Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling

Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP‐endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International endodontic journal 2021-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1383-1393
Hauptverfasser: Lima, C. O., Barbosa, A. F. A., Ferreira, C. M., Ferretti, M. A., Aguiar, F. H. B., Lopes, R. T., Fidel, S. R., Silva, E. J. N. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1393
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1383
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 54
creator Lima, C. O.
Barbosa, A. F. A.
Ferreira, C. M.
Ferretti, M. A.
Aguiar, F. H. B.
Lopes, R. T.
Fidel, S. R.
Silva, E. J. N. L.
description Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP‐endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) were used for comparison. Methodology Forty extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro–computed tomographic and, based on similar anatomical features, were divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of access cavity and canal instrumentation protocol: TradAC/RC, TradAC/XP, UltraAC/RC and UltraAC/XP. All root canal procedures were performed with the teeth placed in a dental mannequin. Teeth were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling. Unprepared canal area, dentine removed, accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD), canal transportation, presence of voids and filling material remnants within the pulp chamber were analysed. After restorative procedures, the teeth were subjected to thermomechanical cycling and to a load capacity test. Statistical analyses were performed using two‐way anova test, considering the randomized blocks design (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iej.13525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508567656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552115421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-b8e09f6e8ba656a9479ba8d4d73f50eab497663fc6c7d8ec0edb5968ab1e59d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTju68AUk4EbBmkkqlVTVUoZRWwYUL-CuyOWUnSaVtEmqh9r5CL6Xb-GTmJ4eXQhmkZCTj--c8CP0mJIzWta5he0ZZbzmd9CKMsGrmvf0LloR2rCq7jp-gh6ktCWEcMLofXTCWEdpK-oV-rn2o5vBa8BhxLPLUergE8S9zHYPWGoNKWEt9zZbSDh4bH3KcZ7A54KUO4yj1VIv-NrmDf7y_tf3H-BNwB83cgcRS2_wB9B2F4N-gUfrnPVfsVTW2bzcvLogTemwk_pQKWNMpWrV7GTEUyh7wmlWW9AZDM4B5w3EKUygN9KXzg7rRR-kD9G9UboEj27PU_T51eWnizfV1bvX64uXV5VmnPFKdUD6UUCnpOBC9k3bK9mZxrRs5ASkavpWCDZqoVvTgSZgFO9FJxUF3puanaJnR2_50rcZUh4mmzQ4Jz2EOQ01Jx0XbZEX9Ok_6DbM0ZfpCsVrSnlT00I9P1I6hpQijMMu2knGZaBkOCQ8lISHm4QL--TWOKsJzF_yT6QFOD8C19bB8n_TsL58e1T-BlvUtkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552115421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lima, C. O. ; Barbosa, A. F. A. ; Ferreira, C. M. ; Ferretti, M. A. ; Aguiar, F. H. B. ; Lopes, R. T. ; Fidel, S. R. ; Silva, E. J. N. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, C. O. ; Barbosa, A. F. A. ; Ferreira, C. M. ; Ferretti, M. A. ; Aguiar, F. H. B. ; Lopes, R. T. ; Fidel, S. R. ; Silva, E. J. N. L.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP‐endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) were used for comparison. Methodology Forty extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro–computed tomographic and, based on similar anatomical features, were divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of access cavity and canal instrumentation protocol: TradAC/RC, TradAC/XP, UltraAC/RC and UltraAC/XP. All root canal procedures were performed with the teeth placed in a dental mannequin. Teeth were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling. Unprepared canal area, dentine removed, accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD), canal transportation, presence of voids and filling material remnants within the pulp chamber were analysed. After restorative procedures, the teeth were subjected to thermomechanical cycling and to a load capacity test. Statistical analyses were performed using two‐way anova test, considering the randomized blocks design (P < 0.05). Results The percentage of unprepared canal area was significantly lower in TradAC groups when compared to UltraAC groups (P < 0.05), regardless of the instrument used. The UltraAC/XP group had significantly lower percentage of root dentine removed when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). UltraAC/XP and TradAC/XP groups had significantly lower percentages of AHTD than UltraAC/RC and TradAC/RC groups (P < 0.05). Regarding canal transportation, in the MB root canals, the TradAC/XP group had significantly lower values than other groups (P < 0.05). In general, in ML and distal root canals, TradAC/XP and UltraAC/XP groups had significantly lower values of canal transportation when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, the UltraAC/RC had the greatest canal transportation values in MB and distal canals. The UltraAC groups had significantly greater percentages of voids and volume of remaining root filling material within the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures than TradAC groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the load capacity amongst groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The UltraAC/XP and UltraAC/RC groups had significantly greater areas of unprepared canal walls, significantly more voids and volume of root filling material remnants within the pulp chamber after canal filling. UltraAC/XP was associated with significantly less root dentine removal and significantly more AHTD whilst TradAC/XP had overall significantly less canal transportation. No differences were observed in the load capacity amongst groups.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iej.13525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33811762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Computed tomography ; Dental caries ; Dental equipment ; Dental pulp ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; fracture resistance ; Fractures ; Mandible ; Molars ; root canal preparation ; Root canals ; Statistical analysis ; Teeth ; Thermal cycling ; ultraconservative access cavity ; X‐ray microtomography</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2021-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1383-1393</ispartof><rights>2021 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-b8e09f6e8ba656a9479ba8d4d73f50eab497663fc6c7d8ec0edb5968ab1e59d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-b8e09f6e8ba656a9479ba8d4d73f50eab497663fc6c7d8ec0edb5968ab1e59d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6445-8243 ; 0000-0003-2132-4373</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiej.13525$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiej.13525$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33811762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, C. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, A. F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, F. H. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidel, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, E. J. N. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP‐endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) were used for comparison. Methodology Forty extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro–computed tomographic and, based on similar anatomical features, were divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of access cavity and canal instrumentation protocol: TradAC/RC, TradAC/XP, UltraAC/RC and UltraAC/XP. All root canal procedures were performed with the teeth placed in a dental mannequin. Teeth were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling. Unprepared canal area, dentine removed, accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD), canal transportation, presence of voids and filling material remnants within the pulp chamber were analysed. After restorative procedures, the teeth were subjected to thermomechanical cycling and to a load capacity test. Statistical analyses were performed using two‐way anova test, considering the randomized blocks design (P < 0.05). Results The percentage of unprepared canal area was significantly lower in TradAC groups when compared to UltraAC groups (P < 0.05), regardless of the instrument used. The UltraAC/XP group had significantly lower percentage of root dentine removed when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). UltraAC/XP and TradAC/XP groups had significantly lower percentages of AHTD than UltraAC/RC and TradAC/RC groups (P < 0.05). Regarding canal transportation, in the MB root canals, the TradAC/XP group had significantly lower values than other groups (P < 0.05). In general, in ML and distal root canals, TradAC/XP and UltraAC/XP groups had significantly lower values of canal transportation when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, the UltraAC/RC had the greatest canal transportation values in MB and distal canals. The UltraAC groups had significantly greater percentages of voids and volume of remaining root filling material within the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures than TradAC groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the load capacity amongst groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The UltraAC/XP and UltraAC/RC groups had significantly greater areas of unprepared canal walls, significantly more voids and volume of root filling material remnants within the pulp chamber after canal filling. UltraAC/XP was associated with significantly less root dentine removal and significantly more AHTD whilst TradAC/XP had overall significantly less canal transportation. No differences were observed in the load capacity amongst groups.]]></description><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental equipment</subject><subject>Dental pulp</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>fracture resistance</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>root canal preparation</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Thermal cycling</subject><subject>ultraconservative access cavity</subject><subject>X‐ray microtomography</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTju68AUk4EbBmkkqlVTVUoZRWwYUL-CuyOWUnSaVtEmqh9r5CL6Xb-GTmJ4eXQhmkZCTj--c8CP0mJIzWta5he0ZZbzmd9CKMsGrmvf0LloR2rCq7jp-gh6ktCWEcMLofXTCWEdpK-oV-rn2o5vBa8BhxLPLUergE8S9zHYPWGoNKWEt9zZbSDh4bH3KcZ7A54KUO4yj1VIv-NrmDf7y_tf3H-BNwB83cgcRS2_wB9B2F4N-gUfrnPVfsVTW2bzcvLogTemwk_pQKWNMpWrV7GTEUyh7wmlWW9AZDM4B5w3EKUygN9KXzg7rRR-kD9G9UboEj27PU_T51eWnizfV1bvX64uXV5VmnPFKdUD6UUCnpOBC9k3bK9mZxrRs5ASkavpWCDZqoVvTgSZgFO9FJxUF3puanaJnR2_50rcZUh4mmzQ4Jz2EOQ01Jx0XbZEX9Ok_6DbM0ZfpCsVrSnlT00I9P1I6hpQijMMu2knGZaBkOCQ8lISHm4QL--TWOKsJzF_yT6QFOD8C19bB8n_TsL58e1T-BlvUtkA</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Lima, C. O.</creator><creator>Barbosa, A. F. A.</creator><creator>Ferreira, C. M.</creator><creator>Ferretti, M. A.</creator><creator>Aguiar, F. H. B.</creator><creator>Lopes, R. T.</creator><creator>Fidel, S. R.</creator><creator>Silva, E. J. N. L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-8243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-4373</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling</title><author>Lima, C. O. ; Barbosa, A. F. A. ; Ferreira, C. M. ; Ferretti, M. A. ; Aguiar, F. H. B. ; Lopes, R. T. ; Fidel, S. R. ; Silva, E. J. N. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-b8e09f6e8ba656a9479ba8d4d73f50eab497663fc6c7d8ec0edb5968ab1e59d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental equipment</topic><topic>Dental pulp</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>fracture resistance</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>root canal preparation</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Thermal cycling</topic><topic>ultraconservative access cavity</topic><topic>X‐ray microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, C. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, A. F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, F. H. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidel, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, E. J. N. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, C. O.</au><au>Barbosa, A. F. A.</au><au>Ferreira, C. M.</au><au>Ferretti, M. A.</au><au>Aguiar, F. H. B.</au><au>Lopes, R. T.</au><au>Fidel, S. R.</au><au>Silva, E. J. N. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1383</spage><epage>1393</epage><pages>1383-1393</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Aim To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP‐endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) were used for comparison. Methodology Forty extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro–computed tomographic and, based on similar anatomical features, were divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of access cavity and canal instrumentation protocol: TradAC/RC, TradAC/XP, UltraAC/RC and UltraAC/XP. All root canal procedures were performed with the teeth placed in a dental mannequin. Teeth were scanned after root canal instrumentation and filling. Unprepared canal area, dentine removed, accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD), canal transportation, presence of voids and filling material remnants within the pulp chamber were analysed. After restorative procedures, the teeth were subjected to thermomechanical cycling and to a load capacity test. Statistical analyses were performed using two‐way anova test, considering the randomized blocks design (P < 0.05). Results The percentage of unprepared canal area was significantly lower in TradAC groups when compared to UltraAC groups (P < 0.05), regardless of the instrument used. The UltraAC/XP group had significantly lower percentage of root dentine removed when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). UltraAC/XP and TradAC/XP groups had significantly lower percentages of AHTD than UltraAC/RC and TradAC/RC groups (P < 0.05). Regarding canal transportation, in the MB root canals, the TradAC/XP group had significantly lower values than other groups (P < 0.05). In general, in ML and distal root canals, TradAC/XP and UltraAC/XP groups had significantly lower values of canal transportation when compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, the UltraAC/RC had the greatest canal transportation values in MB and distal canals. The UltraAC groups had significantly greater percentages of voids and volume of remaining root filling material within the pulp chamber after cleaning procedures than TradAC groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the load capacity amongst groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The UltraAC/XP and UltraAC/RC groups had significantly greater areas of unprepared canal walls, significantly more voids and volume of root filling material remnants within the pulp chamber after canal filling. UltraAC/XP was associated with significantly less root dentine removal and significantly more AHTD whilst TradAC/XP had overall significantly less canal transportation. No differences were observed in the load capacity amongst groups.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33811762</pmid><doi>10.1111/iej.13525</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-8243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-4373</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2021-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1383-1393
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508567656
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Computed tomography
Dental caries
Dental equipment
Dental pulp
Dentistry
Endodontics
fracture resistance
Fractures
Mandible
Molars
root canal preparation
Root canals
Statistical analysis
Teeth
Thermal cycling
ultraconservative access cavity
X‐ray microtomography
title Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP‐endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20ultraconservative%20access%20cavities%20on%20instrumentation%20efficacy%20with%20XP%E2%80%90endo%20Shaper%20and%20Reciproc,%20filling%20ability%20and%20load%20capacity%20of%20mandibular%20molars%20subjected%20to%20thermomechanical%20cycling&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Lima,%20C.%20O.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1383&rft.epage=1393&rft.pages=1383-1393&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iej.13525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552115421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552115421&rft_id=info:pmid/33811762&rfr_iscdi=true