Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791
Hauptverfasser: Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine, Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle, Chopier, Jocelyne, Boyer, Bruno, Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre, Hoppe, Stéphanie, Brouste, Véronique, Chamming’s, Foucauld
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7791
container_issue 10
container_start_page 7783
container_title European radiology
container_volume 31
creator Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
Chopier, Jocelyne
Boyer, Bruno
Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre
Hoppe, Stéphanie
Brouste, Véronique
Chamming’s, Foucauld
description Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result. Results MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%. Conclusion In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 Key Points • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2512334247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512334247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwCdi5ThyzQ4VCpSIkBGvL8U_GVeIE_4DmHXhozEwBiQUrS77fPT7HB6EnlLyghPCXiRAA0pCWNoRzQRp2D-0og7ahZGD30Y4IGBouBDtD5yndEkIEZfwhOgMYWD8w2KEfb7yawpqy11hpXaLSB7w6PEarUsYfPl1jt0a8qextyAl_93mPU0mb134tCQe_bbPFxie9V3GyWAWDg50q_83iRS3LOkW17Q_HQZlzVGktwbzCCm9xTZvVRzLlYg6P0AOn5mQf350X6MvV28-X75ubj--uL1_fNBp4lxsGhgyg-rE3bc1tXK94vbFUD0oIYsAp7igX7ciFdZxQZ_sexoqDo9ABXKDnJ93q4GuxKcul-rfzrIKtoWTb0RaAtYxX9Nk_6O1aYqjuKsVZ1w31GyvVnihdI6VondyiX1Q8SErkr67kqStZu5LHriSrS0_vpMu4WPNn5Xc5FYATkOooTDb-ffs_sj8BsUehcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574558843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</creator><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result. Results MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%. Conclusion In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 Key Points • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33846843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Papilloma ; Patients ; Radiology ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopier, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouste, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result. Results MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%. Conclusion In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 Key Points • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Papilloma</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwCdi5ThyzQ4VCpSIkBGvL8U_GVeIE_4DmHXhozEwBiQUrS77fPT7HB6EnlLyghPCXiRAA0pCWNoRzQRp2D-0og7ahZGD30Y4IGBouBDtD5yndEkIEZfwhOgMYWD8w2KEfb7yawpqy11hpXaLSB7w6PEarUsYfPl1jt0a8qextyAl_93mPU0mb134tCQe_bbPFxie9V3GyWAWDg50q_83iRS3LOkW17Q_HQZlzVGktwbzCCm9xTZvVRzLlYg6P0AOn5mQf350X6MvV28-X75ubj--uL1_fNBp4lxsGhgyg-rE3bc1tXK94vbFUD0oIYsAp7igX7ciFdZxQZ_sexoqDo9ABXKDnJ93q4GuxKcul-rfzrIKtoWTb0RaAtYxX9Nk_6O1aYqjuKsVZ1w31GyvVnihdI6VondyiX1Q8SErkr67kqStZu5LHriSrS0_vpMu4WPNn5Xc5FYATkOooTDb-ffs_sj8BsUehcw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creator><creator>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creator><creator>Chopier, Jocelyne</creator><creator>Boyer, Bruno</creator><creator>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creator><creator>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Brouste, Véronique</creator><creator>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><author>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Papilloma</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopier, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouste, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</au><au>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</au><au>Chopier, Jocelyne</au><au>Boyer, Bruno</au><au>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</au><au>Hoppe, Stéphanie</au><au>Brouste, Véronique</au><au>Chamming’s, Foucauld</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>7783</spage><epage>7791</epage><pages>7783-7791</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result. Results MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%. Conclusion In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 Key Points • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33846843</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2512334247
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Breast
Breast cancer
Cancer
Diagnostic Radiology
Diagnostic systems
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Lesions
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mammography
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Papilloma
Patients
Radiology
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
title Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A19%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20breast%20MRI%20for%20patients%20with%20suspicious%20nipple%20discharge%20and%20negative%20mammography%20and%20ultrasound:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Boisserie-Lacroix,%20Martine&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=7783&rft.epage=7791&rft.pages=7783-7791&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512334247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574558843&rft_id=info:pmid/33846843&rfr_iscdi=true