Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review

•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072
Hauptverfasser: Mirulla, Agostino Igor, Pinelli, Salvatore, Zaffagnini, Stefano, Nigrelli, Vincenzo, Ingrassia, Tommaso, Paolo, Stefano Di, Bragonzoni, Laura
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106072
container_issue
container_start_page 106072
container_title Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
container_volume 204
creator Mirulla, Agostino Igor
Pinelli, Salvatore
Zaffagnini, Stefano
Nigrelli, Vincenzo
Ingrassia, Tommaso
Paolo, Stefano Di
Bragonzoni, Laura
description •Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome. The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation. A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm. Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function. Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2509266652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169260721001474</els_id><sourcerecordid>2509266652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmxS7EnsOIgNqnhJFWxgbTn2BFzlUewE1L_HVQtLVpZmzlz5HkLOGZ0zysTVam7adTUHCiwOBC3ggEyZLCAtuOCHZBqhMoW4mJCTEFaUUuBcHJNJlklWSoApWT6PLXpndJME146NHlzfhaTvknUcr30fhg8cnEmqvsPEY9tbbFz3fp3oJGzCgK3ebj1-Ofw-JUe1bgKe7d8Zebu_e108psuXh6fF7TI1OcCQZhUYi1JmQoia5bYucot5hloD07I2tRVZWYLmuUSUaCsoa1kg57rQFKTIZuRylxv_9zliGFTrgsGm0R32Y1DAaQkxnENEYYeaWCV4rNXau1b7jWJUbS2qldpaVFuLamcxHl3s88eqRft38qstAjc7AGPL2NyrYBx2Bq3zaAZle_df_g_fGYRd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509266652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome. The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation. A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm. Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function. Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33819822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological processes ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling ; Computational analysis ; Computer Simulation ; FE simulations ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Finite Element Analysis ; Models, Biological ; Prosthesis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinelli, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paolo, Stefano Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><title>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><description>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome. The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation. A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm. Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function. Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</description><subject>Biological processes</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling</subject><subject>Computational analysis</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>FE simulations</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Prosthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0169-2607</issn><issn>1872-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmxS7EnsOIgNqnhJFWxgbTn2BFzlUewE1L_HVQtLVpZmzlz5HkLOGZ0zysTVam7adTUHCiwOBC3ggEyZLCAtuOCHZBqhMoW4mJCTEFaUUuBcHJNJlklWSoApWT6PLXpndJME146NHlzfhaTvknUcr30fhg8cnEmqvsPEY9tbbFz3fp3oJGzCgK3ebj1-Ofw-JUe1bgKe7d8Zebu_e108psuXh6fF7TI1OcCQZhUYi1JmQoia5bYucot5hloD07I2tRVZWYLmuUSUaCsoa1kg57rQFKTIZuRylxv_9zliGFTrgsGm0R32Y1DAaQkxnENEYYeaWCV4rNXau1b7jWJUbS2qldpaVFuLamcxHl3s88eqRft38qstAjc7AGPL2NyrYBx2Bq3zaAZle_df_g_fGYRd</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creator><creator>Pinelli, Salvatore</creator><creator>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creator><creator>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creator><creator>Paolo, Stefano Di</creator><creator>Bragonzoni, Laura</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</title><author>Mirulla, Agostino Igor ; Pinelli, Salvatore ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Nigrelli, Vincenzo ; Ingrassia, Tommaso ; Paolo, Stefano Di ; Bragonzoni, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3b2cde883666f14df74de43eaa21a8fcfd63992a548ee8edb29f87e55a7a02863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological processes</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling</topic><topic>Computational analysis</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>FE simulations</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Prosthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinelli, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrassia, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paolo, Stefano Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragonzoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirulla, Agostino Igor</au><au>Pinelli, Salvatore</au><au>Zaffagnini, Stefano</au><au>Nigrelli, Vincenzo</au><au>Ingrassia, Tommaso</au><au>Paolo, Stefano Di</au><au>Bragonzoni, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>106072</spage><epage>106072</epage><pages>106072-106072</pages><artnum>106072</artnum><issn>0169-2607</issn><eissn>1872-7565</eissn><abstract>•Femur and tooth were the most investigated bone segments.•A bonded bone-implant interface was used in about half of the studies.•3D simulations were predominantly used.•The bone remodeling function proposed by Huiskes et al. (1987) was used in more than half of the retrieved studies.•The change in bone density was the most investigated outcome. The aim of the present study was to review the literature concerning the analysis of periprosthetic bone remodeling through finite element (FE) simulation. A systematic review was conducted on 9 databases, taking into account a ten-year time period (from 2009 until 2020). The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English, publication date after 2009, full text articles, articles containing the keywords both in the abstract and in the title. The articles were classified through the following parameters: dimensionality of the simulation, modelling of the bone-prosthesis interface, output parameters, type of simulated prosthesis, bone remodeling algorithm. Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. Femur and tooth were the most evaluated bone segment (respectively 41.8% and 29.9%). The 55.2% of the evaluated articles used a bonded bone-prosthesis interface, 73% used 3D simulations, 67.2% of the articles (45 articles) evaluate the bone remodeling by the bone density variation. At last, 59.7% of the articles employed algorithms based on a specific remodeling function. Increasing interest in the bone remodeling FE analysis in different bone segments emerged from the review, and heterogeneous solutions were adopted. An optimal balance between computational cost and accuracy is needed to accurately simulate the bone remodeling phenomenon in the post-operative period.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33819822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-6444</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2607
ispartof Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021-06, Vol.204, p.106072-106072, Article 106072
issn 0169-2607
1872-7565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2509266652
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Biological processes
Bone Density
Bone Remodeling
Computational analysis
Computer Simulation
FE simulations
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Finite Element Analysis
Models, Biological
Prosthesis
Systematic review
title Numerical simulations on periprosthetic bone remodeling: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20simulations%20on%20periprosthetic%20bone%20remodeling:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20and%20programs%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Mirulla,%20Agostino%20Igor&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=106072&rft.epage=106072&rft.pages=106072-106072&rft.artnum=106072&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509266652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509266652&rft_id=info:pmid/33819822&rft_els_id=S0169260721001474&rfr_iscdi=true