Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA

Effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100%...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-09, Vol.28 (33), p.45375-45389
Hauptverfasser: Eppehimer, Drew E., Hamdhani, Hamdhani, Hollien, Kelsey D., Nemec, Zach C., Lee, Larissa N., Quanrud, David M., Bogan, Michael T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45389
container_issue 33
container_start_page 45375
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 28
creator Eppehimer, Drew E.
Hamdhani, Hamdhani
Hollien, Kelsey D.
Nemec, Zach C.
Lee, Larissa N.
Quanrud, David M.
Bogan, Michael T.
description Effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100% of their baseflow from effluent. The objective of this study was to document and explore trends in microplastic pollution within the effluent-dependent lower Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona (USA). We examined microplastic concentrations in the water column and benthic sediment and microplastic consumption by mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) at 10 sites along a ~40 km stretch of the lower Santa Cruz River across two time periods: baseflow (effluent only) and post-flood (effluent immediately following urban runoff). In total, across both sampling periods, we detected microplastics in 95% of water column samples, 99% of sediment samples, and 6% of mosquitofish stomachs. Flow status (baseflow vs post-flood) was the only significant predictor of microplastic presence and concentrations in our models. Microplastic fragment concentrations in the water column were higher post-flood, microplastic fiber concentrations in benthic sediment were lower post-flood, and mosquitofish were more likely to have consumed microplastics post-flood than during baseflow. The additional microplastics detected after flooding was likely due to a combination of allochthonous material entering the channel via runoff and bed scour that exhumed microplastics previously buried in the riverbed. Effluent-dependent urban streams are becoming increasingly common; more work is needed to identify microplastic pollution baselines and trends in effluent rivers worldwide.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514605156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561133111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c3b28cd9f0a552b4af6960c046902081a1dd77d13be7f6b37d84ec3b160b2d293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PJCEQholZo-PoH9jDhmQvXlr5apg-GuNXYuJBPRO6AcV0Qy9078R_b42jbuJhL0WFeuqlqBehn5ScUELUaaGU17IijFaUKyaq9Q5aUElFpUTT_EAL0ggBJSH20UEpL4Qw0jC1h_Y5X0nBGFugeDOMppsKTh63pjjfpzU20WJIkg3xCaeIh9DlNPamTKHDY-r7eQpwHSKQ2Hnfzy5OlXWjixYybHKwuN-o5PDX5Q04PTv8eH92iHa96Ys7-jiX6PHy4uH8urq9u7o5P7utOq7qCWLLVp1tPDF1zVphvGwk6YiQDfxhRQ21VilLeeuUly1XdiUcNFFJWmZZw5foeKs75vRndmXSQyid62Eol-aiWU2FJDWtJaC_v6Evac4RpgNKwoo5hbBEbEvBJkrJzusxh8HkV02J3riht25ocEO_u6HX0PTrQ3puB2e_Wj7XDwDfAgVK8cnlf2__R_YN9laVdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561133111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eppehimer, Drew E. ; Hamdhani, Hamdhani ; Hollien, Kelsey D. ; Nemec, Zach C. ; Lee, Larissa N. ; Quanrud, David M. ; Bogan, Michael T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eppehimer, Drew E. ; Hamdhani, Hamdhani ; Hollien, Kelsey D. ; Nemec, Zach C. ; Lee, Larissa N. ; Quanrud, David M. ; Bogan, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><description>Effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100% of their baseflow from effluent. The objective of this study was to document and explore trends in microplastic pollution within the effluent-dependent lower Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona (USA). We examined microplastic concentrations in the water column and benthic sediment and microplastic consumption by mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) at 10 sites along a ~40 km stretch of the lower Santa Cruz River across two time periods: baseflow (effluent only) and post-flood (effluent immediately following urban runoff). In total, across both sampling periods, we detected microplastics in 95% of water column samples, 99% of sediment samples, and 6% of mosquitofish stomachs. Flow status (baseflow vs post-flood) was the only significant predictor of microplastic presence and concentrations in our models. Microplastic fragment concentrations in the water column were higher post-flood, microplastic fiber concentrations in benthic sediment were lower post-flood, and mosquitofish were more likely to have consumed microplastics post-flood than during baseflow. The additional microplastics detected after flooding was likely due to a combination of allochthonous material entering the channel via runoff and bed scour that exhumed microplastics previously buried in the riverbed. Effluent-dependent urban streams are becoming increasingly common; more work is needed to identify microplastic pollution baselines and trends in effluent rivers worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33864222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Aquatic Pollution ; Arid lands ; Arid zones ; Aridity ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Base flow ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Flood predictions ; Flooding ; Floods ; Freshwater environments ; Land pollution ; Microplastics ; Plastic debris ; Plastic pollution ; Pollution ; Receiving waters ; Research Article ; River beds ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Sediment samplers ; Sediments ; Trends ; Urban runoff ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-09, Vol.28 (33), p.45375-45389</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c3b28cd9f0a552b4af6960c046902081a1dd77d13be7f6b37d84ec3b160b2d293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c3b28cd9f0a552b4af6960c046902081a1dd77d13be7f6b37d84ec3b160b2d293</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0076-1494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eppehimer, Drew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdhani, Hamdhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollien, Kelsey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemec, Zach C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Larissa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quanrud, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogan, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100% of their baseflow from effluent. The objective of this study was to document and explore trends in microplastic pollution within the effluent-dependent lower Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona (USA). We examined microplastic concentrations in the water column and benthic sediment and microplastic consumption by mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) at 10 sites along a ~40 km stretch of the lower Santa Cruz River across two time periods: baseflow (effluent only) and post-flood (effluent immediately following urban runoff). In total, across both sampling periods, we detected microplastics in 95% of water column samples, 99% of sediment samples, and 6% of mosquitofish stomachs. Flow status (baseflow vs post-flood) was the only significant predictor of microplastic presence and concentrations in our models. Microplastic fragment concentrations in the water column were higher post-flood, microplastic fiber concentrations in benthic sediment were lower post-flood, and mosquitofish were more likely to have consumed microplastics post-flood than during baseflow. The additional microplastics detected after flooding was likely due to a combination of allochthonous material entering the channel via runoff and bed scour that exhumed microplastics previously buried in the riverbed. Effluent-dependent urban streams are becoming increasingly common; more work is needed to identify microplastic pollution baselines and trends in effluent rivers worldwide.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Arid lands</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Base flow</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater environments</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Plastic debris</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Receiving waters</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>River beds</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban runoff</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1PJCEQholZo-PoH9jDhmQvXlr5apg-GuNXYuJBPRO6AcV0Qy9078R_b42jbuJhL0WFeuqlqBehn5ScUELUaaGU17IijFaUKyaq9Q5aUElFpUTT_EAL0ggBJSH20UEpL4Qw0jC1h_Y5X0nBGFugeDOMppsKTh63pjjfpzU20WJIkg3xCaeIh9DlNPamTKHDY-r7eQpwHSKQ2Hnfzy5OlXWjixYybHKwuN-o5PDX5Q04PTv8eH92iHa96Ys7-jiX6PHy4uH8urq9u7o5P7utOq7qCWLLVp1tPDF1zVphvGwk6YiQDfxhRQ21VilLeeuUly1XdiUcNFFJWmZZw5foeKs75vRndmXSQyid62Eol-aiWU2FJDWtJaC_v6Evac4RpgNKwoo5hbBEbEvBJkrJzusxh8HkV02J3riht25ocEO_u6HX0PTrQ3puB2e_Wj7XDwDfAgVK8cnlf2__R_YN9laVdw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Eppehimer, Drew E.</creator><creator>Hamdhani, Hamdhani</creator><creator>Hollien, Kelsey D.</creator><creator>Nemec, Zach C.</creator><creator>Lee, Larissa N.</creator><creator>Quanrud, David M.</creator><creator>Bogan, Michael T.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-1494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA</title><author>Eppehimer, Drew E. ; Hamdhani, Hamdhani ; Hollien, Kelsey D. ; Nemec, Zach C. ; Lee, Larissa N. ; Quanrud, David M. ; Bogan, Michael T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c3b28cd9f0a552b4af6960c046902081a1dd77d13be7f6b37d84ec3b160b2d293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Arid lands</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Base flow</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater environments</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Plastic debris</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Receiving waters</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>River beds</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban runoff</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eppehimer, Drew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdhani, Hamdhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollien, Kelsey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemec, Zach C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Larissa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quanrud, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogan, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eppehimer, Drew E.</au><au>Hamdhani, Hamdhani</au><au>Hollien, Kelsey D.</au><au>Nemec, Zach C.</au><au>Lee, Larissa N.</au><au>Quanrud, David M.</au><au>Bogan, Michael T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>33</issue><spage>45375</spage><epage>45389</epage><pages>45375-45389</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100% of their baseflow from effluent. The objective of this study was to document and explore trends in microplastic pollution within the effluent-dependent lower Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona (USA). We examined microplastic concentrations in the water column and benthic sediment and microplastic consumption by mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) at 10 sites along a ~40 km stretch of the lower Santa Cruz River across two time periods: baseflow (effluent only) and post-flood (effluent immediately following urban runoff). In total, across both sampling periods, we detected microplastics in 95% of water column samples, 99% of sediment samples, and 6% of mosquitofish stomachs. Flow status (baseflow vs post-flood) was the only significant predictor of microplastic presence and concentrations in our models. Microplastic fragment concentrations in the water column were higher post-flood, microplastic fiber concentrations in benthic sediment were lower post-flood, and mosquitofish were more likely to have consumed microplastics post-flood than during baseflow. The additional microplastics detected after flooding was likely due to a combination of allochthonous material entering the channel via runoff and bed scour that exhumed microplastics previously buried in the riverbed. Effluent-dependent urban streams are becoming increasingly common; more work is needed to identify microplastic pollution baselines and trends in effluent rivers worldwide.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33864222</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-1494</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1344
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-09, Vol.28 (33), p.45375-45389
issn 0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514605156
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquatic habitats
Aquatic Pollution
Arid lands
Arid zones
Aridity
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Base flow
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Effluents
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental science
Flood predictions
Flooding
Floods
Freshwater environments
Land pollution
Microplastics
Plastic debris
Plastic pollution
Pollution
Receiving waters
Research Article
River beds
Rivers
Runoff
Sediment samplers
Sediments
Trends
Urban runoff
Waste Water Technology
Wastewater discharges
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Water circulation
Water column
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20baseflow%20and%20flooding%20on%20microplastic%20pollution%20in%20an%20effluent-dependent%20arid%20land%20river%20in%20the%20USA&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Eppehimer,%20Drew%20E.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=33&rft.spage=45375&rft.epage=45389&rft.pages=45375-45389&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561133111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561133111&rft_id=info:pmid/33864222&rfr_iscdi=true