The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery
Background No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2022-01, Vol.156 (1), p.10-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 156 |
creator | Marquini, Gisele V. Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K. Sartori, Marair G.F. |
description | Background
No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and amputation of the cervix.
Objective
To describe the surgical technique of Manchester‐Fothergill and to chart its history.
Search strategy
A bibliographic search was performed of the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases.
Selection criteria
The terms “Manchester‐Fothergill” AND “History” AND “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” were searched from the first publication on this topic (1951) to December 2020.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted from studies independently by two authors. All types of relevant s were selected and analyzed due to the scarcity of studies (books and documents, clinical trials, meta‐analysis, randomized controlled trial, review and systematic review).
Main results
Although this is a well‐described procedure in historic texts, the practical application is not often employed, and modern surgical texts rarely describe how to perform this surgery. The advantages of the Manchester‐Fothergill technique include maintenance of the pelvic anatomy, integrity, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, and shortened operation times and hospital stays.
Conclusion
Many young gynecologists are not familiar with this operation; therefore, it is important to provide training and exposure to the Manchester‐Fothergill technique in the practice of gynecological surgery.
Synopsis
The study describes the Manchester‐Fothergill procedure for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse through a historical review since its first description in 1951. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijgo.13706 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511897399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2511897399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3656-feacdbef2d597b49bea33632cc1459a576e4a5da3a69439c70f22c252543807e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efADJUYTU_UmyXW9abK1UilDPy2YzSbakSd1NKL35CD6jT2JqqkdPwzAfH8OH0CXBQ4IxvTWrrBoSxnF0hPpkxIXPAi6OUb89Yp9TQXvozLkVxphwQk5Rj7FRwHAQ9dHrMgfvRZU6B1eD_fr4nFR1DjYzReHVoPPSvDdw5z3YautMmXmm9Nq7p5u6bteWhyQDT9nay1RRgN2do5NUFQ4uDnOA3iaPy_GTP19MZ-P7ua9ZFEZ-CkonMaQ0CQWPAxGDYixiVGsShEKFPIJAhYliKhIBE5rjlFJNQxoGbIQ5sAG67rwbW7UvulqujdNQFKqEqnGShoSMBGdCtOhNh2pbOWchlRtr1sruJMFyn1DuE8qfhC18dfA28RqSP_S3WQuQDtiaAnb_qOTsebropN_YoH3r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511897399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Marquini, Gisele V. ; Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K. ; Sartori, Marair G.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marquini, Gisele V. ; Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K. ; Sartori, Marair G.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and amputation of the cervix.
Objective
To describe the surgical technique of Manchester‐Fothergill and to chart its history.
Search strategy
A bibliographic search was performed of the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases.
Selection criteria
The terms “Manchester‐Fothergill” AND “History” AND “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” were searched from the first publication on this topic (1951) to December 2020.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted from studies independently by two authors. All types of relevant s were selected and analyzed due to the scarcity of studies (books and documents, clinical trials, meta‐analysis, randomized controlled trial, review and systematic review).
Main results
Although this is a well‐described procedure in historic texts, the practical application is not often employed, and modern surgical texts rarely describe how to perform this surgery. The advantages of the Manchester‐Fothergill technique include maintenance of the pelvic anatomy, integrity, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, and shortened operation times and hospital stays.
Conclusion
Many young gynecologists are not familiar with this operation; therefore, it is important to provide training and exposure to the Manchester‐Fothergill technique in the practice of gynecological surgery.
Synopsis
The study describes the Manchester‐Fothergill procedure for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse through a historical review since its first description in 1951.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33843046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cervix Uteri - surgery ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; reconstructive surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; surgery ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022-01, Vol.156 (1), p.10-16</ispartof><rights>2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3656-feacdbef2d597b49bea33632cc1459a576e4a5da3a69439c70f22c252543807e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3656-feacdbef2d597b49bea33632cc1459a576e4a5da3a69439c70f22c252543807e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4573-5361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijgo.13706$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijgo.13706$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843046$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marquini, Gisele V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartori, Marair G.F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Background
No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and amputation of the cervix.
Objective
To describe the surgical technique of Manchester‐Fothergill and to chart its history.
Search strategy
A bibliographic search was performed of the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases.
Selection criteria
The terms “Manchester‐Fothergill” AND “History” AND “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” were searched from the first publication on this topic (1951) to December 2020.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted from studies independently by two authors. All types of relevant s were selected and analyzed due to the scarcity of studies (books and documents, clinical trials, meta‐analysis, randomized controlled trial, review and systematic review).
Main results
Although this is a well‐described procedure in historic texts, the practical application is not often employed, and modern surgical texts rarely describe how to perform this surgery. The advantages of the Manchester‐Fothergill technique include maintenance of the pelvic anatomy, integrity, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, and shortened operation times and hospital stays.
Conclusion
Many young gynecologists are not familiar with this operation; therefore, it is important to provide training and exposure to the Manchester‐Fothergill technique in the practice of gynecological surgery.
Synopsis
The study describes the Manchester‐Fothergill procedure for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse through a historical review since its first description in 1951.</description><subject>Cervix Uteri - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efADJUYTU_UmyXW9abK1UilDPy2YzSbakSd1NKL35CD6jT2JqqkdPwzAfH8OH0CXBQ4IxvTWrrBoSxnF0hPpkxIXPAi6OUb89Yp9TQXvozLkVxphwQk5Rj7FRwHAQ9dHrMgfvRZU6B1eD_fr4nFR1DjYzReHVoPPSvDdw5z3YautMmXmm9Nq7p5u6bteWhyQDT9nay1RRgN2do5NUFQ4uDnOA3iaPy_GTP19MZ-P7ua9ZFEZ-CkonMaQ0CQWPAxGDYixiVGsShEKFPIJAhYliKhIBE5rjlFJNQxoGbIQ5sAG67rwbW7UvulqujdNQFKqEqnGShoSMBGdCtOhNh2pbOWchlRtr1sruJMFyn1DuE8qfhC18dfA28RqSP_S3WQuQDtiaAnb_qOTsebropN_YoH3r</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Marquini, Gisele V.</creator><creator>Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K.</creator><creator>Sartori, Marair G.F.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-5361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery</title><author>Marquini, Gisele V. ; Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K. ; Sartori, Marair G.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3656-feacdbef2d597b49bea33632cc1459a576e4a5da3a69439c70f22c252543807e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cervix Uteri - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marquini, Gisele V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartori, Marair G.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marquini, Gisele V.</au><au>Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna I.K.</au><au>Sartori, Marair G.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>10-16</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Background
No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and amputation of the cervix.
Objective
To describe the surgical technique of Manchester‐Fothergill and to chart its history.
Search strategy
A bibliographic search was performed of the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases.
Selection criteria
The terms “Manchester‐Fothergill” AND “History” AND “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” were searched from the first publication on this topic (1951) to December 2020.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted from studies independently by two authors. All types of relevant s were selected and analyzed due to the scarcity of studies (books and documents, clinical trials, meta‐analysis, randomized controlled trial, review and systematic review).
Main results
Although this is a well‐described procedure in historic texts, the practical application is not often employed, and modern surgical texts rarely describe how to perform this surgery. The advantages of the Manchester‐Fothergill technique include maintenance of the pelvic anatomy, integrity, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, and shortened operation times and hospital stays.
Conclusion
Many young gynecologists are not familiar with this operation; therefore, it is important to provide training and exposure to the Manchester‐Fothergill technique in the practice of gynecological surgery.
Synopsis
The study describes the Manchester‐Fothergill procedure for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse through a historical review since its first description in 1951.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33843046</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.13706</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-5361</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022-01, Vol.156 (1), p.10-16 |
issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511897399 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cervix Uteri - surgery Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans pelvic organ prolapse Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery reconstructive surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures surgery Uterus |
title | The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A21%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Manchester%E2%80%90Fothergill%20technique:%20Browsing%20in%20the%20cutting%E2%80%90edge%20art%20gallery&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Marquini,%20Gisele%20V.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=10-16&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.13706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511897399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511897399&rft_id=info:pmid/33843046&rfr_iscdi=true |