Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface

Protein binders including antibodies are known not to bind to random sites of target proteins, and their functional effectiveness mainly depends on the binding region, called the epitope. For the development of protein binders with desired functions, it is thus critical to understand which surface r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical information and modeling 2021-04, Vol.61 (4), p.2099-2107
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Dong-Gun, Choi, Yoonjoo, Kim, Hak-Sung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2107
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2099
container_title Journal of chemical information and modeling
container_volume 61
creator Kim, Dong-Gun
Choi, Yoonjoo
Kim, Hak-Sung
description Protein binders including antibodies are known not to bind to random sites of target proteins, and their functional effectiveness mainly depends on the binding region, called the epitope. For the development of protein binders with desired functions, it is thus critical to understand which surface region protein binders prefer (or do not prefer) to bind. The current methods for epitope prediction focus on static indicators such as structural geometry or amino acid propensity, whereas protein binding events are in fact a consequence of dynamic interactions. Here, we demonstrate that the preference for a binding site by protein binders is strongly related to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface. Molecular dynamics simulations on unbound forms of antigen structures revealed that the antigen surface in direct contact with antibodies is less flexible than the rest of the surface. This tendency was shown to be similar in other non-antibody protein binders such as affibody, DARPin, monobody, and repebody. We also found that the relatedness of epitopes to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface is dependent on the secondary structure elements of paratopes. Monobody and repebody, whose binding sites are composed of β-strands, distinctively prefer to bind to a relatively more rigid region of a target protein. These observations enabled us to develop a simple epitope prediction method which shows a comparable performance to the commonly used ones.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2510252667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524949869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a430t-75b452a1afb508deda1d2c3bbccfe00a8ea6df1547e6de0f05bc2a66e6ed848c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EgvKxMyFLLAy02E7ixCNU5UOqBKIgsUUX-wKu0qbYjkT_PS5tGZCYfMPzvud7CDnlbMCZ4Feg_WCq7WzANOOJyndIj2ep6ivJ3na3c6bkATn0fspYkigp9slBkhRC5Yr3CIwWNrQL9LSt6ZNrA9o5vbFzg87Ta4f0GRsIaGhoafhAOgmu06Fz0NDbBr9sZRsblqsw0Bdw7xh-Wyadq0HjMdmrofF4snmPyOvt6GV43x8_3j0Mr8d9SBMW-nlWpZkADnWVscKgAW6ETqpK6xoZgwJBmjpelKM0yGqWVVqAlCjRFGmhkyNyse5duPazQx_KmfUamwbm2Ha-FFlUlgkp84ie_0Gnbefm8XeREqlKVSFVpNia0q713mFdLpydgVuWnJUr_WXUX670lxv9MXK2Ke6qGZrfwNZ3BC7XwE90u_Tfvm9poJIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524949869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Kim, Dong-Gun ; Choi, Yoonjoo ; Kim, Hak-Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Gun ; Choi, Yoonjoo ; Kim, Hak-Sung</creatorcontrib><description>Protein binders including antibodies are known not to bind to random sites of target proteins, and their functional effectiveness mainly depends on the binding region, called the epitope. For the development of protein binders with desired functions, it is thus critical to understand which surface region protein binders prefer (or do not prefer) to bind. The current methods for epitope prediction focus on static indicators such as structural geometry or amino acid propensity, whereas protein binding events are in fact a consequence of dynamic interactions. Here, we demonstrate that the preference for a binding site by protein binders is strongly related to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface. Molecular dynamics simulations on unbound forms of antigen structures revealed that the antigen surface in direct contact with antibodies is less flexible than the rest of the surface. This tendency was shown to be similar in other non-antibody protein binders such as affibody, DARPin, monobody, and repebody. We also found that the relatedness of epitopes to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface is dependent on the secondary structure elements of paratopes. Monobody and repebody, whose binding sites are composed of β-strands, distinctively prefer to bind to a relatively more rigid region of a target protein. These observations enabled us to develop a simple epitope prediction method which shows a comparable performance to the commonly used ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-960X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33829791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Antibodies ; Antigens ; Binding sites ; Bioinformatics ; Flexibility ; Molecular dynamics ; Proteins</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021-04, Vol.61 (4), p.2099-2107</ispartof><rights>2021 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 26, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a430t-75b452a1afb508deda1d2c3bbccfe00a8ea6df1547e6de0f05bc2a66e6ed848c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a430t-75b452a1afb508deda1d2c3bbccfe00a8ea6df1547e6de0f05bc2a66e6ed848c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7989-0402 ; 0000-0001-9687-8093 ; 0000-0002-4034-1892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33829791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yoonjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface</title><title>Journal of chemical information and modeling</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><description>Protein binders including antibodies are known not to bind to random sites of target proteins, and their functional effectiveness mainly depends on the binding region, called the epitope. For the development of protein binders with desired functions, it is thus critical to understand which surface region protein binders prefer (or do not prefer) to bind. The current methods for epitope prediction focus on static indicators such as structural geometry or amino acid propensity, whereas protein binding events are in fact a consequence of dynamic interactions. Here, we demonstrate that the preference for a binding site by protein binders is strongly related to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface. Molecular dynamics simulations on unbound forms of antigen structures revealed that the antigen surface in direct contact with antibodies is less flexible than the rest of the surface. This tendency was shown to be similar in other non-antibody protein binders such as affibody, DARPin, monobody, and repebody. We also found that the relatedness of epitopes to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface is dependent on the secondary structure elements of paratopes. Monobody and repebody, whose binding sites are composed of β-strands, distinctively prefer to bind to a relatively more rigid region of a target protein. These observations enabled us to develop a simple epitope prediction method which shows a comparable performance to the commonly used ones.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><issn>1549-9596</issn><issn>1549-960X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EgvKxMyFLLAy02E7ixCNU5UOqBKIgsUUX-wKu0qbYjkT_PS5tGZCYfMPzvud7CDnlbMCZ4Feg_WCq7WzANOOJyndIj2ep6ivJ3na3c6bkATn0fspYkigp9slBkhRC5Yr3CIwWNrQL9LSt6ZNrA9o5vbFzg87Ta4f0GRsIaGhoafhAOgmu06Fz0NDbBr9sZRsblqsw0Bdw7xh-Wyadq0HjMdmrofF4snmPyOvt6GV43x8_3j0Mr8d9SBMW-nlWpZkADnWVscKgAW6ETqpK6xoZgwJBmjpelKM0yGqWVVqAlCjRFGmhkyNyse5duPazQx_KmfUamwbm2Ha-FFlUlgkp84ie_0Gnbefm8XeREqlKVSFVpNia0q713mFdLpydgVuWnJUr_WXUX670lxv9MXK2Ke6qGZrfwNZ3BC7XwE90u_Tfvm9poJIU</recordid><startdate>20210426</startdate><enddate>20210426</enddate><creator>Kim, Dong-Gun</creator><creator>Choi, Yoonjoo</creator><creator>Kim, Hak-Sung</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-0402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-8093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4034-1892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210426</creationdate><title>Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface</title><author>Kim, Dong-Gun ; Choi, Yoonjoo ; Kim, Hak-Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a430t-75b452a1afb508deda1d2c3bbccfe00a8ea6df1547e6de0f05bc2a66e6ed848c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yoonjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dong-Gun</au><au>Choi, Yoonjoo</au><au>Kim, Hak-Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><date>2021-04-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2099</spage><epage>2107</epage><pages>2099-2107</pages><issn>1549-9596</issn><eissn>1549-960X</eissn><abstract>Protein binders including antibodies are known not to bind to random sites of target proteins, and their functional effectiveness mainly depends on the binding region, called the epitope. For the development of protein binders with desired functions, it is thus critical to understand which surface region protein binders prefer (or do not prefer) to bind. The current methods for epitope prediction focus on static indicators such as structural geometry or amino acid propensity, whereas protein binding events are in fact a consequence of dynamic interactions. Here, we demonstrate that the preference for a binding site by protein binders is strongly related to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface. Molecular dynamics simulations on unbound forms of antigen structures revealed that the antigen surface in direct contact with antibodies is less flexible than the rest of the surface. This tendency was shown to be similar in other non-antibody protein binders such as affibody, DARPin, monobody, and repebody. We also found that the relatedness of epitopes to the structural flexibility of a target protein surface is dependent on the secondary structure elements of paratopes. Monobody and repebody, whose binding sites are composed of β-strands, distinctively prefer to bind to a relatively more rigid region of a target protein. These observations enabled us to develop a simple epitope prediction method which shows a comparable performance to the commonly used ones.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>33829791</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-0402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-8093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4034-1892</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-9596
ispartof Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021-04, Vol.61 (4), p.2099-2107
issn 1549-9596
1549-960X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2510252667
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Amino acids
Antibodies
Antigens
Binding sites
Bioinformatics
Flexibility
Molecular dynamics
Proteins
title Epitopes of Protein Binders Are Related to the Structural Flexibility of a Target Protein Surface
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epitopes%20of%20Protein%20Binders%20Are%20Related%20to%20the%20Structural%20Flexibility%20of%20a%20Target%20Protein%20Surface&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20information%20and%20modeling&rft.au=Kim,%20Dong-Gun&rft.date=2021-04-26&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2099&rft.epage=2107&rft.pages=2099-2107&rft.issn=1549-9596&rft.eissn=1549-960X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524949869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524949869&rft_id=info:pmid/33829791&rfr_iscdi=true