Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study
Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Liu, Tianyao Zhao, Zihan Feng, Baofu Wang, Xin Li, Tianhang Xie, Shangxun Zhu, Wenjie Li, Xiaogong Guo, Hongqian Yang, Rong |
description | Background and Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019.
Results
Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640).
Conclusions
For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.
Highlights
RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jso.26479 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511247222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539886038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMoOo4u_AEJuNFFax79ijsRnwiCj3WTTldjhkynTdLK7PwEv9EvMWOrC8FVkcqpS91bCO1QckgJYUczbw9ZnhZiBU0oEXkiiChX0ST-sSS2yQba9H5GCBEiT9fRBuclz4ngE_R6Z2sbtPp4e5feax-gwUb20lmvbK8VDsPcOgzdoAzIoG2HtccStyC9rg3gAOqp088D4DZyDjpp8JM20o2T_hifxG6Iej2ooF8A-zA0iy201krjYfu7TtHj-dnD6WVyc3txdXpykyiecZHUafSjClpCSlrgJcQXyxhLBS8VbfKihUyyhhXLHNJMZSJv6lIKGhNIAQSfov1Rt3c2LulDNddegTGyAzv4imWUsrRgjEV07w86s4OLfpYUF2WZkxjbFB2MlIqWvIO26p2eS7eoKKmWW1TxGtXXNSK7-6041HNofsmf-CNwNAKv2sDif6Xq-v52lPwES6iVgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539886038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019.
Results
Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640).
Conclusions
For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.
Highlights
RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.26479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33836093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer surgery ; interrupted single‐layer suture ; Kidney cancer ; Laparoscopy ; positive surgical margin ; renal hilar tumor ; robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation ; Tumors ; warm ischemia time</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.26479$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.26479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Baofu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tianhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shangxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaogong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background and Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019.
Results
Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640).
Conclusions
For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.
Highlights
RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</description><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>interrupted single‐layer suture</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>positive surgical margin</subject><subject>renal hilar tumor</subject><subject>robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>warm ischemia time</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMoOo4u_AEJuNFFax79ijsRnwiCj3WTTldjhkynTdLK7PwEv9EvMWOrC8FVkcqpS91bCO1QckgJYUczbw9ZnhZiBU0oEXkiiChX0ST-sSS2yQba9H5GCBEiT9fRBuclz4ngE_R6Z2sbtPp4e5feax-gwUb20lmvbK8VDsPcOgzdoAzIoG2HtccStyC9rg3gAOqp088D4DZyDjpp8JM20o2T_hifxG6Iej2ooF8A-zA0iy201krjYfu7TtHj-dnD6WVyc3txdXpykyiecZHUafSjClpCSlrgJcQXyxhLBS8VbfKihUyyhhXLHNJMZSJv6lIKGhNIAQSfov1Rt3c2LulDNddegTGyAzv4imWUsrRgjEV07w86s4OLfpYUF2WZkxjbFB2MlIqWvIO26p2eS7eoKKmWW1TxGtXXNSK7-6041HNofsmf-CNwNAKv2sDif6Xq-v52lPwES6iVgA</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Liu, Tianyao</creator><creator>Zhao, Zihan</creator><creator>Feng, Baofu</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><creator>Li, Tianhang</creator><creator>Xie, Shangxun</creator><creator>Zhu, Wenjie</creator><creator>Li, Xiaogong</creator><creator>Guo, Hongqian</creator><creator>Yang, Rong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><author>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>interrupted single‐layer suture</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>positive surgical margin</topic><topic>renal hilar tumor</topic><topic>robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>warm ischemia time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Baofu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tianhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shangxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaogong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Tianyao</au><au>Zhao, Zihan</au><au>Feng, Baofu</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><au>Li, Tianhang</au><au>Xie, Shangxun</au><au>Zhu, Wenjie</au><au>Li, Xiaogong</au><au>Guo, Hongqian</au><au>Yang, Rong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background and Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019.
Results
Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640).
Conclusions
For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors.
Highlights
RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33836093</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.26479</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4790 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142 |
issn | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511247222 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cancer surgery interrupted single‐layer suture Kidney cancer Laparoscopy positive surgical margin renal hilar tumor robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation Tumors warm ischemia time |
title | Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%E2%80%90assisted%20laparoscopic%20tumor%20enucleation%20is%20a%20feasible%20technique%20for%20renal%20hilar%20tumors:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Liu,%20Tianyao&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.26479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539886038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539886038&rft_id=info:pmid/33836093&rfr_iscdi=true |