto modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar or applied on membrane filters placed on the surface of plating media. In parallel, 2-mL Bolton broth cultures were taken to extract DNA for real-time PCR and ddPCR assays and bacterial community analysis. A developed primer set for ddPCR and real-time PCR was evaluated for its inclusivity and exclusivity using pure culture of C. jejuni and non-C. jejuni strains, respectively. In pure culture, the primer set reacted only with C. jejuni strains and showed negative reaction to non-C. jejuni strains. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the detection efficiency of positive Campylobacter isolates from coleslaw and lettuce salad using four detection methods. However, for sprout samples, the detection efficiency of the culture method was significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower than those of the two PCR assays and the filtration method. The analysis also revealed the presence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter as the most prevalent competing microbiota in enriched culture and only Acinetobacter on agar plates in the selective culture step.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>33878155</pmid><doi>10.4315/JFP-20-408</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-0538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 2021-10, Vol.84 (10), p.1704-1712
issn 0362-028X
1944-9097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516222213
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acinetobacter
Alfalfa
Animals
Bacteria
Campylobacter
Campylobacter jejuni
Campylobacter jejuni - genetics
Cefoperazone
Charcoal
Chickens
Culture Media
Efficiency
Enrichment
Filtration
Flora
Food contamination & poisoning
Food safety
Genetic testing
Lettuce
Membrane filtration
Membranes
Methods
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Pathogens
Polymerase chain reaction
Poultry
Pseudomonas
Pure culture
Real time
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Strains (organisms)
Vegetables
title Detection of Campylobacter jejuni from Fresh Produce: Comparison of Culture- and PCR-based Techniques, and Metagenomic Approach for Analyses of the Microbiome before and after Enrichment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A16%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20Campylobacter%20jejuni%20from%20Fresh%20Produce:%20Comparison%20of%20Culture-%20and%20PCR-based%20Techniques,%20and%20Metagenomic%20Approach%20for%20Analyses%20of%20the%20Microbiome%20before%20and%20after%20Enrichment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Chon,%20Jung-Whan&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1704&rft.epage=1712&rft.pages=1704-1712&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/JFP-20-408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516222213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2654374038&rft_id=info:pmid/33878155&rfr_iscdi=true