Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients

Previously, we determined that training with vibrotactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway improves MS patients' balance impairment. Here, we posed 5 questions: 1) How many weeks of VTfb training are required to obtain the best short-term carry over effect (CoE) with VTfb? 2) How long does the CoE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the neurological sciences 2021-06, Vol.425, p.117432-117432, Article 117432
Hauptverfasser: Allum, J.H.J., Rust, H.M., Lutz, N., Schouenborg, C., Fischer-Barnicol, B., Haller, V., Derfuss, T., Kuhle, J., Yaldizli, Ö.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117432
container_issue
container_start_page 117432
container_title Journal of the neurological sciences
container_volume 425
creator Allum, J.H.J.
Rust, H.M.
Lutz, N.
Schouenborg, C.
Fischer-Barnicol, B.
Haller, V.
Derfuss, T.
Kuhle, J.
Yaldizli, Ö.
description Previously, we determined that training with vibrotactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway improves MS patients' balance impairment. Here, we posed 5 questions: 1) How many weeks of VTfb training are required to obtain the best short-term carry over effect (CoE) with VTfb? 2) How long does the CoE last once VTfb training terminates? 3) Is the benefit similar for stance and gait? 4) Is position or velocity based VTfb more effective in reducing trunk sway? 5) Do patients' subjective assessments of balance control improve? Balance control of 16 MS patients was measured with gyroscopes at the lower trunk. The gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band. Patients trained twice per week with VTfb for 4 weeks to determine when balance control with and without VTfb stopped improving. Thereafter, weekly assessments without VTfb over 4 weeks and at 6 months determined when CoEs ended. A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfb. Short term CoEs improved from 15 to 20% (p ≤ 0.001). Medium term (1–4 weeks) CoEs were constant at 19% (p ≤ 0.001). At 6 months improvement was not significant, 9%. Most improvement was for lateral sway. Equal improvement occurred when angle position or velocity drove VTfb. Subjectively, balance improvements peaked after 3 weeks of training (32%, p ≤ 0.05). 3–4 weeks VTfb training yields clinically relevant sway reductions and subjective improvements for MS patients during stance and gait. The CoEs lasted at least 1 month. Velocity-based VTfb was equally effective as position-based VTfb. •Described the effects of vibrotactile feedback training (VTfbT) on MS patients’ balance.•Gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band and measured trunk sway.•A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfbT.•Medium term (1-4 weeks) carry-over effects post-VTfbT were constant at 19%.•3-4 weeks of VTfbT yielded both trunk sway reductions and subjective improvements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117432
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511896646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022510X2100126X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2511896646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-569ccb53edfbc6f6022ab79f2593bbd5f91bd9257bb19b7f07278982fba728163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1uFDEYRa0IRDaBB6BBLmlm8U_GP6JCqwCRIqUBic6yPZ-DNzPjxfZslI5Hx6MNlFRuzr2f70HoLSVbSqj4sN_u57JlhNEtpfKKszO0oUqqrleKv0AbQhjrekp-nKOLUvaEEKGUfoXOOVdccyE36Pfup83WV8ix1OgLTgHH6ZDTESaYa8Fxxs6OdvaAfZprTiNeSpzv8TG6nLrasnEE7GIKAIOz_mGtqHmZH3B5tE84pIynZazx0LDiR8ipxIIPtsb1wGv0MtixwJvn9xJ9_3z9bfe1u737crP7dNt5rkXteqG9dz2HITgvgmjLrJM6sF5z54Y-aOoGzXrpHNVOBiKZVFqx4Kxkigp-id6fetu2XwuUaqZYPIxtGqSlGNZTqrQQVytKT6hvXy0ZgjnkONn8ZCgxq3izN028WcWbk_iWefdcv7gJhn-Jv6Yb8PEEQBt5jJBN8U2AhyFm8NUMKf6n_g8ImpcW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511896646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Allum, J.H.J. ; Rust, H.M. ; Lutz, N. ; Schouenborg, C. ; Fischer-Barnicol, B. ; Haller, V. ; Derfuss, T. ; Kuhle, J. ; Yaldizli, Ö.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allum, J.H.J. ; Rust, H.M. ; Lutz, N. ; Schouenborg, C. ; Fischer-Barnicol, B. ; Haller, V. ; Derfuss, T. ; Kuhle, J. ; Yaldizli, Ö.</creatorcontrib><description>Previously, we determined that training with vibrotactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway improves MS patients' balance impairment. Here, we posed 5 questions: 1) How many weeks of VTfb training are required to obtain the best short-term carry over effect (CoE) with VTfb? 2) How long does the CoE last once VTfb training terminates? 3) Is the benefit similar for stance and gait? 4) Is position or velocity based VTfb more effective in reducing trunk sway? 5) Do patients' subjective assessments of balance control improve? Balance control of 16 MS patients was measured with gyroscopes at the lower trunk. The gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band. Patients trained twice per week with VTfb for 4 weeks to determine when balance control with and without VTfb stopped improving. Thereafter, weekly assessments without VTfb over 4 weeks and at 6 months determined when CoEs ended. A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfb. Short term CoEs improved from 15 to 20% (p ≤ 0.001). Medium term (1–4 weeks) CoEs were constant at 19% (p ≤ 0.001). At 6 months improvement was not significant, 9%. Most improvement was for lateral sway. Equal improvement occurred when angle position or velocity drove VTfb. Subjectively, balance improvements peaked after 3 weeks of training (32%, p ≤ 0.05). 3–4 weeks VTfb training yields clinically relevant sway reductions and subjective improvements for MS patients during stance and gait. The CoEs lasted at least 1 month. Velocity-based VTfb was equally effective as position-based VTfb. •Described the effects of vibrotactile feedback training (VTfbT) on MS patients’ balance.•Gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band and measured trunk sway.•A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfbT.•Medium term (1-4 weeks) carry-over effects post-VTfbT were constant at 19%.•3-4 weeks of VTfbT yielded both trunk sway reductions and subjective improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117432</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33839367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Balance control ; Relapsing-remitting MS ; Sensory augmentation ; Trunk sway ; Vibro-tactile feedback</subject><ispartof>Journal of the neurological sciences, 2021-06, Vol.425, p.117432-117432, Article 117432</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-569ccb53edfbc6f6022ab79f2593bbd5f91bd9257bb19b7f07278982fba728163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-569ccb53edfbc6f6022ab79f2593bbd5f91bd9257bb19b7f07278982fba728163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allum, J.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouenborg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer-Barnicol, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derfuss, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhle, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaldizli, Ö.</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients</title><title>Journal of the neurological sciences</title><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><description>Previously, we determined that training with vibrotactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway improves MS patients' balance impairment. Here, we posed 5 questions: 1) How many weeks of VTfb training are required to obtain the best short-term carry over effect (CoE) with VTfb? 2) How long does the CoE last once VTfb training terminates? 3) Is the benefit similar for stance and gait? 4) Is position or velocity based VTfb more effective in reducing trunk sway? 5) Do patients' subjective assessments of balance control improve? Balance control of 16 MS patients was measured with gyroscopes at the lower trunk. The gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band. Patients trained twice per week with VTfb for 4 weeks to determine when balance control with and without VTfb stopped improving. Thereafter, weekly assessments without VTfb over 4 weeks and at 6 months determined when CoEs ended. A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfb. Short term CoEs improved from 15 to 20% (p ≤ 0.001). Medium term (1–4 weeks) CoEs were constant at 19% (p ≤ 0.001). At 6 months improvement was not significant, 9%. Most improvement was for lateral sway. Equal improvement occurred when angle position or velocity drove VTfb. Subjectively, balance improvements peaked after 3 weeks of training (32%, p ≤ 0.05). 3–4 weeks VTfb training yields clinically relevant sway reductions and subjective improvements for MS patients during stance and gait. The CoEs lasted at least 1 month. Velocity-based VTfb was equally effective as position-based VTfb. •Described the effects of vibrotactile feedback training (VTfbT) on MS patients’ balance.•Gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band and measured trunk sway.•A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfbT.•Medium term (1-4 weeks) carry-over effects post-VTfbT were constant at 19%.•3-4 weeks of VTfbT yielded both trunk sway reductions and subjective improvements.</description><subject>Balance control</subject><subject>Relapsing-remitting MS</subject><subject>Sensory augmentation</subject><subject>Trunk sway</subject><subject>Vibro-tactile feedback</subject><issn>0022-510X</issn><issn>1878-5883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1uFDEYRa0IRDaBB6BBLmlm8U_GP6JCqwCRIqUBic6yPZ-DNzPjxfZslI5Hx6MNlFRuzr2f70HoLSVbSqj4sN_u57JlhNEtpfKKszO0oUqqrleKv0AbQhjrekp-nKOLUvaEEKGUfoXOOVdccyE36Pfup83WV8ix1OgLTgHH6ZDTESaYa8Fxxs6OdvaAfZprTiNeSpzv8TG6nLrasnEE7GIKAIOz_mGtqHmZH3B5tE84pIynZazx0LDiR8ipxIIPtsb1wGv0MtixwJvn9xJ9_3z9bfe1u737crP7dNt5rkXteqG9dz2HITgvgmjLrJM6sF5z54Y-aOoGzXrpHNVOBiKZVFqx4Kxkigp-id6fetu2XwuUaqZYPIxtGqSlGNZTqrQQVytKT6hvXy0ZgjnkONn8ZCgxq3izN028WcWbk_iWefdcv7gJhn-Jv6Yb8PEEQBt5jJBN8U2AhyFm8NUMKf6n_g8ImpcW</recordid><startdate>20210615</startdate><enddate>20210615</enddate><creator>Allum, J.H.J.</creator><creator>Rust, H.M.</creator><creator>Lutz, N.</creator><creator>Schouenborg, C.</creator><creator>Fischer-Barnicol, B.</creator><creator>Haller, V.</creator><creator>Derfuss, T.</creator><creator>Kuhle, J.</creator><creator>Yaldizli, Ö.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210615</creationdate><title>Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients</title><author>Allum, J.H.J. ; Rust, H.M. ; Lutz, N. ; Schouenborg, C. ; Fischer-Barnicol, B. ; Haller, V. ; Derfuss, T. ; Kuhle, J. ; Yaldizli, Ö.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-569ccb53edfbc6f6022ab79f2593bbd5f91bd9257bb19b7f07278982fba728163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Balance control</topic><topic>Relapsing-remitting MS</topic><topic>Sensory augmentation</topic><topic>Trunk sway</topic><topic>Vibro-tactile feedback</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allum, J.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouenborg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer-Barnicol, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derfuss, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhle, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaldizli, Ö.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allum, J.H.J.</au><au>Rust, H.M.</au><au>Lutz, N.</au><au>Schouenborg, C.</au><au>Fischer-Barnicol, B.</au><au>Haller, V.</au><au>Derfuss, T.</au><au>Kuhle, J.</au><au>Yaldizli, Ö.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurol Sci</addtitle><date>2021-06-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>425</volume><spage>117432</spage><epage>117432</epage><pages>117432-117432</pages><artnum>117432</artnum><issn>0022-510X</issn><eissn>1878-5883</eissn><abstract>Previously, we determined that training with vibrotactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway improves MS patients' balance impairment. Here, we posed 5 questions: 1) How many weeks of VTfb training are required to obtain the best short-term carry over effect (CoE) with VTfb? 2) How long does the CoE last once VTfb training terminates? 3) Is the benefit similar for stance and gait? 4) Is position or velocity based VTfb more effective in reducing trunk sway? 5) Do patients' subjective assessments of balance control improve? Balance control of 16 MS patients was measured with gyroscopes at the lower trunk. The gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band. Patients trained twice per week with VTfb for 4 weeks to determine when balance control with and without VTfb stopped improving. Thereafter, weekly assessments without VTfb over 4 weeks and at 6 months determined when CoEs ended. A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfb. Short term CoEs improved from 15 to 20% (p ≤ 0.001). Medium term (1–4 weeks) CoEs were constant at 19% (p ≤ 0.001). At 6 months improvement was not significant, 9%. Most improvement was for lateral sway. Equal improvement occurred when angle position or velocity drove VTfb. Subjectively, balance improvements peaked after 3 weeks of training (32%, p ≤ 0.05). 3–4 weeks VTfb training yields clinically relevant sway reductions and subjective improvements for MS patients during stance and gait. The CoEs lasted at least 1 month. Velocity-based VTfb was equally effective as position-based VTfb. •Described the effects of vibrotactile feedback training (VTfbT) on MS patients’ balance.•Gyroscopes drove directionally active VTfb in a head-band and measured trunk sway.•A 20% improvement in balance to normal levels occurred with VTfbT.•Medium term (1-4 weeks) carry-over effects post-VTfbT were constant at 19%.•3-4 weeks of VTfbT yielded both trunk sway reductions and subjective improvements.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33839367</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jns.2021.117432</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-510X
ispartof Journal of the neurological sciences, 2021-06, Vol.425, p.117432-117432, Article 117432
issn 0022-510X
1878-5883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511896646
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Balance control
Relapsing-remitting MS
Sensory augmentation
Trunk sway
Vibro-tactile feedback
title Characteristics of improvements in balance control using vibro-tactile biofeedback of trunk sway for multiple sclerosis patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A06%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20of%20improvements%20in%20balance%20control%20using%20vibro-tactile%20biofeedback%20of%20trunk%20sway%20for%20multiple%20sclerosis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Allum,%20J.H.J.&rft.date=2021-06-15&rft.volume=425&rft.spage=117432&rft.epage=117432&rft.pages=117432-117432&rft.artnum=117432&rft.issn=0022-510X&rft.eissn=1878-5883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117432&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511896646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511896646&rft_id=info:pmid/33839367&rft_els_id=S0022510X2100126X&rfr_iscdi=true