Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review
•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106072 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106072 |
container_title | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine |
container_volume | 204 |
creator | Mirulla, Agostino Igor Pinelli, Salvatore Zaffagnini, Stefano Nigrelli, Vincenzo Ingrassia, Tommaso Paolo, Stefano Di Bragonzoni, Laura |
description | •Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome.
The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation.
A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm.
Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function.
Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2509266652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169260721001474</els_id><sourcerecordid>2509266652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmxS7EnsOIgNqnhJFWxgbTn2BFzlUewE1L_HVQtLVpZmzlz5HkLOGZ0zysTVam7adTUHCiwOBC3ggEyZLCAtuOCHZBqhMoW4mJCTEFaUUuBcHJNJlklWSoApWT6PLXpndJME146NHlzfhaTvknUcr30fhg8cnEmqvsPEY9tbbFz3fp3oJGzCgK3ebj1-Ofw-JUe1bgKe7d8Zebu_e108psuXh6fF7TI1OcCQZhUYi1JmQoia5bYucot5hloD07I2tRVZWYLmuUSUaCsoa1kg57rQFKTIZuRylxv_9zliGFTrgsGm0R32Y1DAaQkxnENEYYeaWCV4rNXau1b7jWJUbS2qldpaVFuLamcxHl3s88eqRft38qstAjc7AGPL2NyrYBx2Bq3zaAZle_df_g_fGYRd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509266652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome.
The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation.
A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm.
Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function.
Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33819822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological processes ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling ; Computational analysis ; Computer Simulation ; FE simulations ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Finite Element Analysis ; Models, Biological ; Prosthesis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinelli, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paolo, Stefano Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><title>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><description>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome.
The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation.
A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm.
Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function.
Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</description><subject>Biological processes</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling</subject><subject>Computational analysis</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>FE simulations</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Prosthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0169-2607</issn><issn>1872-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmxS7EnsOIgNqnhJFWxgbTn2BFzlUewE1L_HVQtLVpZmzlz5HkLOGZ0zysTVam7adTUHCiwOBC3ggEyZLCAtuOCHZBqhMoW4mJCTEFaUUuBcHJNJlklWSoApWT6PLXpndJME146NHlzfhaTvknUcr30fhg8cnEmqvsPEY9tbbFz3fp3oJGzCgK3ebj1-Ofw-JUe1bgKe7d8Zebu_e108psuXh6fF7TI1OcCQZhUYi1JmQoia5bYucot5hloD07I2tRVZWYLmuUSUaCsoa1kg57rQFKTIZuRylxv_9zliGFTrgsGm0R32Y1DAaQkxnENEYYeaWCV4rNXau1b7jWJUbS2qldpaVFuLamcxHl3s88eqRft38qstAjc7AGPL2NyrYBx2Bq3zaAZle_df_g_fGYRd</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creator><creator>Pinelli, Salvatore</creator><creator>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creator><creator>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creator><creator>Paolo, Stefano Di</creator><creator>Bragonzoni, Laura</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><author>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological processes</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling</topic><topic>Computational analysis</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>FE simulations</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Prosthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinelli, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paolo, Stefano Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</au><au>Pinelli, Salvatore</au><au>Zaffagnini, Stefano</au><au>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</au><au>Ingrassia, Tommaso</au><au>Paolo, Stefano Di</au><au>Bragonzoni, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>106072</spage><epage>106072</epage><pages>106072-106072</pages><artnum>106072</artnum><issn>0169-2607</issn><eissn>1872-7565</eissn><abstract>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome.
The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation.
A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm.
Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function.
Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33819822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-2607 |
ispartof | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072 |
issn | 0169-2607 1872-7565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2509266652 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Biological processes Bone Density Bone Remodeling Computational analysis Computer Simulation FE simulations Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - surgery Finite Element Analysis Models, Biological Prosthesis Systematic review |
title | Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20simulations%20on%20periprosthetic%20bone%20remodeling:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20and%20programs%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Mirulla,%20Agostino%20Igor&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=106072&rft.epage=106072&rft.pages=106072-106072&rft.artnum=106072&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509266652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509266652&rft_id=info:pmid/33819822&rft_els_id=S0169260721001474&rfr_iscdi=true |