Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study

Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Tianyao, Zhao, Zihan, Feng, Baofu, Wang, Xin, Li, Tianhang, Xie, Shangxun, Zhu, Wenjie, Li, Xiaogong, Guo, Hongqian, Yang, Rong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 124
creator Liu, Tianyao
Zhao, Zihan
Feng, Baofu
Wang, Xin
Li, Tianhang
Xie, Shangxun
Zhu, Wenjie
Li, Xiaogong
Guo, Hongqian
Yang, Rong
description Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. Results Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Conclusions For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors. Highlights RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.26479
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511247222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539886038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMoOo4u_AEJuNFFax79ijsRnwiCj3WTTldjhkynTdLK7PwEv9EvMWOrC8FVkcqpS91bCO1QckgJYUczbw9ZnhZiBU0oEXkiiChX0ST-sSS2yQba9H5GCBEiT9fRBuclz4ngE_R6Z2sbtPp4e5feax-gwUb20lmvbK8VDsPcOgzdoAzIoG2HtccStyC9rg3gAOqp088D4DZyDjpp8JM20o2T_hifxG6Iej2ooF8A-zA0iy201krjYfu7TtHj-dnD6WVyc3txdXpykyiecZHUafSjClpCSlrgJcQXyxhLBS8VbfKihUyyhhXLHNJMZSJv6lIKGhNIAQSfov1Rt3c2LulDNddegTGyAzv4imWUsrRgjEV07w86s4OLfpYUF2WZkxjbFB2MlIqWvIO26p2eS7eoKKmWW1TxGtXXNSK7-6041HNofsmf-CNwNAKv2sDif6Xq-v52lPwES6iVgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539886038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. Results Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Conclusions For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors. Highlights RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.26479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33836093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer surgery ; interrupted single‐layer suture ; Kidney cancer ; Laparoscopy ; positive surgical margin ; renal hilar tumor ; robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation ; Tumors ; warm ischemia time</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.26479$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.26479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Baofu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tianhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shangxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaogong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. Results Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Conclusions For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors. Highlights RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</description><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>interrupted single‐layer suture</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>positive surgical margin</subject><subject>renal hilar tumor</subject><subject>robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>warm ischemia time</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMoOo4u_AEJuNFFax79ijsRnwiCj3WTTldjhkynTdLK7PwEv9EvMWOrC8FVkcqpS91bCO1QckgJYUczbw9ZnhZiBU0oEXkiiChX0ST-sSS2yQba9H5GCBEiT9fRBuclz4ngE_R6Z2sbtPp4e5feax-gwUb20lmvbK8VDsPcOgzdoAzIoG2HtccStyC9rg3gAOqp088D4DZyDjpp8JM20o2T_hifxG6Iej2ooF8A-zA0iy201krjYfu7TtHj-dnD6WVyc3txdXpykyiecZHUafSjClpCSlrgJcQXyxhLBS8VbfKihUyyhhXLHNJMZSJv6lIKGhNIAQSfov1Rt3c2LulDNddegTGyAzv4imWUsrRgjEV07w86s4OLfpYUF2WZkxjbFB2MlIqWvIO26p2eS7eoKKmWW1TxGtXXNSK7-6041HNofsmf-CNwNAKv2sDif6Xq-v52lPwES6iVgA</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Liu, Tianyao</creator><creator>Zhao, Zihan</creator><creator>Feng, Baofu</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><creator>Li, Tianhang</creator><creator>Xie, Shangxun</creator><creator>Zhu, Wenjie</creator><creator>Li, Xiaogong</creator><creator>Guo, Hongqian</creator><creator>Yang, Rong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</title><author>Liu, Tianyao ; Zhao, Zihan ; Feng, Baofu ; Wang, Xin ; Li, Tianhang ; Xie, Shangxun ; Zhu, Wenjie ; Li, Xiaogong ; Guo, Hongqian ; Yang, Rong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b4109c718e40fe38e09c25224938c1d67fe5a2d27100245c596db8a919094ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>interrupted single‐layer suture</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>positive surgical margin</topic><topic>renal hilar tumor</topic><topic>robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>warm ischemia time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Baofu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tianhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Shangxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaogong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Tianyao</au><au>Zhao, Zihan</au><au>Feng, Baofu</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><au>Li, Tianhang</au><au>Xie, Shangxun</au><au>Zhu, Wenjie</au><au>Li, Xiaogong</au><au>Guo, Hongqian</au><au>Yang, Rong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background and Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation (RAE) for the treatment of renal hilar tumors and to describe our experience with renorrhaphy‐related surgical techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 173 consecutive patients who underwent RAE for localized renal tumors (cT1–cT2N0M0) at our hospital between September 2014 and November 2019. Results Seventy‐five patients had renal hilar tumors and 98 patients had nonhilar tumors. There were no statistical differences between the hilar and nonhilar groups in operation time (190 [115–390] vs. 190 [110–390] min, p = 0.889), warm ischemia time (26 [12–60] vs. 27 [17–41] min, p = 0.257), hospital stay duration (8 [3–16] vs. 7.5 [4–18] days, p = 0.386), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 102.5 [29.4–144] vs. 101.3 [64.2–134.7] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.631); creatinine level, (76 [43–169] vs. 78.5 [50–281.3] µmol/L, p = 0.673), perioperative complications rate, or surgical margin status. However, patients with hilar tumors lost significantly more blood than did those with nonhilar tumors (250 [50–1500] vs. 200 [20–1200] ml, p = 0.007). During the follow‐up period (median, 30 months), three patients in each group experienced recurrence. The 5‐year recurrence‐free rates were 93.0% and 95.4% in the hilar and nonhilar tumor groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Conclusions For experienced robot laparoscopists, RAE is a safe, effective, and feasible procedure for renal hilar tumors, without increased risk of positive surgical margins or worse midterm oncologic outcomes compared with nonhilar tumors. Highlights RAE is an alternative surgical method for renal hilar tumors. It does not increase the positive surgical margin and affect the mid‐term oncology outcome while retaining the normal renal parenchyma to the greatest extent. It seems to have more advantages in reducing postoperative complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33836093</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.26479</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-5969</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.124 (1), p.135-142
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511247222
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Cancer surgery
interrupted single‐layer suture
Kidney cancer
Laparoscopy
positive surgical margin
renal hilar tumor
robotic assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation
Tumors
warm ischemia time
title Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: A retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%E2%80%90assisted%20laparoscopic%20tumor%20enucleation%20is%20a%20feasible%20technique%20for%20renal%20hilar%20tumors:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Liu,%20Tianyao&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.26479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539886038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539886038&rft_id=info:pmid/33836093&rfr_iscdi=true