Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners

Invasive plants are known to alter the soil microbial communities; however, the effects of co-occurring native and invasive congeners on the soil bacterial diversity and their predictive metabolic profiles are not known. Here, we compared the rhizosphere bacterial communities of invasive Prosopis ju...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current microbiology 2021-05, Vol.78 (5), p.2051-2060
Hauptverfasser: Kaushik, Rishabh, Pandit, Maharaj K., Meyerson, Laura A., Chaudhari, Diptaraj S., Sharma, Meesha, Dhotre, Dhiraj, Shouche, Yogesh S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2060
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2051
container_title Current microbiology
container_volume 78
creator Kaushik, Rishabh
Pandit, Maharaj K.
Meyerson, Laura A.
Chaudhari, Diptaraj S.
Sharma, Meesha
Dhotre, Dhiraj
Shouche, Yogesh S.
description Invasive plants are known to alter the soil microbial communities; however, the effects of co-occurring native and invasive congeners on the soil bacterial diversity and their predictive metabolic profiles are not known. Here, we compared the rhizosphere bacterial communities of invasive Prosopis juliflora and its native congener Prosopis cineraria using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) based dendrogram revealed significant variation in the communities of these co-occurring Prosopis species. Additionally, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on microbial communities in addition to the soil physiochemical parameters viz. soil pH, electrical conductivity, moisture content and sampling depth showed ~ 80% of the variation in bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and control soil. We observed that Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum of P. juliflora rhizosphere and the control soil, while P. cineraria rhizosphere was dominated by Cyanobacteria . Notably, the invasive P. juliflora rhizosphere showed an enhanced abundance of bacterial phyla like Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi, Firmicutes and Acidobacteria compared to the native P. cineraria as well as the control soil. Predictive metagenomics revealed that the bacterial communities of the P. juliflora rhizosphere had a higher abundance of pathways involved in antimicrobial biosynthesis and degradation, suggesting probable exposure to enemy attack and an active response mechanism to counter it as compared to native P. cineraria . Interestingly, the higher antimicrobial biosynthesis predicted in the invasive rhizosphere microbiome is further corroborated by the fact that the bacterial isolates purified from the rhizosphere of P. juliflora belonged to genera like Streptomyces, Isoptericola and Brevibacterium from the phylum Actinobacteria, which are widely reported for their antibiotic production ability. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the co-occurring native and invasive Prosopis species have significantly different rhizosphere bacterial communities in terms of composition, diversity and their predictive metabolic potentials. In addition, the rhizosphere microbiome of invasive Prosopis proffers it a fitness advantage and influences invasion success of the species.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511243066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519567988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b6397d503ceff0e2ffc0d65fd511f0abd20f97ec8312102c96944a8d843d67193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIkPgB1ggS2xY0FB-dLu9jIZXpARGCNYttx8ZR932YHuCwsfkW-POBJBYsLCsqjp1q1QXoecE3hAA8TYD0J43QEl9XLCGPEArwhltQEryEK2Acdb0XUuO0JOcLwEIlUAeoyPGeiZ4J1boZh1DSSoXHy7wOs67mH3xMbzG7_yVTTW4xioYvEnWeF1qDp_bosY4eY03sdhQvJpwdLhsLf669b_iqHSxacmee53i6ONsMz7JOWqvijX4py9b_FndiS3ap-FK5SXYpJjjzue6SLiwoY5_ih45NWX77P4_Rt8_vP-2_tScffl4uj45azQTbWnGjklhWmDaOgeWOqfBdK0zLSEO1GgoOCms7hmhBKiWneRc9abnzHSCSHaMXh10dyn-2NtchtlnbadJBRv3eaBViHIGXVfRl_-gl3GfQt1uoWTbCdn3laIHql4g52TdsEt-Vul6IDAs7g0H94bq3nDn3kBq04t76f04W_On5bddFWAHINdSPVH6O_s_srcskqf-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519567988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kaushik, Rishabh ; Pandit, Maharaj K. ; Meyerson, Laura A. ; Chaudhari, Diptaraj S. ; Sharma, Meesha ; Dhotre, Dhiraj ; Shouche, Yogesh S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Rishabh ; Pandit, Maharaj K. ; Meyerson, Laura A. ; Chaudhari, Diptaraj S. ; Sharma, Meesha ; Dhotre, Dhiraj ; Shouche, Yogesh S.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive plants are known to alter the soil microbial communities; however, the effects of co-occurring native and invasive congeners on the soil bacterial diversity and their predictive metabolic profiles are not known. Here, we compared the rhizosphere bacterial communities of invasive Prosopis juliflora and its native congener Prosopis cineraria using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) based dendrogram revealed significant variation in the communities of these co-occurring Prosopis species. Additionally, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on microbial communities in addition to the soil physiochemical parameters viz. soil pH, electrical conductivity, moisture content and sampling depth showed ~ 80% of the variation in bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and control soil. We observed that Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum of P. juliflora rhizosphere and the control soil, while P. cineraria rhizosphere was dominated by Cyanobacteria . Notably, the invasive P. juliflora rhizosphere showed an enhanced abundance of bacterial phyla like Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi, Firmicutes and Acidobacteria compared to the native P. cineraria as well as the control soil. Predictive metagenomics revealed that the bacterial communities of the P. juliflora rhizosphere had a higher abundance of pathways involved in antimicrobial biosynthesis and degradation, suggesting probable exposure to enemy attack and an active response mechanism to counter it as compared to native P. cineraria . Interestingly, the higher antimicrobial biosynthesis predicted in the invasive rhizosphere microbiome is further corroborated by the fact that the bacterial isolates purified from the rhizosphere of P. juliflora belonged to genera like Streptomyces, Isoptericola and Brevibacterium from the phylum Actinobacteria, which are widely reported for their antibiotic production ability. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the co-occurring native and invasive Prosopis species have significantly different rhizosphere bacterial communities in terms of composition, diversity and their predictive metabolic potentials. In addition, the rhizosphere microbiome of invasive Prosopis proffers it a fitness advantage and influences invasion success of the species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0343-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33837467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Actinobacteria ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Bacteria ; Biodegradation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biosynthesis ; Biotechnology ; Composition ; Congeners ; Cyanobacteria ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Indigenous species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Mathematical analysis ; Metabolism ; Metagenomics ; Microbial activity ; Microbiology ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Moisture content ; Next-generation sequencing ; Physiochemistry ; Predictive control ; Prosopis ; Prosopis juliflora ; Rhizosphere ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Soil ; Soil chemistry ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil moisture ; Soil pH ; Soils ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Current microbiology, 2021-05, Vol.78 (5), p.2051-2060</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b6397d503ceff0e2ffc0d65fd511f0abd20f97ec8312102c96944a8d843d67193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b6397d503ceff0e2ffc0d65fd511f0abd20f97ec8312102c96944a8d843d67193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Maharaj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerson, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Diptaraj S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Meesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhotre, Dhiraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shouche, Yogesh S.</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners</title><title>Current microbiology</title><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><description>Invasive plants are known to alter the soil microbial communities; however, the effects of co-occurring native and invasive congeners on the soil bacterial diversity and their predictive metabolic profiles are not known. Here, we compared the rhizosphere bacterial communities of invasive Prosopis juliflora and its native congener Prosopis cineraria using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) based dendrogram revealed significant variation in the communities of these co-occurring Prosopis species. Additionally, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on microbial communities in addition to the soil physiochemical parameters viz. soil pH, electrical conductivity, moisture content and sampling depth showed ~ 80% of the variation in bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and control soil. We observed that Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum of P. juliflora rhizosphere and the control soil, while P. cineraria rhizosphere was dominated by Cyanobacteria . Notably, the invasive P. juliflora rhizosphere showed an enhanced abundance of bacterial phyla like Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi, Firmicutes and Acidobacteria compared to the native P. cineraria as well as the control soil. Predictive metagenomics revealed that the bacterial communities of the P. juliflora rhizosphere had a higher abundance of pathways involved in antimicrobial biosynthesis and degradation, suggesting probable exposure to enemy attack and an active response mechanism to counter it as compared to native P. cineraria . Interestingly, the higher antimicrobial biosynthesis predicted in the invasive rhizosphere microbiome is further corroborated by the fact that the bacterial isolates purified from the rhizosphere of P. juliflora belonged to genera like Streptomyces, Isoptericola and Brevibacterium from the phylum Actinobacteria, which are widely reported for their antibiotic production ability. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the co-occurring native and invasive Prosopis species have significantly different rhizosphere bacterial communities in terms of composition, diversity and their predictive metabolic potentials. In addition, the rhizosphere microbiome of invasive Prosopis proffers it a fitness advantage and influences invasion success of the species.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biosynthesis</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Physiochemistry</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Prosopis</subject><subject>Prosopis juliflora</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0343-8651</issn><issn>1432-0991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIkPgB1ggS2xY0FB-dLu9jIZXpARGCNYttx8ZR932YHuCwsfkW-POBJBYsLCsqjp1q1QXoecE3hAA8TYD0J43QEl9XLCGPEArwhltQEryEK2Acdb0XUuO0JOcLwEIlUAeoyPGeiZ4J1boZh1DSSoXHy7wOs67mH3xMbzG7_yVTTW4xioYvEnWeF1qDp_bosY4eY03sdhQvJpwdLhsLf669b_iqHSxacmee53i6ONsMz7JOWqvijX4py9b_FndiS3ap-FK5SXYpJjjzue6SLiwoY5_ih45NWX77P4_Rt8_vP-2_tScffl4uj45azQTbWnGjklhWmDaOgeWOqfBdK0zLSEO1GgoOCms7hmhBKiWneRc9abnzHSCSHaMXh10dyn-2NtchtlnbadJBRv3eaBViHIGXVfRl_-gl3GfQt1uoWTbCdn3laIHql4g52TdsEt-Vul6IDAs7g0H94bq3nDn3kBq04t76f04W_On5bddFWAHINdSPVH6O_s_srcskqf-</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kaushik, Rishabh</creator><creator>Pandit, Maharaj K.</creator><creator>Meyerson, Laura A.</creator><creator>Chaudhari, Diptaraj S.</creator><creator>Sharma, Meesha</creator><creator>Dhotre, Dhiraj</creator><creator>Shouche, Yogesh S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners</title><author>Kaushik, Rishabh ; Pandit, Maharaj K. ; Meyerson, Laura A. ; Chaudhari, Diptaraj S. ; Sharma, Meesha ; Dhotre, Dhiraj ; Shouche, Yogesh S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b6397d503ceff0e2ffc0d65fd511f0abd20f97ec8312102c96944a8d843d67193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biosynthesis</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Physiochemistry</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Prosopis</topic><topic>Prosopis juliflora</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Maharaj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerson, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Diptaraj S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Meesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhotre, Dhiraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shouche, Yogesh S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaushik, Rishabh</au><au>Pandit, Maharaj K.</au><au>Meyerson, Laura A.</au><au>Chaudhari, Diptaraj S.</au><au>Sharma, Meesha</au><au>Dhotre, Dhiraj</au><au>Shouche, Yogesh S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners</atitle><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Curr Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2051</spage><epage>2060</epage><pages>2051-2060</pages><issn>0343-8651</issn><eissn>1432-0991</eissn><abstract>Invasive plants are known to alter the soil microbial communities; however, the effects of co-occurring native and invasive congeners on the soil bacterial diversity and their predictive metabolic profiles are not known. Here, we compared the rhizosphere bacterial communities of invasive Prosopis juliflora and its native congener Prosopis cineraria using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) based dendrogram revealed significant variation in the communities of these co-occurring Prosopis species. Additionally, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on microbial communities in addition to the soil physiochemical parameters viz. soil pH, electrical conductivity, moisture content and sampling depth showed ~ 80% of the variation in bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and control soil. We observed that Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum of P. juliflora rhizosphere and the control soil, while P. cineraria rhizosphere was dominated by Cyanobacteria . Notably, the invasive P. juliflora rhizosphere showed an enhanced abundance of bacterial phyla like Actinobacteria , Chloroflexi, Firmicutes and Acidobacteria compared to the native P. cineraria as well as the control soil. Predictive metagenomics revealed that the bacterial communities of the P. juliflora rhizosphere had a higher abundance of pathways involved in antimicrobial biosynthesis and degradation, suggesting probable exposure to enemy attack and an active response mechanism to counter it as compared to native P. cineraria . Interestingly, the higher antimicrobial biosynthesis predicted in the invasive rhizosphere microbiome is further corroborated by the fact that the bacterial isolates purified from the rhizosphere of P. juliflora belonged to genera like Streptomyces, Isoptericola and Brevibacterium from the phylum Actinobacteria, which are widely reported for their antibiotic production ability. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the co-occurring native and invasive Prosopis species have significantly different rhizosphere bacterial communities in terms of composition, diversity and their predictive metabolic potentials. In addition, the rhizosphere microbiome of invasive Prosopis proffers it a fitness advantage and influences invasion success of the species.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33837467</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0343-8651
ispartof Current microbiology, 2021-05, Vol.78 (5), p.2051-2060
issn 0343-8651
1432-0991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2511243066
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abundance
Actinobacteria
Antibiotics
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Bacteria
Biodegradation
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biosynthesis
Biotechnology
Composition
Congeners
Cyanobacteria
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Indigenous species
Invasive plants
Invasive species
Life Sciences
Mathematical analysis
Metabolism
Metagenomics
Microbial activity
Microbiology
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Microorganisms
Moisture content
Next-generation sequencing
Physiochemistry
Predictive control
Prosopis
Prosopis juliflora
Rhizosphere
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
rRNA 16S
Soil
Soil chemistry
Soil Microbiology
Soil microorganisms
Soil moisture
Soil pH
Soils
Water content
title Contrasting Composition, Diversity and Predictive Metabolic Potential of the Rhizobacterial Microbiomes Associated with Native and Invasive Prosopis Congeners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20Composition,%20Diversity%20and%20Predictive%20Metabolic%20Potential%20of%20the%20Rhizobacterial%20Microbiomes%20Associated%20with%20Native%20and%20Invasive%20Prosopis%20Congeners&rft.jtitle=Current%20microbiology&rft.au=Kaushik,%20Rishabh&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2051&rft.epage=2060&rft.pages=2051-2060&rft.issn=0343-8651&rft.eissn=1432-0991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00284-021-02473-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519567988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519567988&rft_id=info:pmid/33837467&rfr_iscdi=true