Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica

Two cultivars of sorghum (CSH-1 and Ochuti) were grown in the presence and absence of the root hemiparasite Striga hermonthica in uniform conditions in the field in Kenya, Africa. S. hermonthica had a marked influence on growth and photosynthesis of ‘CSH-1’; however, ‘Ochuti’ showed a less severe re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist 1999-09, Vol.143 (3), p.573-580
Hauptverfasser: GURNEY, A. L., PRESS, M. C., SCHOLES, J. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 580
container_issue 3
container_start_page 573
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 143
creator GURNEY, A. L.
PRESS, M. C.
SCHOLES, J. D.
description Two cultivars of sorghum (CSH-1 and Ochuti) were grown in the presence and absence of the root hemiparasite Striga hermonthica in uniform conditions in the field in Kenya, Africa. S. hermonthica had a marked influence on growth and photosynthesis of ‘CSH-1’; however, ‘Ochuti’ showed a less severe response to infection and tolerance of the parasite. The variation in genotype response might be partly explained by later attachment of the parasite and a lower level of infection. Laboratory studies were used to determine the importance of both variables in determining host response to infection. Early infection by S. hermonthica had a more negative effect on the host than late infection. The level of parasite biomass supported by the host also influenced host productivity but the relationship was nonlinear. Low degrees of parasite infection had a proportionately much greater effect on host grain weight than at greater parasite loading. Early infection of ‘Ochuti’ in laboratory conditions resulted in lower stem dry weight than in uninfected plants but not in smaller total plant biomass or lower rates of photosynthesis. In conclusion, the time of parasite attachment affected host performance and might explain much of the variation in host sensitivity both within and between studies. The level of parasite infection affected host performance to a lesser extent. In addition, late attachment and low levels of infection might have implications for control management strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00467.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514601409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1046_j_1469_8137_1999_00467_x</cupid><jstor_id>2588330</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2588330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5577-6f4e5290b1f0068f10302324a513f7d7978ef06115c616381f87ec8814a7c0463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRB4wYJNgv_i2IgNqoBWqgCpVGJneRw74yGxg52IztvjNMOwhJWvfM65x_pcFADBCkHK3uwrRJkoOSJNhYQQFcy3TXX3oNichIfFBkLMS0bZ97PiSUp7CKGoGX5cnBHCGeaCboofV94aPbngweQGA5RvQWt8ctMBOG_72XhtwLQzIJo0Bp8MCBakELvdPIAp3EujiionnM7xzoU0mjiAmym6ToFdnoOfdk6rp8Ujq_pknh3P8-L244dvF5fl9ZdPVxfvr0td101TMktNjQXcIgsh4xZBAjHBVNWI2KZtRMONhQyhWjPECEeWN0ZzjqhqdOZAzovX694xhp-zSZMcXNKm75U3YU4S1xkSRBSKbOWrVceQUjRWjtENKh4kgnJBLfdyISoXonJBLe9Ry7scfXFsmbeDaU_BP2yz4dXRoJJWvY3Ka5f-Foia1hxn27vV9sv15vDf_fLz18s85PjzNb5PU4inOK45JwRm-eUqWxWk6mJ-wO0NhigjFRRRsix4e0Sghm10bWfkPszR5x_6N4Tf3p6-PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514601409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GURNEY, A. L. ; PRESS, M. C. ; SCHOLES, J. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>GURNEY, A. L. ; PRESS, M. C. ; SCHOLES, J. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Two cultivars of sorghum (CSH-1 and Ochuti) were grown in the presence and absence of the root hemiparasite Striga hermonthica in uniform conditions in the field in Kenya, Africa. S. hermonthica had a marked influence on growth and photosynthesis of ‘CSH-1’; however, ‘Ochuti’ showed a less severe response to infection and tolerance of the parasite. The variation in genotype response might be partly explained by later attachment of the parasite and a lower level of infection. Laboratory studies were used to determine the importance of both variables in determining host response to infection. Early infection by S. hermonthica had a more negative effect on the host than late infection. The level of parasite biomass supported by the host also influenced host productivity but the relationship was nonlinear. Low degrees of parasite infection had a proportionately much greater effect on host grain weight than at greater parasite loading. Early infection of ‘Ochuti’ in laboratory conditions resulted in lower stem dry weight than in uninfected plants but not in smaller total plant biomass or lower rates of photosynthesis. In conclusion, the time of parasite attachment affected host performance and might explain much of the variation in host sensitivity both within and between studies. The level of parasite infection affected host performance to a lesser extent. In addition, late attachment and low levels of infection might have implications for control management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00467.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33862894</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEPHAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass production ; crop growth stage ; cultivars ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic variation ; growth ; host plants ; Infections ; Parasite hosts ; Parasites ; parasitic angiosperm ; Parasitic plants ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; parasitism ; Photosynthesis ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant density ; Plant roots ; Plants ; seed weight ; Seeds ; Sorghum ; Sorghum bicolor ; Striga hermonthica ; temporal variation ; tolerance ; tropical weeds</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 1999-09, Vol.143 (3), p.573-580</ispartof><rights>Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 Trustees of New Phytologist</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5577-6f4e5290b1f0068f10302324a513f7d7978ef06115c616381f87ec8814a7c0463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2588330$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2588330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1954582$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33862894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GURNEY, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHOLES, J. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Two cultivars of sorghum (CSH-1 and Ochuti) were grown in the presence and absence of the root hemiparasite Striga hermonthica in uniform conditions in the field in Kenya, Africa. S. hermonthica had a marked influence on growth and photosynthesis of ‘CSH-1’; however, ‘Ochuti’ showed a less severe response to infection and tolerance of the parasite. The variation in genotype response might be partly explained by later attachment of the parasite and a lower level of infection. Laboratory studies were used to determine the importance of both variables in determining host response to infection. Early infection by S. hermonthica had a more negative effect on the host than late infection. The level of parasite biomass supported by the host also influenced host productivity but the relationship was nonlinear. Low degrees of parasite infection had a proportionately much greater effect on host grain weight than at greater parasite loading. Early infection of ‘Ochuti’ in laboratory conditions resulted in lower stem dry weight than in uninfected plants but not in smaller total plant biomass or lower rates of photosynthesis. In conclusion, the time of parasite attachment affected host performance and might explain much of the variation in host sensitivity both within and between studies. The level of parasite infection affected host performance to a lesser extent. In addition, late attachment and low levels of infection might have implications for control management strategies.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>crop growth stage</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>growth</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>parasitic angiosperm</subject><subject>Parasitic plants</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>parasitism</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>seed weight</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum bicolor</subject><subject>Striga hermonthica</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><subject>tropical weeds</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRB4wYJNgv_i2IgNqoBWqgCpVGJneRw74yGxg52IztvjNMOwhJWvfM65x_pcFADBCkHK3uwrRJkoOSJNhYQQFcy3TXX3oNichIfFBkLMS0bZ97PiSUp7CKGoGX5cnBHCGeaCboofV94aPbngweQGA5RvQWt8ctMBOG_72XhtwLQzIJo0Bp8MCBakELvdPIAp3EujiionnM7xzoU0mjiAmym6ToFdnoOfdk6rp8Ujq_pknh3P8-L244dvF5fl9ZdPVxfvr0td101TMktNjQXcIgsh4xZBAjHBVNWI2KZtRMONhQyhWjPECEeWN0ZzjqhqdOZAzovX694xhp-zSZMcXNKm75U3YU4S1xkSRBSKbOWrVceQUjRWjtENKh4kgnJBLfdyISoXonJBLe9Ry7scfXFsmbeDaU_BP2yz4dXRoJJWvY3Ka5f-Foia1hxn27vV9sv15vDf_fLz18s85PjzNb5PU4inOK45JwRm-eUqWxWk6mJ-wO0NhigjFRRRsix4e0Sghm10bWfkPszR5x_6N4Tf3p6-PQ</recordid><startdate>199909</startdate><enddate>199909</enddate><creator>GURNEY, A. L.</creator><creator>PRESS, M. C.</creator><creator>SCHOLES, J. D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199909</creationdate><title>Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica</title><author>GURNEY, A. L. ; PRESS, M. C. ; SCHOLES, J. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5577-6f4e5290b1f0068f10302324a513f7d7978ef06115c616381f87ec8814a7c0463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>crop growth stage</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>growth</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>parasitic angiosperm</topic><topic>Parasitic plants</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>parasitism</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>seed weight</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum bicolor</topic><topic>Striga hermonthica</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>tropical weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GURNEY, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHOLES, J. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GURNEY, A. L.</au><au>PRESS, M. C.</au><au>SCHOLES, J. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>1999-09</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>573-580</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><coden>NEPHAV</coden><abstract>Two cultivars of sorghum (CSH-1 and Ochuti) were grown in the presence and absence of the root hemiparasite Striga hermonthica in uniform conditions in the field in Kenya, Africa. S. hermonthica had a marked influence on growth and photosynthesis of ‘CSH-1’; however, ‘Ochuti’ showed a less severe response to infection and tolerance of the parasite. The variation in genotype response might be partly explained by later attachment of the parasite and a lower level of infection. Laboratory studies were used to determine the importance of both variables in determining host response to infection. Early infection by S. hermonthica had a more negative effect on the host than late infection. The level of parasite biomass supported by the host also influenced host productivity but the relationship was nonlinear. Low degrees of parasite infection had a proportionately much greater effect on host grain weight than at greater parasite loading. Early infection of ‘Ochuti’ in laboratory conditions resulted in lower stem dry weight than in uninfected plants but not in smaller total plant biomass or lower rates of photosynthesis. In conclusion, the time of parasite attachment affected host performance and might explain much of the variation in host sensitivity both within and between studies. The level of parasite infection affected host performance to a lesser extent. In addition, late attachment and low levels of infection might have implications for control management strategies.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>33862894</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00467.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 1999-09, Vol.143 (3), p.573-580
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514601409
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Biomass production
crop growth stage
cultivars
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genetic variation
growth
host plants
Infections
Parasite hosts
Parasites
parasitic angiosperm
Parasitic plants
Parasitic plants. Weeds
parasitism
Photosynthesis
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
plant density
Plant roots
Plants
seed weight
Seeds
Sorghum
Sorghum bicolor
Striga hermonthica
temporal variation
tolerance
tropical weeds
title Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infection%20time%20and%20density%20influence%20the%20response%20of%20sorghum%20to%20the%20parasitic%20angiosperm%20Striga%20hermonthica&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=GURNEY,%20A.%20L.&rft.date=1999-09&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=573-580&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft.coden=NEPHAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00467.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2588330%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514601409&rft_id=info:pmid/33862894&rft_cupid=10_1046_j_1469_8137_1999_00467_x&rft_jstor_id=2588330&rfr_iscdi=true