Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria
Despite large-scale sorghum production in Nigeria, its utilization as livestock feed is limited to the stover following grain harvest. Therefore, we evaluated the physical, fermentative, and nutritive quality of whole-crop silages from three Sorghum bicolor varieties at different ensiling durations....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical animal health and production 2021-06, Vol.53 (2), p.239-239, Article 239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Usman, Samaila Dele, Peter Aniwe Jimoh, Saheed Olaide Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi Olanite, Jimoh Alao |
description | Despite large-scale sorghum production in Nigeria, its utilization as livestock feed is limited to the stover following grain harvest. Therefore, we evaluated the physical, fermentative, and nutritive quality of whole-crop silages from three
Sorghum bicolor
varieties at different ensiling durations. The experiment was 3×5 factorial comprising three varieties (Samsorg14, Samsorg17, and Samsorg41) and five ensiling durations (0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks). Forages were ensiled at the dough stage, and the silos were opened at the pre-determined durations for quality analyses. Samsorg14 silage recorded higher pH (5.88) and significant titratable acidity (8.32 g kg
-1
), while the least pH was observed for Samsorg17 silage (4.63). The forages ensiled for 8 weeks had a higher pH (5.04) compared with 4.51, 5.03, and 4.57 recorded at 4, 12, and 16 weeks, respectively. In contrast, forages ensiled for 4 weeks recorded the highest titratable acidity (8.39) and Flieg point (104.07). CP content was higher in fresh Samsorg17 (110.64 g kg
-1
) and lower (71.01 g kg
-1
) in Samsorg41 ensiled for 8 weeks as influenced by variety × ensiling duration. Cumulative gas volume and methane were higher for Samsorg41 silage (21.21 and 6.76 ml 200 mg
-1
DM respectively). Ensiling for 16 weeks resulted in higher silages’ IVDMD (44.00%) compared with other ensiling durations. Samsorg14 and Samsorg17 had a relatively stable silage pH, higher CP, and digestibility. Therefore, their silages could be conserved up to 16 weeks to provide high-quality feed for ruminants during the dry season to maintain animal productivity and ultimately enhance food security. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508574702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569855430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-1e6c85b96570d3b4b3611e4d84ba9ccfa3100044cf6fa16db6fd72a5d52bf8ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMoTjv6Ai4k4MbFlCaVS6WWMowXGFRQ10Uuf7ozVFVmchnpZ_FlTdujgouBhCzynfMn5yD0nJLXlJDhTaa0F6QjPW1biqFTD9CGioF1A2fqIdoQwseOD3w4QU9yviKkyZR8jE4YG0Y59mSDfn7Z7XOwej7DHtICa9El3MIZ1qvDay0plBBXPeObqudQ9jh6nMOst5Dxoh1gn-KCyy4B4K8xbXd1wSbYOMeEb3UKUEIjdVvegy3gsNljWJtFWLfY1aQP_jisTV3LrvsBueBPYQsp6Kfokddzhmd35yn6_u7i2_mH7vLz-4_nby87ywkrHQVplTBjS4A4ZrhhklLgTnGjR2u9Zu3bhHPrpddUOiO9G3otnOiNV9qwU_Tq6Hud4k1tD5iWkC3Ms14h1jy1kJVoKZK-oS__Q69iTS2fAyVHJQRn5H6KDIoIKUSj-iNlU8w5gZ-uU1h02k-UTIeCp2PBUyt4-l3wpJroxZ11NQu4v5I_jTaAHYHcrtaW47_Z99j-AtqOst8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507805655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Usman, Samaila ; Dele, Peter Aniwe ; Jimoh, Saheed Olaide ; Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi ; Olanite, Jimoh Alao</creator><creatorcontrib>Usman, Samaila ; Dele, Peter Aniwe ; Jimoh, Saheed Olaide ; Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi ; Olanite, Jimoh Alao</creatorcontrib><description>Despite large-scale sorghum production in Nigeria, its utilization as livestock feed is limited to the stover following grain harvest. Therefore, we evaluated the physical, fermentative, and nutritive quality of whole-crop silages from three
Sorghum bicolor
varieties at different ensiling durations. The experiment was 3×5 factorial comprising three varieties (Samsorg14, Samsorg17, and Samsorg41) and five ensiling durations (0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks). Forages were ensiled at the dough stage, and the silos were opened at the pre-determined durations for quality analyses. Samsorg14 silage recorded higher pH (5.88) and significant titratable acidity (8.32 g kg
-1
), while the least pH was observed for Samsorg17 silage (4.63). The forages ensiled for 8 weeks had a higher pH (5.04) compared with 4.51, 5.03, and 4.57 recorded at 4, 12, and 16 weeks, respectively. In contrast, forages ensiled for 4 weeks recorded the highest titratable acidity (8.39) and Flieg point (104.07). CP content was higher in fresh Samsorg17 (110.64 g kg
-1
) and lower (71.01 g kg
-1
) in Samsorg41 ensiled for 8 weeks as influenced by variety × ensiling duration. Cumulative gas volume and methane were higher for Samsorg41 silage (21.21 and 6.76 ml 200 mg
-1
DM respectively). Ensiling for 16 weeks resulted in higher silages’ IVDMD (44.00%) compared with other ensiling durations. Samsorg14 and Samsorg17 had a relatively stable silage pH, higher CP, and digestibility. Therefore, their silages could be conserved up to 16 weeks to provide high-quality feed for ruminants during the dry season to maintain animal productivity and ultimately enhance food security.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33796920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Digestibility ; Dry season ; Food security ; Forage ; Grain silos ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Livestock feed ; Livestock feeds ; Nutritive value ; pH effects ; Regular Articles ; Silage ; Sorghum ; Sorghum bicolor ; Stover ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2021-06, Vol.53 (2), p.239-239, Article 239</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-1e6c85b96570d3b4b3611e4d84ba9ccfa3100044cf6fa16db6fd72a5d52bf8ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-1e6c85b96570d3b4b3611e4d84ba9ccfa3100044cf6fa16db6fd72a5d52bf8ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7947-676X ; 0000-0002-3238-9079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Usman, Samaila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dele, Peter Aniwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimoh, Saheed Olaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olanite, Jimoh Alao</creatorcontrib><title>Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>Despite large-scale sorghum production in Nigeria, its utilization as livestock feed is limited to the stover following grain harvest. Therefore, we evaluated the physical, fermentative, and nutritive quality of whole-crop silages from three
Sorghum bicolor
varieties at different ensiling durations. The experiment was 3×5 factorial comprising three varieties (Samsorg14, Samsorg17, and Samsorg41) and five ensiling durations (0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks). Forages were ensiled at the dough stage, and the silos were opened at the pre-determined durations for quality analyses. Samsorg14 silage recorded higher pH (5.88) and significant titratable acidity (8.32 g kg
-1
), while the least pH was observed for Samsorg17 silage (4.63). The forages ensiled for 8 weeks had a higher pH (5.04) compared with 4.51, 5.03, and 4.57 recorded at 4, 12, and 16 weeks, respectively. In contrast, forages ensiled for 4 weeks recorded the highest titratable acidity (8.39) and Flieg point (104.07). CP content was higher in fresh Samsorg17 (110.64 g kg
-1
) and lower (71.01 g kg
-1
) in Samsorg41 ensiled for 8 weeks as influenced by variety × ensiling duration. Cumulative gas volume and methane were higher for Samsorg41 silage (21.21 and 6.76 ml 200 mg
-1
DM respectively). Ensiling for 16 weeks resulted in higher silages’ IVDMD (44.00%) compared with other ensiling durations. Samsorg14 and Samsorg17 had a relatively stable silage pH, higher CP, and digestibility. Therefore, their silages could be conserved up to 16 weeks to provide high-quality feed for ruminants during the dry season to maintain animal productivity and ultimately enhance food security.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Grain silos</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock feed</subject><subject>Livestock feeds</subject><subject>Nutritive value</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum bicolor</subject><subject>Stover</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEYhYMoTjv6Ai4k4MbFlCaVS6WWMowXGFRQ10Uuf7ozVFVmchnpZ_FlTdujgouBhCzynfMn5yD0nJLXlJDhTaa0F6QjPW1biqFTD9CGioF1A2fqIdoQwseOD3w4QU9yviKkyZR8jE4YG0Y59mSDfn7Z7XOwej7DHtICa9El3MIZ1qvDay0plBBXPeObqudQ9jh6nMOst5Dxoh1gn-KCyy4B4K8xbXd1wSbYOMeEb3UKUEIjdVvegy3gsNljWJtFWLfY1aQP_jisTV3LrvsBueBPYQsp6Kfokddzhmd35yn6_u7i2_mH7vLz-4_nby87ywkrHQVplTBjS4A4ZrhhklLgTnGjR2u9Zu3bhHPrpddUOiO9G3otnOiNV9qwU_Tq6Hud4k1tD5iWkC3Ms14h1jy1kJVoKZK-oS__Q69iTS2fAyVHJQRn5H6KDIoIKUSj-iNlU8w5gZ-uU1h02k-UTIeCp2PBUyt4-l3wpJroxZ11NQu4v5I_jTaAHYHcrtaW47_Z99j-AtqOst8</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Usman, Samaila</creator><creator>Dele, Peter Aniwe</creator><creator>Jimoh, Saheed Olaide</creator><creator>Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi</creator><creator>Olanite, Jimoh Alao</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7947-676X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-9079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria</title><author>Usman, Samaila ; Dele, Peter Aniwe ; Jimoh, Saheed Olaide ; Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi ; Olanite, Jimoh Alao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-1e6c85b96570d3b4b3611e4d84ba9ccfa3100044cf6fa16db6fd72a5d52bf8ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Grain silos</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock feed</topic><topic>Livestock feeds</topic><topic>Nutritive value</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum bicolor</topic><topic>Stover</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Usman, Samaila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dele, Peter Aniwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimoh, Saheed Olaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olanite, Jimoh Alao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Usman, Samaila</au><au>Dele, Peter Aniwe</au><au>Jimoh, Saheed Olaide</au><au>Aderinboye, Ronke Yemisi</au><au>Olanite, Jimoh Alao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>239-239</pages><artnum>239</artnum><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>Despite large-scale sorghum production in Nigeria, its utilization as livestock feed is limited to the stover following grain harvest. Therefore, we evaluated the physical, fermentative, and nutritive quality of whole-crop silages from three
Sorghum bicolor
varieties at different ensiling durations. The experiment was 3×5 factorial comprising three varieties (Samsorg14, Samsorg17, and Samsorg41) and five ensiling durations (0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks). Forages were ensiled at the dough stage, and the silos were opened at the pre-determined durations for quality analyses. Samsorg14 silage recorded higher pH (5.88) and significant titratable acidity (8.32 g kg
-1
), while the least pH was observed for Samsorg17 silage (4.63). The forages ensiled for 8 weeks had a higher pH (5.04) compared with 4.51, 5.03, and 4.57 recorded at 4, 12, and 16 weeks, respectively. In contrast, forages ensiled for 4 weeks recorded the highest titratable acidity (8.39) and Flieg point (104.07). CP content was higher in fresh Samsorg17 (110.64 g kg
-1
) and lower (71.01 g kg
-1
) in Samsorg41 ensiled for 8 weeks as influenced by variety × ensiling duration. Cumulative gas volume and methane were higher for Samsorg41 silage (21.21 and 6.76 ml 200 mg
-1
DM respectively). Ensiling for 16 weeks resulted in higher silages’ IVDMD (44.00%) compared with other ensiling durations. Samsorg14 and Samsorg17 had a relatively stable silage pH, higher CP, and digestibility. Therefore, their silages could be conserved up to 16 weeks to provide high-quality feed for ruminants during the dry season to maintain animal productivity and ultimately enhance food security.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33796920</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7947-676X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-9079</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2021-06, Vol.53 (2), p.239-239, Article 239 |
issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508574702 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acidity Biomedical and Life Sciences Digestibility Dry season Food security Forage Grain silos Life Sciences Livestock Livestock feed Livestock feeds Nutritive value pH effects Regular Articles Silage Sorghum Sorghum bicolor Stover Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Zoology |
title | Physical, fermentative, and nutritional quality of silages made from three Sorghum bicolor varieties as affected by ensiling duration in South-west Nigeria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A23%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical,%20fermentative,%20and%20nutritional%20quality%20of%20silages%20made%20from%20three%20Sorghum%20bicolor%20varieties%20as%20affected%20by%20ensiling%20duration%20in%20South-west%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Usman,%20Samaila&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=239-239&rft.artnum=239&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-021-02657-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2569855430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507805655&rft_id=info:pmid/33796920&rfr_iscdi=true |