Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. Methods Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7791 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 7783 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle Chopier, Jocelyne Boyer, Bruno Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre Hoppe, Stéphanie Brouste, Véronique Chamming’s, Foucauld |
description | Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds.
Methods
Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result.
Results
MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%.
Conclusion
In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02819362
Key Points
• Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound.
• MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge.
• If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2512334247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512334247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwCdi5ThyzQ4VCpSIkBGvL8U_GVeIE_4DmHXhozEwBiQUrS77fPT7HB6EnlLyghPCXiRAA0pCWNoRzQRp2D-0og7ahZGD30Y4IGBouBDtD5yndEkIEZfwhOgMYWD8w2KEfb7yawpqy11hpXaLSB7w6PEarUsYfPl1jt0a8qextyAl_93mPU0mb134tCQe_bbPFxie9V3GyWAWDg50q_83iRS3LOkW17Q_HQZlzVGktwbzCCm9xTZvVRzLlYg6P0AOn5mQf350X6MvV28-X75ubj--uL1_fNBp4lxsGhgyg-rE3bc1tXK94vbFUD0oIYsAp7igX7ciFdZxQZ_sexoqDo9ABXKDnJ93q4GuxKcul-rfzrIKtoWTb0RaAtYxX9Nk_6O1aYqjuKsVZ1w31GyvVnihdI6VondyiX1Q8SErkr67kqStZu5LHriSrS0_vpMu4WPNn5Xc5FYATkOooTDb-ffs_sj8BsUehcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574558843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</creator><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds.
Methods
Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result.
Results
MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%.
Conclusion
In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02819362
Key Points
• Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound.
• MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge.
• If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33846843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Papilloma ; Patients ; Radiology ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopier, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouste, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds.
Methods
Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result.
Results
MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%.
Conclusion
In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02819362
Key Points
• Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound.
• MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge.
• If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Papilloma</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BAltiwCdi5ThyzQ4VCpSIkBGvL8U_GVeIE_4DmHXhozEwBiQUrS77fPT7HB6EnlLyghPCXiRAA0pCWNoRzQRp2D-0og7ahZGD30Y4IGBouBDtD5yndEkIEZfwhOgMYWD8w2KEfb7yawpqy11hpXaLSB7w6PEarUsYfPl1jt0a8qextyAl_93mPU0mb134tCQe_bbPFxie9V3GyWAWDg50q_83iRS3LOkW17Q_HQZlzVGktwbzCCm9xTZvVRzLlYg6P0AOn5mQf350X6MvV28-X75ubj--uL1_fNBp4lxsGhgyg-rE3bc1tXK94vbFUD0oIYsAp7igX7ciFdZxQZ_sexoqDo9ABXKDnJ93q4GuxKcul-rfzrIKtoWTb0RaAtYxX9Nk_6O1aYqjuKsVZ1w31GyvVnihdI6VondyiX1Q8SErkr67kqStZu5LHriSrS0_vpMu4WPNn5Xc5FYATkOooTDb-ffs_sj8BsUehcw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creator><creator>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creator><creator>Chopier, Jocelyne</creator><creator>Boyer, Bruno</creator><creator>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creator><creator>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Brouste, Véronique</creator><creator>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</title><author>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ; Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle ; Chopier, Jocelyne ; Boyer, Bruno ; Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre ; Hoppe, Stéphanie ; Brouste, Véronique ; Chamming’s, Foucauld</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-43d083a6b6d2779df6a7d08e1c8a990d3fa7f1792b79ef701fe663bb6d3f13533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Papilloma</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopier, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouste, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamming’s, Foucauld</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine</au><au>Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle</au><au>Chopier, Jocelyne</au><au>Boyer, Bruno</au><au>Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre</au><au>Hoppe, Stéphanie</au><au>Brouste, Véronique</au><au>Chamming’s, Foucauld</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>7783</spage><epage>7791</epage><pages>7783-7791</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds.
Methods
Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result.
Results
MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%.
Conclusion
In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02819362
Key Points
• Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound.
• MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge.
• If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33846843</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2021-10, Vol.31 (10), p.7783-7791 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2512334247 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Breast Breast cancer Cancer Diagnostic Radiology Diagnostic systems Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Lesions Magnetic resonance imaging Mammography Medical diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroradiology Papilloma Patients Radiology Tumors Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A19%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20breast%20MRI%20for%20patients%20with%20suspicious%20nipple%20discharge%20and%20negative%20mammography%20and%20ultrasound:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Boisserie-Lacroix,%20Martine&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=7783&rft.epage=7791&rft.pages=7783-7791&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-021-07790-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512334247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574558843&rft_id=info:pmid/33846843&rfr_iscdi=true |